I still love Will Ferrells version
you would think with Wills height and stature he couldnt possibly resemble Bush, but it hits it head on |
|
|
|
In a blog post, Gabe Rottman, a legislative counsel and policy advisor in the ACLU’s Washington Legislative Office, wrote that "it's important to note — contrary to some reports — that H.R. 347 doesn't create any new crimes, or directly apply to the Occupy protests. The bill slightly rewrites a short trespass law, originally passed in 1971 and amended a couple of times since, that covers areas subject to heightened Secret Service security measures
from politifact.com take it as you will, as I said though,, this particular 'right' is not one I have personally EVERY had,,being born in 1969 |
|
|
|
Ya'll should just focus on being good little citizens. Follow the rules. Let the people don't want your views to be heard - let them make the rules. there are many ways to let your views be heard, but you just cant stand wherever you want to speak them or shout them out,,,never have been able to have that ABSOLUTE freedom in every situation or in every place,,, |
|
|
|
someone would already have to be pretty intimate with me to see them,,,and by that point, it should not matter,,,,
|
|
|
|
MsH and Dragonese must be sleeping..... Haven't heard yet how this doesn't mean anything, and how our constitutional lawyer, dictator would never allow it to be used, and would never destroy our constitution or bill of rights. What does it take to make people go ![]() He's going thru our constitution and bill of rights with a red pen saying "this doesn't work for me...." and nobody cares! Guess our country isn't going to hell fast enough to suit some people! ![]() ![]() at your request https://www.aclu.org/blog/free-speech/how-big-deal-hr-347-criminalizing-protest-bill make note of the words :RESTRICTED AREAS: basically areas one shouldnt be FOR ANY REASON,,,,, That's BS! How about what a judge has to say about it? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7SGWH3kirzg&feature=share one judge out of thousands,,,, I wish I had your optimism...... truth is, America and it's people can't afford it! It's only one right....correct? Yep, one right after another that our constitution guarantees us.... until the burnin Bush and King Barry came along..... and you brush it off like it's just a penny among the dollar bills! there is nothing the constitution GUARANTEES, no absolute rights in the bill of rights there is an expectation of common sense application,,, like not yelling FIRE in a crowded theater,,in lieu of the 'freedom of speech' 'restricted area' has always meant just that, whether you are there to speak or to get a manicure,,,, BS! I won't so easily give up what I fought, and many friends died for! ok, Im just saying,,,this particular thing is not something you have to 'give up' as we never had it in the first place,,, |
|
|
|
Topic:
Religion is Child Abuse?
|
|
So in islam telling a kid to hate Jews and anyone affiliated with them isn't child abuse? In Judaism telling a kid that if they marry outside their religion they are considered dead isn't child abuse? In christianity telling a kid if they don't accept a bible character they have never seen or met as their lord and savior they are going to hell isn't child abuse? you are equating what people choose to tell their children with religion indeed teaching kids to hate is abusive teaching them they will be disowned for not displaying bigotry is abusive teaching them (As children) they will 'go to hell' is abusive the former two arent necessarily religious doctrines and are not exclusive to religion the latter, is a matter of developmental stages and appropriate subject matters it would be like telling a child if they broke the rules they would go to jail which would be true, once they bcome an adult, but is too simplistic and misleading a statement on its own, and terrifying, to relate to a child billions of religious upon the earth, and Im sure there are many more than one 'common' perceptions of religious right or wrong,, |
|
|
|
if this makes sense
I think there are soulmates,, I am not sure EVERYONE has one ,,,, |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Mon 04/16/12 11:12 AM
|
|
