Previous 1
Topic: Biden says "No" so Hitlery to be Queen?
Sojourning_Soul's photo
Thu 10/22/15 05:25 AM

Biden announces he will not run for president in 2016

Personally I think either a Clinton or Bush would be the last thing anyone would want for POTUS. One would think people are tired of all the lies and deception of either of those two corrupt dynasties!

I also don't think that Repulsicons running all 3 shows is a good idea but the Demoncraps can't put forward anyone worth voting for!

Also anyone running on the Indy ticket swings one way or the other.

We're screwed! slaphead

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/10/21/biden-to-speak-in-rose-garden/

msharmony's photo
Thu 10/22/15 05:39 AM
Biden has said repeatedly that he is not in an emotional place having lost his son ( and earlier in life losing another child AND a wife),,, to take on the responsibility,,,



Sojourning_Soul's photo
Thu 10/22/15 05:52 AM
Edited by Sojourning_Soul on Thu 10/22/15 06:17 AM

I didn't figure he would run, stated so in the past, but Hitlery thinks she'll get the nod now from the BIG Dem backers that were holding out for "someone other than Hillary".

Biden even bit Hitlery in her large rear end by not offering his support to her campaign and actually cut her and Sanders down...

Biden, though, seemed to take a parting shot Wednesday at her and other Democratic candidates, after some suggested Republicans are their enemy at last week's debate.

"I don't think we should look at Republicans as our enemy. They're the opposition," Biden said, urging lawmakers to find "consensus."

"Four more years of this kind of pitched battle may be more than this country can take," he said. "We have to change it."


In my opinion...... Trump just got a boost, NOT the emailing Benghazi Queen

It should be obvious with the holdouts that the big donors are not interested in the Bush or Clinton dynasties running any show any more. They'd rather have someone NOT a career politician or of the political sphere at the helm for a change

Sadly, with the choices we're offered this election Trump may be the best option (of anyone they'll allow to play) noway

mikeybgood1's photo
Thu 10/22/15 06:17 AM
Well we're seeing stories starting to surface that the Clinton campaign sent a former Bill Clinton aide to read Biden the riot act. If you run, we will destroy you and your family.

Biden got the message and found a reason not to run. He had himself leaked the story about how his late son had wanted him to run, and even a couple weeks ago had said his family was behind him. There were apparently donors out there, and his team had e-mailed a vast array of potential campaign staffers and state level campaign organizers as late as last week saying keep your calendars open for us.

So Biden loses the war before the first shot gets fired. The only way he gets in the race is if Hildabeast either melts down during Benghazi testimony, or a smoking gun e-mail that nails her dead to rights for bad security/cancelling a rescue mission/running guns to Syria, or some other campaign killing behavior.

Don't forget, the Dems even floated Al Gore two months ago as a possible name. We never saw Elizabeth Warren step to the plate, and a few lesser lights never poked their heads up.

Sojourning_Soul's photo
Thu 10/22/15 06:24 AM
Edited by Sojourning_Soul on Thu 10/22/15 06:24 AM

The coronation was promised to Hitlery when she stepped aside for Obozo.... but in her typical "What difference does it make" attitude over doing her job and failing badly at every aspect of it, allowing 4 Americans to die, then blatantly exposing national secrets over an unsecured email server.... "Because I'm Hillary Clinton" or because she was promised.... her own arrogance is her downfall!

metalwing's photo
Thu 10/22/15 06:24 AM
Perhaps the real question is ... If Obama pardons Hillery for multiple counts of treason and obstruction of justice, is she still eligible to run for office?

Sojourning_Soul's photo
Thu 10/22/15 06:29 AM
Edited by Sojourning_Soul on Thu 10/22/15 06:33 AM

Perhaps the real question is ... If Obama pardons Hillery for multiple counts of treason and obstruction of justice, is she still eligible to run for office?


A pardon implies guilt..... he may stop the investigation tho or bury it somehow by presidential decree.

He has a habit of ignoring the Constitution and side-stepping Congress and the law.... and assuming authority he doesn't have......

Conrad_73's photo
Thu 10/22/15 07:39 AM

Perhaps the real question is ... If Obama pardons Hillery for multiple counts of treason and obstruction of justice, is she still eligible to run for office?


pardon

1) v. to use the executive power of a Governor or President to forgive a person convicted of a crime, thus removing any remaining penalties or punishments, and preventing any new prosecution of the person for the crime for which the pardon was given.

A pardon strikes the conviction from the books as if it had never occurred, and the convicted person is treated as innocent.

