2 Next
Topic: US tried to gag British man 'tortured' in Guantanamo
yellowrose10's photo
Fri 05/01/09 07:13 PM
laugh no...this is thorn...the evil twin laugh

let's see...where to start where to start

oh brb

Fanta46's photo
Fri 05/01/09 07:15 PM

laugh no...this is thorn...the evil twin laugh

let's see...where to start where to start

oh brb


Im going to put my eye on you!

yellowrose10's photo
Fri 05/01/09 07:16 PM
your eye sure beats that leotard laugh

Fanta46's photo
Fri 05/01/09 07:17 PM

your eye sure beats that leotard laugh


laugh laugh laugh wait,,,
That's not funny.

InvictusV's photo
Fri 05/01/09 07:23 PM
Edited by InvictusV on Fri 05/01/09 07:24 PM

If????

Did you see this invictus?


Two psychologists are responsible for designing the CIA's program of waterboarding suspected terrorists and for assuring the government the program was safe, according to an ABC News report.

Former military officers Bruce Jessen and Jim Mitchell had an "important role in developing what became the CIA's torture program," Jameel Jaffer, an attorney with the ACLU, told ABC News.

Jessen and Mitchell were previously involved in the U.S. military program to train pilots how to resist brutal tactics if captured -- but Col. Steven Kleinman, an Air Force interrogator, told ABC News that the two never had experience conducting actual interrogations before the CIA hired them.

"They went to two individuals who had no interrogation experience,"

Col. Kleinman told ABC News.


I saw it. Im trying to find out more about these guys.

Associates say Jessen and Mitchell were paid up to $1,000 a day by the CIA to oversee the techniques used against high-profile detainees to extract information in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on New York City and the Pentagon.

The revelation comes as Congressional Democrats turn up the pressure on the Obama administration to appoint a special counsel to start a criminal investigation into harsh interrogations of terror suspects and who authorized them. The debate was sparked by the Obama administration this month releasing four Bush-era memos outlining legal guidelines for the CIA's interrogation methods.

Obama has said it would be up to Attorney General Eric Holder to determine whether "those who formulated those legal decisions" should be prosecuted. The methods, described in the Bush-era memos, included slamming detainees against walls and subjecting them to simulated drowning, known as waterboarding.

The president said he would not seek to punish CIA officers and others who carried out interrogations

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/04/30/report-psychologists-responsible-devising-cia-torture-program/


I saw it. Im trying to find out more about these guys.

yellowrose10's photo
Fri 05/01/09 07:31 PM
think let me get this straight (pacing back and forth while thinking here)...The president said he would not seek to punish CIA officers and others who carried out interrogations....hmmmm and why would that be???? what does this say about him??? think

Fanta46's photo
Fri 05/01/09 07:42 PM

think let me get this straight (pacing back and forth while thinking here)...The president said he would not seek to punish CIA officers and others who carried out interrogations....hmmmm and why would that be???? what does this say about him??? think


It says, "Im not a lawyer, that is up to my AG to decide."

I can think of a hundred reasons why he would not get too involved in an investigation.
He declassified the info, now its in others hands.

Im just hoping he doesnt get in their way!


InvictusV's photo
Fri 05/01/09 07:50 PM
He is a lawyer and Holder works for him. If he wants Holder to prosecute, and it goes bad, he will have to answer for it someday.

Isn't that a pandoras box? If a Republican ever gets elected again, and Obama is deemed to have gone after Bush based on political expediency, it could come back to bite him on the a$$. If he opens the door, who knows where it might lead.

yellowrose10's photo
Fri 05/01/09 07:58 PM

He is a lawyer and Holder works for him. If he wants Holder to prosecute, and it goes bad, he will have to answer for it someday.

Isn't that a pandoras box? If a Republican ever gets elected again, and Obama is deemed to have gone after Bush based on political expediency, it could come back to bite him on the a$$. If he opens the door, who knows where it might lead.


now there is the catch right??? if someone didn't have anything to worry about and did what is right then....

but instead of saying what he did...he could have said something like i hope those involved are given a fair trial and brought to justice...or something of that nature

yellowrose10's photo
Fri 05/01/09 08:02 PM


your eye sure beats that leotard laugh


laugh laugh laugh wait,,,
That's not funny.


BTW :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

Fanta46's photo
Fri 05/01/09 08:04 PM

He is a lawyer and Holder works for him. If he wants Holder to prosecute, and it goes bad, he will have to answer for it someday.

