Topic: Official 9/11 STORY RIPPED APART IN 5 MINUTES
Conrad_73's photo
Mon 11/04/13 07:04 AM

The alien "dustification" beams were more fun.ohwell
:laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

mightymoe's photo
Mon 11/04/13 08:51 AM
i guess some people have no lives...with every going on today, they are still worried about Cheney and Bush?

Conrad_73's photo
Mon 11/04/13 09:17 AM

i guess some people have no lives...with every going on today, they are still worried about Cheney and Bush?

If they didn't,they would have to take a hard look at Barry and His Gang!
They can't permit themselves to do that,lest that Tingly Leg would stop!

mightymoe's photo
Mon 11/04/13 09:49 AM


i guess some people have no lives...with every going on today, they are still worried about Cheney and Bush?

If they didn't,they would have to take a hard look at Barry and His Gang!
They can't permit themselves to do that,lest that Tingly Leg would stop!


lol, i guess some people like to live in the past...

Sojourning_Soul's photo
Mon 11/04/13 10:27 AM

Any truths about 9/11 will never surface when those who may have known of a truth, involement, or cover-up, are the very ones we trust to investigate it.

Lies and secrecy, or doubting by those with questions remaining, do nothing but further stir resentments among the population, and promote the abilities to withhold any truth by those in power.

I for one have my doubts, but under the present conditions and power structure, those questions only allow for labels on those who might question the official story to any degree.

mightymoe's photo
Mon 11/04/13 12:43 PM
Edited by mightymoe on Mon 11/04/13 12:44 PM


Any truths about 9/11 will never surface when those who may have known of a truth, involement, or cover-up, are the very ones we trust to investigate it.

Lies and secrecy, or doubting by those with questions remaining, do nothing but further stir resentments among the population, and promote the abilities to withhold any truth by those in power.

I for one have my doubts, but under the present conditions and power structure, those questions only allow for labels on those who might question the official story to any degree.


i'm sure everyone has doubts, but to the degree of doubting is the problem... some of the things the truthers come up with is beyond ridiculous ... lazer beams that turn steel into dust, ufos, saying there is no way a building could fall like that, when it did, twice... if they had some kind of sense about it, i could probably get on board, but the foolishness prevails...

Bestinshow's photo
Mon 11/04/13 04:30 PM
n order to understand the improbability of the government’s explanation of 9/11, it is not necessary to know anything about what force or forces brought down the three World Trade Center buildings, what hit the Pentagon or caused the explosion, the flying skills or lack thereof of the alleged hijackers, whether the airliner crashed in Pennsylvania or was shot down, whether cell phone calls made at the altitudes could be received, or any other debated aspect of the controversy.

You only have to know two things.

One is that according to the official story, a handful of Arabs, mainly Saudi Arabians, operating independently of any government and competent intelligence service, men without James Bond and V for Vendetta capabilities, outwitted not only the CIA, FBI, and National Security Agency, but all 16 US intelligence agencies, along with all security agencies of America’s NATO allies and Israel’s Mossad. Not only did the entire intelligence forces of the Western world fail, but on the morning of the attack the entire apparatus of the National Security State simultaneously failed. Airport security failed four times in one hour. NORAD failed. Air Traffic Control failed. The US Air Force failed. The National Security Council failed. Dick Cheney failed. Absolutely nothing worked. The world’s only superpower was helpless at the humiliating mercy of a few undistinguished Arabs.

It is hard to image a more far-fetched story–except for the second thing you need to know: The humiliating failure of US National Security did not result in immediate demands from the President of the United States, from Congress, from the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and from the media for an investigation of how such improbable total failure could have occurred. No one was held accountable for the greatest failure of national security in world history. Instead, the White House dragged its feet for a year resisting any investigation until the persistent demands from 9/11 families for accountability forced President George W. Bush to appoint a political commission, devoid of any experts, to hold a pretend investigation.
http://paulcraigroberts.org/2012/09/11/the-11th-anniversary-911-paul-craig-roberts/

mightymoe's photo
Mon 11/04/13 05:25 PM
whenever someone says "you only have to know 2 things", you automatically know they are wrong... you need to know everything you can about it, that way you can make an informed decision... i see you only know two things about 9-11...

