Topic: This turned my stomach | |
---|---|
Edited by
franshade
on
Tue 05/20/08 03:28 PM
|
|
it was introduced as a form of discriination agains minorities. If a person of hispanic origin could not produce id it would be easier to lock them up, and determain their legal status and start deportation. the rebuttal to that though is the fact that it is not something used only against hispanics. It can, and has been used, "against" anyone and everyone. Personally, if it will help deport illegal aliens, without taking anything away from anyone else, then it should be in effect, with no questions. and all this because you say so... for someone who had issues with a teenager yelling at your kids, now your an authority on who to have deported... I say if you cant control what happens at home, stay out of mine (jmo) Ok first of all, I did not attack you, so I will ask that yuo dont attack me. Secondly, I never stated to be an authority on anything. However, United States [n]LAW dictates that someone who was not born on American soil, or born to American parents needs to apply for citizenship in order to be granted citizenship. And if you do not follow this procedure, then you are nt a legal citizen of the United States. Thus, if you are here without proper paperwork (visa, passport for vacation etc) you are an illegal alien in the United States. An United States law also dictates that if you are here illegally then you will be deported back to your nation of origin when found. So, I did not claim to be an authority on anything, I simply stated that if being required to show legal documentation of citizenship (your state id card) would help remove the illegal aliens from our soil, without removing any citizens legal rights and priviledges, then it should be instated without any arguments. And finally, I have an issue with a teenager yelling at my kids, because NO ONE has the right or priviledge to yell at anyone elses children without express permission from the parent(s) of that child first. No comparison to this. you're entitled to your opinion as I am entitled to mine, there was no personal attack just sharing my opinion. Whether I chose to walk with identification in order to make it easier on governmental officials is a choice not mandated as you stated. Then of course you ran w/the illegals... so I ran with the yelling, pretty childish I'd admit but that happens when 'we' steer off the topic no??? Out of graciousness I willa ccept you did not mean to attack. However, I will not accep the excuse of "stearing off topic". I did not "run with the illegals" as you so well put it. The issue of illegals had been mentioned prior to my even using them as an example. As a reasoning behind why the id law was first instated int he first place. I merely maintained that it was not a bad idea to use it that way, as it does not detract from a citizens rights or priviledges. And to answer a comment you made earlier, that I missed, you stated"...stay out of my home...". I have not once netered your abode, nor would I be interested. I hae not once suggested anythign to do with anyone lese entering your place of dwelling. I am refferring to id in public places. what a lot of people do not understand, is that you give up some of your rights when you step out your door and into public, because you are now in a public area, which means the group needs to get along. not everyone conforming to everyone elses wishes. Daniel there is no law mandating we must walk with identification. I give up no rights as I step outside my home. |
|
|
|
it was introduced as a form of discriination agains minorities. If a person of hispanic origin could not produce id it would be easier to lock them up, and determain their legal status and start deportation. the rebuttal to that though is the fact that it is not something used only against hispanics. It can, and has been used, "against" anyone and everyone. Personally, if it will help deport illegal aliens, without taking anything away from anyone else, then it should be in effect, with no questions. and all this because you say so... for someone who had issues with a teenager yelling at your kids, now your an authority on who to have deported... I say if you cant control what happens at home, stay out of mine (jmo) Ok first of all, I did not attack you, so I will ask that yuo dont attack me. Secondly, I never stated to be an authority on anything. However, United States [n]LAW dictates that someone who was not born on American soil, or born to American parents needs to apply for citizenship in order to be granted citizenship. And if you do not follow this procedure, then you are nt a legal citizen of the United States. Thus, if you are here without proper paperwork (visa, passport for vacation etc) you are an illegal alien in the United States. An United States law also dictates that if you are here illegally then you will be deported back to your nation of origin when found. So, I did not claim to be an authority on anything, I simply stated that if being required to show legal documentation of citizenship (your state id card) would help remove the illegal aliens from our soil, without removing any citizens legal rights and priviledges, then it should be instated without any arguments. And finally, I have an issue with a teenager yelling at my kids, because NO ONE has the right or priviledge to yell at anyone elses children without express permission from the parent(s) of that child first. No comparison to this. you're entitled to your opinion as I am entitled to mine, there was no personal attack just sharing my opinion. Whether I chose to walk with identification in order to make it easier on governmental officials is a choice not mandated as you stated. Then of course you ran w/the illegals... so I ran with the yelling, pretty childish I'd admit but that happens when 'we' steer off the topic no??? Out of graciousness I willa ccept you did not mean to attack. However, I will not accep the excuse of "stearing off topic". I did not "run with the illegals" as you so well put it. The issue of illegals had been mentioned prior to my even using them as an example. As a reasoning behind why the id law was first instated int he first place. I merely maintained that it was not a bad idea to use it that way, as it does not detract from a citizens rights or priviledges. And to answer a comment you made earlier, that I missed, you stated"...stay out of my home...". I have not once netered your abode, nor would I be interested. I hae not once suggested anythign to do with anyone lese entering your place of dwelling. I am refferring to id in public places. what a lot of people do not understand, is that you give up some of your rights when you step out your door and into public, because you are now in a public area, which means the group needs to get along. not everyone conforming to everyone elses wishes. Daniel there is no law mandating we must walk with identification. In some states, there is not no. I still believe however, that some states it is a requirement, but for the sake of argument, am not stating so until I have the proof. And as far as for the past deabte, I have been arguing that it SHOULD be law in all states. |
|
|
|
Because my fourth assures me that I have a right to not be subjected to unreasonable searches and Seizures.
