Community > Posts By > msharmony

 
msharmony's photo
Mon 04/16/12 01:58 PM
I still love Will Ferrells version

you would think with Wills height and stature he couldnt possibly resemble Bush, but it hits it head on

msharmony's photo
Mon 04/16/12 01:56 PM
In a blog post, Gabe Rottman, a legislative counsel and policy advisor in the ACLU’s Washington Legislative Office, wrote that "it's important to note — contrary to some reports — that H.R. 347 doesn't create any new crimes, or directly apply to the Occupy protests. The bill slightly rewrites a short trespass law, originally passed in 1971 and amended a couple of times since, that covers areas subject to heightened Secret Service security measures


from politifact.com


take it as you will, as I said though,, this particular 'right' is not one I have personally EVERY had,,being born in 1969

msharmony's photo
Mon 04/16/12 01:39 PM

Ya'll should just focus on being good little citizens. Follow the rules. Let the people don't want your views to be heard - let them make the rules.





there are many ways to let your views be heard, but you just cant stand wherever you want to speak them or shout them out,,,never have been able to have that ABSOLUTE freedom in every situation or in every place,,,

msharmony's photo
Mon 04/16/12 11:57 AM
someone would already have to be pretty intimate with me to see them,,,and by that point, it should not matter,,,,

msharmony's photo
Mon 04/16/12 11:51 AM







MsH and Dragonese must be sleeping.....

Haven't heard yet how this doesn't mean anything, and how our constitutional lawyer, dictator would never allow it to be used, and would never destroy our constitution or bill of rights.

What does it take to make people go slaphead ?

He's going thru our constitution and bill of rights with a red pen saying "this doesn't work for me...." and nobody cares!

Guess our country isn't going to hell fast enough to suit some people! frustrated rant



at your request

https://www.aclu.org/blog/free-speech/how-big-deal-hr-347-criminalizing-protest-bill


make note of the words :RESTRICTED AREAS:

basically areas one shouldnt be FOR ANY REASON,,,,,


That's BS! How about what a judge has to say about it?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7SGWH3kirzg&feature=share


one judge out of thousands,,,,


I wish I had your optimism...... truth is, America and it's people can't afford it! It's only one right....correct?

Yep, one right after another that our constitution guarantees us.... until the burnin Bush and King Barry came along..... and you brush it off like it's just a penny among the dollar bills!



there is nothing the constitution GUARANTEES, no absolute rights in the bill of rights

there is an expectation of common sense application,,,

like not yelling FIRE in a crowded theater,,in lieu of the 'freedom of speech'

'restricted area' has always meant just that, whether you are there to speak or to get a manicure,,,,


BS! I won't so easily give up what I fought, and many friends died for!



ok, Im just saying,,,this particular thing is not something you have to 'give up' as we never had it in the first place,,,

msharmony's photo
Mon 04/16/12 11:50 AM



So in islam telling a kid to hate Jews and anyone affiliated with them isn't child abuse?

In Judaism telling a kid that if they marry outside their religion they are considered dead isn't child abuse?


In christianity telling a kid if they don't accept a bible character they have never seen or met as their lord and savior they are going to hell isn't child abuse?




you are equating what people choose to tell their children with religion

indeed teaching kids to hate is abusive
teaching them they will be disowned for not displaying bigotry is abusive
teaching them (As children) they will 'go to hell' is abusive


the former two arent necessarily religious doctrines and are not exclusive to religion

the latter, is a matter of developmental stages and appropriate subject matters


it would be like telling a child if they broke the rules they would go to jail

which would be true, once they bcome an adult, but is too simplistic and misleading a statement on its own, and terrifying, to relate to a child
meh..christianity and judaism here in America has changed so much that over half the crap that was considered an abomination isn't anymore and things that were unacceptable back then now are acceptable and blah,blah,blah Gods word is like a convenience it's only preached by others when needed but yet not abided by.



billions of religious upon the earth, and Im sure there are many more than one 'common' perceptions of religious right or wrong,,

msharmony's photo
Mon 04/16/12 11:30 AM
if this makes sense

I think there are soulmates,,

I am not sure EVERYONE has one ,,,,

msharmony's photo
Mon 04/16/12 11:10 AM
Edited by msharmony on Mon 04/16/12 11:12 AM



Race riots. I think Zimmermans a Mexican not white.



not really, his dad is white his mom is white peruvian

nothing to do with Mexico,,,,


Have you seen George Zimmerman? Does he look like his mother is a "white Peruvian" to you? She is a native Peruvian, which means she is possibly a mix of South American Indian and Spanish.

