Previous 1
Topic: Time
2Btrue2One's photo
Fri 10/16/09 05:34 AM
When we think about time, is it just to stop and take a look at our watch? Or when we sit and reflect on the past, people we have known, loved ones that have passed, friends as well? Do we think about what we have learned over the course of our lives, and do we understand that it took us time to learn all of this?

Do any of us really realize how fast time moves?
When we get older, we can look back on our life at a much earlier age and recount everything up until now, most of our experiences that we can remember, and so forth... Then we say (but that was a long time ago), but even then do we really know or percieve how much time has went by?

For myself and my own observations, I have come to the conclusion that a lot of people think they have plenty of time, thinking that tommorow will always be there... But we know, or at least some of us do, that tomorrow is in the future, and doesn't exsist yet, most of us just don't anticipate that we may not be here tomorrow... even older people don't really think about it, (not all but some).

Has anyone ever stopped and looked at the posted?, And when you did when was the last time? Have you noticed the date of when it was posted? Or better yet, how many days ago it was started? Before you know it, time has went by so fast...

That's my view, what do others think about this? I would appreciate your input...

Thanks, Daniel


no photo
Fri 10/16/09 05:47 AM
Time never changes it's always the same pace only our perception of it changes.

2Btrue2One's photo
Fri 10/16/09 05:53 AM

Time never changes it's always the same pace only our perception of it changes.


True, time is a constant, I was thinking more along the lines of how people ignor how fast time moves, (meaning that most people, even older ones think there is plenty of time to do this or that)

no photo
Sat 10/17/09 01:07 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Sat 10/17/09 01:08 PM
I have heard that we should make a point to lead exciting and or stimulating lives in order to monitor our mental machinery.

If every day is the same, your memory can only record one day. Hence it can seem like a whole year is just one day.

It would probably be a great idea to keep a journal of each day... if we had the time to do that. laugh :wink:

If you do many different things in one day, time seems to slow down. If you only do one thing that day, time speeds by... it seems.

Time itself does not really exist. The only thing that exists is the present event.

The key to time is events and attention to detail. Perception of 'time' is a perception of events.




Mecca777's photo
Mon 10/19/09 05:26 PM
If you had ABSOLUTELY no way to measure or track time it would be a non issue. There would just be space and us in it. More to the point of your question though, Im with uncle Albert when he said that time is indeed relative to ones own position and motion. What may seem like an hour to me, may seem fore like 4 hours to someone else.

no photo
Mon 10/19/09 07:41 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Mon 10/19/09 07:43 PM

If you had ABSOLUTELY no way to measure or track time it would be a non issue. There would just be space and us in it. More to the point of your question though, Im with uncle Albert when he said that time is indeed relative to ones own position and motion. What may seem like an hour to me, may seem fore like 4 hours to someone else.


So you are saying if we lived underground and had no clocks and could not track time there would just be space with us in it? What happened to all my furniture in my underground complex? laugh

Okay the way to perceive 'time' if there is no movement of 'things' is in relation to thoughts, which on a mental level are "events."

Have you ever heard of "time stalling?"

It is where you can speed up your thoughts and mental processes so fast that in a split second you can think 20 minutes worth of thoughts.

This has actually happened to some people during a critical event like a car accident where they needed 'time' to figure out what to do to save their life. It happened to me once, so I know it is true.

It also allowed me to 'see' the probable future if I did not look over my shoulder. (I saw the accident in a vision about ten times.)
It caused me to look over my shoulder, hence it saved my life and my little brother's life who was in the vehicle with me.

It was as if 'time' stood still, or slowed way down to almost nothing.

So I think "time" is a perception and that is ultimately -- in relation to the person perceiving it and their thinking process.






Quietman_2009's photo
Mon 10/19/09 07:51 PM
the human eye "sees" in a series of still photographic images. I don't remember the exact number but something like 60 frames a second

under periods of extreme stress this increases to something like 120 frames a second

that is the effect to "time slowing down" for people in crashes and stuff like that

no photo
Mon 10/19/09 08:04 PM

the human eye "sees" in a series of still photographic images. I don't remember the exact number but something like 60 frames a second

under periods of extreme stress this increases to something like 120 frames a second

that is the effect to "time slowing down" for people in crashes and stuff like that


That does not explain what happened to me.