By giving this stupid card out, we will be one step from seeing the "Show me your papers" Authoritarianism enacted right here in this country. Stupid cards aren't going to stop illegal immigration anyways, those things aren't fool proof and can be acquired via illegal means. Amendment IV. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Now, do we the people get decide what is reasonable or are we just going to let Government make that call... It all depends on how much you value this particular amendment, it's not like things like no knock search warrants and sneak and peek haven't eroded it already. |
|
|
|
Because my fourth assures me that I have a right to not be subjected to unreasonable searches and Seizures. By giving this stupid card out, we will be one step from seeing the "Show me your papers" Authoritarianism enacted right here in this country. Stupid cards aren't going to stop illegal immigration anyways, those things aren't fool proof and can be acquired via illegal means. Amendment IV. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Now, do we the people get decide what is reasonable or are we just going to let Government make that call... It all depends on how much you value this particular amendment, it's not like things like no knock search warrants and sneak and peek haven't eroded it already. thank you ![]() |
|
|
|
Because my fourth assures me that I have a right to not be subjected to unreasonable searches and Seizures. By giving this stupid card out, we will be one step from seeing the "Show me your papers" Authoritarianism enacted right here in this country. Stupid cards aren't going to stop illegal immigration anyways, those things aren't fool proof and can be acquired via illegal means. Amendment IV. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Now, do we the people get decide what is reasonable or are we just going to let Government make that call... It all depends on how much you value this particular amendment, it's not like things like no knock search warrants and sneak and peek haven't eroded it already. Ok, so as long as the officer in question has a reason to ask you for id, then it is not unreasonable. Remember folks, it is perfectly legal for a cop to stop cars at random and ask for proof of license, registraion and insurance, without having a reason other than they have not stopped someone in a while. That being the case, there woudl be no illegality of doing it when you are not driving. Andyou are right war, nothing is full proof. Even if we were to go the route of putting to death all illegal aliens when found, they would still keep coming. So we have to do what we can with what we have available without losing site of our own beliefs and humanity. |
|
|
|
Because my fourth assures me that I have a right to not be subjected to unreasonable searches and Seizures. By giving this stupid card out, we will be one step from seeing the "Show me your papers" Authoritarianism enacted right here in this country. Stupid cards aren't going to stop illegal immigration anyways, those things aren't fool proof and can be acquired via illegal means. Amendment IV. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Now, do we the people get decide what is reasonable or are we just going to let Government make that call... It all depends on how much you value this particular amendment, it's not like things like no knock search warrants and sneak and peek haven't eroded it already. Ok, so as long as the officer in question has a reason to ask you for id, then it is not unreasonable. Remember folks, it is perfectly legal for a cop to stop cars at random and ask for proof of license, registraion and insurance, without having a reason other than they have not stopped someone in a while. That being the case, there woudl be no illegality of doing it when you are not driving. Andyou are right war, nothing is full proof. Even if we were to go the route of putting to death all illegal aliens when found, they would still keep coming. So we have to do what we can with what we have available without losing site of our own beliefs and humanity. |
|
|
|
Because my fourth assures me that I have a right to not be subjected to unreasonable searches and Seizures. By giving this stupid card out, we will be one step from seeing the "Show me your papers" Authoritarianism enacted right here in this country. Stupid cards aren't going to stop illegal immigration anyways, those things aren't fool proof and can be acquired via illegal means. Amendment IV. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Now, do we the people get decide what is reasonable or are we just going to let Government make that call... It all depends on how much you value this particular amendment, it's not like things like no knock search warrants and sneak and peek haven't eroded it already. Ok, so as long as the officer in question has a reason to ask you for id, then it is not unreasonable. Remember folks, it is perfectly legal for a cop to stop cars at random and ask for proof of license, registraion and insurance, without having a reason other than they have not stopped someone in a while. That being the case, there woudl be no illegality of doing it when you are not driving. Andyou are right war, nothing is full proof. Even if we were to go the route of putting to death all illegal aliens when found, they would still keep coming. So we have to do what we can with what we have available