The irony of seeing the “march against fear” canceled by “fear” itself only goes to show that there is nothing genuine and organic about this effort. It also shows us that the state, not the people, is controlling these events.

The organisers of a “March Against Fear” planned for Sunday to mark the Brussels terror attacks said they had cancelled the event after the authorities asked them to do so because of security fears.

“We understand this request. The security of our citizens is an absolute priority. We join the authorities in proposing a delay and ask people not to come this Sunday,” the organisers said in a statement on Saturday.

The authorities earlier asked for the march to be put off, perhaps for several weeks, to allow the police to concentrate their resources on the investigation into the attacks which left 31 dead and 300 wounded.

They (the authorities in Belgium no doubt under control of the West and NATO) are sending clear deceptive messages to the people; here are three of them:

The authorities are telling the masses that terrorism is a mechanism that operates on its own. The governments of Belgium, the European Union and NATO including the US, Israel, Turkey and Saudi Arabia have nothing to do with this terrorism. The terrorists acted completely on their own and must be stopped.
The authorities are conveying the message to the public that ONLY after police finish their “investigation” into this recent attack in Brussels THEN it will be safe to march against fear and terrorism as if the police effectively control the level of actual “safety.” Nothing could be further from the truth, especially given that the ISIS proxy army is a product of the state.
The authorities are suggesting that “fear” itself and control over fear is granted by the police. In doing so they are making a mockery of humanity and the concept of courage and strength which comes from within. They are instead implying that human courage, strength and valor comes from government just like issuing out a license.

The contrary is true. Courage and true fearlessness is not dependent on police completing their fake “terrorism” investigation. All of this is behavior based on fear; the fear of dying and the fear of being a victim of terrorism. And perpetuation of this fear gives the state the power it needs to control the individual.

It is well known that with humans fear is a paralyzing force and fear breeds fear. But make no mistake, hidden in all of this propaganda is the state’s need to keep everyone in fear in order to keep the illusion of the war on terror going. That’s what this story is all about. It’s about pushing more fear and keeping the recent “terrorism” in the minds of the masses.


When interviewed, the organizers talked about everything except Truth:

“This week, we, Belgian citizens have been attacked, in how we live, our customs, our rights, our liberty,” they said.

“The first reaction in such events is to withdraw but on reflection, fear must give way to hope and the defence of our values.”

Not a word about actual Truth, no one is wondering how ISIS came into existence. Remember that it wasn’t very long ago when ISIS was not even in our vocabulary. ISIS is still a brand new entity born into the minds of the public in a period after the “war on terror” was essentially over with.

Why aren’t these “organizers” asking the critical questions like how is the “war on terror” still going? Who funded ISIS? How did the explosives get into the airport and subway? Why didn’t anyone see or report this? What about video surveillance cameras? Why were all of the “terrorists” known to the government and known to be dangerous terrorists yet were free to do what they wanted and were not quickly identified? How is it that ISIS never runs out of ammunition and explosives even when they are being defeated and running out of supplies on the Turkey-Syria border? How do ISIS fighters evade all Intelligence and surveillance after being in their custody and being subjects of their investigation? The real questions go on and on.

Instead, these organizers, like obedient sheep playing along with the Pentagon’s and NATO’s “terrorism” script, accept the story as-is … and they even bowed out of the march saying they’ll wait for the police to tell them when it’s “safe” to do a “march against fear.”

Apparently when the “authorities” tell the organizers that it’s safe to not be afraid of terrorism, then they will not be afraid and they will march against fear. When the “authorities” tell them to be afraid, then they will once again be afraid and obedient to this command.

This is yet another blueprint for the new world order that everyone is being conditioned to. Can anyone imagine anti-war activists in the 1960s waiting for government permission to march? That’s what this is all about. You march for causes only when told to do so. And the people shall obey.
http://www.activistpost.com/2016/03/march-against-fear-in-brussels-canceled-due-to-security-fears.html

They cancelled it because the P.C. is not working as planned. The people are NOT rallying to continue on this self destructive path. People are feed up. And want the madness to stop.

Check out this PC crap!
Apparently any individual who has any kind of 'Nationalist' view or is 'Anti Mass Migration/ Invasion', is now being labeled & branded as if THEY are the BAD GUYS & assumed to be in some political hate group & the REAL threat is being totally ignored.
--------------------------


Police use water cannon on right-wing protesters at Brussels victims’ shrine

POLICE FIRED A water cannon at far-right football hooligans who invaded a square in the Belgian capital that has become a memorial to the victims of the Brussels attacks, an AFP journalist said.

