Topic: could trump organization be prosecuted under the RICO act?
shovelheaddave's photo
Wed 06/20/18 11:44 AM




i absolutely LOVE the utter desperation that you are showing with your chain of denials that you just posted!!!
laugh

especially about the stuff that you have absolutely no idea about...like exactly WHAT evidence against trump robert mueller has gotten from his investigation,and the witnesses that have already pleaded guilty,and the evidence that his crooked lawyer might give him to keep from spending most of the rest of his life in prison.

but,keep telling yourself what ever you need to to make it through the day,cuz RICO is absolutely a possibility if the D.O.J. decides to pursue it,cuz just the evidence against trump's organization that they have talked about on the news would be enough to justify a RICO case!!




why dont you tell us what we dont know then? what exactly do you know that we dont know?

Ive said this earlier Anyone can be charged under RICO statue today, getting a conviction is another matter.




i already HAVE told you what they have done that would make the trump organization eligible to be prosecuted under RICO...
[like fraud,obstruction of justice,collusion,fraud,and even more fraud!]

its not my fault that you are desperately biased,and not objective enough to read it,or accept it.

but,why dont YOU do an intense study of the FACTS,and everything that the trump organization has ever been accused of,list ALL of the things that make a organization eligible to be prosecuted under the RICO act,and then explain to everybody WHY you think that these things DONT make the trump organization eligible to be prosecuted under the RICO act,and i will tell you if you are right,or just desperately grasping at straws because you are biased.

[and,please....
show your work!!
cuz,opinions dont count in a court of law,unless you are a judge,or on the jury!!]

no photo
Wed 06/20/18 12:12 PM

i already HAVE told you what they have done that would make the trump organization eligible to be prosecuted under RICO...
[like fraud,obstruction of justice,collusion,fraud,and even more fraud!]

its not my fault that you are desperately biased,and not objective enough to read it,or accept it.



Dave, Dave, Dave, yes you told us and we responded to your opinion, your opinion isnt fact

I will say it again, anyone can be charged or investigated under RICO, proving it and convicting isnt another matter.


but,why dont YOU do an intense study of the FACTS,and everything that the trump organization has ever been accused of,list ALL of the things that make a organization eligible to be prosecuted under the RICO act,and then explain to everybody WHY you think that these things DONT make the trump organization eligible to be prosecuted under the RICO act,and i will tell you if you are right,or just desperately grasping at straws because you are biased.

[and,please....
show your work!!
cuz,opinions dont count in a court of law,unless you are a judge,or on the jury!!]


Dave, Dave, Dave.

I'm quite familiar with the RICO statue as we have our version in Canada but that is another topic.

My intense study as you call it is from a few cases

The Commission trial of the mid 80's where Giuliani prosecuted the commission board members of the Italian mafia aka "la cosa nosta" where all the administration ( boss, Under-boss and consigleire) were prosecuted.

The RICO case against the Gambino and Luchesse family ,

Major league baseball because Montreal Expos lost their team

Micheal Milken and finally the LAPD ( rampart scandal) to which was the inspiration of one my favourite cop shows "the shield"

So Im quite familiar with how RICO works Dave.


Now can the Trump organization be charged under RICO yes, why? because of the expansion of RICO, all you need is to commit 2 crimes under the RICO 35 list of crimes, 25 plus federal and 8 state crimes with in 10 years.

Understand now?

Prosecutors have to link TRUMP himself as the boss that orchestrated the crimes and has to prove the Organization it self is a criminal organization, just because a few of his people committed crimes the prosecution has to prove that the organization is a front for criminal activities

Case law the Commission trial, the Gambino and Luchesse Crime family trials and the Rampart scandal that plagued the LAPD.

Understand now?

am I being bias now Dave?



Lpdon's photo
Wed 06/20/18 01:52 PM
Bottom line, end of story he cant. RICO was designed to take a criminal organization like the Mob off the streets for good. That's not what this is. Even if charges happen it wont be RICO. Plus this would be a Kangaroo Court and they definatley wouldn't try RICO in a Kangaroo Court.

no photo
Wed 06/20/18 02:17 PM

Bottom line, end of story he cant. RICO was designed to take a criminal organization like the Mob off the streets for good. That's not what this is. Even if charges happen it wont be RICO. Plus this would be a Kangaroo Court and they definatley wouldn't try RICO in a Kangaroo Court.


they can charge the Trump organization under RICO, but that doesn't mean they will, or even get the chance to convict.

Its just a fancy fishing expedition, most people except for Democrats and Trump haters sees it for what it is.

By the time this over Mueller will be making the lecture rounds or get a gig on the Hillary and Bill Clinton news network aka CNN or MSNBC co hosting with the other idiots there.

shovelheaddave's photo
Wed 06/20/18 04:23 PM
Edited by shovelheaddave on Wed 06/20/18 05:02 PM
sure seems funny that the whole time you are DESPERATELY denying that trump did anything that they can use to enact RICO with,you are blatantly overlooking...

(06/14/2018)
the MULTIPLE fraud charges that the state of new york is now bringing against trump for his fraudulent charity that he has been using to pay his own personal debts out of,which is as open and shut of a case as you could posssibly get,[and EVERY check that was written to pay his own personal debts with is a SERARATE/DIFFERENT charge!!!](and THOSE are STATE charges,that mike pence cant pardon him for!!! lol )
[those charges by themselves count for more than 2 charges!]

