100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Articles to remove Barry Soetoro (AKA B HusseinObama) | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Joe Biden for President?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I just want to say that I will still be voting Democrat come November and I hope that fact gets under your skin....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Im going to vote the best candidates, as always, and it wont be democrats or republicans exclusively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've decided to run, will you vote for me
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I just want to say that I will still be voting Democrat come November and I hope that fact gets under your skin.... I know my vote will not be Republican for sure. So I do understand. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I just want to say that I will still be voting Democrat come November and I hope that fact gets under your skin.... I don't really care. Whoever you elect will be owned by their corporatist masters and unresponsive to you, and I hope that fact gets under your skin as well. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlawfully engaged in a conspiracy to suppress evidence of the true place of his birth. This obstruction of justice has resulted in a violation of the Constitutional provision that a President of the United States must be a natural born citizen. Yanno, any crank with a typewriter can type up any legal brief they want. The Birthers have lost _every_ case in _every_ court they've tried to field this canard in. Never have so few tried to overturn the political will of so many with unhinged conspiracy theories and slander. Besides, I don't really understand your beef, Willing. After all, you yourself hired illegals because they worked cheaper than native-born Americans. What's a measly few hundred thousands of dollars for doing the biggest job on the planet when folks like the CEO of Exxon are pulling down hundreds of _millions_? I would think your sense of thrift would find an Obama presidency appealing on those grounds alone if what you say has any shred of truth to it. Which, of course, it doesn't. :) -Kerry O. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlawfully engaged in a conspiracy to suppress evidence of the true place of his birth. This obstruction of justice has resulted in a violation of the Constitutional provision that a President of the United States must be a natural born citizen. Yanno, any crank with a typewriter can type up any legal brief they want. The Birthers have lost _every_ case in _every_ court they've tried to field this canard in. Never have so few tried to overturn the political will of so many with unhinged conspiracy theories and slander. Besides, I don't really understand your beef, Willing. After all, you yourself hired illegals because they worked cheaper than native-born Americans. What's a measly few hundred thousands of dollars for doing the biggest job on the planet when folks like the CEO of Exxon are pulling down hundreds of _millions_? I would think your sense of thrift would find an Obama presidency appealing on those grounds alone if what you say has any shred of truth to it. Which, of course, it doesn't. :) -Kerry O. Say it ain't so
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Say it ain't so
Yeah, you'd think the Birthers and such would hold Al Gore in high esteem for inventing the Internet so they'd have a place they could toke on their conspiracy-theory hookas, sending smoke signals far and wide while never having to leave their Tea Party communes. Ain't no justice, I'm tellin' ya! -Kerry O. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Say it ain't so
Yeah, you'd think the Birthers and such would hold Al Gore in high esteem for inventing the Internet so they'd have a place they could toke on their conspiracy-theory hookas, sending smoke signals far and wide while never having to leave their Tea Party communes. Ain't no justice, I'm tellin' ya! -Kerry O.  
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
smh,,,,,sigh I suppose the STATE of Hawaii will have to be charged with federal offenses too for they MUST Have forged the embossed and sealed certificate of birth THEY have on file,,,, sigh,,,,much more significant and verifiable atrocities available to tie up the courts and the government than this dribble,,, Is it any more "dribble" than the left's endless rants after the Bush v. Gore decision circa 2000?
I guess it depends upon perception,, I think the premise for my concern in 2000 was the INFORMATION from MSM (not random one sided websites and pundits) when I went to bed , and what I woke up to. The MSM called the win for Gore, why would they do that,,is it unreasonable for people to become suspicious at such an overnight change? The deciding electoral votes coming from the state where Bush brother was the Governor , I think ,was also REASONABLY suspicious. By that same token,, the DECLARATION by Hawaiian Government officials would seem just as 'legitimate' a source as the MSM that announced Gores win. The premise that we expected a certain validity from 'valid' sources is not dribble. There was an inconsistency in what the MSM reported in that two thousand election and what actually happened and the margin of error was suspiciously dependent upon Florida. I find no REASON behind the birthers claims of OBama not being a citizen besides random reports and pundits CLAIMING they have proof and possibly posting documents that could be from anywhere. When weighing this against GOVERNMENT STATEMENTS And DOCUMENTS, I doubt the court would consider such allegations much more than dribble. Actually the deciding electoral votes came from Al Gore's home state of Tennessee. The state in which he LOST. Florida didn't matter if Gore had won Tennessee.. Even Mondale won Minnesota in 84. Seems that the people that knew him best didn't want him. That says alot.. still doesnt refute the complaints about the voting procedures in Florida and the fact that FLORIDAS count was the one contested in supreme court you didn't say anything about voting procedures or complaints. you said because they called florida for gore people had a right to be suspicious. I didn't notice you mentioning the fact that they called florida for gore with an hour of voting left in the panhandle. that's alright though.. Gore lost Tennessee and that is why he lost the election. you can make all the excuses you want. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Wed 06/09/10 06:29 AM
|
|
smh,,,,,sigh I suppose the STATE of Hawaii will have to be charged with federal offenses too for they MUST Have forged the embossed and sealed certificate of birth THEY have on file,,,, sigh,,,,much more significant and verifiable atrocities available to tie up the courts and the government than this dribble,,, Is it any more "dribble" than the left's endless rants after the Bush v. Gore decision circa 2000?