Police took action after about 200 black-clad hooligans shouting nationalist and anti-immigrant slogans moved in on the Place de la Bourse where people were gathering in a show of solidarity with the victims.

“This is our home” and “The state, Daesh accomplice,” the hooligans shouted in unison, using an alternate term for the Islamic State group that claimed Tuesday’s suicide bombings in Brussels that killed 28 peoples.

Scores of people were gathered around the mass of flowers, candles and messages that have been left in front of the ornate former Brussels stock exchange which has been draped in flags and messages of support and sympathy.

“We are football hooligans, we don’t have anything to do with politics,” said Andres, one of the demonstrators. “We are here for the victims and to pay our respects.”

A planned March Against Fear in the city was cancelled amid security fears. However, defiant Belgians gathered near the shrine.

“Not in the name of Islam,” read one banner on the columns of the stately former stock exchange building in Brussels city centre where people, some tearful, milled around under the watchful gaze of heavily-armed police and soldiers.

“This is our dream,” read another among a sea of flags from all over the world, as the carpet of flowers, candles and messages grew steadily larger.

Earlier, the city authorities announced they had arrested four people after 13 raids. A statement from the city prosecutor made no mention of the attacks, which left 31 dead and 340 injured.

It said there were four raids in Mechelen, about 30 kilometres north of Brussels, and one in Duffel, 40 kilometres in the same direction.

Of the 28 who died, 24 have been identified, among them 13 Belgians and 11 foreign nationals, it said. A total 340 people from 19 countries were wounded, of whom 101 remain in hospital — 62 of them in intensive care.

Meanwhile, back in the U.S., Obama during his Easter address:

"" [W]e're going to continue to root
out and defeat ISIL." Obama
promised. "We've been taking out
ISIL leadership, and this week, we
removed one of their top leaders
from the battlefield —
permanently," he said, after
Pentagon officials confirmed Friday
the death of a top financier for the
group."
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/obama-doubles-down-on-refugee-promise/article/2586899

So no worries Belgium, Obama is "on it"....just like he was "on it" right before Paris.....and like he will be "on it" before the next attack.
Problem is...no one knows just what the frick he's actually on.

and the Dolt still calls it ISIL,hm?

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/12/why_does_obama_call_isis_isil.html

December 10, 2015
Why Does Obama Call ISIS 'ISIL'?
By Amil Imani

Many who closely follow the dueling Islamic terror narratives emanating from the White House are mystified by Mr. Obama's inability (or deliberate unwillingness) to utter the phrase "Islamic terrorists." Many are curious, too, about why he refuses to call ISIS "ISIS," steadfastly insisting instead that everybody in his administration call the terror group "ISIL." What's the difference, and why is it important? The agendas behind each diverge widely. In fact, the variance between the two is elephantine in scale.

ISIS stands for the "Islamic State in Iraq and Syria," a terror group controlling a large swath of both Iraq and Syria in which the terrorists claim to have established a "caliphate," a state in which Islamic sharia law is imposed upon all living in the area, anyone who fails to adhere to strict Muslim guidelines has his head removed. Obama's contrary assertions aside, ISIS is by no means contained. In fact, the savage group (which prefers to be called the "Islamic State" or "IS") has metastasized on maps like immense pools of blood covering the ancient borders that once divided parts of Syria and Iraq.

ISIL, Obama's preference, stands for the "Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant." According to glaphyridae.com, "[t]he Levant in its geographical sense comprises the following political entities: the west part of Syria, Lebanon, west part of Jordan, Palestine (West Bank and Gaza Strip), Israel and Sinai (Egypt)." Other sources claim that it also encompasses parts of Turkey. All of these states embrace Islam, with one very notable exception: Israel, our only "blood brother" ally in the region that all Islamic terrorists want gone, violently and forever.

That Obama uses ISIL in discussing the terrorists is extremely telling and chilling. To those of us who keep our fingers on the pulse of Middle Eastern geopolitics, the distinctions separating ISIS and ISIL are by no means meager. It's readily apparent that Obama considers both Israel and its prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, thorns in each of his sides. Since 2009, his atrociously dismissive treatment of Netanyahu has been highly embarrassing, shocking, and outrageous, especially to those of us who cherish our relationship with the Jewish state.