I 'saw' a fatal car crash with me in it... flash before my eyes ten times or more, then I heard my mind tell me I should look over my shoulder. I even argued with that inner voice. I said "I did look in the rear view mirror, and nothing was coming.." The voice answered back, (it was my voice) "Well it would not hurt you to look over your shoulder."

I agreed. Then time returned to normal and the time it took to look over my shoulder... saved my life.

It WAS a miracle. I would have died in that crash.


creativesoul's photo
Mon 10/19/09 10:20 PM
There is new evidence which shows that the speed of light changes with time...

Wrap your head around that one!

huh


no photo
Mon 10/19/09 11:45 PM

There is new evidence which shows that the speed of light changes with time...

Wrap your head around that one!

huh




Kewel. I always thought so. I think I heard about that some while ago.

2Btrue2One's photo
Fri 10/23/09 06:23 AM


the human eye "sees" in a series of still photographic images. I don't remember the exact number but something like 60 frames a second

under periods of extreme stress this increases to something like 120 frames a second

that is the effect to "time slowing down" for people in crashes and stuff like that


That does not explain what happened to me.

I 'saw' a fatal car crash with me in it... flash before my eyes ten times or more, then I heard my mind tell me I should look over my shoulder. I even argued with that inner voice. I said "I did look in the rear view mirror, and nothing was coming.." The voice answered back, (it was my voice) "Well it would not hurt you to look over your shoulder."

I agreed. Then time returned to normal and the time it took to look over my shoulder... saved my life.

It WAS a miracle. I would have died in that crash.



Sounds like you had a guradian angel looking out for you, or maybe your own 6th sense.. either way, you peered into something that hadn't happened yet, but was about to...


Now remember you stated in an earlier post that time doesn't exsist, and the the only thing that exsists is the present.. if that is true then how is it that you saw something that was about to happen before it happened?


So, what you saw were two possible futures, one where you died, and one where you didn't.. All of us have that ability, some can tap into it at will, others it just happens to happen to..

jrbogie's photo
Fri 10/23/09 07:03 AM

If you had ABSOLUTELY no way to measure or track time it would be a non issue. There would just be space and us in it. More to the point of your question though, Im with uncle Albert when he said that time is indeed relative to ones own position and motion. What may seem like an hour to me, may seem fore like 4 hours to someone else.


well said. uncle al, the great one, rules.drinker

jrbogie's photo
Fri 10/23/09 07:06 AM

There is new evidence which shows that the speed of light changes with time...

Wrap your head around that one!

huh




what evidence is that? theory does not amount to evidence. what evidence shows that the speed of light changes?

SkyHook5652's photo
Fri 10/23/09 10:22 AM
There is new evidence which shows that the speed of light changes with time...

Wrap your head around that one!

huh
what evidence is that? theory does not amount to evidence. what evidence shows that the speed of light changes?
Creative isn't prone to claiming there is evidence if he hasn't at least heard it from what he considers to be a reliable source.

But I too am interested in what the actual evidence is. I tried a web search and could find only some older dissertations on how c is, and must always have been, constant.

metalwing's photo
Fri 10/23/09 11:07 AM

There is new evidence which shows that the speed of light changes with time...

Wrap your head around that one!

huh
what evidence is that? theory does not amount to evidence. what evidence shows that the speed of light changes?
Creative isn't prone to claiming there is evidence if he hasn't at least heard it from what he considers to be a reliable source.

But I too am interested in what the actual evidence is. I tried a web search and could find only some older dissertations on how c is, and must always have been, constant.


Creative would have to answer this himself but I suspect that he is referring to Magueijo, a 40-year old native of Portugal who wrote a book and formed a theory of c being many orders of magnitude higher during the early seconds of the universe. The theory would solve certain aspects of unified field theories, string theories, expansion of the universe math, etc. I have wondered the same thing myself (without much thought going into it), i.e., Do the properties of the universe expand with the universe? From a relative standpoint, it would be hard for us to know, but readings from gamma ray burst sources would indicate maybe it has changed. These objects are changing a lot of physics.

SkyHook5652's photo
Fri 10/23/09 12:42 PM
Edited by SkyHook5652 on Fri 10/23/09 12:43 PM
There is new evidence which shows that the speed of light changes with time...

