Am I reading this right? You're asking what I would do if I were a criminal working as a part of a team of criminals?

To start with, I would never GET involved in such a crime. The scenario you chose doesn't fit with the rest of your post. The strategy that criminals follow is anti-community to begin with, and so whatever "code" they choose is likely to be equally destructive.

As for the "no snitching" culture you describe, it's my understanding that this grew out of a racism and resentment filled past. When it was originally established, it wasn't a matter of not telling EACH OTHER what was going on, it was a matter of protecting community members from police who were from outside the community, and who's loyalty of service was to other people outside the community, at the expense of the community.

That culture SHOULD have changed, when it stopped being true that that the police represented outsider persecution. My opinion is that anyone who insists on RETAINING this entirely outmoded behavior, needs to be woken up.

ever come to mind i was being sarcastic

Obama vow to take in 10,000 Syrian refugees under fire after Paris attack -

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/nov/14/obama-vow-take-10000-syrian-refugees-under-fire-af/

Obama vow to take in 10,000 Syrian refugees under fire after Paris attack -

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/nov/14/obama-vow-take-10000-syrian-refugees-under-fire-af/

snitches get stitches

A terrorist behind the Paris attacks who allegedly posed as a Syrian refugee was rescued by Greek authorities after the migrant boat he had smuggled himself on sunk, it has been claimed.

Full Republican control of 29 state legislatures, the highest total since the 1920s, and Republican governors in 32 states...

Barack Obama is a gifted politician. But a president is judged by the gifts he leaves behind. Following his fourth national election as party leader, Democrats are taking stock of what they have received.

For Obama, there have been two convincing presidential victories; for the Democratic Party, electoral ruin at every other level.

On Tuesday (assuming the most likely final outcome), the largest Democratic Senate losses since 1980.

The ranks of moderate Democrats — including Mark Pryor, Mark Begich, Kay Hagan and (probably) Mary Landrieu — decimated.

During Obama’s presidency, the loss of nearly 70 House seats, producing the largest Republican majority since 1931.

The near-extinction of the Democratic Party in the South, including in Arkansas and Tennessee, which provided the party’s national ticket in 1992 and 1996.

Full Republican control of 29 state legislatures, the highest total since the 1920s, and Republican governors in 32 states, including Massachusetts, Illinois and Maryland. (None of which are remotely rightward-leaning.)

Obama’s particular form of political magic has worked only for Obama himself.

His post-election news conference displayed a series of character traits that have become hardened and exaggerated under the pressure of defeat. His self-confidence has slipped into denial — imagining the election as a generalized anti-incumbent tantrum rather than a reaction to the performance of his administration. His moral certitude has turned into the graceless dismissal of opposition, who cannot be conceded anything more than a “good night.” His pride of accomplishment has become a conviction that Americans are just insufficiently grateful for the “real progress” of the past six years.

There is apparently no possible electoral outcome that could shake these beliefs. And they seem rooted in a certain view of the electorate. Obama clearly regards the “two-thirds of voters who chose not to participate in the process yesterday” as a more favorable audience than the discontented third who turned out. It is a view of politics that comes by way of William Butler Yeats: “The best lack all conviction, while the worst/ Are full of passionate intensity.”

This mind-set is among the most damaging gifts of the president to his party.

...

But it is impossible to make the case that Obama has been an inclusive or unifying leader. He has left his party more ideologically and geographically uniform. He has left a riven society and political culture. And these should also be counted as Obama’s gifts.

Rubbish.
A great man is doing a great job.
How about we just cut off all the pointing fingers.

I do see his point.

It would kind of be like giving a purple heart to someone who 'played a soldier' in a movie,,,


when there are ACTUAL, always been, women,,

passing over them for a doctor created one seems ,,,backwards,,

especially JUST for the decision to have the doctors create her


,,may be different if AFTER a reassignment surgery, the person went on to cure cancer, or ran into a burning orphanage to save children,,,

but merely for having a decision and the resources to have a surgery? nah