Race riots. I think Zimmermans a Mexican not white. not really, his dad is white his mom is white peruvian nothing to do with Mexico,,,, Have you seen George Zimmerman? Does he look like his mother is a "white Peruvian" to you? She is a native Peruvian, which means she is possibly a mix of South American Indian and Spanish. I see the racist trash talk out there on the internet "Zimmerman is white or Jewish" as if his race determines his guilt. Race only matters to racists. How about we ignore the race and focus on the truth? Make Zimmerman and Trayvon both white or black, do you feel the same way? If not, then you are a racist. i agree. My comment was posted to contest the idea that being 'mexican' has anything to do with this or that being 'hispanic' or 'mexican' somehow excludes being 'white' its like assuming an american cant be black , because america is predominately a white country,,,,but one is nationality and the other is race ,, neither excludes the other from being true,,, and , as a mother, I would feel the same regardless of race, so long as all the other details were the same white boy in a predominately black neighborhood, being followed by a black Man , trying to lose the Black man who continues to follow him and approach him and then ends up (after a scuffle) shooting him,,,, yeah,, Id still be just as upset about it,,it still could be my child who (if she so chose) could also 'pass' as white,,, |
|
|
|
MsH and Dragonese must be sleeping..... Haven't heard yet how this doesn't mean anything, and how our constitutional lawyer, dictator would never allow it to be used, and would never destroy our constitution or bill of rights. What does it take to make people go ![]() He's going thru our constitution and bill of rights with a red pen saying "this doesn't work for me...." and nobody cares! Guess our country isn't going to hell fast enough to suit some people! ![]() ![]() at your request https://www.aclu.org/blog/free-speech/how-big-deal-hr-347-criminalizing-protest-bill make note of the words :RESTRICTED AREAS: basically areas one shouldnt be FOR ANY REASON,,,,, That's BS! How about what a judge has to say about it? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7SGWH3kirzg&feature=share one judge out of thousands,,,, I wish I had your optimism...... truth is, America and it's people can't afford it! It's only one right....correct? Yep, one right after another that our constitution guarantees us.... until the burnin Bush and King Barry came along..... and you brush it off like it's just a penny among the dollar bills! there is nothing the constitution GUARANTEES, no absolute rights in the bill of rights there is an expectation of common sense application,,, like not yelling FIRE in a crowded theater,,in lieu of the 'freedom of speech' 'restricted area' has always meant just that, whether you are there to speak or to get a manicure,,,, |
|
|
|
LA is a much more diverse area with many more people and a much longer past of police misconduct,, the Rodney King fiasco was just the straw that finally broke the horses back,,,, I dont think that is the same environment in Sanford Florida... so you don't know? My mom lives in Florida. They have just teh same amount of crime and misconduct as we do here. my brother lives in florida,,,,,, that has little to do with whether the climate in sanford florida is the same type of climate as LA in the 1990's |
|
|
|
Topic:
Religion is Child Abuse?
|
|
So in islam telling a kid to hate Jews and anyone affiliated with them isn't child abuse? In Judaism telling a kid that if they marry outside their religion they are considered dead isn't child abuse? In christianity telling a kid if they don't accept a bible character they have never seen or met as their lord and savior they are going to hell isn't child abuse? you are equating what people choose to tell their children with religion indeed teaching kids to hate is abusive teaching them they will be disowned for not displaying bigotry is abusive teaching them (As children) they will 'go to hell' is abusive the former two arent necessarily religious doctrines and are not exclusive to religion the latter, is a matter of developmental stages and appropriate subject matters it would be like telling a child if they broke the rules they would go to jail which would be true, once they bcome an adult, but is too simplistic and misleading a statement on its own, and terrifying, to relate to a child |
|
|
|
Topic:
Religion is Child Abuse?