(04/09/2018)
the judgement of the courts against his 'trump university',where the judge ruled that trump was guilty of fraud,and ordered him to pay 25 MILLION dollars in restitution to the people he defrauded.
[again...i am sure that every one of the people he defrauded would count as separate charges to be used against him!]

(06/03/2018_
the admission on national television where he publically admits that he dictated don jrs misleading letter of denial in the russian collusion case,[which proves that he DID know about it!!!!]

(05/02,03/2018)
all of the OTHER stuff that his feebleminded lawyer,rudy guiliani has admitted on national television that trump knew about/did,and lied about

(01/26/2018)
the obstruction of justice charge for firing james comey to try to stop the russina investigation.

[not to mention,all of the OTHER obstruction of justice charges that robert mueller is about to prosecute him for when he wraps up his investigation.]

[06/20/2018) [....."Trump's personal attorney is 'willing to give info' about the President".... that news headline just came out TODAY!!!] lol

so, who knows WHAT ELSE they will find after his crooked lawyer/fixer rolls on him to save his own skin from spending the rest of his life in jail.
[and he sure has A LOT of dirt to spread!!!] lol


ANY of those things qualify to charge him under RICO,as they establish an obvious pattern to his lack of respect for the law,and a willingness to use his organization to break the law...

sure seems funny that you ignored/neglected to mention any of THOSE things!!!

why is that??

is it just sloppy research??

political bias?

or is your ommission of them because that you cant rationalize them in a way that doesnt REALLY make you look like you are DESPERATELY grasping at straws??
[remember...i TOLD YOU to show your work!!!]
[cuz,i have absolutely no problem showing MINE!!] lol

BUT,now that I have brought them up...why dont you try to explain how ALL THOSE things dont incriminate him enough for the D.O.J. to enact the RICO act?
[and,remember...please show your work!]

no photo
Wed 06/20/18 08:25 PM
Edited by diserli_gears on Wed 06/20/18 08:28 PM

sure seems funny that the whole time you are DESPERATELY denying that trump did anything that they can use to enact RICO with,you are blatantly overlooking...

(06/14/2018)
the MULTIPLE fraud charges that the state of new york is now bringing against trump for his fraudulent charity that he has been using to pay his own personal debts out of,which is as open and shut of a case as you could posssibly get,[and EVERY check that was written to pay his own personal debts with is a SERARATE/DIFFERENT charge!!!](and THOSE are STATE charges,that mike pence cant pardon him for!!! lol )
[those charges by themselves count for more than 2 charges!]


this has nothing to do with his campaign, when he was president elect or president
nice try.


(04/09/2018)
the judgement of the courts against his 'trump university',where the judge ruled that trump was guilty of fraud,and ordered him to pay 25 MILLION dollars in restitution to the people he defrauded.
[again...i am sure that every one of the people he defrauded would count as separate charges to be used against him!]


this has nothing to with his campaign or presidency


(06/03/2018_
the admission on national television where he publically admits that he dictated don jrs misleading letter of denial in the russian collusion case,[which proves that he DID know about it!!!!]


Provide proof of this claim, because as I understand it , It was Trump's legal team letter to the Mueller that address it.

(05/02,03/2018)
all of the OTHER stuff that his feebleminded lawyer,rudy guiliani has admitted on national television that trump knew about/did,and lied about


Your opinion, that doesnt make it fact.


(01/26/2018)
the obstruction of justice charge for firing james comey to try to stop the russina investigation.

not to mention,all of the OTHER obstruction of justice charges that robert mueller is about to prosecute him for when he wraps up his investigation.]
if there was an obstruction of justice he would have been impeached by now.

06/20/2018) [....."Trump's personal attorney is 'willing to give info' about the President".... that news headline just came out TODAY!!!] lol


and Im sure he will get a 7 figure advanced from Random House too, and your point is ?



so, who knows WHAT ELSE they will find after his crooked lawyer/fixer rolls on him to save his own skin from spending the rest of his life in jail.
[and he sure has A LOT of dirt to spread!!!] lol


Again that is your opinion, these are not facts.


ANY of those things qualify to charge him under RICO,as they establish an obvious pattern to his lack of respect for the law,and a willingness to use his organization to break the law...

sure seems funny that you ignored/neglected to mention any of THOSE things!!!


Now that Ive seen your evidence, I will say based on what you've posted, the Chances of Trump being indicted as as likely as Hillary Clinton being the next attorney general for Trump.

why is that??

is it just sloppy research??

political bias?

or is your ommission of them because that you cant rationalize them in a way that doesnt REALLY make you look like you are DESPERATELY grasping at straws??
remember...i TOLD YOU to show your work!!!
cuz,i have absolutely no problem showing MINE!! lol

BUT,now that I have brought them up...why dont you try to explain how ALL THOSE things dont incriminate him enough for the D.O.J. to enact the RICO act?
and,remember...please show your work!


you've just posted your bias Dave, nothing here is new, you obviously got this from some whacked out left wing Anti Trump site.

My conclusion is Can Trump be indicted? yes he can, there is precedent, Nixon was about to be impeached and removed and Clinton was about to be impeached and he signed an "information" avoiding the grand jury.

