Why President Rand Paul Will Keep America Safer Than Bush, Obama, and Hillary Clinton

President Rand Paul will keep you safer than the president who brought America into Iraq and Afghanistan, the same man who in 2000 argued against nation building and foreign military entanglements. He'll keep you safer than the president who just doubled America's military presence in Iraq, yet in 2011 promised, "The long war in Iraq will come to an end by the end of this year." Rand Paul will also keep you safer than Hillary Clinton, a centrist with a neoconservative advisor named Robert Kagan who is quoted in The New York Times as saying, "I feel comfortable with her on foreign policy." Rand Paul will also defend you against terrorism and other national security threats better than Ted Cruz, Mike Huckabee, Ben Carson and any of the other sycophants in American politics. Why? The answer lies in who doesn't want Senator Paul to be the next president of the United States.

<continue>

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/why-president-rand-paul-w_b_6150868.html

now why would Soros throw his weight behind Paul?

Ole Rand may be playing the game like JFK did to get elected.

If so, hopefully it's not with the same results

definitely not an Incident the US needs!

Given Soros' history, his backing of Rand Paul, would be indicative that Paul is just another America hatin' fool.

I think it has more to do with profits.

Under the Dems Soros scored big time businesses at pennies on the dollar. With Rand as POTUS, lowering taxes, and following the business histories of the Repulsicons, those troubled businesses will become money makers or sold for big time profits in a new "business friendly" economy!

First, Rand Paul is not his dad, even by a long shot. And even though his dad was for liberty and clearing up the most pressing issue plaguing this country, the FED, he was still a politician and believed in the statist world.

Second, I find it remarkably ignorant that after more than two centuries of failure, that the population still has the opinion that the mere changing of the color of the political team as supposed leaders would somehow make something different when in reality all it does is shift the blame game until the next elections. Both teams only have the methodology of the slavery of the people as a difference, not the absolute goal of slavery.

And lastly, there can be no change until the two most inherent problems are not only addressed but eliminated: bankers and lawyers. It is the bankers that make slaves of all and the lawyers that are there enablers, insuring the system can not change within itself.

So until the Fed is not only eliminated but those that probagated the absolute evil of it's methods are bought to justice and stripped of all the wealth 'stolen' from the people will the country start on the road to recovery. A country rich and vibrant as seen in the late 19th and early 20th century before the 1913 act that created the Fed.

But, unless the legal system, specifically the courts, are again part of the people under common law, there can be no change.

Not gonna happen. He is to radical just like his racist old man.

Because Rand, like his racist lunatic father un not electable nationally. He is a Sharron Angle fringe candidate.

What, using the Mafia?

Could also be a Soros plot to smear who he sees, as the most viable "conservative" candidate.

It would further divide conservative votes.

a possibility!

Paul is NOT Conservative or a Republican. He is as much of a RHINO as John McCain. If he were president no American on foreign soil would be safe. I would actually vote for Hillary Clinton if somehow Paul weaseled his way onto the Republican ballot and that is saying something as I have NEVER voted for a Libbo in my life.

ditto's to those that sea into the game and know the games mortal rules.