I see the racist trash talk out there on the internet "Zimmerman is white or Jewish" as if his race determines his guilt. Race only matters to racists. How about we ignore the race and focus on the truth? Make Zimmerman and Trayvon both white or black, do you feel the same way? If not, then you are a racist.



i agree. My comment was posted to contest the idea that being 'mexican' has anything to do with this or that being 'hispanic' or 'mexican' somehow excludes being 'white'


its like assuming an american cant be black , because america is predominately a white country,,,,but one is nationality and the other is race ,, neither excludes the other from being true,,,



and , as a mother, I would feel the same regardless of race, so long as all the other details were the same

white boy in a predominately black neighborhood, being followed by a black Man , trying to lose the Black man who continues to follow him and approach him and then ends up (after a scuffle) shooting him,,,,

yeah,, Id still be just as upset about it,,it still could be my child who (if she so chose) could also 'pass' as white,,,

msharmony's photo
Mon 04/16/12 11:01 AM





MsH and Dragonese must be sleeping.....

Haven't heard yet how this doesn't mean anything, and how our constitutional lawyer, dictator would never allow it to be used, and would never destroy our constitution or bill of rights.

What does it take to make people go slaphead ?

He's going thru our constitution and bill of rights with a red pen saying "this doesn't work for me...." and nobody cares!

Guess our country isn't going to hell fast enough to suit some people! frustrated rant



at your request

https://www.aclu.org/blog/free-speech/how-big-deal-hr-347-criminalizing-protest-bill


make note of the words :RESTRICTED AREAS:

basically areas one shouldnt be FOR ANY REASON,,,,,


That's BS! How about what a judge has to say about it?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7SGWH3kirzg&feature=share


one judge out of thousands,,,,


I wish I had your optimism...... truth is, America and it's people can't afford it! It's only one right....correct?

Yep, one right after another that our constitution guarantees us.... until the burnin Bush and King Barry came along..... and you brush it off like it's just a penny among the dollar bills!



there is nothing the constitution GUARANTEES, no absolute rights in the bill of rights

there is an expectation of common sense application,,,

like not yelling FIRE in a crowded theater,,in lieu of the 'freedom of speech'

'restricted area' has always meant just that, whether you are there to speak or to get a manicure,,,,

msharmony's photo
Mon 04/16/12 10:58 AM


LA is a much more diverse area with many more people and a much longer past of police misconduct,, the Rodney King fiasco was just the straw that finally broke the horses back,,,,


I dont think that is the same environment in Sanford Florida...


so you don't know? My mom lives in Florida. They have just teh same amount of crime and misconduct as we do here.



my brother lives in florida,,,,,,

that has little to do with whether the climate in sanford florida is the same type of climate as LA in the 1990's

msharmony's photo
Mon 04/16/12 07:39 AM

So in islam telling a kid to hate Jews and anyone affiliated with them isn't child abuse?

In Judaism telling a kid that if they marry outside their religion they are considered dead isn't child abuse?


In christianity telling a kid if they don't accept a bible character they have never seen or met as their lord and savior they are going to hell isn't child abuse?




you are equating what people choose to tell their children with religion

indeed teaching kids to hate is abusive
teaching them they will be disowned for not displaying bigotry is abusive
teaching them (As children) they will 'go to hell' is abusive


the former two arent necessarily religious doctrines and are not exclusive to religion

the latter, is a matter of developmental stages and appropriate subject matters


it would be like telling a child if they broke the rules they would go to jail

which would be true, once they bcome an adult, but is too simplistic and misleading a statement on its own, and terrifying, to relate to a child

msharmony's photo
Mon 04/16/12 07:06 AM
Edited by msharmony on Mon 04/16/12 07:07 AM


Funches...

Knowing and believing...

I know I exist.

I beleive you exist (you keep showing up in the reality I know).

Msharmony had the right of it.

BOTH.


AdventureBegins...the question was constructed to include no other existence but the one that dared to answer the question

which is why your attempt to use parables to include my existence is an attempt to deceive ....

the fact that the religious are not willing to answer the truth about their own existence is why they can't be trusted to tell the truth about a so call God existence and an example of why religion is abuse...and abuse to children...because it teaches them how to find ways to lie to others and to themselves




perhaps trying to force ones personal definitions upon others is equally 'abusive'?

perhaps refusing to answer how someone can know something without first BELIEVING It,, is running away from the 'truth'....

msharmony's photo
Mon 04/16/12 07:02 AM



MsH and Dragonese must be sleeping.....