Will Trump be impeached? the more Ive read the answer is NO.
Most of us figured out Mueller strategy they want to indict him, embarrass him , try and find him guilty so they can remove him but instead force him to resign.

a pretty sh_tty strategy which will back fire.

mark my words

Lpdon's photo
Thu 06/21/18 02:59 AM


sure seems funny that the whole time you are DESPERATELY denying that trump did anything that they can use to enact RICO with,you are blatantly overlooking...

(06/14/2018)
the MULTIPLE fraud charges that the state of new york is now bringing against trump for his fraudulent charity that he has been using to pay his own personal debts out of,which is as open and shut of a case as you could posssibly get,[and EVERY check that was written to pay his own personal debts with is a SERARATE/DIFFERENT charge!!!](and THOSE are STATE charges,that mike pence cant pardon him for!!! lol )
[those charges by themselves count for more than 2 charges!]


this has nothing to do with his campaign, when he was president elect or president
nice try.


(04/09/2018)
the judgement of the courts against his 'trump university',where the judge ruled that trump was guilty of fraud,and ordered him to pay 25 MILLION dollars in restitution to the people he defrauded.
[again...i am sure that every one of the people he defrauded would count as separate charges to be used against him!]


this has nothing to with his campaign or presidency


(06/03/2018_
the admission on national television where he publically admits that he dictated don jrs misleading letter of denial in the russian collusion case,[which proves that he DID know about it!!!!]


Provide proof of this claim, because as I understand it , It was Trump's legal team letter to the Mueller that address it.

(05/02,03/2018)
all of the OTHER stuff that his feebleminded lawyer,rudy guiliani has admitted on national television that trump knew about/did,and lied about


Your opinion, that doesnt make it fact.


(01/26/2018)
the obstruction of justice charge for firing james comey to try to stop the russina investigation.

not to mention,all of the OTHER obstruction of justice charges that robert mueller is about to prosecute him for when he wraps up his investigation.]
if there was an obstruction of justice he would have been impeached by now.

06/20/2018) [....."Trump's personal attorney is 'willing to give info' about the President".... that news headline just came out TODAY!!!] lol


and Im sure he will get a 7 figure advanced from Random House too, and your point is ?



so, who knows WHAT ELSE they will find after his crooked lawyer/fixer rolls on him to save his own skin from spending the rest of his life in jail.
[and he sure has A LOT of dirt to spread!!!] lol


Again that is your opinion, these are not facts.


ANY of those things qualify to charge him under RICO,as they establish an obvious pattern to his lack of respect for the law,and a willingness to use his organization to break the law...

sure seems funny that you ignored/neglected to mention any of THOSE things!!!


Now that Ive seen your evidence, I will say based on what you've posted, the Chances of Trump being indicted as as likely as Hillary Clinton being the next attorney general for Trump.

why is that??

is it just sloppy research??

political bias?

or is your ommission of them because that you cant rationalize them in a way that doesnt REALLY make you look like you are DESPERATELY grasping at straws??
remember...i TOLD YOU to show your work!!!
cuz,i have absolutely no problem showing MINE!! lol

BUT,now that I have brought them up...why dont you try to explain how ALL THOSE things dont incriminate him enough for the D.O.J. to enact the RICO act?
and,remember...please show your work!


you've just posted your bias Dave, nothing here is new, you obviously got this from some whacked out left wing Anti Trump site.

My conclusion is Can Trump be indicted? yes he can, there is precedent, Nixon was about to be impeached and removed and Clinton was about to be impeached and he signed an "information" avoiding the grand jury.

Will Trump be impeached? the more Ive read the answer is NO.
Most of us figured out Mueller strategy they want to indict him, embarrass him , try and find him guilty so they can remove him but instead force him to resign.

a pretty sh_tty strategy which will back fire.

mark my words



I have been looking all over the internet for an interview I saw with former US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald who is now in provide practice and he was interviewed on President Trumps legal issues and he even said that there is not a case against Trump and this is just a political fiasco. This is a man while as a US attorney successfully prosecuted dirty politicians from both sides of the aisle and took out two sitting Governors. If he says there isn't a case, well he would know.

Lpdon's photo
Thu 06/21/18 03:02 AM

sure seems funny that the whole time you are DESPERATELY denying that trump did anything that they can use to enact RICO with,you are blatantly overlooking...

(06/14/2018)
the MULTIPLE fraud charges that the state of new york is now bringing against trump for his fraudulent charity that he has been using to pay his own personal debts out of,which is as open and shut of a case as you could posssibly get,[and EVERY check that was written to pay his own personal debts with is a SERARATE/DIFFERENT charge!!!](and THOSE are STATE charges,that mike pence cant pardon him for!!! lol )
[those charges by themselves count for more than 2 charges!]

(04/09/2018)
the judgement of the courts against his 'trump university',where the judge ruled that trump was guilty of fraud,and ordered him to pay 25 MILLION dollars in restitution to the people he defrauded.
[again...i am sure that every one of the people he defrauded would count as separate charges to be used against him!]

(06/03/2018_
the admission on national television where he publically admits that he dictated don jrs misleading letter of denial in the russian collusion case,[which proves that he DID know about it!!!!]