without losing site of our own beliefs and humanity. Benjamin Franklin said it as you well know. And I agree with that statement. What I do not agree with however is the idea that you are giving up any type of freedom by being required to produce a legal id card if asked while out in public. Having said id card on you does not prohibit you from doing anything you would normally do if you did not have it. It does not prevent you from being able to go out and have a beer (provided you are legal age, lol). It does not prevent you fromgoing to a block party. It does not prevent you from going out to dinner or to hte movies, or to the beach. If you can name one right it would prevent, then I will drop the entire debate imediately. And fair warnign, the fourth amendmant is not violated by haviong a card on you, so long as the officer inquestio has a legitimate reason for asking for it (which could be as simple as showqing proof that you have the legal right to be where you are at; i.e in a bar). Good Luck. |
|
|
|
I believe that particular quote can be attributed to Ben Franklin.
|
|
|
|
Because my fourth assures me that I have a right to not be subjected to unreasonable searches and Seizures. By giving this stupid card out, we will be one step from seeing the "Show me your papers" Authoritarianism enacted right here in this country. Stupid cards aren't going to stop illegal immigration anyways, those things aren't fool proof and can be acquired via illegal means. Amendment IV. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Now, do we the people get decide what is reasonable or are we just going to let Government make that call... It all depends on how much you value this particular amendment, it's not like things like no knock search warrants and sneak and peek haven't eroded it already. Ok, so as long as the officer in question has a reason to ask you for id, then it is not unreasonable. Remember folks, it is perfectly legal for a cop to stop cars at random and ask for proof of license, registraion and insurance, without having a reason other than they have not stopped someone in a while. That being the case, there woudl be no illegality of doing it when you are not driving. Andyou are right war, nothing is full proof. Even if we were to go the route of putting to death all illegal aliens when found, they would still keep coming. So we have to do what we can with what we have available without losing site of our own beliefs and humanity. Benjamin Franklin said it as you well know. And I agree with that statement. What I do not agree with however is the idea that you are giving up any type of freedom by being required to produce a legal id card if asked while out in public. Having said id card on you does not prohibit you from doing anything you would normally do if you did not have it. It does not prevent you from being able to go out and have a beer (provided you are legal age, lol). It does not prevent you fromgoing to a block party. It does not prevent you from going out to dinner or to hte movies, or to the beach. If you can name one right it would prevent, then I will drop the entire debate imediately. And fair warnign, the fourth amendmant is not violated by haviong a card on you, so long as the officer inquestio has a legitimate reason for asking for it (which could be as simple as showqing proof that you have the legal right to be where you are at; i.e in a bar). Good Luck. I disagree, The Amendment clearly states that I have the right to be secure in my papers and effects from unreasonable searches and seizures. It's not the having the card on me, that would violate the fourth, it's the idea that a public servant would have the authority to demand I present one on command. Land of the free, not home of the slave. Once again it comes down to what is or isn't unreasonable and who gets to make that call. |
|
|
|
Because my fourth assures me that I have a right to not be subjected to unreasonable searches and Seizures. By giving this stupid card out, we will be one step from seeing the "Show me your papers" Authoritarianism enacted right here in this country. Stupid cards aren't going to stop illegal immigration anyways, those things aren't fool proof and can be acquired via illegal means. Amendment IV. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Now, do we the people get decide what is reasonable or are we just going to let Government make that call... It all depends on how much you value this particular amendment, it's not like things like no knock search warrants and sneak and peek haven't eroded it already. Ok, so as long as the officer in question has a reason to ask you for id, then it is not unreasonable. Remember folks, it is perfectly legal for a cop to stop cars at random and ask for proof of license, registraion and insurance, without having a reason other than they have not stopped someone in a while. That being the case, there woudl be no illegality of doing it when you are not driving. Andyou are right war, nothing is full proof. Even if we were to go the route of putting to death all illegal aliens when found, they would still keep coming. So we have to do what we can with what we have available without losing site of our own beliefs and humanity. Benjamin Franklin said it as you well know. And I agree with that statement. What I do not agree with however is the idea that you are giving up any type of freedom by being required to produce a legal id