Isn't that a pandoras box? If a Republican ever gets elected again, and Obama is deemed to have gone after Bush based on political expediency, it could come back to bite him on the a$$. If he opens the door, who knows where it might lead.


LOL
He is a lawyer, LOL

Dont forget Kennedy or MLK!!!!
You know the rumors about the CIA!

:wink:

InvictusV's photo
Fri 05/01/09 08:19 PM


He is a lawyer and Holder works for him. If he wants Holder to prosecute, and it goes bad, he will have to answer for it someday.

Isn't that a pandoras box? If a Republican ever gets elected again, and Obama is deemed to have gone after Bush based on political expediency, it could come back to bite him on the a$$. If he opens the door, who knows where it might lead.


LOL
He is a lawyer, LOL

Dont forget Kennedy or MLK!!!!
You know the rumors about the CIA!

:wink:


The most competent of incompetents.

yellowrose10's photo
Fri 05/01/09 08:28 PM
now how could BHO get in the way???

Fanta46's photo
Fri 05/01/09 08:33 PM

now how could BHO get in the way???


Renege on his promise of transparency in gov and go back to hiding it like The Bush Admin did!

adj4u's photo
Sat 05/02/09 08:29 AM
Obama may revive Guantanamo military courts

Source: System once branded a 'failure' by president could be reinstated

By William Glaberson
updated 6:14 a.m. ET, Sat., May 2, 2009

The Obama administration is moving toward reviving the military commission system for prosecuting Guantánamo detainees, which was a target of critics during the Bush administration, including Mr. Obama himself.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30531510/

---------------------------------------------------------------------

wonder how much will be made of this

but it is dif it is obama it has to right

interesting

very interesting

but not very surprising

Fanta46's photo
Sat 05/02/09 10:18 AM

Obama may revive Guantanamo military courts

Source: System once branded a 'failure' by president could be reinstated

By William Glaberson
updated 6:14 a.m. ET, Sat., May 2, 2009

The Obama administration is moving toward reviving the military commission system for prosecuting Guantánamo detainees, which was a target of critics during the Bush administration, including Mr. Obama himself.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30531510/

---------------------------------------------------------------------

wonder how much will be made of this

but it is dif it is obama it has to right

interesting

very interesting

but not very surprising


Not much considering it wont be the same!




As the next paragraph informs,


......Bush administration, including Mr. Obama himself.

Officials said the first public moves could come as soon as next week, perhaps in filings to military judges at the United States naval base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, outlining an administration plan to amend the Bush administration’s system to provide more legal protections for terrorism suspects.


adj4u's photo
Sat 05/02/09 02:08 PM
Edited by adj4u on Sat 05/02/09 02:10 PM
and a lil further down in the article

--------------

Shifting mood
But in recent days a variety of officials involved in the deliberations say that after administration lawyers examined many of the cases, the mood shifted toward using military commissions to prosecute some detainees,........


administration officials said Friday that some detainees would be prosecuted in federal courts and noted that Mr. Obama had always left open the possibility of using military commissions.

Still, during the presidential campaign Mr. Obama criticized the commissions, saying that “by any measure our system of trying detainees has been an enormous failure,” and declaring that as president he would “reject the Military Commissions Act.”

----------------

still looks like he is just saying what people want to hear to me

i am neither condemning nor condoning

just saying and providing info


Fanta46's photo
Sat 05/02/09 04:49 PM
You skip right over this though.

outlining an administration plan to amend the Bush administration’s system to provide more legal protections for terrorism suspects.


Meaning the trials will not be run by the Bush rules.
They will be fair this time and speedy!

The idea is to sort through the group as fast and fairly as possible. Wean out the menacing from the innocent and clear Gitmo for closure.
End its use as a torture camp!

Clean up the Bush embarrassment!

adj4u's photo
Sat 05/02/09 11:36 PM

You skip right over this though.

outlining an administration plan to amend the Bush administration’s system to provide more legal protections for terrorism suspects.


Meaning the trials will not be run by the Bush rules.
They will be fair this time and speedy!

The idea is to sort through the group as fast and fairly as possible. Wean out the menacing from the innocent and clear Gitmo for closure.
End its use as a torture camp!

Clean up the Bush embarrassment!


hope you are right

drinker

nogames39's photo
Sun 05/03/09 01:11 AM
drinker

Yep. Prosecute.

Later, that will hopefully allow us to prosecute the current gang.

2 Next