(05/02,03/2018)
all of the OTHER stuff that his feebleminded lawyer,rudy guiliani has admitted on national television that trump knew about/did,and lied about

(01/26/2018)
the obstruction of justice charge for firing james comey to try to stop the russina investigation.

[not to mention,all of the OTHER obstruction of justice charges that robert mueller is about to prosecute him for when he wraps up his investigation.]

[06/20/2018) [....."Trump's personal attorney is 'willing to give info' about the President".... that news headline just came out TODAY!!!] lol

so, who knows WHAT ELSE they will find after his crooked lawyer/fixer rolls on him to save his own skin from spending the rest of his life in jail.
[and he sure has A LOT of dirt to spread!!!] lol


ANY of those things qualify to charge him under RICO,as they establish an obvious pattern to his lack of respect for the law,and a willingness to use his organization to break the law...

sure seems funny that you ignored/neglected to mention any of THOSE things!!!

why is that??

is it just sloppy research??

political bias?

or is your ommission of them because that you cant rationalize them in a way that doesnt REALLY make you look like you are DESPERATELY grasping at straws??
[remember...i TOLD YOU to show your work!!!]
[cuz,i have absolutely no problem showing MINE!!] lol

BUT,now that I have brought them up...why dont you try to explain how ALL THOSE things dont incriminate him enough for the D.O.J. to enact the RICO act?
[and,remember...please show your work!]


Feebleminded attorney? You realize Giuliani is one of the most successful prosecutors in our countries history. He fought corruption across the aisle and he brought down the mafia commission when the majority of people including law enforcement thought it didn't really exist. He was also the US Attorney involved with the Donnie Brascoe investigation which was the most successful undercover operation in the history of the country. Giuliani is the US Attorney that made the decision to pull Agent Pistone right before he got made into the Bonanno crime family.


no photo
Thu 06/21/18 04:34 AM
What you're finding out, is that you might have some obscure reason to prosecute the Trump foundation, and implicate him in the process.

Rather like trying to nail Hillary to the wall, and we can't.

Stinks, don't it? Just because the lib news feeds say they can doesn't make it so. I read the same types of feeds a couple years ago about how conservatives could bring down obama. That didn't happen, ether.

But there is just a wee bit of satisfaction coming around. Hillary is mad at Comey, because he won't apologize for comments made about her. How DARE he besmirch Hillary's perfect reputation. (Ha ha ha ha!)

So, we get to watch both sides fling dog-do at each other. I think it's about time both sides start attacks with flaming fudge bags.

shovelheaddave's photo
Thu 06/21/18 06:22 AM


sure seems funny that the whole time you are DESPERATELY denying that trump did anything that they can use to enact RICO with,you are blatantly overlooking...

(06/14/2018)
the MULTIPLE fraud charges that the state of new york is now bringing against trump for his fraudulent charity that he has been using to pay his own personal debts out of,which is as open and shut of a case as you could posssibly get,[and EVERY check that was written to pay his own personal debts with is a SERARATE/DIFFERENT charge!!!](and THOSE are STATE charges,that mike pence cant pardon him for!!! lol )
[those charges by themselves count for more than 2 charges!]


this has nothing to do with his campaign, when he was president elect or president
nice try.


(04/09/2018)
the judgement of the courts against his 'trump university',where the judge ruled that trump was guilty of fraud,and ordered him to pay 25 MILLION dollars in restitution to the people he defrauded.
[again...i am sure that every one of the people he defrauded would count as separate charges to be used against him!]


this has nothing to with his campaign or presidency


(06/03/2018_
the admission on national television where he publically admits that he dictated don jrs misleading letter of denial in the russian collusion case,[which proves that he DID know about it!!!!]


Provide proof of this claim, because as I understand it , It was Trump's legal team letter to the Mueller that address it.

(05/02,03/2018)
all of the OTHER stuff that his feebleminded lawyer,rudy guiliani has admitted on national television that trump knew about/did,and lied about


Your opinion, that doesnt make it fact.


(01/26/2018)
the obstruction of justice charge for firing james comey to try to stop the russina investigation.

not to mention,all of the OTHER obstruction of justice charges that robert mueller is about to prosecute him for when he wraps up his investigation.]
if there was an obstruction of justice he would have been impeached by now.

06/20/2018) [....."Trump's personal attorney is 'willing to give info' about the President".... that news headline just came out TODAY!!!] lol


and Im sure he will get a 7 figure advanced from Random House too, and your point is ?



so, who knows WHAT ELSE they will find after his crooked lawyer/fixer rolls on him to save his own skin from spending the rest of his life in jail.
[and he sure has A LOT of dirt to spread!!!] lol


Again that is your opinion, these are not facts.


ANY of those things qualify to charge him under RICO,as they establish an obvious pattern to his lack of respect for the law,and a willingness to use his organization to break the law...

sure seems funny that you ignored/neglected to mention any of THOSE things!!!


