Topic: TODAY IN TRUMPLAND. PART 2.
hardBNhard's photo
Thu 03/21/19 08:06 AM
Thanks for the reply . Your opinion explains your position . whoa
Good luck with the kool aid :laughing:

Seakolony's photo
Thu 03/21/19 08:12 AM
Yes I am Libertarian that's right. The US needs a business man that can run things like a business. Government screws everything up for everyone. The history of Dem Vs Republicans needs to end. The drama needs to end. And what's best for the US needs consideration.

hardBNhard's photo
Thu 03/21/19 08:31 AM
Running a country as a buisness only makes the rich richer without any consideration to the people or the enviroment . Trickle down economics is a proven failure ! Unless you are the top 1% ers of the world dingbat donalds policies will eventualy crush you and sweet you aside like garbage .

no photo
Thu 03/21/19 08:36 AM
Edited by tombraider on Thu 03/21/19 09:20 AM

HBH the one's drinking the Kool-Aid is yourselves you all just haven't figured it out yet..just like you all hadn't figured out there was NO TRUMP RUSSIAN COLLUSION..but ya see that's why we are here..to set things straight..and to once again offer all of the misguided followers of the mockingbird media a seat on the Trump Train..there's still time ..the train hasn't left the station yet..You see there are those of us who know one thing of MAJOR IMPORTANCE..and that is..

This isn't about the Dems vs. the Reps ..it's about something much more DEEPER..much more DARKER..it's about GOOD vs. EVIL..an evil that is UNIMAGINABLE..As far as the Dems vs. the Reps..that's the deflection and the distraction..but I don't expect you to get it most won't simply because they don't "DO THE RESEARCH"..but I do..and that's why I say..

FOLLOW THE RABBIT.. Alice



You want the truth ..you're gonna have to DIG for it..clue* find the childrenspock

Seakolony's photo
Thu 03/21/19 09:29 AM
Edited by Seakolony on Thu 03/21/19 09:59 AM

Running a country as a buisness only makes the rich richer without any consideration to the people or the enviroment . Trickle down economics is a proven failure ! Unless you are the top 1% ers of the world dingbat donalds policies will eventualy crush you and sweet you aside like garbage .


Everyone has an opportunity to work and become that. Talk about personal responsibility. At 27 I built a 3 million dollar company and failed. At 36 I built another company and failed due to a theiving partner. Each time learning from my mistakes. Anyone can make it well and not be a top 1%. To think otherwise is failure thinking. People that achieve persevere. Do not let negative thinking interfere with your own personal achievment. That sells everyone short.

no photo
Thu 03/21/19 10:55 AM

there was NO TRUMP RUSSIAN COLLUSION..


Oh dear, why doesn't everybody read all those quotes that Charles posts. I guess because it would take too long as there are many of them!

Not sure what you're so scared of, there certainly WAS collusion between dozy Donald and those nice folk in the Kremlin, also between his son and the Russians. It's all there, just READ what Charles posted before you make posts that disagree, as if it were no more than a matter of opinion. The facts are all there frustrated

Seakolony's photo
Thu 03/21/19 11:10 AM
Who cares about a business corporation transaction. I would've kept going what might have made money should he lose the Presidency. So everyone should stop all earnings of business if they run for president I guess. Did Mitt Romney stop all business dealing while he ran? Ross Perot? Bush? Carter? Johnson? Just saying....the only prosecuted for business dealing this far would be Nixon. Of Clinton hasn't been either......so really your point is that it was in Russia....amazingly prejudicial don't you think

no photo
Thu 03/21/19 11:18 AM
You misunderstand my post. The collusion was illegal under US law. Read those posts and the links that Charles has provided. It is all clearly explained.

hardBNhard's photo
Thu 03/21/19 11:19 AM


there was NO TRUMP RUSSIAN COLLUSION..


Oh dear, why doesn't everybody read all those quotes that Charles posts. I guess because it would take too long as there are many of them!

Not sure what you're so scared of, there certainly WAS collusion between dozy Donald and those nice folk in the Kremlin, also between his son and the Russians. It's all there, just READ what Charles posted before you make posts that disagree, as if it were no more than a matter of opinion. The facts are all there frustrated

:thumbsup:

Seakolony's photo
Thu 03/21/19 11:26 AM

You misunderstand my post. The collusion was illegal under US law. Read those posts and the links that Charles has provided. It is all clearly explained.


I don't read hard left or hard right but I look at math is prejudiced to no one

msharmony's photo
Thu 03/21/19 11:31 AM

Who cares about a business corporation transaction. I would've kept going what might have made money should he lose the Presidency. So everyone should stop all earnings of business if they run for president I guess. Did Mitt Romney stop all business dealing while he ran? Ross Perot? Bush? Carter? Johnson? Just saying....the only prosecuted for business dealing this far would be Nixon. Of Clinton hasn't been either......so really your point is that it was in Russia....amazingly prejudicial don't you think



No one caress about BUSINESS transactions, UNLESS said transaction is with someone that has the power to interfere in the outcome of an election and that 'business' involves potential promises in return for doing so.



