Topic: poll: Why is more likely to kill you? | |
---|---|
Who is more likely to kill you?
A. a Middle Eastern terrorist? B. a "thug"? C. a pissed off white guy who thinks you should feel his pain? D. the girl who told me that I couldn't F the S out of a virgin (hey I was tired)? E. other? |
|
|
|
E.
The old broad ya cheated on. |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Tue 05/27/14 02:44 PM
|
|
Who is more likely to kill you? A. a Middle Eastern terrorist? B. a "thug"? C. a pissed off white guy who thinks you should feel his pain? D. the girl who told me that I couldn't F the S out of a virgin (hey I was tired)? E. other? hmm, depends upon whom you are most often around for me, from experience, Im leaning towards C but only because I have TWICE been accosted personally by white males,,, someone in the middle east is more likely to succumb to A than C or Dlol I think all categories of murderer are 'thugs',, so that's kind of a trick option ![]() |
|
|
|
Edited by
Conrad_73
on
Tue 05/27/14 03:02 PM
|
|
during a Law-enforcement-Action most likely!
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Who is more likely to kill you? In the USA, the correct answer is "An idiot who is driving a vehicle." |
|
|
|
very close though
Motor vehicle traffic deaths •Number of deaths: 33,687 •Deaths per 100,000 population: 10.9 All firearm deaths •Number of deaths: 31,672 •Deaths per 100,000 population: 10.3 http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/injury.htm |
|
|
|
AAAA dude you should have added a crazy azz stocker from mingale2..
thats how i was thinking i was going to go.. I can still here her saying.NASCAR if i cant have you nobody will..lol |
|
|
|
during a Law-enforcement-Action most likely! ![]() ![]() At least that one involved a crime: Man Dies in Police Raid on Wrong House |
|
|
|
very close though Motor vehicle traffic deaths â¢Number of deaths: 33,687 â¢Deaths per 100,000 population: 10.9 All firearm deaths â¢Number of deaths: 31,672 â¢Deaths per 100,000 population: 10.3 http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/injury.htm And little miss libreal thinking................ that somehow them guns are so dangerous. "Firearm—In 2010, 31,672 persons died from firearm injuries in the United States (Tables 18 and 19), accounting for 17.5% of all injury deaths in that year. The two major component causes of all firearm injury deaths in 2010 were suicide (61.2%, 19,392) and homicide (35.0%, 11,078), but let's not forget: Legal intervention/war 344. That leaves 858 that were unintentional of undetermined. So I guess that if killing someone were a crime we could reduce that total by 35%. And if there were no guns, 19,392 people wouldn't have killed themselves. But what I want to know is what is that 344? Does that mean of we disarm police, we could save 344 people a year, I'll vote for that. |
|
|
|
Who is more likely to kill you? In the USA, the correct answer is "An idiot who is driving a vehicle." Then stop driving. |
|
|
|
Who is more likely to kill you? In the USA, the correct answer is "An idiot who is driving a vehicle." Then stop driving. Dude, you don't have to be driving in order to be killed by an idiot who is driving a vehicle. |
|
|
|
Who is more likely to kill you? In the USA, the correct answer is "An idiot who is driving a vehicle." Then stop driving. Dude, you don't have to be driving in order to be killed by an idiot who is driving a vehicle. Yea, dude, it's called a drive by shooting. |
|
|
|
Who is more likely to kill you? In the USA, the correct answer is "An idiot who is driving a vehicle." Then stop driving. Dude, you don't have to be driving in order to be killed by an idiot who is driving a vehicle. Yea, dude, it's called a drive by shooting. Nah. Plenty of people who were not driving have been killed by a motorist who was not driving properly. In once case (that took place in my state), a man deliberately drove his vehicle into a crowd of people. |
|
|
|
Who is more likely to kill you? In the USA, the correct answer is "An idiot who is driving a vehicle." Then stop driving. Dude, you don't have to be driving in order to be killed by an idiot who is driving a vehicle. Yea, dude, it's called a drive by shooting. Nah. Plenty of people who were not driving have been killed by a motorist who was not driving properly. In once case (that took place in my state), a man deliberately drove his vehicle into a crowd of people. Was that in the Hebei Province of northern China? |
|
|
|
Who is more likely to kill you? In the USA, the correct answer is "An idiot who is driving a vehicle." Then stop driving. Dude, you don't have to be driving in order to be killed by an idiot who is driving a vehicle. Wow, is that what I meant? |
|
|
|
Who is more likely to kill you? In the USA, the correct answer is "An idiot who is driving a vehicle." Then stop driving. Dude, you don't have to be driving in order to be killed by an idiot who is driving a vehicle. Yea, dude, it's called a drive by shooting. Nah. Plenty of people who were not driving have been killed by a motorist who was not driving properly. In once case (that took place in my state), a man deliberately drove his vehicle into a crowd of people. If they would get a driver's license that wouldn't happen, the state would be responsible to insure no injuries occurred. |
|
|
|
Who is more likely to kill you? In the USA, the correct answer is "An idiot who is driving a vehicle." Then stop driving. Dude, you don't have to be driving in order to be killed by an idiot who is driving a vehicle. Yea, dude, it's called a drive by shooting. Nah. Plenty of people who were not driving have been killed by a motorist who was not driving properly. In once case (that took place in my state), a man deliberately drove his vehicle into a crowd of people. Was that in the Hebei Province of northern China? No, could of been to one in Austin, guy ran over a bunch of liberals outside a nightclub while being chased by the police for drunk driving in a crowded downtown area during a festival. |
|
|