No Fly No Buy: Obama's Last Ditch Effort to Cripple the Second Amendment



There’s one thing that all gun-grabbing politicians have in common. They are all quite adamant that they don’t want to take your guns. They’ll tell you over and over again that all they want is a few reasonable regulations. Every once in a blue moon they’ll let their guard down in front of an reporter, and reveal their true long-term intentions, but by and large they’re always trying to put a reassuring face on their gun grabbing agenda.

Obama, for instance, has consistently claimed throughout his presidency that all he wants is a few “reasonable” restrictions, and that all he intends to do is keep guns out of the hands of “bad guys.” Whenever he talks about it, however, you can read between the lines and find his ulterior motives.

At a recent Town Hall meeting, Obama was put on the spot by gun store owner, who asked him why he wants to restrict gun use for law-abiding citizens. The video has since gone viral among liberals who think that the president gave a stellar response. In reality, he merely showed us his true colors.

“First of all, the notion that I or Hillary or Democrats or whoever you want to choose are hell-bent on taking away folks’ guns is just not true,” he claims “And I don’t care how many times the NRA says it.” Obama then goes on to make the case for restricting gun ownership for people who find themselves on the no-fly list, and cites an example of someone who has been visiting ISIS websites but is still allowed to buy firearms.

So sir I just have to say respectfully, that there is a way for us to have common sense gun laws. There is a way for us to make sure that lawful responsible gun owners like yourself, are able to use them for sporting, hunting, protecting yourself. But the only way we’re going to do that is if we don’t have a situation in which anything that is proposed is viewed as some tyrannical destruction of the Second Amendment.

Unfortunately, his idea to restrict gun ownership for people on the no-fly list is exactly the kind of thing that could lead to the tyrannical destruction of the Second Amendment. In a perfect world it would be nice if we could keep guns away from terrorists, but restricting the gun rights of people who are on the no-fly list is anything but reasonable or “common sense.”

That’s because literally anyone can find themselves on the no-fly list. You don’t have to commit a crime and you don’t need to visit any suspicious websites. They can take away your right to travel freely without any due process whatsoever. At best, all the government needs to do is hear that you might have some sympathies for a terrorist organization, and you’ll be barred from being on a plane for life.

As Techdirt.com pointed out last year, more than a third of the people on the no-fly list have no known terrorist affiliations. If Obama’s plan were ever put in place, you could lose your right to bear arms over nothing more than a hunch or a rumor.

Leaks to the Intercept revealed that the “process” by which people are put on either the no fly list or the terrorist watch list basically involves hunches, and revelations from just a few months ago show that DHS still uses flim flam pseudo science to put people on the list based on hunches that the government laughably calls “predictive judgment,” but which experts have said has no scientific basis whatsoever.

If you want to understand how incredibly wrong this proposal is, you just need to replace “buy guns” with something else, like “the right to assemble” or “the right to use the internet.” It’s easy to say: “What could possibly be the argument for allowing a terrorist suspect to use the internet?” But then you remember that these aren’t actual suspects — they’re just people put on a list by law enforcement with no thorough process, let alone due process to defend themselves or to get off the list. And, of course, being a “suspect” doesn’t mean you’re guilty. Innocent until proven guilty used to actually mean something.

And let’s not forget, that our government has a very broad definition of “terrorist,” and has in the past claimed that conservatives, libertarians, veterans, and Christians should be watched closely for their supposed terrorist potential (i.e., the groups that are most likely to own firearms).

Sorry Obama, but you’re a gun grabber plain and simple. At best, perhaps, you’re ignorant of what your proposal could do to our rights, and at worse you’re lying to the American people. You know exactly what a “no-buy list” would lead to. Furthermore, the fact that more guns were sold during your administration than any other in history does not prove that you’re not trying to take our guns, it’s only proof that you’ve failed to take them. You can sugarcoat
http://www.activistpost.com/2016/06/no-fly-no-buy-obama-s-last-ditch-effort-to-cripple-the-second-amendment.html/
* Embedded Links & Video- PBS News Hour*


* Well. This guy is angry. Insert dramatic music...here*

he is a Lying Liar!
Confiscation always follows a National Firearms Register!

Speaking of Hillary and gun control....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/06/05/hillary-clinton-wavers-on-second-amendment-right-to-bear-arms/

There is no doubt in my mind....with the right congress and senate, we would be left with owning a single barreled shotgun and rock salt.... if that. AND this bltch is gonna be able to appoint enough Supreme Court Justices to uphold it too.

well, if they do try a gun grab, the bodies will be pilling up, on both sides of this... the whole idea seems undoable right now, they need the children to grow up thinking that it's a good idea first...

guess they will send Arnie and Sylvester from house to house to collect them?
amazing the amount of Firearms suddenly got lost in that latest big Spate of Boating-Accidents!

Funny you mention boating accidents...I seem to have one about a day or two after I buy a new firearm....never fails to happen

damn things must be jinxed!

They just have decided here to tighten the Regulations again in July,by better Communication between the different States,Military,etc,coming ever closer to a National Register,something we have expressively forbidden the Authorities to do in a Referendum a few years ago!
And we don't have the Constitutional Guaranties to own and Bear Arms like you have!
There is NO 2nd Amendment in our Constitution!
Whatever vestiges of any Rights to Firearms was obliterated in the total-Revision of our Constitution in '99,and no one was brave enough to sound the Alarm!
Now the Article reads,That Our Rights to Firearms are protected under the Law!
All because the Azzwipes were hellbent to join the Schengen-Agreement with the EU!
That stinking EU has brought us nothing but trouble!

Well it should never seem "doable" in the first place...but an actual ban during Hillary's husband's presidency wasn't just doable, it actually got done.
And the end game is NOT just an "assault weapons" ban.....The right president, the right congress, the right senate and the right SC and they're all banned.
Anyone thinking progs just want "sensible gun laws"....which, btw, only effect law abiding citizens....are kidding themselves.

yep,sensible Gunlaws like in Hitler-Germany,USSR,People's Republic of China,etc!