Really, where?

we know smoking is unsafe because of the PAST observations of those who smoke

we know speeding can be dangerous because of the PAST observations of those who sped

likewise , with politics, the PAST can be a lesson regarding what does or doesn't work,,,


insanity: doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome

this observation REQUIRES reviewing PAST choices,,


the piece is not about Bush, it is about 'haters',,,,

Now that would be a true fact.

i don't hate deers, they taste really good.

And free.

So, the OP of this thread is the product of someone who hates the Republican Party and FOX News. The opinion piece quoted in the OP makes false claims about the Republican Party and Fox News.

Pot, meet kettle.



Now, I personally have challenged the vile hatred toward President Obama that is frequently expressed in this particular forum. Yet, that expressed hatred doesn't justify the expressed hatred in this thread's OP.

It is sad to see Republican-haters continuing to promote false claims about Republicans ...

... such as the false claim that Republicans are more racist than Democrats,

... such as the false claim that Republicans are comfortable with their alleged racism.

Yes, the OP of this thread quotes the opinion of a person who is full of hate. The OP of this thread promotes hate.

As I see it, to agree with the OP is to agree with the hate that the OP expresses.

no, it was about hating bush... people are going to hate, regardless... these diversionary tactics you liberals always try to use makes no sense... hate is not the problem, bush is not the problem (anymore), barry and congress is the problem...

I have no heroes,, men are all flawed

the 'hero' is symbolic emotionalism I don't relate to

I do have those I 'respect' more than others
but no 'heros'


and DODO:

I Agree with his assessment of 'haters' , he is pretty descriptive of what QUALIFIES,,,

I would call it hypocrites, but being they are hypocrites full of 'hate' , haters suffices as well

I 'hate' no one,,,I agree with some words and behaviors and not others

that is all,,

Bush was mentioned ONCE,, it wasn't about Bush, it was about 'haters'

That is absolutely hilarious, but now that I have stopped rolling across the floor...

Actually no, that is not what all commentaries do, they normally have a subject and comment upon that subject or otherwise it would just be an idiots rant with no meaning which a lot of the entitlement crowd seem to do.

Now trying to use "Odumboites" and "Welfare Hos" as an example pretty much negates the whole argument presented by this poster as those are finite subjects and not gross generalizations.

And again with the opinions, opinion are the author's interpretations of facts, but are still based on some facts. Without facts as a basis it is just some idiotic rant.

Dear OP,

But the difference is the first statement is just a rant with no facts to support any of the parameters, such as whose policy, what emergency, by what right, all assumptions the negate the whole argument.l

Now the second statement is not hate as it contains an element of truth, I know that is a foreign concept to the entitlement crowd, but it is still true all the same. In a christian environment, women who get abortions are considered a party to murder but they would not use the word "ho" to describe the woman, an element of truth. Now Odumbo and Bush being child killers are just a plain true statement, Bush as collateral damage to his actions and Odumbo as a direct action. That would make Bush guilty of manslaughter and Odumbo a murderer.



Actually if you ask those that hang with her, both statement would be fact. Why do you think she needed Rehab?



And the rest is just pure rant and deserves no response as that would portend to add validity to trash.

kewl

'haters' is a 'finite' subject too

Im more than aware what opinions and facts are

and thanx for the correction, I should say MOST MINGLE commentaries , instead of 'all' commentaries,,,

Haters try to vilify people and political parties.

For example, haters try to vilify the Republican Party by making the false claim that the GOP is more racist than the Democratic Party. The two parties are actually equals when it comes to racism.

Whenever the above-stated party equality is mentioned, haters will still try to vilify the Republican Party by making the false claim that Republicans are comfortable with their alleged racism.

At the other end of the hate spectrum, haters will continue to make the false claim that President Obama isn't a natural born citizen of the USA. Haters will also make the false claim that the Democratic Party is anti-God.

Know how? Yeah that would be correct, you don't know, it is just what someone has told you. But then you have committed to a major course of study in those fields and can do a peer analysis. Of course not just another opinion backed by no facts.

Now as for speeding, I have and do drive vehicles at speeds within the capabilities of the vehicles. I loved my vehicles that would cruise well in excess of the 100 MPH mark. Nothing like passing a police cruiser at more than 50 MPH speed difference. Also nothing like driving at 115 MPH and being passed by a vehicle with a rated cruise speed of 160MPH and doing it, dang those Dino Ferrais are fast.

So I can attest that your speed statement is just pure BS.

And yes the piece is all about Bush and the Repulseacons and how Odumbo is so great.

.. from one Canadian.. to all you Yankees... why can't we all just get along...

I agree with haters vilifying people

being opposed or in disagreement to the ACTIONS and WORDS of people is quite different from HATING on people,,,and usually doesn't require or include the use of insulting and juvenile NAME CALLING and LABELS,,,

I am guilty with fighting juvenile behavior with juvenile behavior,,,

but rarely INTRODUCING it or INITIATING it,,,

Im definitely a work in progress with the 'turn the other cheek' philosophy DoDo

but life is good and getting better by the minute,, when I do become more of what I am meant to become, I will probably be somewhere else around the crowds who are uplifting, compassionate, intelligent, and Inspiring,,,

away from the juvenile rhetoric of 'haters'

That makes sense.

The thread is a blatant attempt to lump all who are not like the Liberal as haters.