The Feds are going to have their hands full wasting our money on lawsuits against laws that are an federal books they refuse to enforce.

FREMONT, Neb. — Angered by a recent influx of Hispanic workers attracted by jobs at local meatpacking plants, voters in the eastern Nebraska city of Fremont will decide Monday whether to ban hiring or renting property to illegal immigrants.
In this photo taken June 19, 2010 an unidentified person walks past a patriotic mural in Fremont, Neb. Angered by a recent influx of Hispanic workers attracted by jobs at local meatpacking plants, voters in the eastern Nebraska city of Fremont will vote Monday whether to ban hiring or renting property to illegal immigrants. (AP Photo/Clay Lomneth)


The vote will be the culmination of a two-year fight that saw proponents collect enough signatures to put the question to a public vote. If the ordinance is approved, the community of 25,000 people could face a long and costly court battle. Either way, the emotions stirred up won't settle quickly.

"Even if we say 'no' ... we still need to say, 'How do we get along with each other now?'" said Kristin Ostrom, who helps oversee a campaign against the measure.

Across the nation, people have been outraged by – and demanded action against – the poor enforcement of federal laws to prevent illegal immigration. A law recently introduced in Arizona requires police to question people on their immigration status if there's a "reasonable suspicion" they are illegal.

A man who helped write the Arizona law is helping to fight for the ordinance in Fremont, which has seen its Hispanic population surge in the past two decades. That increase is largely because they were recruited to work for the Fremont Beef and Hormel plants, and the city maintains an enviably low unemployment rate.

Nonetheless, residents worry that jobs are going to illegal immigrants who they fear could drain community resources.

Clint Walraven, who has lived in Fremont all his 51 years, said the jobs should go to legal residents who are unemployed – something he believes the ordinance would help fix. Discussions on the issue can get heated, he said, particularly if racism is mentioned.

"It has nothing to do with being racist," he said. "We all have to play by the same rules. ... If you want to stay here, get legal."

When he worked at the Hormel plant in the 1980s, Walraven said, he had one Hispanic co-worker.

From about 165 Hispanics – both legal and illegal – living in Fremont in 1990, the total surged to 1,085 in 2000, according to census expert David Drozd at the University of Nebraska at Omaha. He said an estimated 2,060 Hispanics lived there last year. In May, Fremont recorded just 4.9 percent unemployment, in line with the statewide rate and significantly lower than the national average of 9.7 percent.

If approved, the measure will require potential renters to apply for a license to rent. The application process will force Fremont officials to check if the renters are in the country legally. If they are found to be illegal, they will not be issued a license allowing them to rent.

The ordinance also requires businesses to use the federal E-Verify database to ensure employees are allowed to work.

Supporters of the proposal say it's needed to make up for what they see as lax federal law enforcement. Opponents say it could fuel discrimination.

Results are expected Monday night.

Ron Tillery, executive director of the Fremont Chamber of Commerce, which opposes the measure, said businesses are concerned the E-Verify system isn't reliable and that they would be subject to fines if forced to rely on it. He pointed out that the main targets of the ordinance – the Fremont Beef and Hormel plants – would not be covered by it anyway because they are located outside the city.

Walraven said the measure is necessary because workers send their salaries to family in Mexico instead of spending it in the city.

"I understand supporting your family," he said, "But it's very much at our expense. We're footing the bill."

Those costs include spending on education and medical care, said Jerry Hart, a Fremont resident who petitioned for the vote. He said the ordinance would help curb that spending and protect jobs.

He said it would also end the divisiveness that's taken over.

"The division is because the illegal aliens are here and nobody's taken care of it," he said. "If it does not pass, it's going to get worse."

The Fremont Tribune has reported several instances of legal Hispanic residents being told to return to Mexico, including a woman who was shoved and yelled at by an elderly white man in a grocery store.

Hart said he's been called a Nazi.

"Fear is kind of guiding," said Ostrom, adding that frustration about immigration issues nationwide ignites a misconception that all Hispanic immigrants in Fremont are illegal.

Sandra Leffler, 69, who owns a downtown antique store with her husband, Marv, said she knows not all Hispanics are illegal immigrants, but that it's hard not to think that way. She said she scrutinizes her Hispanic customers.

"I have to admit, when I see them come into the store ... I can't help wondering if I'm profiling someone who's completely honest," she said.

