100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: These Boots Were Made For Lyin'... | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
There won't be 50 special ops in syria its non sense talk all talk. Moscow n syria already reponded. Its against international law. Funny is usa saying oh we have "NEW" moderate rebels we want to train and arm. 50 usa troops in syria russia n syria have every legal right to take them out as invading trespassers. could you source that,Old Son? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U need a source that's its against international law to invade a country with military troops??? You have to be invited.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U need a source that's its against international law to invade a country with military troops??? You have to be invited. so,WTH is Putin doing in Eastern Ukraine,or in the Georgian Separatist Regions? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fighting the Jewish Mafia??? Keeping peace in border countries? Standing behind ukraine farmers not letting monsanto n cargill screw them into deeper poverty?? Fighting terrorists? Those are my guesses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Conrad_73
on
Sun 11/01/15 09:10 AM
|
|
Fighting the Jewish Mafia??? Keeping peace in border countries? Standing behind ukraine farmers not letting monsanto n cargill screw them into deeper poverty?? Fighting terrorists? Those are my guesses. you evaded the Fact,that they were also not invited,and therefore broke your sacred International Law,whatever that is! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nope ukraine didn't had a legal government to ask and there were no russian boots in ukraine geoegia a russian jet was shot down. Also those are not countries they are buffer states. Lets stick to the agreements. Chechenya war was a civil war against the jewish mafia warlords. The elected president of ukraine fled to russia to save his skin. While mccain n kerry were there to find a replacement government. One that would sign monstanto cargil agreement. Moscow simply isn't letting the usa pull crap on or around their country. Or where russia has legal contracts. Syria is a sovereign country with legit government. Ukraine was taken over by a western back coup. it it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nope ukraine didn't had a legal government to ask and there were no russian boots in ukraine geoegia a russian jet was shot down. Also those are not countries they are buffer states. Lets stick to the agreements. Chechenya war was a civil war against the jewish mafia warlords. The elected president of ukraine fled to russia to save his skin. While mccain n kerry were there to find a replacement government. One that would sign monstanto cargil agreement. Moscow simply isn't letting the usa pull crap on or around their country. Or where russia has legal contracts. Syria is a sovereign country with legit government. Ukraine was taken over by a western back coup. it it Do you always spout putinist Propaganda,or only on Sundays?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
1onlyaname
on
Sun 11/01/15 04:20 PM
|
|
splitting Hair much? Do you always spout putinist Propaganda,or only on Sundays? putin is by far the most powerful man in the world. not watch him and what he is all about is foolish. 60% of the worlds countries are on russia side 2/3s of world population. Lets see if putin moves the tactical nuclear weapons into Syria. Syria will be cleaned out before christmas syrian Oil wil be off the black market. Russia also has pre fab housing for the refugees. 50 special ops to train n arm "new rebels" lol. Btw way BRIC bank is open for business. Another anti zion move Putin made. China is fast delevoping Brazil. usa israel europe australia going to get left behind. We lie we steal we kill. The world has awakened. Should have listened to Putin that man has put over half the world on his side talking common sense. We shall see. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fighting the Jewish Mafia??? Keeping peace in border countries? Standing behind ukraine farmers not letting monsanto n cargill screw them into deeper poverty?? Fighting terrorists? Those are my guesses. Time to bring out the rolling heads  
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DAMASCUS, Syria (AP) — The United States' decision to send troops into Syria is an act of aggression because it does not have the government's agreement, a Syrian member of parliament said Saturday.Sharif Shehadeh told The Associated Press that the troops will have no effect on the ground, but that Washington wants to say it is present in Syria."What has happened to make America realize, after five years, that it should send between 30 and 50 military advisers?" asked Shehadeh,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Like I said there won't be troops in syria its illegal act of agression send them iraq. Plenty of isis in iraq n libya.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It would be interesting to find out which particular anti-Obama people complained that he wasn't doing enough about Syria, to see who will admit that they hate him when he DOES do what they want, just as much as when he doesn't. One thing the "anti" people of the world all have in common, they implicitly believe EVERY allegation from ANY source that supports their preferred illusions, but become suspicious and skeptical in to a fault, about any data which opposes them. Most of this thread so far, is anti-people fantasization. Neither useful, nor functionally informative. By the way, I personally have a very low opinion of Obama's management of foreign policy. I think that aside from managing to avoid the international condemnation for suborning torture that his predecessor managed, he's done an over all terrible job. Mucked up Lybia, Syria, Russia and the Ukraine, China. However, I don't condemn a leader for changing course when circumstances warrant it. That's what a leader is SUPPOSED to do. Is this particular course shift a good one? I wont know for a while. SO far, it's just a point of petty political parsimony for his opponents to slap lips about. The problem is he is doing it but lying about it. You don't send Delta and SEAL teams into a heavy combat zone and say they are not there for combat related missions. He must think American's are morons. Plus only sending 50? That's like giving a whale a tic tac for bad breath. