OK, Mr. Tough Guy. I think it has something to do with stuff like 'all (men) are created equal, the 14th amendment and the dynamics of racism'. Where is it appropriate to differentiate between white women and not-white women?

Oh, I think we're happy to leave you on your own, you rugged individualist, you.

You completely missed my point. Where is there even a place in our political discourse for a phrase like "white women"?

He has to be the anti-Christ. Isn't he expected to be coming along about now?

One of the really cool things about being me is that I don't work for you, and I don't have to take orders from you.

Mom will be really pissed! But at least I know who she will be pissed at.

Does the woman's color matter to you? You seem repulsed by the idea of a black man having sex with a white woman. Why would that be? We do forget that they are white women. Why would that be an issue?

It's hypocrisy. When they condemn people for their militancy, it's not because they reject hatred or violence. It's because they can't understand why they would be the object of hatred. Hatred and violence is perfectly fine with them as long as it's directed toward the right people.

So, Jeannie, here's a hypothetical. Say the country you love is at risk of being taken over by the evil of , say, a corporate fascist dictatorship. Which approach would you prefer to take? A more militant, possibly violent strategy, or the MLK passive strategy?

I guess this is an argument of some kind. I'm not sure what it's supposed to prove. the whole world knows that King's whole thing was Ghandiesk passivism. and X was more militant and aggressive. Some Conservatives here advocate violence over arguments about things like Labor Unions and taxes.

What is your point?

Not one of Australia's proudest moments. I don't know much about Australia except whet my dad told ne from his experiences in WWII and that there are some awesome Australian women on Mingle. This is not something to brag about. We already had a discussion over the racist and xenophobic remarks of that woman (Prime Minister?) Whoever that was.

And they wonder why we don't take their ideas seriously.

I have no need to. The whole world already knows who is responsible. You ought to read some of the stuff in the foreign press.

It might not be so bad if we default now. The economy will be destroyed, but the righties are bound and determined to accomplish that in order to gain power anyway. 80% of the people already understand who will be responsible.

Don't be stupid. You're much more intelligent than that

Aha. I guess I got it about right.

Would you like to see pictures of my toys?

No argument from me. I think 90% is high, but I can say that, with Republicans, it's 100%

Oh, I'm sorry. I thought that was a direct quote from you. I did it from memory.

I had one of these when I was a kid.


But I got bored with it when I discovered Playboy magazine