2 Next
Topic: Michelle Obama afraid of media attention‏?
no photo
Thu 03/20/14 04:19 PM

First of all, Mrs. Obama isn't an elected official. She isn't even a government official. So, she doesn't need to tell reporters anything if she doesn't want to.


She does when she is traveling as an official "envoy" of the people on the peoples dime. That places her in the servant role and servants owe their masters full accountability.

{quote]
Second, Lolo Soetoro was President Obama's step-father. President Obama's legal last name has always been Obama.


Wrong again, where is the paperwork where he changed it back from Soetoro, the name he had in Indonesia? Oh, another sealed document.


Anyway, attacking the spouse of a politician because one hates the politician is, IMHO, inappropriate at best.


Only in your mind, I can criticize any servant any time I desire and see is a servant with her hand in the public till.

Sojourning_Soul's photo
Thu 03/20/14 04:29 PM
Edited by Sojourning_Soul on Thu 03/20/14 04:41 PM

Oooops!


no photo
Thu 03/20/14 05:07 PM
Oh I can't wait to see this denial.

willing2's photo
Thu 03/20/14 05:26 PM

Oh I can't wait to see this denial.

It will be either denial or avoidance.

I detest liberal trolls.


no photo
Thu 03/20/14 05:51 PM


Oh I can't wait to see this denial.

It will be either denial or avoidance.

I detest liberal trolls.


Same here, can't just sit idly by and have them spout their BS. But what is remarkable is the pure gall of some to continue to not just display absolute stupidity but to instill it as some sort of right.

Conrad_73's photo
Fri 03/21/14 01:35 AM




another 'entitled' reporter

got an answer that wasn't controversial enough to lead(if it bleeds it leads),

a formulaic explanation about "the power and importance of education" and "reaching people," followed by an explanation that the First Lady would participate in open press events and take questions online and in forums

so she created controversy about the 'mystery' of who answered her, and the fact they didn't want to be specifically named in her piece,lol

whoa


this government is so secretive i can't believe anything they do or say...

just another waste of taxpayers money so mrs. soetoro can be queen...


First of all, Mrs. Obama isn't an elected official. She isn't even a government official. So, she doesn't need to tell reporters anything if she doesn't want to.

Second, Lolo Soetoro was President Obama's step-father. President Obama's legal last name has always been Obama.

Anyway, attacking the spouse of a politician because one hates the politician is, IMHO, inappropriate at best.


Excuse me? The 1st.....lady?.... has a position, an office, a staff, and security.

Otherwise, why are students forced to eat shite they are refusing to for school lunches?

However, a vacation to China to beg for more money they have recently quit spending buying our debt, and spitting in the face of taxpayers with her flamboyant lifestyle at our expense (and taking the family, her mother, staff, security, a fleet of vehicles, and probably a warship or two along as well).

One thing tho..... what has China got to do with school lunches and child health in America? And her momma is now an Ambassador to China? Hmmmmm... didn't know that

The USA is a Republic.... we don't have Royals (except in their own minds)!



Sojourning_Soul's photo
Fri 03/21/14 04:28 AM
Edited by Sojourning_Soul on Fri 03/21/14 04:33 AM





another 'entitled' reporter

got an answer that wasn't controversial enough to lead(if it bleeds it leads),

a formulaic explanation about "the power and importance of education" and "reaching people," followed by an explanation that the First Lady would participate in open press events and take questions online and in forums

so she created controversy about the 'mystery' of who answered her, and the fact they didn't want to be specifically named in her piece,lol

whoa


this government is so secretive i can't believe anything they do or say...

just another waste of taxpayers money so mrs. soetoro can be queen...


First of all, Mrs. Obama isn't an elected official. She isn't even a government official. So, she doesn't need to tell reporters anything if she doesn't want to.

Second, Lolo Soetoro was President Obama's step-father. President Obama's legal last name has always been Obama.

Anyway, attacking the spouse of a politician because one hates the politician is, IMHO, inappropriate at best.


Excuse me? The 1st.....lady?.... has a position, an office, a staff, and security.

Otherwise, why are students forced to eat shite they are refusing to for school lunches?

However, a vacation to China to beg for more money they have recently quit spending buying our debt, and spitting in the face of taxpayers with her flamboyant lifestyle at our expense (and taking the family, her mother, staff, security, a fleet of vehicles, and probably a warship or two along as well).

One thing tho..... what has China got to do with school lunches and child health in America? And her momma is now an Ambassador to China? Hmmmmm... didn't know that

The USA is a Republic.... we don't have Royals (except in their own minds)!





laugh more like the Bungler King

He deserves to reign in another place.... where they would appreciate his pretty mouth.....

no photo
Fri 03/21/14 09:32 AM




So he replaces this guy...



But really, more like this....



And totally misinterprets this...


Dodo_David's photo
Fri 03/21/14 09:37 AM


Oooops!