Sometimes pardons are given to an older rehabilitated person long after the sentence has been served to clear his/her record. However, a pardon can also terminate a sentence and free a prisoner when the chief executive is convinced there is doubt about the guilt or fairness of the trial, the party is rehabilitated and has performed worthy public service, or there are humanitarian reasons such as terminal illness.

The most famous American pardon was the blanket pardon given by President Gerald Ford to ex-President Richard Nixon in the wake of the Watergate scandal and Nixon's resignation; that pardon closed the door to any future prosecution against Nixon for any crime before the pardon.noway noway huh


A pardon is distinguished from "a commutation of sentencee" which cuts short the term; "a reprieve," which is a temporary halt to punishment, particularly the death penalty, pending appeal or determination of whether the penalty should be reduced; "amnesty," which is a blanket "forgetting" of possible criminal charges due to a change in public circumstances (such as the end of a war or the draft system); or a "reduction in sentence," which shortens a sentence and can be granted by a judge or an executive.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Presidential+pardon

The most widely publicized pardons have involved political figures. President gerald r. ford's September 1974 pardon of former president richard m. nixon for all offenses that he had committed, or in which he had taken part, relieved Nixon from facing criminal prosecution for his role in the Watergate scandal. President Ford justified the pardon as a way to restore domestic tranquility to a nation that had spent two years in political turmoil.

Conrad_73's photo
Thu 10/22/15 07:45 AM
you Guys might be in SheepDit!

http://www.heritage.org/constitution/#!/articles/2/essays/89/pardon-power

no photo
Thu 10/22/15 08:27 AM
I think the whole world might be in Sheep Dit. Refugee's, extremist's, illuminati and who know's what. I am glad I don't have figure out how to make it all work.

mightymoe's photo
Thu 10/22/15 08:33 AM

I think the whole world might be in Sheep Dit. Refugee's, extremist's, illuminati and who know's what. I am glad I don't have figure out how to make it all work.


they know how to fix it... WW3... depopulate

no photo
Thu 10/22/15 10:40 AM


I think the whole world might be in Sheep Dit. Refugee's, extremist's, illuminati and who know's what. I am glad I don't have figure out how to make it all work.


they know how to fix it... WW3... depopulate




Matthew 24:21-23

21 For then there will be great distress, unequaled from the beginning of the world until now—and never to be equaled again.

22 “If those days had not been cut short, no one would survive, but for the sake of the elect those days will be shortened.


Conrad_73's photo
Thu 10/22/15 10:55 AM

no photo
Thu 10/22/15 11:39 AM
One would think people are tired of all the lies and deception

People love lies and deception.
How else do you explain...pretty much any television program (especially "reality" tv), movie, social media, internet forums of people constantly vying for attention pointing it out.

People "say" they are tired of all the lies and deception but it's pure lip service, people constantly seek it out and want to be the ones to feel special that they've found it.

People keep seeking a captain to lead them to xanadu so they don't have to realistically evaluate their own lives or take responsibility for themselves.

"can't put forward anyone worth voting for!"


That's a common complaint.

Whenever I've heard someone say that it always comes across as though they are entitled to other people providing them choice.

You don't really hear anyone say "I'm tired of the lies and deception, so I'm going to reign in my focus to my area of influence. I'm going to get rid of t.v. and social/internet media and focus on building extremely personal relationships with people so by the very nature of knowing them I'm going to be able to tell if they are lying, I can immediately determine if there's deception. I'm going to focus on where I live (and what's going on here), who I know, and grow myself in my community, and really support those people I know and I think can really represent me."

"Think globally act locally" is a horrible symptom to a terrible disease.
It leads to things like people expecting the global mob to provide them local specialization in governing, of people spending all of their free time completely ignoring what's going on in their neighborhood, their city, their state, to focus on national politics, and global happenings.

We're screwed!

We're screwed if someone who really doesn't do anything deciding not to do something else is worth any kind of comment.


mightymoe's photo
Thu 10/22/15 12:03 PM

One would think people are tired of all the lies and deception

People love lies and deception.
How else do you explain...pretty much any television program (especially "reality" tv), movie, social media, internet forums of people constantly vying for attention pointing it out.

People "say" they are tired of all the lies and deception but it's pure lip service, people constantly seek it out and want to be the ones to feel special that they've found it.

People keep seeking a captain to lead them to xanadu so they don't have to realistically evaluate their own lives or take responsibility for themselves.

"can't put forward anyone worth voting for!"


That's a common complaint.

Whenever I've heard someone say that it always comes across as though they are entitled to other people providing them choice.

