100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Does anyone else hear crickets? | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
and was one of 11000 gun deaths that occurred last year
____________________________________________________________________ Yes, and 1/10 of those took place in Chicago. |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Wed 11/29/17 05:45 PM
|
|
not quite, 38000 gun related deaths in the US
400 in chicago and I am bias towards the double standards I started the thread about |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not quite, 38000 gun related deaths in the US 400 in chicago and I am bias towards the double standards I started the thread about You might find this interesting... http://ijr.com/2016/01/510415-10-charts-that-put-obamas-gun-violence-town-hall-in-perspective/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not quite, 38000 gun related deaths in the US 400 in chicago and I am bias towards the double standards I started the thread about Not quite.. get your numbers right. And its black on black.. thugs killing for drugs and profit... sorry.. but it is. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- The city saw a surge in gun violence in 2016: 762 murders, 3,550 shooting incidents, and 4,331 shooting victims, according to a statement released by the department on Sunday. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Thu 11/30/17 11:23 PM
|
|
not quite, 38000 gun related deaths in the US 400 in chicago and I am bias towards the double standards I started the thread about Not quite.. get your numbers right. And its black on black.. thugs killing for drugs and profit... sorry.. but it is. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- The city saw a surge in gun violence in 2016: 762 murders, 3,550 shooting incidents, and 4,331 shooting victims, according to a statement released by the department on Sunday. sorry, but its important to read before responding gun related DEATHS< not gun violence, which doesnt always end in death or murders, which are not all by gun or shooting incidents, which also do not all end in death or victims, who have not all died I was posting about gun related DEATH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not quite, 38000 gun related deaths in the US 400 in chicago and I am bias towards the double standards I started the thread about Not quite.. get your numbers right. And its black on black.. thugs killing for drugs and profit... sorry.. but it is. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- The city saw a surge in gun violence in 2016: 762 murders, 3,550 shooting incidents, and 4,331 shooting victims, according to a statement released by the department on Sunday. sorry, but its important to read before responding gun related DEATHS< not gun violence, which doesnt always end in death or murders, which are not all by gun or shooting incidents, which also do not all end in death or victims, who have not all died I was posting about gun related DEATH Glad you can try to down play the apparent ( and clear) black on black MURDERS Chicago. And by the way this year is on track to past last years records. Take a look at the attached Chicago Sun page. look at the victims.. and then look at the suspects... the overwhelming ethnic group BLACK in both categories. homicides.suntimes.com Down play your numbers to the victims families... oh, its just a " cycle" right... Lol Thugs.. black ones.. killing their own.. for drugs, turf or money. the faces don't lie, Ms. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have no idea what your point. It is indisputable and that in ALL RACES most victims are victimized by someone of their own race.
The OP was tying the fact that a victim had been some sort of colleague to another as reason for some conspiracy theory. My response was a statement of how common victim hood occurs, irrelevant of race. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ar~~~~mighty lore~~~~I have a vision of massive redneck will do so again in the future~~~~~~~save us~~~~~~save us all~~~~~Ar~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm. Well, I personally don't remember a lot of complaints about Obama golfing, but then I tend to tune out such things, unless the people complaining are actually in a position to push policy because of it. I do remember Bush the Younger, infamously using the golf course as a backdrop for one of his attacks on the mess in the Middle East after 9-11, where he said some pointed aggressive words about our chosen opponents there, ending with the words "Now watch me hit this (golf ball) onto the next green." Or something like that anyway. Anyone who pretends that they thought Obama didn't take things seriously enough, must have demanded that Bush be instantly removed from office for THAT little ditty. Or admitted that their righteousness about Obama is all puffery. In a larger historic context, this is an oft repeated story. When a political party is OUT OF POWER, they tend to find all manner of things to say about the opposition, in hopes of getting the electorate to hate them, which they immediately blank their minds about, the moment they win power back again. It's what I think of as "standard level hypocrisy," and it's only really egregious, when it becomes the ONLY reason that I am supposed to support removing the guy from office for.   ALL of you decided to take the conversation away from the subject matter, and turn it into an attack on your own inability to understand what I said. Please go back and read JUST what I said, and stop inserting your own political bias into it, and pretending that I said what you want to imagine. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A cop unjustifiably kills someone and we blame all the police,why not just blame all of mankind,people are murdered every year and we blame the color or what we believe is race by one's color. when you take in the fact most people are a culmination of more than just one race which one should we discriminate against..Perhaps they should take a DNA test and then just discriminate against all of them ..I mean let's at least get it right. One would think that by now we had figured out that it's the individual or individuals who are the ones who committed the crime and no one else..and put the blame where it rightfully belongs ..on them.. alone...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm. Well, I personally don't remember a lot of complaints about Obama golfing, but then I tend to tune out such things, unless the people complaining are actually in a position to push policy because of it. I do remember Bush the Younger, infamously using the golf course as a backdrop for one of his attacks on the mess in the Middle East after 9-11, where he said some pointed aggressive words about our chosen opponents there, ending with the words "Now watch me hit this (golf ball) onto the next green." Or something like that anyway. Anyone who pretends that they thought Obama didn't take things seriously enough, must have demanded that Bush be instantly removed from office for THAT little ditty. Or admitted that their righteousness about Obama is all puffery. In a larger historic context, this is an oft repeated story. When a political party is OUT OF POWER, they tend to find all manner of things to say about the opposition, in hopes of getting the electorate to hate them, which they immediately blank their minds about, the moment they win power back again. It's what I think of as "standard level hypocrisy," and it's only really egregious, when it becomes the ONLY reason that I am supposed to support removing the guy from office for. ALL of you decided to take the conversation away from the subject matter, and turn it into an attack on your own inability to understand what I said. Please go back and read JUST what I said, and stop inserting your own political bias into it, and pretending that I said what you want to imagine. |
|
|
|
|