Yep, it is amazing what you can do with photoshop. indifferent

Dodo_David's photo
Fri 03/21/14 09:45 AM
From About.com:

Analysis: This is a hoax aimed at convincing the gullible that Barack Obama attended college as a foreign student, and therefore could not have been born in the U.S., and therefore is ineligible to be president.

The first clue that it's a fake is the name, "Barry Soetoro." Though Soetoro was his stepfather's last name and Obama did attend grade school in Indonesia under that name, there's no evidence he used any name other than Barack (or "Barry") Obama while attending college (for example, see the byline of an essay by Obama published in Columbia University's weekly magazine, The Sundial, in 1983: "Barack Obama").

Secondly, it's as easy as doing a Google image search on the phrase "Columbia University Student ID" to locate the original image from which the bogus Obama ID card was made. Issued in 1998, it bears the same identification number as the one supposedly issued to Obama above. The name of the original cardholder was neither Barry Soetoro nor Barack Obama.

Thirdly, as noted on Snopes.com, the university didn't begin issuing digitally generated ID cards such as the one pictured above until 1996. It cannot be anything other than a fake.


Here is the real ID card that was used to produce the fake one depicting Obama:


mightymoe's photo
Fri 03/21/14 09:45 AM



Oooops!




Yep, it is amazing what you can do with photoshop. indifferent


and how do you know it's Photoshopped? are you an expert on digital photo analysis? or are you just saying that because you have nothing else to say?

mightymoe's photo
Fri 03/21/14 09:46 AM

From About.com:

Analysis: This is a hoax aimed at convincing the gullible that Barack Obama attended college as a foreign student, and therefore could not have been born in the U.S., and therefore is ineligible to be president.

The first clue that it's a fake is the name, "Barry Soetoro." Though Soetoro was his stepfather's last name and Obama did attend grade school in Indonesia under that name, there's no evidence he used any name other than Barack (or "Barry") Obama while attending college (for example, see the byline of an essay by Obama published in Columbia University's weekly magazine, The Sundial, in 1983: "Barack Obama").

Secondly, it's as easy as doing a Google image search on the phrase "Columbia University Student ID" to locate the original image from which the bogus Obama ID card was made. Issued in 1998, it bears the same identification number as the one supposedly issued to Obama above. The name of the original cardholder was neither Barry Soetoro nor Barack Obama.

Thirdly, as noted on Snopes.com, the university didn't begin issuing digitally generated ID cards such as the one pictured above until 1996. It cannot be anything other than a fake.


Here is the real ID card that was used to produce the fake one depicting Obama:




post one from 81 then...

willing2's photo
Fri 03/21/14 09:49 AM
The Obama Administration isn’t joking, however, when it insists on people having to show proper identification for a book signing with Michelle Obama but also insists that NO ID should be required for a person to vote for/against a binding law or a representative to any political office here in the United States.

msharmony's photo
Fri 03/21/14 09:49 AM



Oooops!




Yep, it is amazing what you can do with photoshop. indifferent



lol,, jumping on any print that supports an opinion, without verifying,,,

considering the Columbia digital id wasn't used until 1996, more than a DECADE after Obama attended

I have researched and corrected the reposting of false pics several times in politics, but still some REFUSE to look beyond the initial claims,,,


is there anything else expected in politics threads?..lol

no photo
Fri 03/21/14 10:22 AM




Oooops!




Yep, it is amazing what you can do with photoshop. indifferent



lol,, jumping on any print that supports an opinion, without verifying,,,

considering the Columbia digital id wasn't used until 1996, more than a DECADE after Obama attended

I have researched and corrected the reposting of false pics several times in politics, but still some REFUSE to look beyond the initial claims,,,


is there anything else expected in politics threads?..lol


Coming from the current administration nothing is expected but more lies. How about "barry the liar" producing REAL documents. What is the reason not to? Would not that end all speculation? This liar has told so many lies he has become one himself.

msharmony's photo
Fri 03/21/14 10:34 AM
seriously? how would he do that?

just the question about 'real' documents suggests that he could never do enough to prove the validity of anything he produced for those who wish to believe the negative anyway,,,


no photo
Fri 03/21/14 10:43 AM
Edited by alleoops on Fri 03/21/14 10:47 AM

seriously? how would he do that?

just the question about 'real' documents suggests that he could never do enough to prove the validity of anything he produced for those who wish to believe the negative anyway,,,




That's the only position that a liar can take.

msharmony's photo
Fri 03/21/14 10:46 AM
or are falsely accused

ask any of those who served time before dna proved them innocent, because police were so certain and believed so completely that they were guilty


its rare one can do enough that will change ones opinion once their mind is made up that its fact,,,,


no photo
Fri 03/21/14 10:55 AM

or are falsely accused

ask any of those who served time before dna proved them innocent, because police were so certain and believed so completely that they were guilty


its rare one can do enough that will change ones opinion once their mind is made up that its fact,,,,




Not talking about DNA. Just plain, simple documents. you know the kind that most Americans produce to get jobs, drivers license, etc.
Unless, someone is covering something up. See, how it raises many questions? What's the deal?

2 Next