You don't really hear anyone say "I'm tired of the lies and deception, so I'm going to reign in my focus to my area of influence. I'm going to get rid of t.v. and social/internet media and focus on building extremely personal relationships with people so by the very nature of knowing them I'm going to be able to tell if they are lying, I can immediately determine if there's deception. I'm going to focus on where I live (and what's going on here), who I know, and grow myself in my community, and really support those people I know and I think can really represent me."

"Think globally act locally" is a horrible symptom to a terrible disease.
It leads to things like people expecting the global mob to provide them local specialization in governing, of people spending all of their free time completely ignoring what's going on in their neighborhood, their city, their state, to focus on national politics, and global happenings.

We're screwed!

We're screwed if someone who really doesn't do anything deciding not to do something else is worth any kind of comment.




and yet, you comment

1onlyaname's photo
Thu 10/22/15 01:04 PM
Does it matter who is president? Hold a spelling bee the winner gets to be king or queen. President of what a Congress witha 10% approval rating. It still ddoesn't seem clear to americans NO one represents them. We have corporations for a government.

Sojourning_Soul's photo
Thu 10/22/15 01:46 PM
Edited by Sojourning_Soul on Thu 10/22/15 01:51 PM
So, let's roll backward into the past for a moment. It is time we learned what they didn't teach us in school. It is far more interesting than what they DID tell us. I think you'll stay awake for this lesson.

The date is February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the "Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62. On this date in the history of our nation, Congress passed an Act titled: "An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia." This is also known as the "Act of 1871." What does this mean? Well, it means that Congress, under no constitutional authority to do so, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, which is a ten mile square parcel of land.

What??? How could they do that? Moreover, WHY would they do that? To explain, let's look at the circumstances of those days. The Act of 1871 was passed at a vulnerable time in America. Our nation was essentially bankrupt — weakened and financially depleted in the aftermath of the Civil War. The Civil War itself was nothing more than a calculated "front" for some pretty fancy footwork by corporate backroom players. It was a strategic maneuver by European interests (the international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the neck (and the coffers) of America.

The Congress realized our country was in dire financial straits, so they cut a deal with the international bankers — (in those days, the Rothschilds of London were dipping their fingers into everyone's pie) thereby incurring a DEBT to said bankers. If we think about banks, we know they do not just lend us money out of the goodness of their hearts. A bank will not do anything for you unless it is entirely in their best interest to do so. There has to be some sort of collateral or some string attached which puts you and me (the borrower) into a subservient position. This was true back in 1871 as well. The conniving international bankers were not about to lend our floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations. So, they devised a brilliant way of getting their foot in the door of the United States (a prize they had coveted for some time, but had been unable to grasp thanks to our Founding Fathers, who despised them and held them in check), and thus, the Act of 1871 was passed.

In essence, this Act formed the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Note the capitalization, because it is important. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, moved right in and shoved the original "organic" version of the Constitution into a dusty corner. With the "Act of 1871," our Constitution was defaced in the sense that the title was block-capitalized and the word "for" was changed to the word "of" in the title. The original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers, was written in this manner:

"The Constitution for the united states of America".

The altered version reads: "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA". It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the same document you might think it is. The corporate constitution operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. It absolutely is not.

Capitalization - an insignificant change? Not when one is referring to the context of a legal document, it isn't. Such minor alterations have had major impacts on each subsequent generation born in this country. What the Congress did with the passage of the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia. The kind of government THEY created was a corporation. The new, altered Constitution serves as the constitution of the corporation, and not that of America. Think about that for a moment.

Incidentally, this corporate constitution does not benefit the Republic. It serves only to benefit the corporation. It does nothing good for you or me - and it operates outside of the original Constitution. Instead of absolute rights guaranteed under the "organic" Constitution, we now have "relative" rights or privileges. One example of this is the Sovereign's right to travel, which has been transformed under corporate government policy into a "privilege" which we must be licensed to engage in. This operates outside of the original Constitution.

So, Congress committed TREASON against the People, who were considered Sovereign under the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution. When we consider the word "Sovereign," we must think about what the word means.

According to Webster's Dictionary, "sovereign" is defined as: 1. chief or highest; supreme. 2. Supreme in power, superior in position to all others. 3. Independent of, and unlimited by, any other, possessing or entitled to, original and independent authority or jurisdiction.

