100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
| Topic: 2015 military budget - more now than it was when bush was in | |
|---|---|
|
Edited by
mightymoe
on
Mon 05/23/16 08:24 AM
|
In 2015, the United States spent more on its war machine than the next six countries combined, with a total of $596 billion spent on military expenditures. This week the U.S. House of Representatives passed its version of the annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), with roughly $602 billion slated to be spent on military programs and armaments in the 2017 budget. To put this amount in perspective, the U.S. spent more on its military than the next six nations combined, with China coming in second at $215 billion, followed by Saudi Arabia at $87 billion, Russia at $66 billion, with the United Kingdom, India and France spending roughly $50 billion each on defense expenses. When looking at this spending in context, the U.S. not only spends more than the next six countries combined, but spends almost triple the amount on military expenses than the second biggest defense spender in the world, China, according to data from the Stockholm International Peach Research Institute. These figures come on top of the recently announced $1 trillion dollar nuclear missile modernization program that has been curiously absent from public discourse, having not even been mentioned in the televised presidential debates. All of this comes as the U.S. pivots from the "Global War on Terror," to a more traditional defense posture. The reasoning behind this is simple; who needs new tanks, bombers, fighters and missiles to fight ISIS or al-Qaeda? There simply wasn't enough money to be made in bombing jihadists in tents in the desert, thus the drums of war in the media, regarding an "aggressive Russia," began to be played as to allow for the return of traditional military-industrial complex/Cold War posturing. The sheer enormity of the sums being given to the military-industrial complex is enough to boggle the mind. Think for a moment how else that $600 billion could be spent to actually assist in creating growth rather than death. Consider that in January 2015, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) found there were 564,708 homeless people on a given night in the United States - the government could actually purchase a $1 million dollar home for each individual homeless person in the U.S. and still have money left over. Or perhaps the money could be spent on the rapidly eroding domestic U.S. nuclear infrastructure. Although the media spotlight is rarely shined upon America's aging nuclear infrastructure, U.S. nuclear power plants are decaying rapidly, precipitating numerous nuclear environmental disasters across the country. The Free Thought Project recently reported on four nuclear disasters playing out across the country, with massive amounts of radioactive material having been leaked. US infrastructure rotting away while billions go to surveillance, killing, and foreign bribery Rather than investing in these terminal goods, such as bombs and bullets, which are meant for destruction, we should be investing in capital goods that are able to provide growth. The U.S. war machine spends hundreds of billions of dollars per year waging war against humanity, while Americans at home are dying from a crumbling nuclear infrastructure and crippling poverty. http://thefreethoughtproject.com/years-proposed-military-budget-buy-homeless-american-1-million-home/ when we were in a war,(Iraq, Afganistan) the budget was less than it is now, when we are not in a war... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2015, the United States spent more on its war machine than the next six countries combined, with a total of $596 billion spent on military expenditures. This week the U.S. House of Representatives passed its version of the annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), with roughly $602 billion slated to be spent on military programs and armaments in the 2017 budget. To put this amount in perspective, the U.S. spent more on its military than the next six nations combined, with China coming in second at $215 billion, followed by Saudi Arabia at $87 billion, Russia at $66 billion, with the United Kingdom, India and France spending roughly $50 billion each on defense expenses. When looking at this spending in context, the U.S. not only spends more than the next six countries combined, but spends almost triple the amount on military expenses than the second biggest defense spender in the world, China, according to data from the Stockholm International Peach Research Institute. These figures come on top of the recently announced $1 trillion dollar nuclear missile modernization program that has been curiously absent from public discourse, having not even been mentioned in the televised presidential debates. All of this comes as the U.S. pivots from the "Global War on Terror," to a more traditional defense posture. The reasoning behind this is simple; who needs new tanks, bombers, fighters and missiles to fight ISIS or al-Qaeda? There simply wasn't enough money to be made in bombing jihadists in tents in the desert, thus the drums of war in the media, regarding an "aggressive Russia," began to be played as to allow for the return of traditional military-industrial complex/Cold War posturing. The sheer enormity of the sums being given to the military-industrial complex is enough to boggle the mind. Think for a moment how else that $600 billion could be spent to actually assist in creating growth rather than death. Consider that in January 2015, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) found there were 564,708 homeless people on a given night in the United States - the government could actually purchase a $1 million dollar home for