Well I see you have the copy and paste function mastered, have you ever tried original thought?

How to appear to be an intellectual Liberal Socialist:

1. Google leftwing trash

2. Cut and paste

3. Never but never take the time trouble and effort to actually write something in your own words that expresses your own ideas.

4. When the argument is lost play symantics, argue the meaning of liberal and socialist or the meaning of "is".

All you need to know about the stock market is:

Bulls make money, Bears make money and Pigs get slaughtered.

Madman the only thing I am sick of is the cut and paste crap you continue to post. Have you ever had an original thought? You keep rerunning the same trite BS that was aired here several months ago.

Ramsey Clark, the same secretary of defense that gave us Viet Nam, now there's a comforting thought

Rapunzel, I don't recall saying that you were a mean spirited liberal. This quote is what I was referring to.

"with any kind of luck, maybe the military will blast it out of the sky above the white house,so it can shower the harmful liquid there and no where else..." if you agree with that statement then the shoe fits, wear it otherwise it don't apply to you.

Back to the subject at hand, a few years ago there was a Russian Spy Sattelite that malfunctioned and fell back to Earth. It did not completely burn up on re-entry just like this one won't The Russians did not have the capability to drop it in the ocean and it landed in Northern Canada. It had radioactive fuel on board. What the U.S. is trying to do is drop this thing in to the ocean where it has no chance of causing any injury or falling into the wrong hand if it lands on the ground.

The original subject of this thread was not missed, unfortunately ya all must have a very short memory this same thread was posted about a month or two ago SSDD

Liquid oxygen, or oxygen for that matter because it is only liquified for storage and transportation purposes is NOT flammable. I spent many years working for a trucking company that hauled that and other cryogenic liquids. Oxygen causes materials to burn much hotter and faster but it is not flammable in and of itself. As an oxydizer many other materials are more powerful than oxygen. As I mentioned before the oxidizer that is used with the Hydrazine missle fuel is Nitrogen Tetraoxide, N2O4. It contains twice as much oxygen as pure oxygen which is O2. Releasing the oxygen into the atmosphere would cause no harm, and the hydrazine would be completely consumed in the reentry fireball. There is something else onboard that needs to be destroyed. I am thinking perhaps some radioactive material. They use that sometimes as a heat source to keep things warm that can't stand the extreme cold of space. The natural decay of the radioactive material releases heat. This thing was supposed to be up there for years or maybe forever before it malfunctioned. It then would have had enough radioactive material on board to keep certain systems warm for many years.

For ease of computation, we'll use approximate figures. Assume the U.S.'s war crimes have resulted in one million deaths. That is roughly 1/26 of the total Iraqi population. An equivalent number of American deaths would be 11.5 million people. 3,000 Americans were murdered on 9/11. In terms of casualties, 11.5 million deaths represent 3,800 9/11s -- or a 9/11 every day for ten and a half years.

That's one hell of an assumption your figures on the Iraqui deaths are no where near accurate but that don't stop you from spreading your poison propaganda. You liberal socialists think if you tell the same lie often enough it will become believeable. Didn't your Political Science professor tell you to check the accuracy of your data before you publish it?

If you go back to about page 45 of this forum and check Gina22, Gary86, and a few others you will find the same tired retoric you post almost word for word. SSDD

Very good, best I have seen in a while

The Pope took a couple of days off to visit the mountains of Alaska for some sight-seeing. He was cruising along the campground in the Pope-mobile when there was a frantic commotion just at the edge of the woods.

A helpless Democrat, wearing sandals, shorts, a "Save the Whales" hat, and a "To Hell with Bush" T-shirt, was screaming while struggling frantically, thrashing around trying to free himself from the grasp of a 10 foot grizzly bear.

As the Pope watched horrified, a group of Republican loggers came racing up.

One quickly fired a .44 magnum into the bear's chest. The other two reached up and pulled the bleeding, semiconscious Democrat from the bear's grasp, then using long clubs, the three loggers finished off the bear and two of them threw it onto the bed of their truck while the third tenderly placed the injured Democrat in the back seat.

As they prepared to leave, the Pope summoned them to come over. "I give you my blessing for your brave actions!" he told them. "I heard there was a bitter hatred between Republican loggers and Democratic Environmental Activists but now I've seen with my own eyes that this is not true."

As the Pope drove off, one of the loggers asked his uddies "Who was that guy?"

"It was the Pope," another replied. "He's in direct contact with heaven and has access to all wisdom."

"Well," the logger said, "he may have access to all wisdom but he sure don't know anything about bear hunting! Is the bait holding up, or do we need to go back to Massachusetts and get another one?"

Very well said.

Sage it brings back fond memories of Gary, Gina and that ilk don't it. If they would just check back to about page 45 of this thread they would find all this stuff there and they could just post their comments instead of wasting their time posting a whole new thread but I think it is probably an assignement from the Political Science Professor

I am a vet, I am not being deined any benefits. I get excellent medical care. Some how the left wing socialist slant and reality never seem to come together.

Our liberals think the government should control everything, that is socialism. The socialists have hijacked the term liberal to make their program more paletable. But that's not the subject of this thread. This thread was about Bush being a fascist he's not, you loose

ah once again you strayed from the subject but then you always do when your argument falls apart.

there is no difference between a liberal and a socialist. Socialists call themselves liberals to disguise their agenda. Ask your political science professor about that one

SMO you have the same reply to every post on this forum no matter what the topic. Why don't you save yourself time and effort and just name your reply SMO Reply #1. we all have it memorized now and you can just click the replay button, type in SMO Reply #1 and click post topic. You could save yourself a lot of time that way which could be better spent lining your hat with tinfoil

Why is it that when the argument turns against the liberal socialists they always default to the "well gee someone else did something bad too". Who ordered the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Harry S. Truman, a liberal socialist. Viet Nam, guess who got us involved there, Kennedy and then Johnson, both liberal socialists. But you like all liberal socialists can't stick to the facts when they don't support your position. The fact is you called Bush a fascist and that shoe don't fit.

