Topic: haplogene I1
Jesusprincessmt's photo
Wed 12/24/14 06:18 AM
http://beforeitsnews.com/prophecy/2014/06/geneticists-are-spell-bound-by-discovery-of-dna-that-confirms-fallen-angels-mated-with-humans-stunning-videos-2462290.html.

This is very interesting to me because it links science with what The Bible says

metalwing's photo
Wed 12/24/14 07:03 AM
Maybe. The link didn't work so I used it to search for your site.

http://beforeitsnews.com/prophecy/2014/06/geneticists-are-spell-bound-by-discovery-of-dna-that-confirms-fallen-angels-mated-with-humans-stunning-videos-2462290.html

The website is a little like the show "Ancient Aliens" which brings up lots of these questions. The website looks at the DNA from a religious point of view.

It should be noted that there were multiple human species at one time. The only one left is us homo sapiens. We interbred with, at least, some of them as the portion of Neanderthal DNA can be measured in most non Africans. The portion of Denisovans is not known and some of the more isolated species, such as the Hobbits, may not have mixed with modern humans.

Conrad_73's photo
Wed 12/24/14 07:27 AM
Edited by Conrad_73 on Wed 12/24/14 07:37 AM

Maybe. The link didn't work so I used it to search for your site.

http://beforeitsnews.com/prophecy/2014/06/geneticists-are-spell-bound-by-discovery-of-dna-that-confirms-fallen-angels-mated-with-humans-stunning-videos-2462290.html

The website is a little like the show "Ancient Aliens" which brings up lots of these questions. The website looks at the DNA from a religious point of view.

It should be noted that there were multiple human species at one time. The only one left is us homo sapiens. We interbred with, at least, some of them as the portion of Neanderthal DNA can be measured in most non Africans. The portion of Denisovans is not known and some of the more isolated species, such as the Hobbits, may not have mixed with modern humans.


The Comments to the Story are more interesting than the Story itself!bigsmile

BeforeItsNews,is,to say the least,a somewhat "Unusual" Site!spock

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_floresiensis

Tolkien Hobbit?:smile:

metalwing's photo
Wed 12/24/14 07:44 AM


Maybe. The link didn't work so I used it to search for your site.

http://beforeitsnews.com/prophecy/2014/06/geneticists-are-spell-bound-by-discovery-of-dna-that-confirms-fallen-angels-mated-with-humans-stunning-videos-2462290.html

The website is a little like the show "Ancient Aliens" which brings up lots of these questions. The website looks at the DNA from a religious point of view.

It should be noted that there were multiple human species at one time. The only one left is us homo sapiens. We interbred with, at least, some of them as the portion of Neanderthal DNA can be measured in most non Africans. The portion of Denisovans is not known and some of the more isolated species, such as the Hobbits, may not have mixed with modern humans.


The Comments to the Story are more interesting than the Story itself!bigsmile

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_floresiensis

Tolkien Hobbit?:smile:


No. :smile: Homo floresiensis (Hobbits) are from Sumatra, specifically the island of Flores, Indonesia.

The "I" group "Haplogroup" migrated from Sweden/Norway and would have appeared as tall, fair skinned, horny visitors to the Middle Easterners. The record of Viking exploration routes includes paths South through Russia.


Jesusprincessmt's photo
Wed 12/24/14 07:57 AM
Edited by Jesusprincessmt on Wed 12/24/14 07:55 AM
I have yet to figure out how to embed a link in the forums. Sorry.

I did more research because it was just a video of a lady talking, which is not really credible. I did find that this chunk of DNA was introduced around the time period of the flood mentioned in the Bible. I also did more research about giants living today. I was amazed to see actual pictures of proportionate people that are huge in stature and build. This is interesting to me because I have a seven foot relative and very large built family members. They are built like tanks. The thought was the growth hormone was over producing because of a tumor or some other cause. Most people that have this problem are usually disfigured in some form.

There are other people of many races that are portionate compared to their size, but huge compared to us.

Jesusprincessmt's photo
Wed 12/24/14 08:03 AM
We also have tracked that part of the family back to the Nordic region. I thought that part was very interesting also. I joke that we are the land of the giants, but maybe this part of the family really does come from a different hominid species of giants.