Now that Ive seen your evidence, I will say based on what you've posted, the Chances of Trump being indicted as as likely as Hillary Clinton being the next attorney general for Trump.

why is that??

is it just sloppy research??

political bias?

or is your ommission of them because that you cant rationalize them in a way that doesnt REALLY make you look like you are DESPERATELY grasping at straws??
remember...i TOLD YOU to show your work!!!
cuz,i have absolutely no problem showing MINE!! lol

BUT,now that I have brought them up...why dont you try to explain how ALL THOSE things dont incriminate him enough for the D.O.J. to enact the RICO act?
and,remember...please show your work!


you've just posted your bias Dave, nothing here is new, you obviously got this from some whacked out left wing Anti Trump site.

My conclusion is Can Trump be indicted? yes he can, there is precedent, Nixon was about to be impeached and removed and Clinton was about to be impeached and he signed an "information" avoiding the grand jury.

Will Trump be impeached? the more Ive read the answer is NO.
Most of us figured out Mueller strategy they want to indict him, embarrass him , try and find him guilty so they can remove him but instead force him to resign.

a pretty sh_tty strategy which will back fire.

mark my words


^
^
"My conclusion is Can Trump be indicted? yes he can, there is precedent,"

there you go!!!
you just admitted that you agree with the point that i made,so TECHNICALLY,i am right!

no matter how much you wish that it WOULDNT happen,if the D.O.J. decided to pursue it under RICO,it COULD happen!!!

all the rest of your desperate denials are nothing more than YOUR OWN political bias showing itself!!

point/match...ME!!
shades


no photo
Thu 06/21/18 06:37 AM

^
^
"My conclusion is Can Trump be indicted? yes he can, there is precedent,"

there you go!!!
you just admitted that you agree with the point that i made,so TECHNICALLY,i am right!

no matter how much you wish that it WOULDNT happen,if the D.O.J. decided to pursue it under RICO,it COULD happen!!!

all the rest of your desperate denials are nothing more than YOUR OWN political bias showing itself!!

point/match...ME!!
shades




Was I speaking in tongues or Swahili? I know I wasn't speaking in French .

Dude , anyone can be indicted, heck a Roast beef sandwich made with Swiss cheese on rye imported from Denmark can be indicted.

Convicting is another matter.

And if you read what I wrote slowly, you would have seen that I said I seriously doubt Congress would Impeach the president

Did you miss that part? why you think I agreed with you is nuttier than my Neighbour Aunt's can of Nutbutter she makes for Christmas.

Just because someone can be indicted doesn't mean they will be indicted

duh.

shovelheaddave's photo
Thu 06/21/18 06:47 AM


^
^
"My conclusion is Can Trump be indicted? yes he can, there is precedent,"

there you go!!!
you just admitted that you agree with the point that i made,so TECHNICALLY,i am right!

no matter how much you wish that it WOULDNT happen,if the D.O.J. decided to pursue it under RICO,it COULD happen!!!

all the rest of your desperate denials are nothing more than YOUR OWN political bias showing itself!!

point/match...ME!!
shades




Was I speaking in tongues or Swahili? I know I wasn't speaking in French .

Dude , anyone can be indicted, heck a Roast beef sandwich made with Swiss cheese on rye imported from Denmark can be indicted.

Convicting is another matter.

And if you read what I wrote slowly, you would have seen that I said I seriously doubt Congress would Impeach the president

Did you miss that part? why you think I agreed with you is nuttier than my Neighbour Aunt's can of Nutbutter she makes for Christmas.

Just because someone can be indicted doesn't mean they will be indicted

duh.

the rest of what you wrote was just white noise to try to distract from the fact that what i originally wrote is true...

that trump HAS commited enough crimes to qualify him to be prosected under the RICO act if the D.O.J. wanted to pursue it that way,and i dont really see ANYWHERE where you countered my points with anything except MEANINGLESS denials,and opinion,without any FACTS to back them up.

and,the FACT that THAT is all the rebuttal that you have to offer just thoroughly validates MY argument that much more!!!
laugh

so,keep on desperately denying my points without any verifiable facts to refute them,because i find that absolutely
HILARIOUS!!!

no photo
Thu 06/21/18 07:01 AM





the rest of what you wrote was just white noise to try to distract from the fact that what i originally wrote is true...

that trump HAS commited enough crimes to qualify him to be prosected under the RICO act if the D.O.J. wanted to pursue it that way,and i dont really see ANYWHERE where you countered my points with anything except MEANINGLESS denials,and opinion,without any FACTS to back them up.


sorry, Ive presented facts and countered your bias argument Dave, sorry to inform you but facts are facts and opinions are like azzholes, everyone has one.

You have to prove Trump committed crimes during his campaign and as current commander in chief, what he did during is private sector life is irrelevant.

The Russian collusion accusation and obstructing of justice is what is on the table, his affairs with Stormy Daniels is just a witch hunt

and,the FACT that THAT is all the rebuttal that you have to offer just thoroughly validates MY argument that much more!!!
laugh


no Dave, you've offered nothing but straw man arguments, you haven't offered any actual facts just more of sophistry.



so,keep on desperately denying my points without any verifiable facts to refute them,because i find that absolutely
HILARIOUS!!!


