it still matters not, genetic pools can be pretty large,, black women really can give birth to VARIOUS shades of babies,,

yeah, and quite difficult

people generally apply past experience or knowledge to what they read and learn to justify whether it makes sense to them, thats kind of how logic works

I dont think many people are SOLELY intolerant because of a 'religious' belief because I dont think 'religious' beliefs exist in a vaccum or are owned exclusively by religion,,,,

whatever you were doing when you attracted them,,,keep doing it,,,,

huh?

I wasnt there, I dont know,, with glass and a shredder around, I think it was understandable to use the QUICKEST method for ensuring her safety and that of others,,,

parents have to do what works with their kids, IM glad it didnt continue to get out of hand in your family

thats cool too,,,,like I said,, Im just old school like that,,worked with us, seems to work in my family/culture,,,,,

Im from old school. The neighbor lady would spank your behind and then the parents would too. I think handcuffs is pretty light, if used as a 'restraint' which was clearly necessary in this instance,,,

Im not sure the event he was at had anything to do with 'killing' anyone

Im also not sure when people can 'predict' something will be in the news,,,,or how many news stations will pick a story up,,,,


perhaps the News chooses to cover those stories more often then the others,, the new panthers are always newsworthy, whatever they do

and just like gloria allred is hardly going to make waves when women are abusive to other women, because she is a 'womans' advocate and not the mans

and the republicans wont make waves whenever it is implied that all those welfare moms arent 'working', because they advocate for the haves and not the have nots,,,,

the panthers probably wont make waves about blacks being abusive to other blacks,, they are advocates for 'blacks' and not for non blacks

I think my heart works along those lines too,, I cant buy the car to see if I Want to keep it,, I have to want to keep it before I invest money into owning it

not to belittle men into cars,, just making an analogy,,, I cant see being 'exclusive' with someone that I hardly know,,,,but Im also not into the casual sex...so maybe thats a factor

I would never be sleeping with anyone that I had not already become 'exclusive' with,,,

I think its regional and cultural. Crimes are usually reported locally based upon where they happen. You can find them daily in your own newspaper or on your local news.

Why some stories get more sensational coverage is a question that will probably never have an adequate answer

black folks wonder why its white babies or white girls who 'seem' to get tha national coverage when they are missing

and white folks wonder why white on black crime 'seems' to get the national coverage

and poor folks wonder why rich folks kids so often get 'sentenced' to rehabs when they are under the influece while poor folks and their kids generally just go to jail and start building their record,,,,


,,,etc,,,etc,,

what would the bounty be for? havent the cops already captured and incarcerated her for the killing?

from what I read she was supposed to be adopting, and its also possible that she may have been light enough to have a baby that appeared white,,,, I did,,,,

I think peoples beliefs are their personal business, and that beliefs dont need to be tolerated unless they turn into behavior

then I think certain actual behaviors exhibited by an individual may or may not be wise to tolerate,,,,

When does something become exclusive?

How do you know?

Is there an assumption or is it something to be discussed and mutually agreed upon?

If you are 'dating' someone, do you know or care whether they are also dating others?

would it cause jealousy or problems if someone that was 'dating' you, that you were developing feelings for, was dating others as well?

How would you discuss it,, ,,,how would you bring it up?



,,,I imagine I will have to tackle dating eventually, but its new to me because I Was always someones 'wife' and the commitment is important to me.


Just looking for some opinions and I know this is where to find them....lol

I WAS LOOKING FOR WHY AMERICANS CLING TO A DOCUMENT WRITTEN BY IMPERFECT MEN(from womanizers, to adulterers, to slaveholders) TO DEFINE THE PERFECT AMERICA,,,,, I thought this piece was inciteful,,,



The Folly of Strict Constitutional Constructionism
Posted on June 10, 2011 by David W. Boles

English language experts wrote the United States Constitution. When those authors wrote — “in order to form a more perfect Union” — they were making a hard and specific point that is lost on many of us today.




From a purely grammatical perspective, “in order to form a more perfect Union” doesn’t make sense because the word “perfect” is not a comparative, it is an absolute — just as the phrase “more unique” doesn’t make sense because the word “unique” is also an absolute.

What, then, were our forefathers trying to teach us about the real meaning of that phrase? They knew something we do not!



Our founding fathers knew that human beings are imperfect and, because the Constitution was written by them — imperfect people, too — it too, was imperfect and, by definition, unfinished and flawed and open to interpretation. Our Constitution was written to be a breathable document. Our Constitution was drafted to change with the times and to provide a basis for thinking and not something that was strict and absolute.

We must be wary of people who use the “strict Constitutionalist” argument for appointing judges and ruling — We The People — because the Constructionists are building their reasoning on a purposefully flawed notion that was originally intended to guide us without mandating. Deconstructing the Constitution to pull out bits of it to serve a narrow political purpose is precisely not what the document was intended to inspire. In fact, the document clearly condemns that sort of thinking against action.

We must also be aware of cunning charlatans who will use our most famous document as bus advertising for their personal profiteering on the backs of regular Americans.



Our Constitution was written to live and breathe to be free. Don’t let anyone persuade you against that American ideal. Our forefathers wrote the Constitution, not to restrict us to a certain place and time, but to demand that we keep thinking as our lives of this nation expand.

We, and our Constitution, are works in progress, and the clue to that thinking is embedded right there in the document in a purposeful, and thrilling, grammatical error — “in order to form a more perfect Union” — and the ongoing moral duty falls to us to accept there will always be more work to do, and we owe it to each other, We The People, to facilitate an open interpretation of a piece of paper that was intended to refine us, not just define us.


http://wordpunk.com/2011/06/10/the-folly-of-strict-constitutional-constructionism/

I doubt it....


not even Nugent believes it enough to follow through on it,,,just venting with the most shocking words he can think of,,,

lol,, ummmm because they have to deal with a GLOBAL economy and GLOBAL politics,, and therefore travel to other countries


would it be better if they spent their time at an ice cream stand brushing each others hair?

I wonder if Romney will be as pressured to throw this one under the bus as OBama was to do to Rev. Wright,,,,,

yeah, if its a direct exchange of sex for money

if there is going to be some actual 'relationship' involved,, maybe its more of a gift,,,