Seakolony's photo
Thu 03/21/19 11:39 AM


Who cares about a business corporation transaction. I would've kept going what might have made money should he lose the Presidency. So everyone should stop all earnings of business if they run for president I guess. Did Mitt Romney stop all business dealing while he ran? Ross Perot? Bush? Carter? Johnson? Just saying....the only prosecuted for business dealing this far would be Nixon. Of Clinton hasn't been either......so really your point is that it was in Russia....amazingly prejudicial don't you think



No one caress about BUSINESS transactions, UNLESS said transaction is with someone that has the power to interfere in the outcome of an election and that 'business' involves potential promises in return for doing so.




And there isn't a politician out there doing that......if dead people can vote and illegals what stop any other government from sending illegals to change the outcome of the vote. Yep I still don't care. They are all living in glass houses and throwing stones. Before too long none of them will have any said house left.

msharmony's photo
Thu 03/21/19 11:53 AM



Who cares about a business corporation transaction. I would've kept going what might have made money should he lose the Presidency. So everyone should stop all earnings of business if they run for president I guess. Did Mitt Romney stop all business dealing while he ran? Ross Perot? Bush? Carter? Johnson? Just saying....the only prosecuted for business dealing this far would be Nixon. Of Clinton hasn't been either......so really your point is that it was in Russia....amazingly prejudicial don't you think



No one caress about BUSINESS transactions, UNLESS said transaction is with someone that has the power to interfere in the outcome of an election and that 'business' involves potential promises in return for doing so.




And there isn't a politician out there doing that......if dead people can vote and illegals what stop any other government from sending illegals to change the outcome of the vote. Yep I still don't care. They are all living in glass houses and throwing stones. Before too long none of them will have any said house left.


and IF there is evidence of a politician having connections that can 'send illegals to change the outcome of a vote' AND it is also shown that in fact illegals DID change the outcome of the vote, the law would and should care.

other people do it, is not a legal defense for a criminal act. Any other politician who negotiates with dictators to interfere with our elections SHOULD be held accountable, glass houses or not.


Seakolony's photo
Thu 03/21/19 12:29 PM




Who cares about a business corporation transaction. I would've kept going what might have made money should he lose the Presidency. So everyone should stop all earnings of business if they run for president I guess. Did Mitt Romney stop all business dealing while he ran? Ross Perot? Bush? Carter? Johnson? Just saying....the only prosecuted for business dealing this far would be Nixon. Of Clinton hasn't been either......so really your point is that it was in Russia....amazingly prejudicial don't you think



No one caress about BUSINESS transactions, UNLESS said transaction is with someone that has the power to interfere in the outcome of an election and that 'business' involves potential promises in return for doing so.




And there isn't a politician out there doing that......if dead people can vote and illegals what stop any other government from sending illegals to change the outcome of the vote. Yep I still don't care. They are all living in glass houses and throwing stones. Before too long none of them will have any said house left.


and IF there is evidence of a politician having connections that can 'send illegals to change the outcome of a vote' AND it is also shown that in fact illegals DID change the outcome of the vote, the law would and should care.

other people do it, is not a legal defense for a criminal act. Any other politician who negotiates with dictators to interfere with our elections SHOULD be held accountable, glass houses or not.




Okay sure like that will happen

msharmony's photo
Thu 03/21/19 01:00 PM





Who cares about a business corporation transaction. I would've kept going what might have made money should he lose the Presidency. So everyone should stop all earnings of business if they run for president I guess. Did Mitt Romney stop all business dealing while he ran? Ross Perot? Bush? Carter? Johnson? Just saying....the only prosecuted for business dealing this far would be Nixon. Of Clinton hasn't been either......so really your point is that it was in Russia....amazingly prejudicial don't you think



No one caress about BUSINESS transactions, UNLESS said transaction is with someone that has the power to interfere in the outcome of an election and that 'business' involves potential promises in return for doing so.




And there isn't a politician out there doing that......if dead people can vote and illegals what stop any other government from sending illegals to change the outcome of the vote. Yep I still don't care. They are all living in glass houses and throwing stones. Before too long none of them will have any said house left.


and IF there is evidence of a politician having connections that can 'send illegals to change the outcome of a vote' AND it is also shown that in fact illegals DID change the outcome of the vote, the law would and should care.

other people do it, is not a legal defense for a criminal act. Any other politician who negotiates with dictators to interfere with our elections SHOULD be held accountable, glass houses or not.




Okay sure like that will happen



exactly what people said about Trump being elected, or Clinton being impeached for a lie (Who cares about lies, right? other people lie too.)

one never knows what might happen. We just have to wait and see.