Your continued Anti American rants are starting to sound like Gina, Gary, Fitnessfanatic, Knoxman, and a few others who have been on here before. The same old cut and paste retoric only the names and pictures seem to change. It seems that a new one of you comes along about every 3 months which just happens to coincide with a college semester. I wonder if some radical left wing nutcase political science professor passes out assignments to his students to post this stuff on websites to see what reaction it generates. At least in Gina's case she admitted it. You really should go back and check the archives because all the BS you post has already been posted several times in the last year.

I posted this before but since liberal socialists only have a short memory here it is again.


Over the years the liberal socialistic Democrats continually accuse the conservative Republicans of being “Nazis and Fascists” and attempting to establish a dictatorship in this country. That got me to thinking. What party would the World’s worst dictators, who incidentally just happen to be the World’s worst mass murderers, have belonged to? The answer is they would all have been liberal socialistic Democrats. If you think I am wrong, consider the following:

Stalin and the entire communist ilk in Russia – Socialists who came to power supported by the “oppressed masses” used them to overthrow the Tsar and then murdered them by the millions with absolute impunity when they asked for a piece of the pie or reminded the leaders that they were not living up to the promises that had been made. Estimated number of dead 30+ million.

Hitler and the Nazis – Nazi stands for National Socialist party. Hitler came to power supported by the masses by promising them a bigger piece of the pie. Once in power he turned on the people who had helped him attain it and murdered and anyone who opposed him them with glee. Estimated number of dead 12+ million in the concentration camps alone, that does not include the number of people who died in or as a result of WW II.

Chairman Mao – Socialist who came to power promising the masses a better life and again once in power condoned mass slaughter of all who were even suspected of thinking the wrong thing. Started his “Cultural Revolution” which allowed his Red Guard to be judge, jury and executioner and to write any laws on the spot that they saw fit in order to justify their murderous rampage. Number of dead in the millions but no one knows the exact total.

Fidel Castro – Liberal Socialist who came to power promising to lift up the impoverished masses. Little did they know that for many the uplifting experience would be from a rope around their neck thrown over the nearest strong branch or being tied very erect to a post in front of a firing squad. Number of dead unknown but it would have been more if thousands had not fled the 90 miles across the sea to Florida

Ho Chi Minh – Socialist who once again came to power with the support of the masses and as soon as he was firmly entrenched turned on the people and enslaved them. He wasn’t as ruthless as Pol Pot but he was in power longer so the number he slaughtered is probably greater.

Pol Pot – Socialist once again came to power with the support of the masses by promising to lift them out of poverty. Once in control he murdered with a savageness that hasn’t been seen since Ghengus Kahn. Some of the heinous crimes committed by his victims include being an intellectual, having an education, wearing glasses. Number of dead in excess of 3 million.

Saddam Hussein – I know you are going to call Bull **** on me for this one, but check the definition of Liberal and the definition of Conservative and see which title fits him. Seized power in a military coop of sorts and once again promised change and a piece of the pie to the masses then turned on them and slaughtered them like Attila the Hun. Allowed his family members to murder and rape for their own amusement and entertainment also used weapons of mass destruction against his own people. Number of dead in the hundreds of thousands.

All the rebel factions in Africa – Socialists who want to rise up the downtrodden masses and overthrow the corrupt exiting governments. Yes these governments are corrupt and in cases support and participate in genocide but no one has told the rebels that the way to win the hearts and minds of people is not to hack them to pieces with machetes, and burn them alive in churches. They rape, murder and destroy in the name of freedom. Number of dead in the millions and still counting.

Caesar Chavez in Venezuela – liberal socialist who will eliminate anyone who opposes him or attempts to remove him from power by legal means. Number of dead not many but it’s early yet.

Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups. The liberal socialistic Democratic mantra has always been “promise them the world and then give them just enough to keep them loyal.” And all of these people bought in to the lie that they were actually going to get vast improvements in their lives handed to them by the Government. A great many of them have had to get their share of the pie in the after life because they became expendable to the liberal socialists in this one. When someone offers you a bigger piece of the pie for doing nothing, remember that pies are round but so are bullets.

What is the moral of this story you might ask? All of these countries had existing governments that were corrupt, some more than others and they had large groups of poor and discontent people. The liberal socialists seized on this and used their support to elevate themselves to power. Once in power they immediately subjugated the people who had placed them in power and the people that survived always ended up worse off than they were in the first place. In each case an existing evil was replaced with a greater evil and always in the name of freedom and social good for the masses. Remember that power corrupts but absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Our Liberal Socialistic Democratic Party thinks that the only reason socialism hasn’t worked in the past is because they didn’t have the right people running it. Now we have Hillary, Obama or John, one of which is surely the “right” person to implement socialism here. Unfortunately, they enjoy the full support of the liberal “mainstream” media because those damn fool talking heads can’t figure out that the first casualty of socialism is the free press. When, and notice that I said “when” not “if”, the socialists take control in this country these idiots will find their asses tied to a post against a wall and I doubt they will be offered the luxury of a last cigarette or a blindfold. As the firing squad prepares to send them on their way to Nirvana or where ever the godless liberals go when they die will their last words will not be a cry for freedom and justice, it will be a whimper about it shouldn’t be happening this way.

Hummmm maybe he flew over Area 51.