Conrad_73's photo
Wed 12/24/14 08:08 AM



Maybe. The link didn't work so I used it to search for your site.

http://beforeitsnews.com/prophecy/2014/06/geneticists-are-spell-bound-by-discovery-of-dna-that-confirms-fallen-angels-mated-with-humans-stunning-videos-2462290.html

The website is a little like the show "Ancient Aliens" which brings up lots of these questions. The website looks at the DNA from a religious point of view.

It should be noted that there were multiple human species at one time. The only one left is us homo sapiens. We interbred with, at least, some of them as the portion of Neanderthal DNA can be measured in most non Africans. The portion of Denisovans is not known and some of the more isolated species, such as the Hobbits, may not have mixed with modern humans.


The Comments to the Story are more interesting than the Story itself!bigsmile

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_floresiensis

Tolkien Hobbit?:smile:


No. :smile: Homo floresiensis (Hobbits) are from Sumatra, specifically the island of Flores, Indonesia.

The "I" group "Haplogroup" migrated from Sweden/Norway and would have appeared as tall, fair skinned, horny visitors to the Middle Easterners. The record of Viking exploration routes includes paths South through Russia.



seems there are/were some other strange Species of Animals on that Island!

Dodo_David's photo
Wed 12/24/14 08:56 AM

http://beforeitsnews.com/prophecy/2014/06/geneticists-are-spell-bound-by-discovery-of-dna-that-confirms-fallen-angels-mated-with-humans-stunning-videos-2462290.html.

This is very interesting to me because it links science with what The Bible says


So, you enjoy reading online tabloids. laugh

Jesusprincessmt's photo
Wed 12/24/14 08:57 AM
Supposedly this "alien" can procreate with different kinds of animals.

Dodo_David's photo
Wed 12/24/14 09:09 AM
Now I get it. This thread has been misplaced. It should be in the Jokes & Funny Stories forum.

Jesusprincessmt's photo
Wed 12/24/14 09:22 AM
If this is a tabloid article then there sure is a lot of research done on it. Many sites talk about this haplo group

Sojourning_Soul's photo
Wed 12/24/14 10:13 AM

If this is a tabloid article then there sure is a lot of research done on it. Many sites talk about this haplo group


Most info we get today would qualify as "tabloid", even under the heading of "headline news"

The nature of a person is to accept their own beliefs as gospel and disavow any others that don't fit their understanding or belief system.

Don't let others opinions frustrate you, we still have a right to exercise our own beliefs in this country....

even aliens that feast on cats bigsmile

no photo
Wed 12/24/14 10:59 AM
Here is a source that provide three videos on the subject of ancient remains:

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLw3AsroE_OEJURUlDwg55rJq89vRhCXp5

This has nothing to do with "angels" or "religion".

metalwing's photo
Wed 12/24/14 12:29 PM

If this is a tabloid article then there sure is a lot of research done on it. Many sites talk about this haplo group


The key word here is quality, not quantity. Wiki is a good source for most general research but can fall apart on the really technical subjects. Major university websites are sometimes good sources but sometimes not.

Blogs are the worst websites followed by the online news magazines. They tend to take a little truth and make outrageous projections that turn the resulting conclusions into something far from the truth.

Real magazines like Discover and Popular Science tend to be more accurate than not but still rely on some (possibly goofy) science writer to turn boring facts into exciting reading.

There is an old saying, "Consider the source!".:smile:

Dodo_David's photo
Wed 12/24/14 01:52 PM


If this is a tabloid article then there sure is a lot of research done on it. Many sites talk about this haplo group


The key word here is quality, not quantity. Wiki is a good source for most general research but can fall apart on the really technical subjects. Major university websites are sometimes good sources but sometimes not.

Blogs are the worst websites followed by the online news magazines. They tend to take a little truth and make outrageous projections that turn the resulting conclusions into something far from the truth.

Real magazines like Discover and Popular Science tend to be more accurate than not but still rely on some (possibly goofy) science writer to turn boring facts into exciting reading.

There is an old saying, "Consider the source!".:smile:



Someone wake me when an actual science magazine reports that scientists have empirical evidence for the existence of supernatural beings called "angels".