It looks like,

In the USA we elect citizens to represent our interests. Its a requirement that the elects must be citizens first. The citizens of the USA have businesses, go to work, inherit their wealth or are considered poor. Poor people don't get elected because they have no weath needed to conduct an effective campaign. We are forced to choose from a pool of weathy citizens.

The POTUS is elected to represent all the citizens of the nation. As a fellow citizen, they have wealth, often from businesses they own or operate. The fact that they have businesses or wealth should have bearing on their credibility in their position. They are successful.

If an elected citizen uses their position of power for personal bussiness gain, chances are they are not representing the citizens of the nation and are then derelict in their duties. If they push policy that gives their businessses an advantage over other citizen's businesses they need to be removed from office.

Carter was into peanuts but he didn't push policy to cause his peanut businesses to prosper. His fame as president may have help his business but other citizen's fame helps their businesses as well. Remember Billy Beer? Bush's had high interests and businesses relating to oil. They DID push policy that affected their interests but the policy also affected the other citizens of the nation.

Trump sucks as a person, I agree. Until he tries to set policy to benefit just his own businesses he should not be punished for merely having businesses. He is still a US citizen.

As for taxes. The whole tax system is unfair to all citizens. As far as I am concerned there should be no loopholes or advantages. Income should be all income, no matter what. If I have to file my taxes, report all my income then everyone else, including the citizens that we elect to office should have to do the same.

Our income (as citizens) is available (with just cause) to the public record (if you think it isn't you are deluded) so they're income also should be available to the public record. The reason elected officials actions and statuses are available to public view is because they are there to represent the public. Thus, everything they do while on duty concerns all citizens.

By your own words you are not anti-establishment.
Edit to add: Anti-establishment is a grouping of ALL establishments.

Anti means against.
A negative.
Anti anything establishes a sense of negativity.

You are probably pro-equal rights for all citizens.
Pro means supporting.
It is a positive.
Pro anything establishes a sense of positive thoughts.

One thing I notice about a lot of people's opinion is that they exist in the negative. This is because in some way, shape or form they feel they have been wronged. Negativity resulting from anger or sadness (all negative feelings). Existing in the negative results in more negative awareness. It causes one to lose focus on the good things.

There is good and bad in any situation. The media attempts to sell its product by emphasizing the negative because that is what most people are tuned to and react to.

You 'blogs' as you call it are focused on negative subjects because that is what people will respond to.

The world is not unjust. It is a mixture of just and unjust.

Even my unfair boss had good things going on. Even Trump, as fugged up as he is, has good things going on. People take the good without fanfare but exacerbate the bad into a frenzy. Not that we should ignore the bad things that happen. We should identify them and WORK TOGETHER on a solution.

Oh, and all the things the republicans are sure of about 'corrupt' Hillary that aren't proven,,

guess its not just a liberal affliction,, after all

Oh, and all the things the republicans are sure of about 'corrupt' Hillary that aren't proven,,

guess its not just a liberal affliction,, after all