100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
|
Edited by
DaddyTime
on
Mon 02/13/12 06:45 PM
|
|
Thou shall not kill....means...thou shall not murder. we kill animals , fish, and fowls of the air, in order to eat... even the birds of the air kill bugs on the ground for their daily meals.... point being...the Word has to be studied and rightly divided..... and also btw..... There is a big difference between walking in Faith...versus walking in Foolishness   Then why doesn't it say that? depending upon the translation,, it does translates,, thou shalt not murder, which is unlawful killing, and leaves alot of room for debate based upon culture and current laws,,, I have not read on bible where it said thou shall not murder, can you link me to this version please? certainly... http://www.levitt.com/hebrew/commandments.html Hmmm it say's “Thou Shalt Not Kill” — Ex. 20:. then they go on to interpret their own way. Like I said it can't be amended, the original scripture says. “Thou Shalt Not Kill” Anything anyone say's after is only how they wish to interpret it...Amend. So since it say's Thou Shalt Not Kill it means Thou Shalt Not Kill. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupy = thousands and thousand wanting different things and the only thing they do agree on is that they don't want to work and earn their wy in to the 1%. otherwise all their views are different on what changes they want. Very stupid stick to one thing otherwise don't say you speak for everyone. Anonymous = a bunch of wannabe hackers, if they had left the psn alone I may not hate them so much. My only issue otherwise is that they are called hackers. hell you could be this type of hacker to just google a few tutorials on DDoS and you'll be good to go, ready to join Anonymous lmfao. Obviously you know nothing about this movement. I protest!! I work!! Do some research on the movement. Find out how many people have been able to stay in their homes i really need more then this to work on, can you please explain how I do not understand. When I was at memorial park talking with the occupy members in my city not one had the same views or wanted the same changes. all had different methods of how to change things. So what exactly are they wanting other then to be handed the 1% status? You quoted me during my edit. my post remains the same as you're still does not answer mine. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
DaddyTime
on
Mon 02/13/12 06:40 PM
|
|
Thou shall not kill....means...thou shall not murder. we kill animals , fish, and fowls of the air, in order to eat... even the birds of the air kill bugs on the ground for their daily meals.... point being...the Word has to be studied and rightly divided..... and also btw..... There is a big difference between walking in Faith...versus walking in Foolishness Then why doesn't it say that? depending upon the translation,, it does translates,, thou shalt not murder, which is unlawful killing, and leaves alot of room for debate based upon culture and current laws,,, I have not read one bible where it said thou shall not murder, can you link me to this version please? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
DaddyTime
on
Mon 02/13/12 06:35 PM
|
|
Occupy = thousands and thousand wanting different things and the only thing they do agree on is that they don't want to work and earn their wy in to the 1%. otherwise all their views are different on what changes they want. Very stupid stick to one thing otherwise don't say you speak for everyone. Anonymous = a bunch of wannabe hackers, if they had left the psn alone I may not hate them so much. My only issue otherwise is that they are called hackers. hell you could be this type of hacker to just google a few tutorials on DDoS and you'll be good to go, ready to join Anonymous lmfao. Obviously you know nothing about this movement. I protest!! I work!! Do some research on the movement. Find out how many people have been able to stay in their homes i really need more then this to work on, can you please explain how I do not understand. When I was at memorial park talking with the occupy members in my city not one had the same views or wanted the same changes. all had different methods of how to change things. So what exactly are they wanting other then to be handed the 1% status? Note: when i say work i do not mean they don't have jobs, I mean that they do not want to work to rise above the norm and be the 1%. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
potato pancakes, breaded pork and broccoli. Mmmmmm, I LOVE potato pancakes. me too, had to fight to get them involved in this meal lol not sure why since I was cooking. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupy = thousands and thousand wanting
different things and the only thing they do agree on is that they don't want to work and earn their wy in to the 1%. otherwise all their views are different on what changes they want. Very stupid stick to one thing otherwise don't say you speak for everyone. Anonymous = a bunch of wannabe hackers, if they had left the psn alone I may not hate them so much. My only issue otherwise is that they are called hackers. hell you could be this type of hacker to just google a few tutorials on DDoS and you'll be good to go, ready to join Anonymous lmfao. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
potato pancakes, breaded pork and broccoli.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
I just HAVE to do it....