I guess it depends upon perception,, I think the premise for my concern in 2000 was the INFORMATION from MSM (not random one sided websites and pundits) when I went to bed , and what I woke up to. The MSM called the win for Gore, why would they do that,,is it unreasonable for people to become suspicious at such an overnight change? The deciding electoral votes coming from the state where Bush brother was the Governor , I think ,was also REASONABLY suspicious. By that same token,, the DECLARATION by Hawaiian Government officials would seem just as 'legitimate' a source as the MSM that announced Gores win. The premise that we expected a certain validity from 'valid' sources is not dribble. There was an inconsistency in what the MSM reported in that two thousand election and what actually happened and the margin of error was suspiciously dependent upon Florida. I find no REASON behind the birthers claims of OBama not being a citizen besides random reports and pundits CLAIMING they have proof and possibly posting documents that could be from anywhere. When weighing this against GOVERNMENT STATEMENTS And DOCUMENTS, I doubt the court would consider such allegations much more than dribble. Actually the deciding electoral votes came from Al Gore's home state of Tennessee. The state in which he LOST. Florida didn't matter if Gore had won Tennessee.. Even Mondale won Minnesota in 84. Seems that the people that knew him best didn't want him. That says alot.. still doesnt refute the complaints about the voting procedures in Florida and the fact that FLORIDAS count was the one contested in supreme court you didn't say anything about voting procedures or complaints. you said because they called florida for gore people had a right to be suspicious. I didn't notice you mentioning the fact that they called florida for gore with an hour of voting left in the panhandle. that's alright though.. Gore lost Tennessee and that is why he lost the election. you can make all the excuses you want. hmm, so are you saying that had he WON Florida he would not have won the election? no excuses,, the information being reported on MSM was that GORE won,,, and the dispute arose out of the state that his brother governed,,,,,, which amounts to reasonable suspicion as far as many were concerned... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
" ... hmm, so are you saying that had he WON Florida he would not have won the election? no excuses,, the information being reported on MSM was that GORE won,,, and the dispute arose out of the state that his brother governed,,,,,, which amounts to reasonable suspicion as far as many were concerned... ' Is it really so difficult to understand the simple math that would have suddenly changed the entire equation IF Little Albert the Despised had merely managed to win the loyalties and admiration of the residents of the state in which he was birthed ... ? The people of TN didn't LIKE Little Albert enough or trust him enough to give their vote to him, so they gave their vote to BUSH. That loss of his HOME STATE cost Little Albert the election. The FL dispute arose NOT out of the governorship being held by Bush's brother, but out of the POORLY-DESIGNED VOTING FORM (say 'butterfly ballot') that the DEMOCRATS designed to 'guarantee' people would 'accidentally' vote for THEIR candidates because of its intentionally confused layout. The person occupying the governor's office then makes NO difference. They brought it on themselves. The fact STILL remains that, HAD Little Albert not been so disliked by his home state, that singular win would have rendered FL unnecessary. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
smh,,,,,sigh I suppose the STATE of Hawaii will have to be charged with federal offenses too for they MUST Have forged the embossed and sealed certificate of birth THEY have on file,,,, sigh,,,,much more significant and verifiable atrocities available to tie up the courts and the government than this dribble,,, Is it any more "dribble" than the left's endless rants after the Bush v. Gore decision circa 2000?