Wrap your head around that one!

huh
what evidence is that? theory does not amount to evidence. what evidence shows that the speed of light changes?
Creative isn't prone to claiming there is evidence if he hasn't at least heard it from what he considers to be a reliable source.

But I too am interested in what the actual evidence is. I tried a web search and could find only some older dissertations on how c is, and must always have been, constant.
Creative would have to answer this himself but I suspect that he is referring to Magueijo, a 40-year old native of Portugal who wrote a book and formed a theory of c being many orders of magnitude higher during the early seconds of the universe. The theory would solve certain aspects of unified field theories, string theories, expansion of the universe math, etc.
Yes, there is that. And that is exactly what I thought when I first read it. But his use of the words "new" and "evidence" didn't fit that particular explantion very well vis-a-vis what I know about Creatives "style".

But as you say, he is the only one who can really say for sure exactly what it is that he is referring to.

SkyHook5652's photo
Fri 10/23/09 01:07 PM
... Magueijo, a 40-year old native of Portugal who wrote a book and formed a theory of c being many orders of magnitude higher during the early seconds of the universe. The theory would solve certain aspects of unified field theories, string theories, expansion of the universe math, etc. I have wondered the same thing myself (without much thought going into it), i.e., Do the properties of the universe expand with the universe?
Now that makes me think of an interesting idea. Supposing that c were not really a constant per se, but were always relative to the size of the universe. i.e. light always travels x% of the diameter of the universe in a specific time span.

Now that would seem to be proved wrong by the fact that (as I understand it) light itself is what was used to detect the expansion of the universe in the first place.

So maybe it isn't that the universe is expanding, but that c is slowing down.

Probably several factual errors in that, but hey, I'm just ruminating anyway. :smile:

no photo
Fri 10/23/09 01:11 PM



the human eye "sees" in a series of still photographic images. I don't remember the exact number but something like 60 frames a second

under periods of extreme stress this increases to something like 120 frames a second

that is the effect to "time slowing down" for people in crashes and stuff like that


That does not explain what happened to me.

I 'saw' a fatal car crash with me in it... flash before my eyes ten times or more, then I heard my mind tell me I should look over my shoulder. I even argued with that inner voice. I said "I did look in the rear view mirror, and nothing was coming.." The voice answered back, (it was my voice) "Well it would not hurt you to look over your shoulder."

I agreed. Then time returned to normal and the time it took to look over my shoulder... saved my life.

It WAS a miracle. I would have died in that crash.



Sounds like you had guradian angel looking out for you, or maybe your own 6th sense.. either way, you peered into something that hadn't happened yet, but was about to...


Now remember you stated in an earlier post that time doesn't exsist, and the the only thing that exsists is the present.. if that is true then how is it that you saw something that was about to happen before it happened?


So, what you saw were two possible futures, one where you died, and one where you didn't.. All of us have that ability, some can tap into it at will, others it just happens to happen to..


Well everybody says I MUST have guardian angels or else I would be dead by now.

But I believe what I saw was a probability. A probability actually exists in the multidimensional matrix which is a mind world. My guardian angel is actually what I believe to be my 'higher mind' that exists within my own individual unified field and has its own space-time system which is a lot slower than this one. In comparing the two, the space-time of that field almost seems to stand still, but it is actually still proceeding forward at a vastly different and slower rate. The inner voice I heard and spoke to was my own voice.

I have experienced telepathy with another person who could project his voice into my mind, and I learned that I CAN tell the difference between my voice and someone else.




2Btrue2One's photo
Sat 11/21/09 11:03 AM
I fugured I would give it some time since I posted here, point being look how long time has passed since the last post, ok, time is a concept, or is it? Think about it, every day that passes we can't take back, but what if we could?

no photo
Sat 11/21/09 01:08 PM

I fugured I would give it some time since I posted here, point being look how long time has passed since the last post, ok, time is a concept, or is it? Think about it, every day that passes we can't take back, but what if we could?


I believe we can.

But for what purpose would we want to? To go back and live our lives over and perhaps make different choices? To forge a different path through the space-time matrix? To go back to see if we could get it right this time? To correct a mistake?

We have all the time in the world. From spirit's point of view, time may not even exist. Every system or universe has a different space-time.

Yes, here, in this physical universe, time is very very fast. Like the blink of an eye.


Previous 1