The Fremont City Council narrowly rejected a policy similar to the proposed ordinance in 2008, but proponents got it to a public vote and the state Supreme Court refused to block it.

The Nebraska chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union has threatened a lawsuit, and the city worries about the cost of defending the policy. The city has estimated the legal action would cost $1 million per year to fight – costs that would have to be covered by property tax raises and city job cuts.

Kansas City, Mo.-based attorney Kris Kobach, who worked on the Arizona law and has been in legal battles over local ordinances elsewhere, said Valley Park, Mo. paid between $250,000 and $300,000 in legal fees in a similar case. Valley Park, like Fremont, is covered by the 8th Circuit.

State Sen. Charlie Janssen of Fremont, who has said he may introduce an Arizona-style bill in the Legislature next session, said it's unfortunate residents have to decide how to vote amid threats of a lawsuit. He has declined to give his position on the ordinance, saying residents need to decide on their own.

"A vote for or against the ordinance does not make you more or less patriotic," he said in a posting on his legislative blog. "Just as a vote for or against the ordinance does not make you racist or not."
___
Associated Press writer Nate Jenkins in Lincoln, Neb., contributed to this report.
___
Online: City of Fremont's information on proposed ordinance: http://www.fremontne.gov/index.aspx?NID434

I don't think it matters, no one wants to go to Fremont, Nebraska anyway.

lol,, that was funny

I can agree with this measure when it comes to hiring. Having gone through the legal process myself, you are not supposed to have employment unless you have proper paperwork (work visa) to do so, so this doesnt seem unfair. Not to mention, every application I have ever filled in has a spot where you have to disclose whether you are a citizen, have the right to work , and have paper proving that you can work.

As to the whole lawsuit thing, I think people are simplifying the issue. I dont think it is suing over the law that is on federal books, it is suing over how the law is implemented and by whom. From what I understand (and if there are any AZ cops who can correct me please do), the AZ law MANDATES police to profile basically ,,,which means if an illegal immigrant commits some crime that can later show they had contact with a police officer prior, the police can be held LEGALLY and FISCALLY responsible for not having profiled them and asked them for papers. From what I heard of a radio broadcast with such an officer, this was one of the MAJOR objections to the law as it was written.

They are not suppose to be hiring illegals anyway, it is illegal to do so.

As for renting to illegals, who cares.

Millions of immigrants, hispasic and otherwise, are caught in the American administrative fubar. Originally here legally with full documentation and a the right to be here but the administrative process is year behind schedule and cannot even update legally attained approved documents which have expired.

Some of these immigrants cannot afford to make a trip back to a country in which they no longer have a home.

Its a difficult sitution for everyone. With all the bail money that has been thrown to the wind, it seems unfair that a govenment agency that administers to immingration should be so far behind that it puts poeples lives in danger.

How can we continue to issue documentation to millions of new immigrants each year, knowing full well that the will be left hanging when their visas expire?

Actually it would be wonderful if we could hold people accountable for renting to illegal immigration families.....all illegals should have to enter the US the same way any other immigrant must enter and work in the US. If there was no place for them to rent or they were not allowed to purchase property because of the illegal status. Then they would be less likely to come to the US. The people they hurt remain the business man. They come here do not have to pay insurance double income, SSI, or medicare out of there companies or tax anyone or pay taxes on their earning, thereby undercutting the legal business owners in the US. I think anything to make it more difficult on an illegal is wonderful.

If nobody RENTS to illegals, then they got a serious problem ... namely, where they gon' 'stay at' while they abuse our ERs, schools, welfare, political, judicial, social services, and other systems on OUR nickel ... ? Good for Fremont, NB ... Prosecute the Lords of the Illegal Renters as far as possible - and then some more. As for whether these 'poor illegals' can make a buck or not ... ? I could care less. They shoulda thought about that before they BROKE INTO our country ... screw 'em. If they can't 'afford' a ticket back home, once again: Screw 'em. Let 'em get home the same way they got here - WALK IT.

If we put all the illegals on the street, won't the democrats just force us to build them housing, which they'll get to use for free?

I don't feel for the once legals who let their welcome expire.

All they had to do was fill out the renewal form and send in the application fee.

They get plenty of advanced notice when it's about to expire.