Edited by
msharmony
on
Mon 04/16/12 07:07 AM
|
|
Funches... Knowing and believing... I know I exist. I beleive you exist (you keep showing up in the reality I know). Msharmony had the right of it. BOTH. AdventureBegins...the question was constructed to include no other existence but the one that dared to answer the question which is why your attempt to use parables to include my existence is an attempt to deceive .... the fact that the religious are not willing to answer the truth about their own existence is why they can't be trusted to tell the truth about a so call God existence and an example of why religion is abuse...and abuse to children...because it teaches them how to find ways to lie to others and to themselves perhaps trying to force ones personal definitions upon others is equally 'abusive'? perhaps refusing to answer how someone can know something without first BELIEVING It,, is running away from the 'truth'.... |
|
|
|
MsH and Dragonese must be sleeping..... Haven't heard yet how this doesn't mean anything, and how our constitutional lawyer, dictator would never allow it to be used, and would never destroy our constitution or bill of rights. What does it take to make people go ![]() He's going thru our constitution and bill of rights with a red pen saying "this doesn't work for me...." and nobody cares! Guess our country isn't going to hell fast enough to suit some people! ![]() ![]() at your request https://www.aclu.org/blog/free-speech/how-big-deal-hr-347-criminalizing-protest-bill make note of the words :RESTRICTED AREAS: basically areas one shouldnt be FOR ANY REASON,,,,, That's BS! How about what a judge has to say about it? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7SGWH3kirzg&feature=share one judge out of thousands,,,, |
|
|
|
Race riots. I think Zimmermans a Mexican not white. not really, his dad is white his mom is white peruvian nothing to do with Mexico,,,, |
|
|
|
Topic:
Love
|
|
music, chocolate, and dreams
|
|
|
|
Topic:
What CAN'T you do?
|
|
awwww.love you too chickadee....
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Topic:
What CAN'T you do?
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sun 04/15/12 04:30 PM
|
|
I wont take part in infidelity
same sex sex I wont do 'hard drugs' or drink alcohol on any regular or excessive basis I wont tolerate being harassed or bullied I wont belittle others or let others belittle me in public I wont cry over spilled milk or things I cant help change I will try to contribute to things I can help change I wont use vulgarity just to get a point across I wont use racial slurs against others I wont disrespect my elders |
|
|
|
Topic:
Excellent Question
|
|
Kudos to msharmony because this IS a good question ![]() cant take all the credit, it was a younger relative who asked me,,, but THANKS yellow ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Topic:
Excellent Question
|
|
My answer: Women are responsible because it's their bodies. Who is fertile when doesn't matter to me....the woman is the one that gets pregnant, so she has a bigger responsibility IMO. If men don't want to worry about a woman having their child, then they are responsible, as well Basically, we are responsible for our own bodies. It takes 2 to tango, so if you don't want to risk getting pregnant then protect yourself or don't dance I mean, if I decide to have sex and I don't want to get pregnant or STDs, then I should be responsible for my decision. Both are equal in deciding to have sex so both are equal to be responsible JMO So, if a woman should be solely responsible for birth control, do you also believe she should be the one responsible for deciding what to do with the baby? Whether she keeps it, puts it up for adoption, or gets an abortion? If that were really the case, there wouldn't be any guys having a problem when a woman does one of those things without his approval. And if it were really just her choice, why are there people out there who want abortion banned? ![]() this is an emotional but relevant point. In terms of our culture/laws, pregnancy is strictly a womans rights issue to which men are not given any say,,, which would perhaps make it 'just' to expect the responsibility for preventing said pregnancy fall upon the woman as well,,, |
|
|
|
Topic:
Religion is Child Abuse?
|
|
explain something you KNOW but dont believe,,,, the question is about your existence MsHarmony ....so let's try again do you "know" that you yourself exist or do you "believe" that you yourself exist? both MsHarmony...you were asked to pick either "Know" or "Believe" to answer the question...and this was specifically told to you ....or perhaps you became confused so let's try again for the Trinity time.....oops... I meant let's try again for the third time MsHarmony...do you "know" that you yourself exist or do you "believe" that you yourself exist? pointless question that no answer can be bullied into existence may as well ask me if im 'black' or 'african american' when I am, personally, both then I would have asked...if you "know" that you exist as an africian american or if you "believe" that you exist as an africian american.... it still would have only required you to pick one ..either "know" or "believe" but I asked you about your existence...not what you exist as in that existence.....all you had to do was pick one ...... the religious tend to run from that question like Dracula runs from a cross noone is running by not giving the answer you try to demand of them,, |
|
|