100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Gun control, a must view!! | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
It just keeps getting better and better. http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/11/michelle-obamas-warning-to-gun-owners/ The following will give you examples of "WHY GUN CONTROLL SHOULD NEVER BE CONCIDERED" "INNOCENTS BETRAYED". Cut and paste the Following URL. http://www.veoh.com/iphone/#_Watch/v19384745tgeTy96g 170,000,000. That's the number of civilians that have been murdered by their own governments in the 20th century alone. 170,000,000 men, women, and children who were defenseless to protect themselves. 170,000,000 victims of gun control. You have never seen anything like Innocents Betrayed. This story has never been told in a documentary film. In this powerful documentary produced by Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, you will learn how governments have historically deprived people of firearms ... and then wiped them from the face of the earth. 58 minutes that will open eyes. Destroy myths. Change minds. Save lives./n"Only the police and military should have guns; private citizens don't need them." Innocents Betrayed shows what happens when the government alone has all power. It's sensible to license guns and register their owners." Innocents Betrayed shows how licensing and registration were key elements to disarming populations, leaving them vulnerable to methodical slaughter. "America should follow the lead of the rest of the worldÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂàstrict 'gun control.'" Innocents Betrayed shows how the "rest of the world" lost 170,000,000 innocent, non-combatant men, women and children. "It can't happen here." It already has. Innocents Betrayed documents mass murders and vicious brutality in the US as a result of gun control. The victims left disarmed and powerless, by law. See with your own eyes the facts that the mainstream media has ignored and concealed for decades Except that the amount of human life lost by a gun that went off without someone's hand on the trigger or a child's finger on the trigger or the amount of family members who have killed other family members intentionally or the amount of legal gun owners who have shot their fellow employees or boss or the amount of legal gun owners who have brandished their weapons in a threat to others illegally or etc.... outweighs the times the guns have actually helped someone in a good way. So the stats actually show fearful people who arm themselves with guns are more of a nuisance and danger to themselves and others than they are a help. And I am not anti gun, just logical. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The democratic country with the most stringent gun control is Japan. According to David Kopel, research director of the Independence Institute, and a strong opponent of gun control, Japan entirely outlawed all rifles and handguns, resulting in a strong sense of security.
“You can walk down the street at 4:00 a.m.,” Kopel wrote in his article “International Perspectives on Gun Controls” published in the New York Law School Journal of International and Comparative Law. “There is very little demand even within the criminal community.” ,,ITS CULTURAL, not merely about regulations who knows what will work best for OUR culture, but I think it wont work to arm everyone indiscriminately in such an aggressive and rebellious culture,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I dont believe in taking away guns from law abiding citizens, I do believe in determining how law abiding (and mentally sane) someone is before ISSUING them a gun though,,,,, So the Government would be allowed to decide who could own a gun? This is a violation of our second Amendment rights and it would allow the Government to deny guns to anyone on a whim. Not true. It would allow non gun toting citizens to be safer from gun toting crazies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have two guns in my home and both are secure and usable......I don't have a problem with my children.....I am practiced and have gun safety training. BTW, guns don't just go off there is a reason a gun goes off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I dont believe in taking away guns from law abiding citizens, I do believe in determining how law abiding (and mentally sane) someone is before ISSUING them a gun though,,,,, So the Government would be allowed to decide who could own a gun? This is a violation of our second Amendment rights and it would allow the Government to deny guns to anyone on a whim. Not true. It would allow non gun toting citizens to be safer from gun toting crazies. Crazies who have a gun usually got them illegally. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I dont believe in taking away guns from law abiding citizens, I do believe in determining how law abiding (and mentally sane) someone is before ISSUING them a gun though,,,,, So the Government would be allowed to decide who could own a gun? This is a violation of our second Amendment rights and it would allow the Government to deny guns to anyone on a whim. Not true. It would allow non gun toting citizens to be safer from gun toting crazies. No, it wouldn't you can get a gun from non-licensed dealers on the street, or buy one from an individual, yard sale, etc. without being background checked. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I dont believe in taking away guns from law abiding citizens, I do believe in determining how law abiding (and mentally sane) someone is before ISSUING them a gun though,,,,, So the Government would be allowed to decide who could own a gun? This is a violation of our second Amendment rights and it would allow the Government to deny guns to anyone on a whim. Not true. It would allow non gun toting citizens to be safer from gun toting crazies. No, it wouldn't you can get a gun from non-licensed dealers on the street, or buy one from an individual, yard sale, etc. without being background checked. Yea I was speaking of true gun control. Also that fearmongering ploy, same as the OP, won't make anyone who has guts run out in fear and buy a gun. Only the weaklings will fall for that rhetoric anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
  
|
|
|
|
|