|
|
I thought I had won this debate already and that it had ended. I warned you  Hmm not good enough apparently, got do something extravagant like whip off you're shirt and jump up and down yelling don't debate her. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
DaddyTime
on
Mon 02/13/12 06:16 PM
|
|
They are nothing more then Steve Urkel terrorists that have to hide behind a computer screen and attack people waiting for their pimple cream to dry on their faces. I am pretty sure Urkel is a way more skilled hacker then these attention wh0res. When they do something significant that any 12 year old couldn't do, then I will be impressed. And I am tired of groups saying they speak/fight for the people. Anonymous almost as bad as the occupy losers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thou shall not kill....means...thou shall not murder. we kill animals , fish, and fowls of the air, in order to eat... even the birds of the air kill bugs on the ground for their daily meals.... point being...the Word has to be studied and rightly divided..... and also btw..... There is a big difference between walking in Faith...versus walking in Foolishness Then why doesn't it say that? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
I just HAVE to do it....
|
|
I thought I had won this debate already
and that it had ended. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No where , got called for penalty.  nah I took the ball and went home, wasn't my ball but I took it anyway. basketball |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No where , got called for penalty. nah I took the ball and went home, wasn't my ball but I took it anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
did you know
|
|
Are you that man from Kansas Oklahoma?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No where , got called for penalty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Guess my age
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I dont think maternal/paternal/reproductive responsibility is a mere privelege or right Not very clear what your point, nor your position is here. I think its something, because of the great potential to create and therefore directly affect another person, should be considered seriously and in any society which WISHES to make policy regarding the responsibility we should have for our bodies, they should do so I dont consider it 'right' or 'wrong' , if it is responsible Lets make this clear, becuase often times its in the best interest of politicians to make this as muddy as possible and I think the whole topic gets muddied by what we see as standard operating procedures when it comes to this topic. Are you for banning abortions? Are you for restricting the conditions under which a person can express the reproductive right of abortion? If so how? Are you for defining when a fetus has its own rights? If so when? No, I wouldnt want them banned Yes, I would like to see them restricted for use in life threatening situations and cases where the mother is too mentally deficient(not to be confused with being too bothered) to take care of the child, and only in the first trimester Yes, I dont know about 'rights' in general, but I would like to see a right to life beginning at the second trimester and no later than the third Mommy had a baby and the head popped off. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
DaddyTime
on
Mon 02/13/12 04:02 PM
|
|
Be it a written novel or a composed song with lyrics, SOMEONE made it and has done it to earn a living? I don't see a Red Cross on MY back... What makes me think they have one on theirs? Canada is no China.... Shame on us for not protecting the copyrights of others. A song is just a song... right! If it was that easy, go ahead and do it... If it makes it to top 20... Just know, JOHNN111 won't steal your chit. I work for a living.... So do Artists! say that next time you buy a season of Keeping Up with the Kardashians or the simple life. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I see so much wrong with this tread and wonder how any of you can actually sit here and argue this with a straight face. I see people arguing abortion is wrong then justifying war, saying that "thou shall not kill" covers everything. Well if it covers everything, you can not later justify other acts of killing no matter the reason.. Lets go back to abortion here for a second, I am going to justify it right now, Mothers life is in danger carrying the child for health reasons. would killing that child not be self defense therefore justifying it? No I am not arguing for abortion as I personally have issue with doing with my own children. I do not judge other on their choice as sometimes that is whats best for the child. My point is that it's either one or the other, you either think killing is a sin or you don't. there are no exceptions or you are a hypocrite. choosing to take a human life is sinful choosing to save one is not in the case of a mother in grave danger , the decision to take a life is no longer in anyones hands as its been decided that SOMEONE will l ikely die,, the issue then becomes , which do you save? the same is true of self defense, when the issue of someone being harmed or killed is not a choice but a certainty then the issue becomes , what to do to SAVE someones life (even our own) the same is true of wars, or any situation where an aggression makes it certain that some will be hurt or killed than the choice has changed from one of doing no harm, to allowing no harm to be done to,,,,, No thou shall not kill, it does not say "thou shall not kill but...." that means no killing at all. you can either choose that or not to, not just the bits and pieces that suit you at the time. If you are attacked simply turn the other cheek, god will punish them but you must stay pure. The bible is not the bill of rights it can't be amended. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I see so much wrong with this tread
and wonder how any of you can actually sit here and argue this with a straight face. I see people arguing abortion is wrong then justifying war, saying that "thou shall not kill" covers everything. Well if it covers everything, you can not later justify other acts of killing no matter the reason.. Lets go back to abortion here for a second, I am going to justify it right now, Mothers life is in danger carrying the child for health reasons. would killing that child not be self defense therefore justifying it? No I am not arguing for abortion as I personally have issue with doing with my own children. I do not judge other on their choice as sometimes that is whats best for the child. My point is that it's either one or the other, you either think killing is a sin or you don't. there are no exceptions or you are a hypocrite. |
|
|
|
|
Previous