card if asked while out in public. Having said id card on you does not prohibit you from doing anything you would normally do if you did not have it. It does not prevent you from being able to go out and have a beer (provided you are legal age, lol). It does not prevent you fromgoing to a block party. It does not prevent you from going out to dinner or to hte movies, or to the beach. If you can name one right it would prevent, then I will drop the entire debate imediately. And fair warnign, the fourth amendmant is not violated by haviong a card on you, so long as the officer inquestio has a legitimate reason for asking for it (which could be as simple as showqing proof that you have the legal right to be where you are at; i.e in a bar). Good Luck. I disagree, The Amendment clearly states that I have the right to be secure in my papers and effects from unreasonable searches and seizures. It's not the having the card on me, that would violate the fourth, it's the idea that a public servant would have the authority to demand I present one on command. Land of the free, not home of the slave. Once again it comes down to what is or isn't unreasonable and who gets to make that call. |
|
|
|
Because my fourth assures me that I have a right to not be subjected to unreasonable searches and Seizures. By giving this stupid card out, we will be one step from seeing the "Show me your papers" Authoritarianism enacted right here in this country. Stupid cards aren't going to stop illegal immigration anyways, those things aren't fool proof and can be acquired via illegal means. Amendment IV. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Now, do we the people get decide what is reasonable or are we just going to let Government make that call... It all depends on how much you value this particular amendment, it's not like things like no knock search warrants and sneak and peek haven't eroded it already. Ok, so as long as the officer in question has a reason to ask you for id, then it is not unreasonable. Remember folks, it is perfectly legal for a cop to stop cars at random and ask for proof of license, registraion and insurance, without having a reason other than they have not stopped someone in a while. That being the case, there woudl be no illegality of doing it when you are not driving. Andyou are right war, nothing is full proof. Even if we were to go the route of putting to death all illegal aliens when found, they would still keep coming. So we have to do what we can with what we have available without losing site of our own beliefs and humanity. Benjamin Franklin said it as you well know. And I agree with that statement. What I do not agree with however is the idea that you are giving up any type of freedom by being required to produce a legal id card if asked while out in public. Having said id card on you does not prohibit you from doing anything you would normally do if you did not have it. It does not prevent you from being able to go out and have a beer (provided you are legal age, lol). It does not prevent you fromgoing to a block party. It does not prevent you from going out to dinner or to hte movies, or to the beach. If you can name one right it would prevent, then I will drop the entire debate imediately. And fair warnign, the fourth amendmant is not violated by haviong a card on you, so long as the officer inquestio has a legitimate reason for asking for it (which could be as simple as showqing proof that you have the legal right to be where you are at; i.e in a bar). Good Luck. I disagree, The Amendment clearly states that I have the right to be secure in my papers and effects from unreasonable searches and seizures. It's not the having the card on me, that would violate the fourth, it's the idea that a public servant would have the authority to demand I present one on command. Land of the free, not home of the slave. Once again it comes down to what is or isn't unreasonable and who gets to make that call. I wouldn't call that fringe, I'd call that a citizen who values their liberty and right to privacy. ![]() |
|
|
|
oh, and everything you just mentioned is absolutely true and easily proven.
|
|
|
|
oh, and everything you just mentioned is absolutely true and easily proven. |
|
|
|
oh, and everything you just mentioned is absolutely true and easily proven. The only way we will ever get to the source of the problems that plaque our nation, let alone the world at large, is to be able to have a proactive debate, that doesn't fall into ninnying and irrelevant attacks and then take the results of those debates and include them in how we interact with the world. Or at least, thats the idea, anyways. |
|
|
|
I refuse to give up my right to say,
Damn Republicans ![]() |
|
|
|
I resemble that remark!
Not all of us are so damnable are we? Well maybe...Just the dirty no good neocons! |
|
|
|
and this one,, I like them both equally!
Damn Democrats ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
and this one,, I like them both equally! Damn Democrats ![]() ![]() Aha, I get it now... let me try: Damn Globalists ![]() ![]() ![]() Wow, that was fun. |
|
|
|
I refuse to give up my right to say, Damn Republicans ![]() Republicans are the least of our problems. Its those shape shifting, blood drinking aliens you should be worried about. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Damn shape shifting, blood drinking aliens
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|