I guess it depends upon perception,, I think the premise for my concern in 2000 was the INFORMATION from MSM (not random one sided websites and pundits) when I went to bed , and what I woke up to. The MSM called the win for Gore, why would they do that,,is it unreasonable for people to become suspicious at such an overnight change? The deciding electoral votes coming from the state where Bush brother was the Governor , I think ,was also REASONABLY suspicious. By that same token,, the DECLARATION by Hawaiian Government officials would seem just as 'legitimate' a source as the MSM that announced Gores win. The premise that we expected a certain validity from 'valid' sources is not dribble. There was an inconsistency in what the MSM reported in that two thousand election and what actually happened and the margin of error was suspiciously dependent upon Florida. I find no REASON behind the birthers claims of OBama not being a citizen besides random reports and pundits CLAIMING they have proof and possibly posting documents that could be from anywhere. When weighing this against GOVERNMENT STATEMENTS And DOCUMENTS, I doubt the court would consider such allegations much more than dribble. Actually the deciding electoral votes came from Al Gore's home state of Tennessee. The state in which he LOST. Florida didn't matter if Gore had won Tennessee.. Even Mondale won Minnesota in 84. Seems that the people that knew him best didn't want him. That says alot.. still doesnt refute the complaints about the voting procedures in Florida and the fact that FLORIDAS count was the one contested in supreme court you didn't say anything about voting procedures or complaints. you said because they called florida for gore people had a right to be suspicious. I didn't notice you mentioning the fact that they called florida for gore with an hour of voting left in the panhandle. that's alright though.. Gore lost Tennessee and that is why he lost the election. you can make all the excuses you want. hmm, so are you saying that had he WON Florida he would not have won the election? no excuses,, the information being reported on MSM was that GORE won,,, and the dispute arose out of the state that his brother governed,,,,,, which amounts to reasonable suspicion as far as many were concerned... I'm not saying that at all. He didn't win florida. Even so, had he won his home state, florida wouldn't have mattered. Florida wasn't the only state with voting irregularities. If I recall correctly there were 6 million votes nationwide that weren't counted for one reason or another. New Mexico was decided by 356 votes. Iowa was 4000 votes.. Wisconsin was 6000 votes.. All in favor of Gore.. Any one of those 3 states could have been contested to the extent that florida was. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Im going to vote the best candidates, as always, and it wont be democrats or republicans exclusively. 
yep I vote what I think is best. Party has not a bit to do with it. I wish more people voted that way. Would limit the number of idiots that slip past in the primaries. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'Party' is irrelevant. 'PRINCIPLES' are relevant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can not seriously believe that you all are touting MSM as being 'non-biased'.
It is the most one sided news services I have ever watched. Even the hardline Islamic news services are more balanced than MSM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Thu 06/10/10 11:18 AM
|
|
" ... hmm, so are you saying that had he WON Florida he would not have won the election? no excuses,, the information being reported on MSM was that GORE won,,, and the dispute arose out of the state that his brother governed,,,,,, which amounts to reasonable suspicion as far as many were concerned... ' Is it really so difficult to understand the simple math that would have suddenly changed the entire equation IF Little Albert the Despised had merely managed to win the loyalties and admiration of the residents of the state in which he was birthed ... ? The people of TN didn't LIKE Little Albert enough or trust him enough to give their vote to him, so they gave their vote to BUSH. That loss of his HOME STATE cost Little Albert the election. The FL dispute arose NOT out of the governorship being held by Bush's brother, but out of the POORLY-DESIGNED VOTING FORM (say 'butterfly ballot') that the DEMOCRATS designed to 'guarantee' people would 'accidentally' vote for THEIR candidates because of its intentionally confused layout. The person occupying the governor's office then makes NO difference. They brought it on themselves. The fact STILL remains that, HAD Little Albert not been so disliked by his home state, that singular win would have rendered FL unnecessary. that is true,,and does not refute anything I posted. My point, however, was that it was reasonable suspicion that was held in the election based upon MSM (which I use to refer to the networks BEFORE cable, namely ABC, NBC, and CBS) reporting Gore as the winner, and MSM accrediting the deciding vote to Florida, a state in which GEORGE BUSH brother was the governor and in which COMPLAINTS had been made by FLORIDA voters about the polling procedures .... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wanna vote for someone who has worked hard all in his or her life, had a debt crisis and later had trouble paying for his/her mortgage and had a hard time finding a job.
That would be a real "one of us", who has walked in our shoes and talked our talks and knows damn well enough what are the problem, but again of course those people can't enter the system, they would might bring real experience into Washington, which has cocooned itself away from The People and living in an entirely different universe. |
|
|
|
|
