It's as good a name as any other, Mightymoe !

For as often as research equipment goes into the deepest parts of the Ocean, usually, there's always another new-found species to be documented.

Apparently, we can't go often enough.

Because I live in such a rural place, I often see meteors that look like a florescent-tube in either white or green. Not too unlike this picture.

On one occasion I did see a real fire-ball and I stood silent for several minutes waiting for a sonic-boom or a shock-wave, but it didn't reach me.

It looked like a dark center with a reddish orange halo with a dull slipstream behind it and lasted several seconds.

To the extent we can safely-say we've an absolute constant in physics and providing we don't find other properties that remain at a constant for as often as they're tested, I'd argue the Laws Of Physics remain the same.

Unless, God Almighty chooses to usurp these rules. (This Is Called A Miracle)

********************************************

Sir Isaac Newton declared three fundamental laws of motion with regards anything that has mass for example.

"'For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction in proportion to its mass.'"

"'An object at rest has a tendency to stay at rest unless effected by an outside force, and likewise an object in motion has a tendency to continue in motion unless effected by an outside force.'"

"'The greater the mass of an object the greater the amount of energy to accelerate or decelerate that object, and likewise the lesser the mass of an object the lesser amount of energy is required to accelerate or decelerate that object.'"

*******************************************

To this day these fundamental Laws Of Planetary Motion seem to be without dispute even though centuries have passed.

Topsinardo, I hope these same verses are just as clarifying to You as well.

Very Well, we'll discuss this extensively if You wish another day, God willing.

Nope... !

Just take Your time reading the quotes I've given You.

While Jesus was in subjection to The Almighty God he'd never of implied he was a deity.

Now, to what extent God Almighty permit Jesus be part of the rest of creation is anybody's guess. (Proverbs 8: 30)

The title 'lord' is a respective to Jesus' contemporaries.

But, the metaphorical Father who is God Almighty doesn't also have a lesser-god in Jesus.

Jesus is first of God Almighty's creations. (Proverbs 8: 22-36)

[ Regarding The Previous Statement ]


Very Good... !

Yes, Jesus just like Ruth was/is in loving subject to The Unseen Almighty God.

Here's another thought... (Hebrews 7: 7)

Also, (Mark 14: 36)

Absolutely Not !

(Matthew 26: 39)

Okay, You think like CowboyGH.

You believe 'God' is plural or a group.

*********************************

You'd be better-off in the pagan land of Moab !

An assertion followed by a contradiction is an Oxymoron.

If Jesus is God Almighty, to whom else is he in subjection to ?

What is this guy talking about ?

What type of successful day is a good-day to die-hard ?

Will my unsuccessful day provide any more-so a bad-day to die-well ?

*******************************

What was the would-be Biblical quote at 1st Thessalonians 5: 25 about ?

"'Brothers, continue in prayer for us.'"

Well, Ruth was well informed by Naomi about who and what the True God is.

Can we say the same about every would-be Christian Woman... ?

Do they all assume Jesus is God or do some recognize Jesus was also in subjection to an unseen God ?

Tom... ?

Perhaps, it would be helpful is one subject at a time were concentrated on.

For example it might be easier to discuss Your pessimism about the longevity of ancient people like Noah and Moses.

While Noah did live into multiples of hundred years (950), Moses likely didn't live more than a century and a half.

This line is killing me !

Obviously, Ruth wasn't as complacent about returning to the land of her widowed sister-in-law, and their polytheism, as I'd argue too many would-be Christian Women are or would-be.

Ruth lived more than a thousand years before Jesus walked the Earth, and One can hardly assume she was any less adamant about her faith in the one unseen God.

It is believed that Samuel wrote The Book Of Ruth, and because the entire romantic account is only four chapters long it merits being read in its entirety.

The Book of Ruth is between Judges and 1st Samuel in the Bible.

Cracker813...

I believe the scriptural reference that Msharmony and Candyswirl are referring to is at - (Matthew 19: 4-6)

Well, as an example it doesn't fixate on 'why' the number of people that would be on the jury, but it does mention it must always be an uneven number so that there can be no ties.

Perhaps it was the number of available elders at the time that could be made available.