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There won't be 50 special ops in syria its non sense talk all talk. Moscow n syria already reponded. Its against international law. Funny is usa saying oh we have "NEW" moderate rebels we want to train and arm. 50 usa troops in syria russia n syria have every legal right to take them out as invading trespassers. Just move to Russia so you can be with your man crush Putin. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U need a source that's its against international law to invade a country with military troops??? You have to be invited. You mean like what Putin did with Ukraine? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It would be interesting to find out which particular anti-Obama people complained that he wasn't doing enough about Syria, to see who will admit that they hate him when he DOES do what they want, just as much as when he doesn't. One thing the "anti" people of the world all have in common, they implicitly believe EVERY allegation from ANY source that supports their preferred illusions, but become suspicious and skeptical in to a fault, about any data which opposes them. Most of this thread so far, is anti-people fantasization. Neither useful, nor functionally informative. By the way, I personally have a very low opinion of Obama's management of foreign policy. I think that aside from managing to avoid the international condemnation for suborning torture that his predecessor managed, he's done an over all terrible job. Mucked up Lybia, Syria, Russia and the Ukraine, China. However, I don't condemn a leader for changing course when circumstances warrant it. That's what a leader is SUPPOSED to do. Is this particular course shift a good one? I wont know for a while. SO far, it's just a point of petty political parsimony for his opponents to slap lips about. The problem is he is doing it but lying about it. You don't send Delta and SEAL teams into a heavy combat zone and say they are not there for combat related missions. He must think American's are morons. Plus only sending 50? That's like giving a whale a tic tac for bad breath. The Nobel Peace Prize winner's foreign policy is laughable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It would be interesting to find out which particular anti-Obama people complained that he wasn't doing enough about Syria, to see who will admit that they hate him when he DOES do what they want, just as much as when he doesn't. One thing the "anti" people of the world all have in common, they implicitly believe EVERY allegation from ANY source that supports their preferred illusions, but become suspicious and skeptical in to a fault, about any data which opposes them. Most of this thread so far, is anti-people fantasization. Neither useful, nor functionally informative. By the way, I personally have a very low opinion of Obama's management of foreign policy. I think that aside from managing to avoid the international condemnation for suborning torture that his predecessor managed, he's done an over all terrible job. Mucked up Lybia, Syria, Russia and the Ukraine, China. However, I don't condemn a leader for changing course when circumstances warrant it. That's what a leader is SUPPOSED to do. Is this particular course shift a good one? I wont know for a while. SO far, it's just a point of petty political parsimony for his opponents to slap lips about. The problem is he is doing it but lying about it. You don't send Delta and SEAL teams into a heavy combat zone and say they are not there for combat related missions. He must think American's are morons. Plus only sending 50? That's like giving a whale a tic tac for bad breath. Wouldn't be the first time he lied to the Sheeple. "If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U need a source that's its against international law to invade a country with military troops??? You have to be invited. You mean like what Putin did with Ukraine? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There won't be 50 special ops in syria its non sense talk all talk. Moscow n syria already reponded. Its against international law. Funny is usa saying oh we have "NEW" moderate rebels we want to train and arm. 50 usa troops in syria russia n syria have every legal right to take them out as invading trespassers. Just move to Russia so you can be with your man crush Putin. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Conrad_73
on
Mon 11/02/15 02:50 AM
|
|
U need a source that's its against international law to invade a country with military troops??? You have to be invited. You mean like what Putin did with Ukraine? man you're friggen blind! Vlad has robbed your Eyesight! actually,the Ukrainian Border suddenly jumped over those Russian Troops! Deplorable I tells ya,deplorable! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There won't be 50 special ops in syria its non sense talk all talk. Moscow n syria already reponded. Its against international law. Funny is usa saying oh we have "NEW" moderate rebels we want to train and arm. 50 usa troops in syria russia n syria have every legal right to take them out as invading trespassers. Just move to Russia so you can be with your man crush Putin. If you wish in one Hand...................... You know the rest!
|
|
|
|
|
