100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Bush did better than Obama, poll shows | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
your acquaintance must not have been with the president 24-7 ,, or at least not on these three pretty important occasions Late 1998-Early 2000: On at least three occasions, spies in Afghanistan report bin Laden's location. Each time, the president approves an attack. Each time, the CIA Director says the information is not reliable enough and the attack cannot go forward. [New York Times, 12/30/01, more] That is not correct. Clinton did not approve an order to capture or kill Bin Laden until 2000 when he was about to leave office and it was to late. There were several times the CIA's SAD had Bin Laden withing their scopes or verified he was in a certain building of one of the camps and could have taken him out with something simular to an RPG but Clinton wouldn't give the order until after the USS Cole was attacked in 2000. really? from Washington Post Three times after Aug. 20, 1998, when Clinton ordered the only missile strike of his presidency against bin Laden's organization, the CIA came close enough to pinpointing bin Laden that Clinton authorized final preparations to launch. In each case, doubts about the intelligence aborted the mission |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like Li'l Bammy's used up all his 'inheritance' ... I'm just sayin' ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
your acquaintance must not have been with the president 24-7 ,, or at least not on these three pretty important occasions Late 1998-Early 2000: On at least three occasions, spies in Afghanistan report bin Laden's location. Each time, the president approves an attack. Each time, the CIA Director says the information is not reliable enough and the attack cannot go forward. [New York Times, 12/30/01, more] That is not correct. Clinton did not approve an order to capture or kill Bin Laden until 2000 when he was about to leave office and it was to late. There were several times the CIA's SAD had Bin Laden withing their scopes or verified he was in a certain building of one of the camps and could have taken him out with something simular to an RPG but Clinton wouldn't give the order until after the USS Cole was attacked in 2000. really? from Washington Post Three times after Aug. 20, 1998, when Clinton ordered the only missile strike of his presidency against bin Laden's organization, the CIA came close enough to pinpointing bin Laden that Clinton authorized final preparations to launch. In each case, doubts about the intelligence aborted the mission The Washington post isnt biased or anything. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
your acquaintance must not have been with the president 24-7 ,, or at least not on these three pretty important occasions Late 1998-Early 2000: On at least three occasions, spies in Afghanistan report bin Laden's location. Each time, the president approves an attack. Each time, the CIA Director says the information is not reliable enough and the attack cannot go forward. [New York Times, 12/30/01, more] That is not correct. Clinton did not approve an order to capture or kill Bin Laden until 2000 when he was about to leave office and it was to late. There were several times the CIA's SAD had Bin Laden withing their scopes or verified he was in a certain building of one of the camps and could have taken him out with something simular to an RPG but Clinton wouldn't give the order until after the USS Cole was attacked in 2000. really? from Washington Post Three times after Aug. 20, 1998, when Clinton ordered the only missile strike of his presidency against bin Laden's organization, the CIA came close enough to pinpointing bin Laden that Clinton authorized final preparations to launch. In each case, doubts about the intelligence aborted the mission The Washington post isnt biased or anything. lol, it would be quite a bit more than BIAS to LIE about a date of an event,,,,bias would be in how the event was presented |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
your acquaintance must not have been with the president 24-7 ,, or at least not on these three pretty important occasions Late 1998-Early 2000: On at least three occasions, spies in Afghanistan report bin Laden's location. Each time, the president approves an attack. Each time, the CIA Director says the information is not reliable enough and the attack cannot go forward. [New York Times, 12/30/01, more] That is not correct. Clinton did not approve an order to capture or kill Bin Laden until 2000 when he was about to leave office and it was to late. There were several times the CIA's SAD had Bin Laden withing their scopes or verified he was in a certain building of one of the camps and could have taken him out with something simular to an RPG but Clinton wouldn't give the order until after the USS Cole was attacked in 2000. really? from Washington Post Three times after Aug. 20, 1998, when Clinton ordered the only missile strike of his presidency against bin Laden's organization, the CIA came close enough to pinpointing bin Laden that Clinton authorized final preparations to launch. In each case, doubts about the intelligence aborted the mission The Washington post isnt biased or anything. lol, it would be quite a bit more than BIAS to LIE about a date of an event,,,,bias would be in how the event was presented It's a well known fact, not just Clinton trying to cover his *** after the fact. |
|
|
|
|