Haven't heard yet how this doesn't mean anything, and how our constitutional lawyer, dictator would never allow it to be used, and would never destroy our constitution or bill of rights.

What does it take to make people go slaphead ?

He's going thru our constitution and bill of rights with a red pen saying "this doesn't work for me...." and nobody cares!

Guess our country isn't going to hell fast enough to suit some people! frustrated rant



at your request

https://www.aclu.org/blog/free-speech/how-big-deal-hr-347-criminalizing-protest-bill


make note of the words :RESTRICTED AREAS:

basically areas one shouldnt be FOR ANY REASON,,,,,


That's BS! How about what a judge has to say about it?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7SGWH3kirzg&feature=share


one judge out of thousands,,,,

msharmony's photo
Mon 04/16/12 07:01 AM

Race riots. I think Zimmermans a Mexican not white.



not really, his dad is white his mom is white peruvian

nothing to do with Mexico,,,,

msharmony's photo
Sun 04/15/12 09:38 PM
music, chocolate, and dreams

msharmony's photo
Sun 04/15/12 04:38 PM
awwww.love you too chickadee....flowerforyou :heart:

msharmony's photo
Sun 04/15/12 04:29 PM
Edited by msharmony on Sun 04/15/12 04:30 PM
I wont take part in infidelity

same sex sex

I wont do 'hard drugs' or drink alcohol on any regular or excessive basis


I wont tolerate being harassed or bullied


I wont belittle others or let others belittle me in public

I wont cry over spilled milk or things I cant help change

I will try to contribute to things I can help change


I wont use vulgarity just to get a point across
I wont use racial slurs against others
I wont disrespect my elders

msharmony's photo
Sun 04/15/12 04:26 PM

Kudos to msharmony because this IS a good question drinker



cant take all the credit, it was a younger relative who asked me,,,

but THANKS yellow flowerforyou flowerforyou

msharmony's photo
Sun 04/15/12 04:25 PM





My answer:

Women are responsible because it's their bodies. Who is fertile when doesn't matter to me....the woman is the one that gets pregnant, so she has a bigger responsibility IMO.

If men don't want to worry about a woman having their child, then they are responsible, as well

Basically, we are responsible for our own bodies. It takes 2 to tango, so if you don't want to risk getting pregnant then protect yourself or don't dance

I mean, if I decide to have sex and I don't want to get pregnant or STDs, then I should be responsible for my decision. Both are equal in deciding to have sex so both are equal to be responsible

JMO


So, if a woman should be solely responsible for birth control, do you also believe she should be the one responsible for deciding what to do with the baby? Whether she keeps it, puts it up for adoption, or gets an abortion?
technically she does have that choice cause it's her body and she can do want she wants no matter if anyone likes it or not.Same goes for birth control


If that were really the case, there wouldn't be any guys having a problem when a woman does one of those things without his approval. And if it were really just her choice, why are there people out there who want abortion banned?
well both are responsible if a lady becomes pregnant and the man should step up and pay his dues and help too or she should just take the jerk to court if he doesn't as for >why are there people out there who want abortion banned? tell you truth it should be banned the child is alive in the womans womb to me i think its like murder i mean if a doctor does abortion whats the differant's at start or when its born they both still growing ? see its just sick both ways but while in side they don't charge them with murder outside they do in my eyes people who have abortions just murdered their baby sad but true :)and so sad i hate that :thumbsup:



this is an emotional but relevant point.

In terms of our culture/laws, pregnancy is strictly a womans rights issue to which men are not given any say,,,

which would perhaps make it 'just' to expect the responsibility for preventing said pregnancy fall upon the woman as well,,,

msharmony's photo
Sun 04/15/12 04:21 PM






explain something you KNOW but dont believe,,,,


the question is about your existence MsHarmony ....so let's try again

do you "know" that you yourself exist or do you "believe" that you yourself exist?





both


MsHarmony...you were asked to pick either "Know" or "Believe" to answer the question...and this was specifically told to you ....or perhaps you became confused

so let's try again for the Trinity time.....oops... I meant let's try again for the third time

MsHarmony...do you "know" that you yourself exist or do you "believe" that you yourself exist?









pointless question that

no answer can be bullied into existence

may as well ask me if im 'black' or 'african american'


when I am, personally, both




then I would have asked...if you "know" that you exist as an africian american or if you "believe" that you exist as an africian american....

it still would have only required you to pick one ..either "know" or "believe"


but I asked you about your existence...not what you exist as in that existence.....all you had to do was pick one ......

the religious tend to run from that question like Dracula runs from a cross



noone is running by not giving the answer you try to demand of them,,

1 2 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Next