JustDukkyMkII's photo
Mon 11/04/13 06:01 PM

whenever someone says "you only have to know 2 things", you automatically know they are wrong... you need to know everything you can about it, that way you can make an informed decision... i see you only know two things about 9-11...


I only need to know one thing about 911 and that is how big should the cells be after the arrests for treason and crimes against humanity?

mightymoe's photo
Mon 11/04/13 06:08 PM


whenever someone says "you only have to know 2 things", you automatically know they are wrong... you need to know everything you can about it, that way you can make an informed decision... i see you only know two things about 9-11...


I only need to know one thing about 911 and that is how big should the cells be after the arrests for treason and crimes against humanity?


whoa more foolishness... i take it your forgot the innocent untill proven guilty part of the constitution? when was anyone proven guilty besides the muslims that died?

JustDukkyMkII's photo
Mon 11/04/13 06:23 PM



whenever someone says "you only have to know 2 things", you automatically know they are wrong... you need to know everything you can about it, that way you can make an informed decision... i see you only know two things about 9-11...


I only need to know one thing about 911 and that is how big should the cells be after the arrests for treason and crimes against humanity?


whoa more foolishness... i take it your forgot the innocent untill proven guilty part of the constitution? when was anyone proven guilty besides the muslims that died?


Actually, I think your government forgot all about the presumption of innocence, especially with respect to Usama Bin Laden, David Koresh, and a whole pile of other people that your stalinist masters tortured at guantanamo and at CIA secret prisons world wide. Just the same, I'd like to see them properly arrested and given the fair public trial that they denied to the people they framed for their own crimes.

mightymoe's photo
Mon 11/04/13 06:27 PM




whenever someone says "you only have to know 2 things", you automatically know they are wrong... you need to know everything you can about it, that way you can make an informed decision... i see you only know two things about 9-11...


I only need to know one thing about 911 and that is how big should the cells be after the arrests for treason and crimes against humanity?


whoa more foolishness... i take it your forgot the innocent untill proven guilty part of the constitution? when was anyone proven guilty besides the muslims that died?


Actually, I think your government forgot all about the presumption of innocence, especially with respect to Usama Bin Laden, David Koresh, and a whole pile of other people that your stalinist masters tortured at guantanamo and at CIA secret prisons world wide. Just the same, I'd like to see them properly arrested and given the fair public trial that they denied to the people they framed for their own crimes.


thats because the people did first...as long as you can prove it, you can arrest anyone for anything... but I myself have not seen any proof of these things, just heresay from other people

JustDukkyMkII's photo
Mon 11/04/13 06:47 PM





whenever someone says "you only have to know 2 things", you automatically know they are wrong... you need to know everything you can about it, that way you can make an informed decision... i see you only know two things about 9-11...


I only need to know one thing about 911 and that is how big should the cells be after the arrests for treason and crimes against humanity?


whoa more foolishness... i take it your forgot the innocent untill proven guilty part of the constitution? when was anyone proven guilty besides the muslims that died?


Actually, I think your government forgot all about the presumption of innocence, especially with respect to Usama Bin Laden, David Koresh, and a whole pile of other people that your stalinist masters tortured at guantanamo and at CIA secret prisons world wide. Just the same, I'd like to see them properly arrested and given the fair public trial that they denied to the people they framed for their own crimes.


thats because the people did first...as long as you can prove it, you can arrest anyone for anything... but I myself have not seen any proof of these things, just heresay from other people


You've got to be kidding me!...even I have enough evidence to form a prima facie case for treason and crimes against humanity sufficient to indict several people in your own government. I'd make the arrests myself too, but the guys I want to arrest are afraid to come into Canada!

mightymoe's photo
Mon 11/04/13 07:56 PM






whenever someone says "you only have to know 2 things", you automatically know they are wrong... you need to know everything you can about it, that way you can make an informed decision... i see you only know two things about 9-11...


I only need to know one thing about 911 and that is how big should the cells be after the arrests for treason and crimes against humanity?


whoa more foolishness... i take it your forgot the innocent untill proven guilty part of the constitution? when was anyone proven guilty besides the muslims that died?


