Previous 1 3
Topic: worlld war 3?
oceanriderz's photo
Wed 05/18/16 01:38 AM
are we on the verge of another world war?

Annierooroo's photo
Wed 05/18/16 02:55 AM
I flipping hope not

Conrad_73's photo
Wed 05/18/16 03:05 AM
next week at 3PM,in case of Rain,at 4PM!

no photo
Wed 05/18/16 03:31 AM
Didn't we have 3 already?...we should be on the 4th or 5th one by now.

IgorFrankensteen's photo
Wed 05/18/16 04:22 AM
This is one of those "it depends on what you mean" questions.

For the most part, I'd say no, in the sense that there's no reason to think that any of the larger countries are about to march their infantries into some one else's country.

But you can also look at the facts that China seems to be looking to expand it's military presence in the Pacific, and push back against the long standing US military presence there. And Russia under Putin certainly seems eager to overrun Ukraine and try to reestablish the old Russian Empire.

One thing that makes it extra hard to be sure of anything, is that there are a lot of heavy duty political interests here in the US, for whom the ability to scare Americans into THINKING we are about to enter a huge war, pays tremendous dividends in power and money. And of course, various "news" media outlets benefit every time we all get upset at the same time.

Robxbox73's photo
Wed 05/18/16 06:34 AM
Edited by Robxbox73 on Wed 05/18/16 09:02 AM


"War" by Edwin Starr (Original Video - 1969)

http://youtu.be/01-2pNCZiNk/




really Sassy, what has this 'to my uncultured ears' song got to do with the original question. times are way different. Elvis then wouldn't fit in Now; like Mahatma Gandhi then or even JC!

yes we are now at war, a different kind of war, an animal war of or an undefined war. this time the enemy is within ourselves, our laws where the animals can strike and we can't carry a stick.

Past empires, including Roma's downfall due from excesses; don't come close to explaining what is actually happening. We grope to History and crusades; but all that turned over its head the day one man landed on the moon.

yes we are at war, at a time when religious absolutes are finished. yet, we are getting slashed by a thousand cuts.
a war that cannot be won with guns, navy and nuclear warheads.

yes sir, we are at war where civilians will go down; yesterday at Baghdad; and the armies will watch helplessly.

and we will revert to blame game: the Russians, the Chinese, the Iraqis and the Iranians, Pakistan and me.

'We don't have a clue why this is happening' - said Mr. Trump
'Till then, let's hold up Muslim immigration' (not exact words)

a punk mayor of a city which has dealt history for 500 years has openly blown the bugle for a 'larger ISIS' and we are still in denial. are we ducks for their weekend shootout?
sadly yes.

next week at 3PM,in case of Rain,at 4PM!

sums it up.




A little dramatic don't you think. Probably not a good idea to post over your Meade. When there is a world War you know it. It's everywhere and so is death.
Don't be fooled, these are bad times. A precursor to things to come. It is more a economic reset. Nothing new here. So stop jumping overboard, have a beer and relax. If you have the power to change the situation, do it. If not, there's nothing worrying about it can do.

metalwing's photo
Wed 05/18/16 06:37 AM
It's already started. We lost our chance to end it when the US left Iraq. Now it will spread like the disease it is farther than WWII. The radical branch of Islam is on one side and the rest of the world is on the other.

Robxbox73's photo
Wed 05/18/16 06:41 AM

It's already started. We lost our chance to end it when the US left Iraq. Now it will spread like the disease it is farther than WWII. The radical branch of Islam is on one side and the rest of the world is on the other.


They start it we'll end it.

Lpdon's photo
Wed 05/18/16 07:09 AM

This is one of those "it depends on what you mean" questions.

For the most part, I'd say no, in the sense that there's no reason to think that any of the larger countries are about to march their infantries into some one else's country.

But you can also look at the facts that China seems to be looking to expand it's military presence in the Pacific, and push back against the long standing US military presence there. And Russia under Putin certainly seems eager to overrun Ukraine and try to reestablish the old Russian Empire.

One thing that makes it extra hard to be sure of anything, is that there are a lot of heavy duty political interests here in the US, for whom the ability to scare Americans into THINKING we are about to enter a huge war, pays tremendous dividends in power and money. And of course, various "news" media outlets benefit every time we all get upset at the same time.


Actually could see Putin pulling a Hitler and trying to retake all of the countries formerly in the USSR and more honestly.

Robxbox73's photo
Wed 05/18/16 07:18 AM
Edited by Robxbox73 on Wed 05/18/16 09:03 AM



A little dramatic don't you think. Probably not a good idea to post over your Meade.

--xx--


They start it we'll end it.


that's quite a flip-flop pal.
laugh
but since you are a recent member, letting it go this time.




Chill out P.A.L. I was responding to MW post. I didn't know I needed to check with you for anything, got it?
Flip flop? I'm saying stop the fear mongering. And I'm agreeing that since many parts of the world won't deal with their problems, we have to.
Maybe in your country that's a flip flop.

Conrad_73's photo
Wed 05/18/16 07:28 AM


This is one of those "it depends on what you mean" questions.

For the most part, I'd say no, in the sense that there's no reason to think that any of the larger countries are about to march their infantries into some one else's country.

