There are two popular metaphorical references to 'sons of God' found in the Bible. The first of which I was speaking of is that of the Angels, like that mentioned in Job 1:6. The latter was a reference to those who are obedient to God, and thus become metaphorical sons of God. This can not be emphasized enough when for example looking to the 1st letter of John chapter 4 onward. Really, are the sons of dis-obedience any more originating with the Devil then that of God?
Good or Evil the Almighty God is the Creator of both. What is more Satin can not create anything of his own accord, except by God's leave.

Most early Xians were Arian in orientation:

Arius taught that God the Father and the Son of God did not always exist together eternally.[5] Arians taught that the Logos was a divine being created by God the Father before the world. The Son of God is subordinate to God the Father.[6] In English-language works, it is sometimes said that Arians believe that Jesus is or was a "creature", in the sense of "created being". Arius and his followers appealed to Bible verses such as Jesus saying that the father is "greater than I" (John 14:28), and "The LORD/Yahweh created me at the beginning of his work" (Proverbs 8:22).[7]

Controversy over Arianism arose in the late 3rd century and persisted throughout most of the 4th century. It involved most church members—from simple believers, priests and monks to bishops, emperors and members of Rome's imperial family. Such a deep controversy within the Church during this period of its development could not have materialized without significant historical influences providing a basis for the Arian doctrines.[8] Some historians define and minimize the Arian conflict as the exclusive construct of Arius and a handful of rogue bishops engaging in heresy;[citation needed] but others recognize Arius as a defender of 'original' Christianity,[citation needed] or as providing a conservative response against the politicization of Christianity seeking union with the Roman Empire.[citation needed] Of the roughly three hundred bishops in attendance at the Council of Nicea, only two bishops did not sign the Nicene Creed, which condemned Arianism.[9] Two Roman emperors, Constantius II and Valens, became Arians, as did prominent Gothic, Vandal and Lombard warlords both before and after the fall of the Western Roman Empire.

Lucian of Antioch had contended for a Christology very similar to what would later be known as Arianism[citation needed] and is thought to have influenced its development.[citation needed] (Arius was a student of Lucian's private academy in Antioch.) After the dispute over Arianism became politicized and a general solution to the divisiveness was sought—with a great majority holding to the Trinitarian position—the Arian position was officially declared heterodox.

Arianism continued to exist for several decades, even within the family of the emperor, the imperial nobility, and higher-ranking clergy.[citation needed] But, by the end of the 4th century it had surrendered its remaining ground to Trinitarianism in the official Roman church hierarchy.[citation needed] In western Europe, Arianism, which had been taught by Ulfilas, the Arian missionary to the Germanic tribes, was dominant among the Goths and Lombards (and, significantly for the late Empire, the Vandals); but it ceased to be the mainstream belief by the 8th century, as the rulers of these Germanic tribes gradually adopted Catholicism, beginning with Clovis I of the Franks in 496. It was crushed through a series of military and political conquests,[citation needed] culminating in religious and political domination of Europe over the next 1,000 years by Trinitarian forces in the Catholic Church. Trinitarianism has remained the dominant doctrine in all major branches of the Eastern and Western Church and later within Protestantism.

Whateverrr.. call him a king, a creator, whatever we call him, whoever we are, we all need one..
#just saying.

Yes we all need one. If we can call him whatever we want, then why do we need him in the 1st place? He listens to everyone then because of belief their should be no Doctrine of Hell. Yet all teach a fiery place for the unbeliever. The problem is the same now as it was before. The ones in power teaching us the word tells us we r to stupid to understand it ourselves. We need them and needing them denies the Power of the Creator. It is all custom but we love custom. We love to go to our churches and believe we r saved. Our Minister says so. As long as u follow what he says. Yahshua did not so they plotted to kill him from the beginning after his Baptism John says. Why did they plot to kill him? Because he did not g along with their customs. He did not follow them he followed the words of his Father which is the Scriptures. Choose who you will follow. Man or Life

Why did they plot to kill him.?
I think it has something to do with freedom..the bible starts with the fact that God built free choice into human race n the beggining..therefore, there would have to b the possibility of misuse of that freedom..

My apologies TB Rich, Your obviously one of God's wondrous enigmas.

Wa Alaykum As-Salaam... Okay, maybe You'll make a great Muslim yet.

Sufi, means 'Mystic'

Some have referred to myself as such, but I also decline.

Heck...! I'm not even a Sheihk. The fact is I've only been a Muslim for the last 14 years. I don't have the whole Quran memorized. I've only ever been able to read it in English and I can't speak in Arabic at length at all. I do try to read the entire Quran at least once a year though. (It's only about three-quarters the length of the New Testament) Reading the Quran is a modest goal.

Everybody whom I meet, I tell them, for as often as we may get on the subject of religion, "Islam is not so much a format for a religion, as a minimum prerequisite of faith."

The Quran teaches, that every original format of Judaism and Christianity is a form of acceptable worship. It's apostasy that invalidates their format. Even modern Islam has its apostate factions too.

You, (Everybody In General) must make 'submission to God' their own obligation of faith firstly.

The Quran's purpose is to reiterate God's original minimum prerequisites for humanity.

First, and foremost among those prerequisites, is You must not believe in or worship any other gods other than the One True God.
Polytheism or the worship and belief in 'many gods' can not be tolerated... And yet the majority of humanity can't seem to evade that simple prerequisite. Christendom for the most part would not only advocate that You worship the Heavenly Father, but also Saints, the Virgin Mary, the Holy Ghost or Spirit, Jesus along with Icons, Statues, and Crucifixes.

No disrespect in intended for those whom the True God has sent, but He hasn't wanted His worship to be redirected to others without His leave. This would be an insult to the Almighty's majesty.

Once more, Jesus with all modesty, never asked to be worshiped. To the contrary, he reproached those who did. [Mark 10:18]