100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
| Topic: Would you | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
rather have a relationship with great sex but little communication, or great communication and little, not-so good sex?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communication.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rather have a relationship with great sex but little communication, or great communication and little, not-so good sex? sounds like the last 2 realtionships that I had... neither one lasted more than 3 years... neither.... I want it all |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Would like to have both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Although I would prefer to have great sex AND great communication....
I have done without the sex ( good or bad ) for the last 4 years. Going longer without it won't kill me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One hopes that with good communication the sex can get better or at least have fun working on it. But in the long run good communication is key.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Deadline
on
Sun 01/11/09 07:45 PM
|
|
GREAT SEX and nothing in common(besides that) is not going to work out in a long run. I know from personal experience... while No sex and all kinda of understanding is just a friendship.
So a healthy balance of both is a way to go... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rather have a relationship with great sex but little communication, or great communication and little, not-so good sex? Hummm sorry both or forget it I will not settle on either. Hummmm is that wrong I don't think so now if something happen years down the road and they had problems as far as sex then that would be different for by then you would have a bond already and you would be in love with them. But in the beginning two people bond sexually. JMO 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
both=amount
|
|
|
|
|