Israel has proven itself a tried and true friend since its return to its ancient homeland in 1948. Despite some disagreements between the U.S. and the Jewish state, no previous president has shown such a hideous and blatant disregard for Israel's head of state as has Obama. Nor has any previous president ever considered (to our knowledge) or suggested in a way bordering on insistence that Israel relinquish the land it now controls by contracting to its pre-1967 borders. Obama wants just that. Why? For Israel, a return to those boundaries would be suicidal, shrinking the country to a width of a very svelte nine miles and making it essentially indefensible.

Besides Israel, Jordan and the Kurds in Northern Iraq have been stalwart friends and allies. Jordan is one of the 65 countries Obama claims are actively "engaged" in taking ISIS/ISIL out. In reality, roughly 60 nations in that vaporous coalition are contributing little or nothing to the cause but allowing their country's names to appear on a meaningless list.

One exception, Jordan's King Abdullah II, is an eager participant in the war on ISIS. He traveled to Washington to ask Obama for more weapons so Jordan could better defend itself and play a larger role in the regional fight. In like manner, the Kurds, who constitute one of the fiercest fighting forces in the region, have been enormously supportive of the U.S., but they are fighting ISIS with guns from WWII. They too have requested contemporary weaponry. The plaintive requests from both have been ignored. Why were they rebuffed?

Some very suggestive hints can be snipped from the speeches Obama has given, especially in Muslim countries during his humiliating "Apology (we prefer 'Apostasy') Tour." This was where Obama fondly reminisced about his Muslim roots in Indonesia, where he and his mother moved with the latter's second husband, Lolo Soetero, who adopted Obama and renamed him "Barry Soetero." An examination of Barry's Indonesian school record (a form ubiquitous on the web) lists his "Citizenship" as "Indonesian," a country that did not allow dual citizenship when Soetero (Obama) lived in Indonesia, which means Barry had to have relinquished his U.S. passport. Finally, and significantly, his "Religion" is listed as "Islam."

When he became president, as he traveled through Muslim lands, he spoke wistfully of Islam. During multiple speeches he said "the holy Quran teaches" so many times we lost count, and he claimed that the Muslim call to prayer at dawn was "the prettiest sound on earth."

He was amazingly quick to support the Muslim Brotherhood-inspired Arab Spring by encouraging the overthrow of Hosni Mubarak in Egypt and endorsing Mohamed Morsi as the new Egyptian leader. Morsi was a high-ranking member of the Brotherhood, an insidious, duplicitous organization seeking to foment widespread adoption of sharia law and surreptitiously funnel funds to Islamic terror groups.

Taken together, all of this gets us closer to understanding why Obama refuses to call Islamic terrorists what they are. His use of ISIL could be a strong indication that he supports re-establishing Muslim rule and sharia law throughout the Levant, and good riddance to Israel.

The somewhat murky and contradictory understanding of which religious tenets Obama truly follows has caused some thorny questions to arise.

If he was a Muslim, when did he turn his back on Islam (his biological father's and stepfather's faith) and become a Christian? The answer may lie in a story appearing at the Washington Times website and at the Daily Caller.

The Washington Times reports, "Several people who know Barack Obama well perceive him as Muslim. Most remarkably, his half-sister, Maya Soetoro-Ng, has stated: 'My whole family was Muslim.' Her whole family, obviously includes her half-brother, Barack." The same article highlights some doubts about Obama's "Christian" conversion. His spiritual adviser, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, was asked about how he helped Obama renounce Islam. Stunningly, however, Wright claims he's not sure Obama actually did convert from Islam. That, of course, is not proof he isn't a Christian, but it certainly raises eyebrows.

Edward Klein, who authored The Amateur, a book about Obama, told the Daily Caller that he interviewed Wright (and has him quoted on tape), who told Klein that he (Wright) "made it comfortable" for Obama to accept Christianity without having to renounce his "Islamic background."

We believe it's time to stop whispering about what much of the nation is thinking, but we leave it up to you to decide why Obama calls ISIS ISIL, why he can't bring himself to call Islamic terrorists what they are, and why he acts in a manner that supports Islam over Christianity at every opportunity.

Brussels is the Sphincter of the EU!