Im glad I can make you laugh Dave, I guess when you are trying to deflect because you cannot make a point

I can deflect too, I sometimes scratch my balls when Im playing baseball, does that mean Im uncouth or my balls are itchy ?


shovelheaddave's photo
Thu 06/21/18 08:55 AM






the rest of what you wrote was just white noise to try to distract from the fact that what i originally wrote is true...

that trump HAS commited enough crimes to qualify him to be prosected under the RICO act if the D.O.J. wanted to pursue it that way,and i dont really see ANYWHERE where you countered my points with anything except MEANINGLESS denials,and opinion,without any FACTS to back them up.


sorry, Ive presented facts and countered your bias argument Dave, sorry to inform you but facts are facts and opinions are like azzholes, everyone has one.

You have to prove Trump committed crimes during his campaign and as current commander in chief, what he did during is private sector life is irrelevant.

The Russian collusion accusation and obstructing of justice is what is on the table, his affairs with Stormy Daniels is just a witch hunt

and,the FACT that THAT is all the rebuttal that you have to offer just thoroughly validates MY argument that much more!!!
laugh


no Dave, you've offered nothing but straw man arguments, you haven't offered any actual facts just more of sophistry.



so,keep on desperately denying my points without any verifiable facts to refute them,because i find that absolutely
HILARIOUS!!!


Im glad I can make you laugh Dave, I guess when you are trying to deflect because you cannot make a point

I can deflect too, I sometimes scratch my balls when Im playing baseball, does that mean Im uncouth or my balls are itchy ?



LMAO!!!
what 'facts' are you talking about??

all you have offered is opinion,and desperate attempts to dodge answering my facts that i have plainly presented.

nothing that you say has anything to do with RICO,or offers anything except a glimpse of somebody that is desperately trying to use meaningless personal opinions,and political bias as facts to dodge the REAl facts of what RICO is,and what the requirements are to qualify for a RICO case in the eyes of the law.

the information to the REAl facts is out there for anybody with the correct number of chromosomes to view,so your feeble attempts to ignore them is absolutely HILARIOUS,and your lack of a proper rebuttal validates the facts that i have presented!
shades

no photo
Thu 06/21/18 09:21 AM


LMAO!!!
what 'facts' are you talking about??

all you have offered is opinion,and desperate attempts to dodge answering my facts that i have plainly presented.

nothing that you say has anything to do with RICO,or offers anything except a glimpse of somebody that is desperately trying to use meaningless personal opinions,and political bias as facts to dodge the REAl facts of what RICO is,and what the requirements are to qualify for a RICO case in the eyes of the law.

the information to the REAl facts is out there for anybody with the correct number of chromosomes to view,so your feeble attempts to ignore them is absolutely HILARIOUS,and your lack of a proper rebuttal validates the facts that i have presented!
shades


Dave, Dave, Dave

relax sport, you're about to go into full meltdown, grab some herbal green tea or decaf ( I dont know if they sell Swiss decaf down there)

Okay, now breathe ...

Back to the topic.

You keep posting the same thing over and over and over again, just because you post it over and over again doesnt mean its the truth.

I know what RICO is

Now here is your challenge if you chose to accept it

name all the crimes Donald trump has committed according to the 35 crimes as defined by the RICO statue as is pertains to him being president
President elect
and when he kicked off his campaign.

can you do that without the silly commentary

and if you dont know when he kicked off his campaign its June 16, 2015

IM going to you a favour and post a link that has the Federal Prosecutor manual to RICO crimes

https://www.justice.gov/usam/file/870856/download

so after you find the crimes post them here for us to see which crimes Donald Trump committed and we can discuss and debate.


You're welcome



shovelheaddave's photo
Thu 06/21/18 09:28 AM
Edited by shovelheaddave on Thu 06/21/18 09:31 AM



LMAO!!!
what 'facts' are you talking about??

all you have offered is opinion,and desperate attempts to dodge answering my facts that i have plainly presented.

nothing that you say has anything to do with RICO,or offers anything except a glimpse of somebody that is desperately trying to use meaningless personal opinions,and political bias as facts to dodge the REAl facts of what RICO is,and what the requirements are to qualify for a RICO case in the eyes of the law.

the information to the REAl facts is out there for anybody with the correct number of chromosomes to view,so your feeble attempts to ignore them is absolutely HILARIOUS,and your lack of a proper rebuttal validates the facts that i have presented!
shades


Dave, Dave, Dave

relax sport, you're about to go into full meltdown, grab some herbal green tea or decaf ( I dont know if they sell Swiss decaf down there)

Okay, now breathe ...

Back to the topic.

You keep posting the same thing over and over and over again, just because you post it over and over again doesnt mean its the truth.

I know what RICO is

Now here is your challenge if you chose to accept it

name all the crimes Donald trump has committed according to the 35 crimes as defined by the RICO statue as is pertains to him being president
President elect
and when he kicked off his campaign.

can you do that without the silly commentary

and if you dont know when he kicked off his campaign its June 16, 2015

IM going to you a favour and post a link that has the Federal Prosecutor manual to RICO crimes

https://www.justice.gov/usam/file/870856/download

so after you find the crimes post them here for us to see which crimes Donald Trump committed and we can discuss and debate.


You're welcome





i already have named several,complete with dates,and all you have done if COMICALLY offer your DESPERATE denials,and opinions,without any facts to back them up,or any knowledge of what actually constitutes a valid RICO case,which only validates my own argument.

rofl

so,thank you for playing.

you can pick up your parting prize at the exit!!
waving

no photo
Thu 06/21/18 09:38 AM


sure seems funny that the whole time you are DESPERATELY denying that trump did anything that they can use to enact RICO with,you are blatantly overlooking...