In other words, our government was created by and for "sovereigns" - the free citizens who were deemed the highest authority. Only the People can be sovereign - remember that. Government cannot be sovereign. We can also look to the Declaration of Independence, where we read: "government is subject to the consent of the governed" - that's supposed to be us, the sovereigns. Do you feel like a sovereign nowadays? I don't.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist or a constitutional historian to figure out that this is not what is happening in our country today. Government in these times is NOT subject to the consent of the governed. Rather, the governed are subject to the whim and greed of the corporation, which has stretched its tentacles beyond the ten-mile-square parcel of land known as the District of Columbia - encroaching into every state of the Republic. Mind you, the corporation has NO jurisdiction outside of the District of Columbia. THEY just want you to think it does.

You see, you are presumed to know the law. This is ironic because as a people, we are taught basically nothing about the law in school. We are made to memorize obscure factoids and paragraphs here and there, such as the Preamble, and they gloss over the Bill of Rights. But we are not told about the law. Nor do our corporate government schools delve into the Constitution in any great depth. After all, they were put into place to indoctrinate and dumb down the masses - not to teach us anything. We were not told that we were sold-out to foreign interests and made beneficiaries of the debt incurred by Congress to the international bankers. For generations, American citizens have had the bulk of their earnings confiscated to pay on a massive debt that they, as a People, did not incur. There are many, many things the People have not been told. How do you feel about being made a beneficiary of somebody else's massive debt without your knowledge or consent? Are we gonna keep going along with this??

When you hear some individuals say that the Constitution is null and void, think about how our government has transformed over time from a municipal or service-oriented entity to a corporate or profit-oriented entity. We are living under the myth that this is lawful, but it is not. We are being ruled by a "de facto," or unlawful, form of government - the corporate body of the death-mongers - The Controllers.

With the passage of the Act of 1871, a series of subtle and overt deceptions were set in motion - all in conjunction and collusion with the Congress, who knowingly and deliberately sold the People down the river. Did they tell you this in government school? I doubt it. They were too busy drumming the fictional version of history into your brain - and mine. By failing to disclose what THEY did to the American People, the people became ignorant of what was happening. Over time, the Republic took it on the chin to the point of a knockdown. With the surrender of their gold in 1933, the People essentially surrendered their law. I don't suppose you were taught THAT in school either. That's because our REAL history is hidden from us. This is the way Roman Civil Law works - and our form of governance today is based upon Roman Civil Law and Admiralty/Maritime Law - better known as the "Divine Right of Kings" and "Law of the Seas", respectively. This explains a lot. Roman Civil Law was fully established in the original colonies even before our nation began and is also known as private international law.

The government which was created for the District of Columbia via the Act of 1871 operates under Private International Law, and not Common Law, which was the law of the Constitutional Republic. This is very important to note since it impacts all Americans in concrete ways. You must recognize that private international law is only applicable within the District of Columbia and NOT in the other states of the Union. The various arms of the corporation are known as "departments" such as the Judiciary, Justice and Treasury. You recognize those names? Yes, you do! But they are not what you assume them to be. These "departments" all belong to the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. They do NOT belong to you and me under the corporate constitution and its various amendments that operate outside of the Constitutional Republic.

I refer you to the UNITED STATES CODE (note the capitalization, indicating the corporation, not the Republic) Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C). It is stated unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is a corporation [see note]. Realize, too, that the corporation is not a separate and distinct entity from the government. It IS the government. YOUR government. This is extremely important. I refer to this as the "corporate empire of the UNITED STATES," which operates under Roman Civil Law outside of the Constitution. How do you like being ruled by a cheesy, sleazy corporation? You'll ask your Congressperson about this, you say? HA!!

Congress is fully aware of this deception. You must be made aware that the members of Congress do NOT work for you and me. Rather, they work for the Corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Is this really any surprise to you? This is why we can't get them to do anything on our behalf or to answer to us - as in the case with the illegal income tax - among many other things. Contrary to popular belief, they are NOT our civil servants. They do NOT work for us. They are the servants of the corporate government and carry out its bidding. Period.

The great number of committees and sub-committees that the Congress has created all work together like a multi-headed monster to oversee the various corporate "departments." And, you should know that every single one of these that operates outside the District of Columbia is in violation of the law. The corporate government of the UNITED STATES has no jurisdiction or authority in ANY state of the Republic beyond the District of Columbia. Let this sink into your brain for a minute. Ask yourself, "Could this deception REALLY have occurred without the full knowledge and complicity of the Congress?" Do you think it happened by accident? You are deceiving yourself if you do. There are no accidents or coincidences. It is time to confront the truth and awaken from ignorance.

