i just thought id ask the question that has always been on my mind
i mean republicans call them selves god fearing people yet the try to make every one else envious of them which is fundamentally flawed but hey this is coming from a guy who agrees with george washington that teh 2 party system is a load of crap and completely worthless if some one is good to their word taht means that they are teh best candidate but not because tehy share a partial veiw of a party of people. i am not exactly proud of democrats either im independent of green support all day.

you've been listening too much to somebody's propaganda

Because they need a "boogieman" in order to scare people to accept their crappy agenda

They are Fake christians and phoney patriots

May I laugh yet...

Or is it appropriate to cry.

Take a look back through history and you will find that 'liberals' started or finished just as many conflicts as did 'conservatives'.

EEEEEK...

This is why we have a congress and president that does not listen to the people. (though they should by law and by EXPECTATION).

Though most of us think this is a two party system in truth it appears to be three parties.

Democrats, Republicans, and ... the party with actual control though we don't recognize it yet. (perhaps after a few more sickening laws and such are shoved down our throuts)

WE THE PEOPLE ARE THE LARGEST SINGLE GROUP IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

Slow to anger does not mean slow to act.

oh

now that you mention it

it WAS Democrats that got us into

WW2

the Korean War

the Viet Nam War

and Bosnia/Kosovo

How about this to stop war.
In medival days the king got on his horse and lead the charge into battle.
Put all the pols. on the boat and make them be the first ones to hit the beach.
That ought to remove the party politics.

no matter who starts a war it's more financial than "doing the right thing" or any of the other stuff they try to tout or shove down your throat in school.

Its propaganda that leads to wars and welcome back by the way.

Nobody seems how this 2 party system is mostly just an illusion?

Vote all you want, the course stays the same?

Wow, i am happy to see there are so many people here bright enough to see through this bogus two party system.



People get mad at conservatives for being nonconservative, so they get back at them by voting in nonconservatives. How intelligent is that?

Same train, same direction, with a different driver who likes to go faster every time there is an election...

Don't forget "Charlie Wilson's War", the Democrat that got us into Afghanistan, that eventually led to 9/11 that led to .....

The OP should spend sixty seconds reading the history of Charles Wilson.

False paradign, both sides of the left/right have their hawkish tendencies.

Of course they do. How Republicans got the label "warmongers" is beyond common sense. Both parties are for or against as suits the moment.

I agree with alot of what y our saying in this thread so dont take it wrong but wasnt reagan in charge of the government when charlie was doing all this?

Some background on Mr Wilson
How did a liberal Democrat like Charlie Wilson ever get elected in conservative Texas?
A couple factors may have significantly contributed to Democrat Charlie Wilson winning his seat in Congress in 1973. The most important being that in the election Charlie ran against the wife of the previous congressman, who'd been sent to prison for bribery. Charlie was also a stark anti-communist, which appealed to the Texas conservatives. For this reason, he is often referred to as a conservative Democrat, despite holding liberal points of view on social policies such as abortion. In a 1988 interview, Congressman Charlie Wilson explained his Texas political victories by saying, "You have to bring home the bacon, convince'em you don't want to take no sh*t off them Russkies, and you can't think of anything more obscene than gun control." -WashingtonPost.com
http://www.chasingthefrog.com/reelfaces/charliewilsonswar.php

The reason they call it "Charlie Wilson's War" is that he did it mostly behind everyone's back.

Just behind the back of the american people. But it does support the case that both parties are corrupt. I wouldnt even think for a minute that the offical government in the united states headed by Reagan would not have given approval for any of his activities.

O really?

ya wanna wrestle?