Actually, I think your government forgot all about the presumption of innocence, especially with respect to Usama Bin Laden, David Koresh, and a whole pile of other people that your stalinist masters tortured at guantanamo and at CIA secret prisons world wide. Just the same, I'd like to see them properly arrested and given the fair public trial that they denied to the people they framed for their own crimes.


thats because the people did first...as long as you can prove it, you can arrest anyone for anything... but I myself have not seen any proof of these things, just heresay from other people


You've got to be kidding me!...even I have enough evidence to form a prima facie case for treason and crimes against humanity sufficient to indict several people in your own government. I'd make the arrests myself too, but the guys I want to arrest are afraid to come into Canada!


so arrest them, if you have all this evidence... but is weird how all the lawyers in Washington doesn't have enough evidence to do anything

Bestinshow's photo
Tue 11/05/13 01:45 AM







whenever someone says "you only have to know 2 things", you automatically know they are wrong... you need to know everything you can about it, that way you can make an informed decision... i see you only know two things about 9-11...


I only need to know one thing about 911 and that is how big should the cells be after the arrests for treason and crimes against humanity?


whoa more foolishness... i take it your forgot the innocent untill proven guilty part of the constitution? when was anyone proven guilty besides the muslims that died?


Actually, I think your government forgot all about the presumption of innocence, especially with respect to Usama Bin Laden, David Koresh, and a whole pile of other people that your stalinist masters tortured at guantanamo and at CIA secret prisons world wide. Just the same, I'd like to see them properly arrested and given the fair public trial that they denied to the people they framed for their own crimes.


thats because the people did first...as long as you can prove it, you can arrest anyone for anything... but I myself have not seen any proof of these things, just heresay from other people


You've got to be kidding me!...even I have enough evidence to form a prima facie case for treason and crimes against humanity sufficient to indict several people in your own government. I'd make the arrests myself too, but the guys I want to arrest are afraid to come into Canada!


so arrest them, if you have all this evidence... but is weird how all the lawyers in Washington doesn't have enough evidence to do anything
The evidence is of course classified.

JustDukkyMkII's photo
Tue 11/05/13 02:21 AM

so arrest them, if you have all this evidence... but is weird how all the lawyers in Washington doesn't have enough evidence to do anything


Having sufficient evidence isn't the only problem:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxzSuxPPbXA

If you can't even nail cops for murder in broad daylight, what chance do you have making arrests & getting a fair trial if you have to deal with a corrupt DoJ running the courts?

The lawyers in Washington have plenty of evidence...They just can't do anything with it.

mightymoe's photo
Tue 11/05/13 09:53 AM


so arrest them, if you have all this evidence... but is weird how all the lawyers in Washington doesn't have enough evidence to do anything


Having sufficient evidence isn't the only problem:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxzSuxPPbXA

If you can't even nail cops for murder in broad daylight, what chance do you have making arrests & getting a fair trial if you have to deal with a corrupt DoJ running the courts?

The lawyers in Washington have plenty of evidence...They just can't do anything with it.


i don't know, i've never seen any of this evidence... speculation is not proof of anything...

Troubled's photo
Tue 11/05/13 10:06 AM


You mean speculation like the 911 Ommission report?

mightymoe's photo
Tue 11/05/13 10:11 AM



You mean speculation like the 911 Ommission report?


and what does that mean?

JustDukkyMkII's photo
Tue 11/05/13 10:21 AM



so arrest them, if you have all this evidence... but is weird how all the lawyers in Washington doesn't have enough evidence to do anything


Having sufficient evidence isn't the only problem:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxzSuxPPbXA

If you can't even nail cops for murder in broad daylight, what chance do you have making arrests & getting a fair trial if you have to deal with a corrupt DoJ running the courts?

The lawyers in Washington have plenty of evidence...They just can't do anything with it.


i don't know, i've never seen any of this evidence... speculation is not proof of anything...


Who said anything about speculation? I'm talking about EVIDENCE, not speculation or proof.

In law, "proof" of guilt is the verdict of guilty reached at trial. How in hell can anyone prove their guilt if they aren't even arrested and put on trial???

I'm pretty sure you've never seen any evidence because you are too chicken to look for it; if you saw it, it might make you feel an uncomfortable moral duty to your nation to DO something besides pretending it doesn't exist.

If you haven't got the balls for justice, at least have the decency to get Bush & Cheney north of the 49th parallel...We can try them here!