100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: no genitals,,, | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
what if people no longer had genitals?
technology figures out how to clone individuals making sex not really NECESSARY for procreation social pressure makes male and female the COMPLETE SAME THING< making it politically incorrect to really acknowledge a difference , making gender unnecessary so we could allow people to clone their kids engineered somehow to not have sexual organs,,,,, and then we have ,, no more sexual discrimination, no more sexual preference discrimination, no more rape, no more unwanted children, abortions, only problem(leaving religion and God and the 'soul' out of it): it would essentially become an exercise in bougeise where only the wealthiest class would be deemed financially qualified to AFFORD the procedure to clone children for themselves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
have you been reading ray bradbury or orwell again? lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
joethebricky
on
Fri 01/30/15 03:43 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
what if people no longer had genitals? technology figures out how to clone individuals making sex not really NECESSARY for procreation social pressure makes male and female the COMPLETE SAME THING< making it politically incorrect to really acknowledge a difference , making gender unnecessary so we could allow people to clone their kids engineered somehow to not have sexual organs,,,,, and then we have ,, no more sexual discrimination, no more sexual preference discrimination, no more rape, no more unwanted children, abortions, only problem(leaving religion and God and the 'soul' out of it): it would essentially become an exercise in bougeise where only the wealthiest class would be deemed financially qualified to AFFORD the procedure to clone children for themselves The result would not be human. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
joethebricky
on
Fri 01/30/15 04:00 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
what if people no longer had genitals? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
what if people no longer had genitals? technology figures out how to clone individuals making sex not really NECESSARY for procreation social pressure makes male and female the COMPLETE SAME THING< making it politically incorrect to really acknowledge a difference , making gender unnecessary so we could allow people to clone their kids engineered somehow to not have sexual organs,,,,, and then we have ,, no more sexual discrimination, no more sexual preference discrimination, no more rape, no more unwanted children, abortions, only problem(leaving religion and God and the 'soul' out of it): it would essentially become an exercise in bougeise where only the wealthiest class would be deemed financially qualified to AFFORD the procedure to clone children for themselves you just love that socialist concept, huh... i see why your a big obarry fan now... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
what if people no longer had genitals? technology figures out how to clone individuals making sex not really NECESSARY for procreation social pressure makes male and female the COMPLETE SAME THING< making it politically incorrect to really acknowledge a difference , making gender unnecessary so we could allow people to clone their kids engineered somehow to not have sexual organs,,,,, and then we have ,, no more sexual discrimination, no more sexual preference discrimination, no more rape, no more unwanted children, abortions, only problem(leaving religion and God and the 'soul' out of it): it would essentially become an exercise in bougeise where only the wealthiest class would be deemed financially qualified to AFFORD the procedure to clone children for themselves you just love that socialist concept, huh... i see why your a big obarry fan now... :-) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
what if people no longer had genitals? technology figures out how to clone individuals making sex not really NECESSARY for procreation social pressure makes male and female the COMPLETE SAME THING< making it politically incorrect to really acknowledge a difference , making gender unnecessary so we could allow people to clone their kids engineered somehow to not have sexual organs,,,,, and then we have ,, no more sexual discrimination, no more sexual preference discrimination, no more rape, no more unwanted children, abortions, only problem(leaving religion and God and the 'soul' out of it): it would essentially become an exercise in bougeise where only the wealthiest class would be deemed financially qualified to AFFORD the procedure to clone children for themselves you just love that socialist concept, huh... i see why your a big obarry fan now... :-) 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
what if people no longer had genitals? technology figures out how to clone individuals making sex not really NECESSARY for procreation social pressure makes male and female the COMPLETE SAME THING< making it politically incorrect to really acknowledge a difference , making gender unnecessary so we could allow people to clone their kids engineered somehow to not have sexual organs,,,,, and then we have ,, no more sexual discrimination, no more sexual preference discrimination, no more rape, no more unwanted children, abortions, only problem(leaving religion and God and the 'soul' out of it): it would essentially become an exercise in bougeise where only the wealthiest class would be deemed financially qualified to AFFORD the procedure to clone children for themselves you just love that socialist concept, huh... i see why your a big obarry fan now... what about this indicates I love the 'socialist' concept? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 things that make you go hmmm???? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
what if people no longer had genitals? technology figures out how to clone individuals making sex not really NECESSARY for procreation social pressure makes male and female the COMPLETE SAME THING< making it politically incorrect to really acknowledge a difference , making gender unnecessary so we could allow people to clone their kids engineered somehow to not have sexual organs,,,,, and then we have ,, no more sexual discrimination, no more sexual preference discrimination, no more rape, no more unwanted children, abortions, only problem(leaving religion and God and the 'soul' out of it): it would essentially become an exercise in bougeise where only the wealthiest class would be deemed financially qualified to AFFORD the procedure to clone children for themselves  ,but It is definitely something to think about though,but we'd definitely be used to it for sure,I guess all the attention would probably be on kissing maybe?Lmao!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Fri 01/30/15 08:13 PM
|
|
lol
I would never support man playing God by creating life outside of natural means,,, I just thought of the 'what if', after reading a suggesting about banning religion for all the ills associate with it I thought of all the ills associated with 'gender' and 'gender identity' and sex,, and all the talk of everything being equal,,,,,,, but it was just a nonsense topic about the potential we have to go overboard,,,and if it would have much support,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
what if people no longer had genitals? we would all be the same....like sperm wiggling around at the disco, who can't find a dance partner... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
what if people no longer had genitals? we would all be the same....like sperm wiggling around at the disco, who can't find a dance partner... dancing sperm,, sounds like a great rocker band,,,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is nothing evil about genitals ms harmony ... Laughing .. Do you really think they act independently of the brain :-) nope, just like a gun doesn't operate without a human but a human cant shoot without the gun ,,,kind of circular that way,,,removing either removes some of the unwanted results,,, 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well, this doesn't seem like much fun...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And I really like shooting my gun
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
what if people no longer had genitals? technology figures out how to clone individuals making sex not really NECESSARY for procreation social pressure makes male and female the COMPLETE SAME THING< making it politically incorrect to really acknowledge a difference , making gender unnecessary so we could allow people to clone their kids engineered somehow to not have sexual organs,,,,, and then we have ,, no more sexual discrimination, no more sexual preference discrimination, no more rape, no more unwanted children, abortions, only problem(leaving religion and God and the 'soul' out of it): it would essentially become an exercise in bougeise where only the wealthiest class would be deemed financially qualified to AFFORD the procedure to clone children for themselves Genetically this is not possible, since the geno would deteriate in a short period of time. Plants and animals have a different amino acid (protien) structure that prevents this from occuring. To attempt the insertion of the plant condon into human structure could possibly resemble a disease like cancer. Taking animal condon's and inserting into plants is possible. The different protien structures in animals are more complicated than plants. What you really wanted to do, was use the word "IF" regarding relationships.
|
|
|
|
|