But you can also look at the facts that China seems to be looking to expand it's military presence in the Pacific, and push back against the long standing US military presence there. And Russia under Putin certainly seems eager to overrun Ukraine and try to reestablish the old Russian Empire.

One thing that makes it extra hard to be sure of anything, is that there are a lot of heavy duty political interests here in the US, for whom the ability to scare Americans into THINKING we are about to enter a huge war, pays tremendous dividends in power and money. And of course, various "news" media outlets benefit every time we all get upset at the same time.


Actually could see Putin pulling a Hitler and trying to retake all of the countries formerly in the USSR and more honestly.

Plenty more Ethnic Russians in the Baltics,Finland and other Independent Sovereign Countries!

Robxbox73's photo
Wed 05/18/16 07:29 AM
Edited by Robxbox73 on Wed 05/18/16 09:03 AM





A little dramatic don't you think. Probably not a good idea to post over your Meade.

--xx--


They start it we'll end it.


that's quite a flip-flop pal.
laugh
but since you are a recent member, letting it go this time.




Chill out P.A.L. I was responding to MW post. I didn't know I needed to check with you for anything, got it?
Flip flop? I'm saying stop the fear mongering. And I'm agreeing that since many parts of the world won't deal with their problems, we have to.
Maybe in your country that's a flip flop.



no you dont,
neither do you have to wrap the patriotic flag around to save your point.

it's not about your country or mine we are talking about.
it's about global terrorism, a different kind of war, got it chum?


Nope, agreeing that we disagree. Chump.

Robxbox73's photo
Wed 05/18/16 07:41 AM
Edited by Robxbox73 on Wed 05/18/16 09:03 AM







A little dramatic don't you think. Probably not a good idea to post over your Meade.

--xx--


They start it we'll end it.


that's quite a flip-flop pal.
laugh
but since you are a recent member, letting it go this time.




Chill out P.A.L. I was responding to MW post. I didn't know I needed to check with you for anything, got it?
Flip flop? I'm saying stop the fear mongering. And I'm agreeing that since many parts of the world won't deal with their problems, we have to.
Maybe in your country that's a flip flop.



no you dont,
neither do you have to wrap the patriotic flag around to save your point.

it's not about your country or mine we are talking about.
it's about global terrorism, a different kind of war, got it chum?


Nope, agreeing that we disagree. Chump.


neither do i see any genuine contribution
except for the niggardly language, bud.



Don't step in to the ring, unless you want to get tagged. Princess.

Robxbox73's photo
Wed 05/18/16 07:49 AM
Edited by Robxbox73 on Wed 05/18/16 09:04 AM
Nigarddly?? Is that popular in india? I thought you guys were beyond that. Guess I was wrong.

Robxbox73's photo
Wed 05/18/16 07:57 AM
Edited by Robxbox73 on Wed 05/18/16 09:04 AM


Nigarddly?? Is that popular in india? I thought you guys were beyond that. Guess I was wrong.


check dictionary.
laugh
not what you thought, eh?


Yes I found it, curse words bookworms use. :banana:

Conrad_73's photo
Wed 05/18/16 08:25 AM
considering the price of Wars these days,better make it WW2.5!pitchfork

TxsGal3333's photo
Wed 05/18/16 09:07 AM
Several post have been deleted due to offtopic

Please post to the Topic matter only not towards others or post that do not have anything to do with the Topic in hand.

Site Mod
Kristi

Smartazzjohn's photo
Wed 05/18/16 10:56 AM
World wars are described by Wikipedia as "a war involving many or most of the world's most powerful and populous countries. World wars span multiple countries on multiple continents, with battles fought in multiple theatres."

If those same parameters used to categorize past conflicts as "world wars" were used to describe conflicts today WW3 may have started years ago, especially if the internet were to be considered a "theater" in which attacks are conducted.

Lpdon's photo
Wed 05/18/16 11:20 AM

World wars are described by Wikipedia as "a war involving many or most of the world's most powerful and populous countries. World wars span multiple countries on multiple continents, with battles fought in multiple theatres."

If those same parameters used to categorize past conflicts as "world wars" were used to describe conflicts today WW3 may have started years ago, especially if the internet were to be considered a "theater" in which attacks are conducted.


don if Putin started a conquest across Europe trying to put the Soviet Union back together by military force (Which he has stated he wants to do) that wouldn't turn into a World War?

IgorFrankensteen's photo
Wed 05/18/16 12:47 PM

There are some factions (of a sort) of modern historians, who would like to rename the World Wars we've had, with some saying that the worldwide conflict of Empires, centered around France and Great Britain in the 18th Century (of which our little rebellion in 1776 was a small backwater conflict), should be called World War 1, with the Napoleonic portion being lumped in with all that. That would make the one that started in 1914, World War 2. And some see the rise of Naziism and the attacks of Japan, as extensions of that war, rather than being part of an all new conflict, so that what we call WW2, would become the "post-Armistice continuation" of the 1914 war.

Other conflicts have ALWAYS been occurring, with how they are named, often having more to do with local politics than anything else.

Plenty of people died during that thing we called the Cold War. Most were hidden from both sides, again for political reasons. Viet Nam was called A Police Action by some, more because they wanted to pretend we weren't really at war, than anything else.



Previous 1 3