(06/14/2018)
the MULTIPLE fraud charges that the state of new york is now bringing against trump for his fraudulent charity that he has been using to pay his own personal debts out of,which is as open and shut of a case as you could posssibly get,[and EVERY check that was written to pay his own personal debts with is a SERARATE/DIFFERENT charge!!!](and THOSE are STATE charges,that mike pence cant pardon him for!!! lol )
[those charges by themselves count for more than 2 charges!]


this has nothing to do with his campaign, when he was president elect or president
nice try.


(04/09/2018)
the judgement of the courts against his 'trump university',where the judge ruled that trump was guilty of fraud,and ordered him to pay 25 MILLION dollars in restitution to the people he defrauded.
[again...i am sure that every one of the people he defrauded would count as separate charges to be used against him!]


this has nothing to with his campaign or presidency


(06/03/2018_
the admission on national television where he publically admits that he dictated don jrs misleading letter of denial in the russian collusion case,[which proves that he DID know about it!!!!]


Provide proof of this claim, because as I understand it , It was Trump's legal team letter to the Mueller that address it.

(05/02,03/2018)
all of the OTHER stuff that his feebleminded lawyer,rudy guiliani has admitted on national television that trump knew about/did,and lied about


Your opinion, that doesnt make it fact.


(01/26/2018)
the obstruction of justice charge for firing james comey to try to stop the russina investigation.

not to mention,all of the OTHER obstruction of justice charges that robert mueller is about to prosecute him for when he wraps up his investigation.]
if there was an obstruction of justice he would have been impeached by now.

06/20/2018) [....."Trump's personal attorney is 'willing to give info' about the President".... that news headline just came out TODAY!!!] lol


and Im sure he will get a 7 figure advanced from Random House too, and your point is ?



so, who knows WHAT ELSE they will find after his crooked lawyer/fixer rolls on him to save his own skin from spending the rest of his life in jail.
[and he sure has A LOT of dirt to spread!!!] lol


Again that is your opinion, these are not facts.


ANY of those things qualify to charge him under RICO,as they establish an obvious pattern to his lack of respect for the law,and a willingness to use his organization to break the law...

sure seems funny that you ignored/neglected to mention any of THOSE things!!!


Now that Ive seen your evidence, I will say based on what you've posted, the Chances of Trump being indicted as as likely as Hillary Clinton being the next attorney general for Trump.

why is that??

is it just sloppy research??

political bias?

or is your ommission of them because that you cant rationalize them in a way that doesnt REALLY make you look like you are DESPERATELY grasping at straws??
remember...i TOLD YOU to show your work!!!
cuz,i have absolutely no problem showing MINE!! lol

BUT,now that I have brought them up...why dont you try to explain how ALL THOSE things dont incriminate him enough for the D.O.J. to enact the RICO act?
and,remember...please show your work!


Gibberish.
i already have named several,complete with dates,and all you have done if COMICALLY offer your DESPERATE denials,and opinions,without any facts to back them up,or any knowledge of what actually constitutes a valid RICO case,which only validates my own argument.

rofl

so,thank you for playing.

you can pick up your parting prize at the exit!!
waving


Yeah yeah yeah, you're a barrel of laughs Dave, 3000 comedians out of work and let me guess you are one of them?

for your viewing pleasure I decided to re-post my original post to you , countering your every "fact"

did get you the herbal tea or decaf?

no photo
Thu 06/21/18 10:34 AM


Let's see Trump the violator of the Rico act as some would say or Hillary the murderer of countless thousands ..hmm let me think on this... one who violates the RICO act as you say or one who puts the lives of every citizen at risk for "convenience"..whom shall I choose I don't know yet ..I'm still thinkin" ...spock

There are those of us with EYES WIDE OPEN" that have turned away from watching the bouncing ball thrown out by the main stream media..there is far more at risk than the" battle of the blue and red"..it is US aginst "THEM" no matter what party they may claim allegiance to they are one and the same under their sick and twisted alliance..the onion has only started to be peeled..

There is a lot more to come ..it goes a lot farther down the rabbit hole.But the MSM and the so called "elites" have more diversionary tactics at hand and these are merely nothing more than distractions thrown to the masses like a bone to a pack of dogs ..now watch them fight amongst themselves tactics that have long been overly exposed..spock

But as the Main Stream Media continues to throw every bone they can they will slowly come to realize that their last futile attempts are in vain..For their archaic tactics that they have relied on to fool the masses through every brainwashing attempt no longer works..Technology has replaced the main tool they have used over the decades and the "idiot box" has been replaced with the internet and the knowledge that the masses have needed for so long..Perhaps they should go back to the time of their ancestors and start chiseling out their messages on rocks..because no one is listening any more..we know who they are and they know who we are..


We Are ANONYMOUS..We Are Legion...

shovelheaddave's photo
Thu 06/21/18 11:50 AM



sure seems funny that the whole time you are DESPERATELY denying that trump did anything that they can use to enact RICO with,you are blatantly overlooking...