each individual homeless person in the U.S. and still have money left over. Or perhaps the money could be spent on the rapidly eroding domestic U.S. nuclear infrastructure. Although the media spotlight is rarely shined upon America's aging nuclear infrastructure, U.S. nuclear power plants are decaying rapidly, precipitating numerous nuclear environmental disasters across the country. The Free Thought Project recently reported on four nuclear disasters playing out across the country, with massive amounts of radioactive material having been leaked. US infrastructure rotting away while billions go to surveillance, killing, and foreign bribery Rather than investing in these terminal goods, such as bombs and bullets, which are meant for destruction, we should be investing in capital goods that are able to provide growth. The U.S. war machine spends hundreds of billions of dollars per year waging war against humanity, while Americans at home are dying from a crumbling nuclear infrastructure and crippling poverty. http://thefreethoughtproject.com/years-proposed-military-budget-buy-homeless-american-1-million-home/ when we were in a war,(Iraq, Afganistan) the budget was less than it is now, when we are not in a war... yes, why don't they? boggles the mind that military budget.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2015, the United States spent more on its war machine than the next six countries combined, with a total of $596 billion spent on military expenditures. This week the U.S. House of Representatives passed its version of the annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), with roughly $602 billion slated to be spent on military programs and armaments in the 2017 budget. To put this amount in perspective, the U.S. spent more on its military than the next six nations combined, with China coming in second at $215 billion, followed by Saudi Arabia at $87 billion, Russia at $66 billion, with the United Kingdom, India and France spending roughly $50 billion each on defense expenses. When looking at this spending in context, the U.S. not only spends more than the next six countries combined, but spends almost triple the amount on military expenses than the second biggest defense spender in the world, China, according to data from the Stockholm International Peach Research Institute. These figures come on top of the recently announced $1 trillion dollar nuclear missile modernization program that has been curiously absent from public discourse, having not even been mentioned in the televised presidential debates. All of this comes as the U.S. pivots from the "Global War on Terror," to a more traditional defense posture. The reasoning behind this is simple; who needs new tanks, bombers, fighters and missiles to fight ISIS or al-Qaeda? There simply wasn't enough money to be made in bombing jihadists in tents in the desert, thus the drums of war in the media, regarding an "aggressive Russia," began to be played as to allow for the return of traditional military-industrial complex/Cold War posturing. The sheer enormity of the sums being given to the military-industrial complex is enough to boggle the mind. Think for a moment how else that $600 billion could be spent to actually assist in creating growth rather than death. Consider that in January 2015, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) found there were 564,708 homeless people on a given night in the United States - the government could actually purchase a $1 million dollar home for each individual homeless person in the U.S. and still have money left over. Or perhaps the money could be spent on the rapidly eroding domestic U.S. nuclear infrastructure. Although the media spotlight is rarely shined upon America's aging nuclear infrastructure, U.S. nuclear power plants are decaying rapidly, precipitating numerous nuclear environmental disasters across the country. The Free Thought Project recently reported on four nuclear disasters playing out across the country, with massive amounts of radioactive material having been leaked. US infrastructure rotting away while billions go to surveillance, killing, and foreign bribery Rather than investing in these terminal goods, such as bombs and bullets, which are meant for destruction, we should be investing in capital goods that are able to provide growth. The U.S. war machine spends hundreds of billions of dollars per year waging war against humanity, while Americans at home are dying from a crumbling nuclear infrastructure and crippling poverty. http://thefreethoughtproject.com/years-proposed-military-budget-buy-homeless-american-1-million-home/ when we were in a war,(Iraq, Afganistan) the budget was less than it is now, when we are not in a war... yes, why don't they? boggles the mind that military budget.. well, every war is just a test campaign for the weapons makers, and all the congress/senators that vote yes on the budget gets a kickback... nobody in washing cares about the people, it's just a get rich program for them, as they go into office broke, and come out rich... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How much of the budget accounts for
equipment given to Iran? And designated to be given to Vietnam? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How much of the budget accounts for equipment given to Iran? And designated to be given to Vietnam? this budget was appoved in 2014, so i'm gussing nothing to vietnam... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kinda buggers the claims that the military is being shortchanged more now than during the Bush years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kinda buggers the claims that the military is being shortchanged more now than during the Bush years. agreed, but i don't trust/believe anything the liberals say anymore |
|
|
|
|