Toodygirl5's photo
Thu 03/21/19 01:17 PM

CONDUCT UNBECOMING OF A PRESIDENT.
]



Where is all the posts referring to the Conduct of the Democratic party in Congress . Also all the followers of the Democratic Party''s. Negative comments and conduct against their President !!



Seakolony's photo
Thu 03/21/19 01:25 PM






Who cares about a business corporation transaction. I would've kept going what might have made money should he lose the Presidency. So everyone should stop all earnings of business if they run for president I guess. Did Mitt Romney stop all business dealing while he ran? Ross Perot? Bush? Carter? Johnson? Just saying....the only prosecuted for business dealing this far would be Nixon. Of Clinton hasn't been either......so really your point is that it was in Russia....amazingly prejudicial don't you think



No one caress about BUSINESS transactions, UNLESS said transaction is with someone that has the power to interfere in the outcome of an election and that 'business' involves potential promises in return for doing so.




And there isn't a politician out there doing that......if dead people can vote and illegals what stop any other government from sending illegals to change the outcome of the vote. Yep I still don't care. They are all living in glass houses and throwing stones. Before too long none of them will have any said house left.


and IF there is evidence of a politician having connections that can 'send illegals to change the outcome of a vote' AND it is also shown that in fact illegals DID change the outcome of the vote, the law would and should care.

other people do it, is not a legal defense for a criminal act. Any other politician who negotiates with dictators to interfere with our elections SHOULD be held accountable, glass houses or not.




Okay sure like that will happen



exactly what people said about Trump being elected, or Clinton being impeached for a lie (Who cares about lies, right? other people lie too.)

one never knows what might happen. We just have to wait and see.
[/quote

Exactly what did impeachment of Clinton do. Everyone thought Trump would win maybe not around you.

msharmony's photo
Thu 03/21/19 02:05 PM







Who cares about a business corporation transaction. I would've kept going what might have made money should he lose the Presidency. So everyone should stop all earnings of business if they run for president I guess. Did Mitt Romney stop all business dealing while he ran? Ross Perot? Bush? Carter? Johnson? Just saying....the only prosecuted for business dealing this far would be Nixon. Of Clinton hasn't been either......so really your point is that it was in Russia....amazingly prejudicial don't you think



No one caress about BUSINESS transactions, UNLESS said transaction is with someone that has the power to interfere in the outcome of an election and that 'business' involves potential promises in return for doing so.




And there isn't a politician out there doing that......if dead people can vote and illegals what stop any other government from sending illegals to change the outcome of the vote. Yep I still don't care. They are all living in glass houses and throwing stones. Before too long none of them will have any said house left.


and IF there is evidence of a politician having connections that can 'send illegals to change the outcome of a vote' AND it is also shown that in fact illegals DID change the outcome of the vote, the law would and should care.

other people do it, is not a legal defense for a criminal act. Any other politician who negotiates with dictators to interfere with our elections SHOULD be held accountable, glass houses or not.




Okay sure like that will happen



exactly what people said about Trump being elected, or Clinton being impeached for a lie (Who cares about lies, right? other people lie too.)

one never knows what might happen. We just have to wait and see.
[/quote

Exactly what did impeachment of Clinton do. Everyone thought Trump would win maybe not around you.



the point was, there were people who never thought a politician would be impeached for lying about a marital affair, and there were people who never thought an inexperienced pompous past his prime billionaire reality tv star would be elected President, there were polls in fact that said just that.

So no, 'everyone' did not think Trump would win, and everyone, very obviously did not think he wouldn't. But people had thoughts on both sides, as they always do.




Seakolony's photo
Thu 03/21/19 06:30 PM
Edited by Seakolony on Thu 03/21/19 06:30 PM
Polls mean nothing....polls are a sample of people. Everyone I knew thought Trump would be President. Those polls were made to look the way they wanted them to. You have no point with Trump winning the Presidency. BTW he will win again. Watch

msharmony's photo
Thu 03/21/19 06:32 PM
Edited by msharmony on Thu 03/21/19 06:38 PM

Polls mean nothing....polls are a sample of people. Everyone I knew thought Trump would be President. Those polls were made to look the way they wanted them to. You have no point with Trump winning the Presidency. BTW he will win again. Watch


birds of a feather tend to flock together, which is why polls are a bit more reliable, than just asking our own circle of friends and family, although they are flawed because they tend to ask people with similar tastes as well, who watch or read the same sources, who take the polls from their audience. But its still a larger pool of responses than our personal friends, colleagues and family, with more potential for diverse opinions as a result.

Everyone I knew thought Trump would never be president. Trump won the electoral vote, but not the popular vote. So, I do have a point concerning what people, or individuals 'thought'. some thought he would, some thought he wouldn't.