(06/14/2018)
the MULTIPLE fraud charges that the state of new york is now bringing against trump for his fraudulent charity that he has been using to pay his own personal debts out of,which is as open and shut of a case as you could posssibly get,[and EVERY check that was written to pay his own personal debts with is a SERARATE/DIFFERENT charge!!!](and THOSE are STATE charges,that mike pence cant pardon him for!!! lol )
[those charges by themselves count for more than 2 charges!]


this has nothing to do with his campaign, when he was president elect or president
nice try.


(04/09/2018)
the judgement of the courts against his 'trump university',where the judge ruled that trump was guilty of fraud,and ordered him to pay 25 MILLION dollars in restitution to the people he defrauded.
[again...i am sure that every one of the people he defrauded would count as separate charges to be used against him!]


this has nothing to with his campaign or presidency


(06/03/2018_
the admission on national television where he publically admits that he dictated don jrs misleading letter of denial in the russian collusion case,[which proves that he DID know about it!!!!]


Provide proof of this claim, because as I understand it , It was Trump's legal team letter to the Mueller that address it.

(05/02,03/2018)
all of the OTHER stuff that his feebleminded lawyer,rudy guiliani has admitted on national television that trump knew about/did,and lied about


Your opinion, that doesnt make it fact.


(01/26/2018)
the obstruction of justice charge for firing james comey to try to stop the russina investigation.

not to mention,all of the OTHER obstruction of justice charges that robert mueller is about to prosecute him for when he wraps up his investigation.]
if there was an obstruction of justice he would have been impeached by now.

06/20/2018) [....."Trump's personal attorney is 'willing to give info' about the President".... that news headline just came out TODAY!!!] lol


and Im sure he will get a 7 figure advanced from Random House too, and your point is ?



so, who knows WHAT ELSE they will find after his crooked lawyer/fixer rolls on him to save his own skin from spending the rest of his life in jail.
[and he sure has A LOT of dirt to spread!!!] lol


Again that is your opinion, these are not facts.


ANY of those things qualify to charge him under RICO,as they establish an obvious pattern to his lack of respect for the law,and a willingness to use his organization to break the law...

sure seems funny that you ignored/neglected to mention any of THOSE things!!!


Now that Ive seen your evidence, I will say based on what you've posted, the Chances of Trump being indicted as as likely as Hillary Clinton being the next attorney general for Trump.

why is that??

is it just sloppy research??

political bias?

or is your ommission of them because that you cant rationalize them in a way that doesnt REALLY make you look like you are DESPERATELY grasping at straws??
remember...i TOLD YOU to show your work!!!
cuz,i have absolutely no problem showing MINE!! lol

BUT,now that I have brought them up...why dont you try to explain how ALL THOSE things dont incriminate him enough for the D.O.J. to enact the RICO act?
and,remember...please show your work!


Gibberish.
i already have named several,complete with dates,and all you have done if COMICALLY offer your DESPERATE denials,and opinions,without any facts to back them up,or any knowledge of what actually constitutes a valid RICO case,which only validates my own argument.

rofl

so,thank you for playing.

you can pick up your parting prize at the exit!!
waving


Yeah yeah yeah, you're a barrel of laughs Dave, 3000 comedians out of work and let me guess you are one of them?

for your viewing pleasure I decided to re-post my original post to you , countering your every "fact"

did get you the herbal tea or decaf?



it is not any more valid right now than it was when you originally posted it!

you appear to not be able to discern actual facts from your own biased opinions,which you mistakenly think are facts,and are therefore,in my opinion,not worth wasting any of my time on trying to intelligently debate anything with.

so,like i said...

thank you for playing.

you can pick up your parting gift at the exit.

shovelheaddave's photo
Thu 06/21/18 11:56 AM



Let's see Trump the violator of the Rico act as some would say or Hillary the murderer of countless thousands ..hmm let me think on this... one who violates the RICO act as you say or one who puts the lives of every citizen at risk for "convenience"..whom shall I choose I don't know yet ..I'm still thinkin" ...spock

There are those of us with EYES WIDE OPEN" that have turned away from watching the bouncing ball thrown out by the main stream media..there is far more at risk than the" battle of the blue and red"..it is US aginst "THEM" no matter what party they may claim allegiance to they are one and the same under their sick and twisted alliance..the onion has only started to be peeled..

There is a lot more to come ..it goes a lot farther down the rabbit hole.But the MSM and the so called "elites" have more diversionary tactics at hand and these are merely nothing more than distractions thrown to the masses like a bone to a pack of dogs ..now watch them fight amongst themselves tactics that have long been overly exposed..spock

But as the Main Stream Media continues to throw every bone they can they will slowly come to realize that their last futile attempts are in vain..For their archaic tactics that they have relied on to fool the masses through every brainwashing attempt no longer works..Technology has replaced the main tool they have used over the decades and the "idiot box" has been replaced with the internet and the knowledge that the masses have needed for so long..Perhaps they should go back to the time of their ancestors and start chiseling out their messages on rocks..because no one is listening any more..we know who they are and they know who we are..


We Are ANONYMOUS..We Are Legion...


offtopic

i'm sorry,but that string of gibberish you just posted has absolutely nothing to do with RICO.

maybe you should try posting it in the creative writing forum,or maybe even in the health forum,as they might be able to better diagnose your ailment,and get you the help that your desperate plea for attention requires?
scared