Your legislators will not apprise you of this information. You are presumed to know the law. THEY know you don't know the law, or your history for that matter, because this information has not been taught to you. No concerted effort has been made to inform you. As a Sovereign, you are entitled to full disclosure of the facts. As a slave, you are entitled to nothing other than what the corporation decides to "give" you - at a price. Be wary of accepting so-called "benefits" of the corporation of the UNITED STATES. Aren't you enslaved enough already?

I said (above) that you are presumed to know the law. Still, it matters not if you don't in the eyes of the corporation. Ignorance of the law is not considered an excuse. It is your responsibility and your obligation as an American to learn about the law and how it applies to you. THEY count on the fact that most people are too uninterested or distracted or lazy to do so. The People have been mentally conditioned to allow the alleged government to do their thinking for them. We need to turn that around if we are to save our Republic before it is too late.

The UNITED STATES government is basically a corporate instrument of the international bankers. This means YOU are owned by the corporation from birth to death. The corporate UNITED STATES also holds ownership of all your assets, your property, and even your children. Does this sound untrue? Think long and hard about all those bills you pay, all those various taxes and fines and licenses you must pay for. Yes, they've got you by the pockets. Actually, they've had you by the *** for as long as you've been alive. In your heart, you know it's true. Don't believe any of this? Read up on the 14th Amendment. Check out how "free" you really are.

With the Act of 1871 and subsequent legislation such as the purportedly ratified 14th Amendment, our once-great nation of Sovereigns has been subverted from a Republic to a democracy. As is the case under Roman Civil Law, our ignorance of the facts has led to our silence. Our silence has been construed as our consent to become beneficiaries of a debt we did not incur. The Sovereign People have been deceived for hundreds of years into thinking they remain free and independent, when in actuality we continue to be slaves and servants of the corporation.

Treason was committed against the People in 1871 by the Congress. This could have been corrected through the decades by some honest men (assuming there were some), but it was not, mainly due to lust for money and power. Nothing new there. Are we to forgive and justify this crime against the People? You have lost more freedom than you may realize due to corporate infiltration of the so-called government. We will lose more unless we turn away from a democracy that is the direct road to disaster - and restore our Constitutional Republic.

In an upcoming article, we'll take a closer look at the purportedly ratified 14th Amendment and how we became "property" of the corporation and enslaved by our silence.

I am saddened to think about the brave men and women who were killed in all the wars and conflicts instigated by the Controllers. These courageous souls fought for the preservation of ideals they believed to be true - not for the likes of a corporation. Do you believe that any one of the individuals who have been killed as a result of war would have willingly fought if they knew the full truth? Do you think one person would have laid down his life for a corporation? I think not. If the People had known long ago to what extent their trust had been betrayed, I wonder how long it would have taken for another Revolution. What we need is a Revolution in THOUGHT. We change our thinking and we change our world.

Will we ever restore the Republic? That is a question I cannot answer yet. I hope, and most of all - pray - that WE, the Sovereign People, will work together in a spirit of cooperation to make it happen in this lifetime. I know I will give it my best shot - come what may. Our children deserve their rightful legacy - the liberty our ancestors fought so hard to give to us. Will we remain silent telling ourselves we are free, and perpetuate the MYTH? Or, do we stand as One Sovereign People, and take back what has been stolen from the house of our Republic?

Something to think about - it's called freedom.

http://www.serendipity.li/jsmill/us_corporation.htm

no photo
Thu 10/22/15 02:06 PM

Perhaps the real question is ... If Obama pardons Hillery for multiple counts of treason and obstruction of justice, is she still eligible to run for office?


No need for a pardon, the fix is in. No charges will be filed.grumble

no photo
Thu 10/22/15 02:18 PM


Perhaps the real question is ... If Obama pardons Hillery for multiple counts of treason and obstruction of justice, is she still eligible to run for office?


No need for a pardon, the fix is in. No charges will be filed.grumble
Never gonna be charges in the first place...congressional hearing is a dog and pony show....repubs attacking her and dems groveling hoping for a cabinet position if she gets elected.
Voters have already made up their minds about Benghazi and theres no changing them.
Its gonna be Hillary vs The Donald....hopefully to the death laugh

no photo
Thu 10/22/15 02:25 PM



Perhaps the real question is ... If Obama pardons Hillery for multiple counts of treason and obstruction of justice, is she still eligible to run for office?


No need for a pardon, the fix is in. No charges will be filed.grumble
Never gonna be charges in the first place...congressional hearing is a dog and pony show....repubs attacking her and dems groveling hoping for a cabinet position if she gets elected.
Voters have already made up their minds about Benghazi and theres no changing them.
Its gonna be Hillary vs The Donald....hopefully to the death laugh

laugh

Previous 1