Topic: Rush Is 100% Right On This One!
Dragoness's photo
Mon 03/05/12 12:52 PM





Kinda like calling people that disagree with oblahmas policies bigots and racists..

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh


If they just disagree, no they're not racist. If they're saying racist things, they're racist. Not quite the same.


Its exactly the same.


No it isn't.

Dragoness's photo
Mon 03/05/12 12:55 PM
Ladies want to get together and start a petition to put salt peter in the food of any man who agrees with Rush on this one? That way they wouldn't have to worry about birth control at all, no erections for them.

J/K, I heard the stuff ruins them for life but if they can't be part of the solution maybe it would be best if they couldn't be part of the problem, hmmmmm something to think about.

no photo
Mon 03/05/12 12:59 PM

Ladies want to get together and start a petition to put salt peter in the food of any man who agrees with Rush on this one? That way they wouldn't have to worry about birth control at all, no erections for them.

J/K, I heard the stuff ruins them for life but if they can't be part of the solution maybe it would be best if they couldn't be part of the problem, hmmmmm something to think about.


Saltpeter doesn't cause impotence or at least, there is no scientific evidence that it does.

no photo
Mon 03/05/12 01:50 PM
IMHO birth control should be handled just like every other medication.
No special exceptions just because its a contraceptive.



no photo
Mon 03/05/12 01:55 PM

IMHO birth control should be handled just like every other medication.
No special exceptions just because its a contraceptive.


I'm fine with that, as long as it's optional and the insurance company can charge more for it. When it's mandated by Congress, it forces everyone to help pay for the birth control pills or Viagra or whatever other drug.

no photo
Mon 03/05/12 02:59 PM

IMHO birth control should be handled just like every other medication.
No special exceptions just because its a contraceptive.





I'm fine with that. I don't see why it should be handled differently.

InvictusV's photo
Mon 03/05/12 03:13 PM






Kinda like calling people that disagree with oblahmas policies bigots and racists..

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh


If they just disagree, no they're not racist. If they're saying racist things, they're racist. Not quite the same.


Its exactly the same.


No it isn't.


you are exactly who I had in mind when I typed that..

no one throws around more generalized unsubstantiated slurs than you.


no photo
Mon 03/05/12 03:34 PM




Its ignorant stupidity like this that makes me not like republicans! These blowhards are all Jesus freaky and feel its their duty to shove it down everybody elses throats, Well I do say sir that I don't give a flying **** one about your god damn religion, it's your choice so keep it to yourself.


No, we just don't want to pay for someone's birth control because she wants to lay on her back. If she wants it she can pay for it.



If its just money you are worried about, you will be paying for welfare for their children that they can't afford to raise.

So you lie when you say it is about money.

It is a sexist thing.

If Insurance will pay for viagra for your Dick to get hard, then they should pay for the damage it does.




no photo
Mon 03/05/12 03:36 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Mon 03/05/12 03:37 PM
Which means Insurance should either pay for birth control, or pay to deliver AND RAISE a child to adulthood.

How do you think they would like them apples? rant rant

no photo
Mon 03/05/12 03:40 PM

Ladies want to get together and start a petition to put salt peter in the food of any man who agrees with Rush on this one? That way they wouldn't have to worry about birth control at all, no erections for them.

J/K, I heard the stuff ruins them for life but if they can't be part of the solution maybe it would be best if they couldn't be part of the problem, hmmmmm something to think about.



....and outlaw Viagra.

If men are so against birth control and/or abortion they should not be allowed to have sex at all except after they get permission to do it to procreate.




no photo
Mon 03/05/12 03:54 PM
population reduction of the lower classes

do not have kids middle/poor people



he wants to stop diseases like pregnancy with eugenics

both parties are trying to destroy your life


skip to 20:00

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdzepK-LVtU

msharmony's photo
Mon 03/05/12 04:48 PM


IMHO birth control should be handled just like every other medication.
No special exceptions just because its a contraceptive.





I'm fine with that. I don't see why it should be handled differently.


medication is to treat illness or prevent illness

birth control is to back up those who wish to have sex but not get pregnant

few people have as much control over 'illnesses' as they do over whether they get pregnant

so, its a BIT different

msharmony's photo
Mon 03/05/12 04:49 PM

Which means Insurance should either pay for birth control, or pay to deliver AND RAISE a child to adulthood.

How do you think they would like them apples? rant rant



insurance shouldnt HAVE to cover our sexual activities,,,


sex is not mandatory

or required for life

insurance SHOULD be able to have the OPTION to cover them though

no photo
Mon 03/05/12 05:08 PM


Which means Insurance should either pay for birth control, or pay to deliver AND RAISE a child to adulthood.

How do you think they would like them apples? rant rant



insurance shouldnt HAVE to cover our sexual activities,,,


sex is not mandatory

or required for life

insurance SHOULD be able to have the OPTION to cover them though



sex is not mandatory <-------try telling that to your husband.

no photo
Mon 03/05/12 05:10 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Mon 03/05/12 05:11 PM
What I would like to point out is that it that Insurance covers Viagra for men who can't get it up.

Since sex is NOT MANDATORY or necessary for life, then Insurance should not cover Viagra - if they will not cover birth control.



ITS SEXIST!

markc48's photo
Mon 03/05/12 05:19 PM
Owe xxxx Birth control and viagra for all. Has my vote:wink:

TJN's photo
Mon 03/05/12 05:31 PM

What I would like to point out is that it that Insurance covers Viagra for men who can't get it up.

Since sex is NOT MANDATORY or necessary for life, then Insurance should not cover Viagra - if they will not cover birth control.



ITS SEXIST!

I never knew insurance companies had to cover Viagra.
I'm sure some policies do just like some policies cover contraception.
I have yet to see any statistic on how many insurance companies don't cover contraception.

no photo
Mon 03/05/12 05:40 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Mon 03/05/12 05:42 PM


What I would like to point out is that it that Insurance covers Viagra for men who can't get it up.

Since sex is NOT MANDATORY or necessary for life, then Insurance should not cover Viagra - if they will not cover birth control.



ITS SEXIST!

I never knew insurance companies had to cover Viagra.
I'm sure some policies do just like some policies cover contraception.
I have yet to see any statistic on how many insurance companies don't cover contraception.


I've never seen the statistics yet either, but I had a friend who had health insurance and could not get contraceptives and when she got pregnant she had a tubal pregnancy and her life was in danger and she had to have surgery. Her insurance did not cover any of that.

Yet her boyfriend was taking viagra and his insurance covered that.

She did not think that was fair.

Of course you have to have insurance that covers medications.


no photo
Mon 03/05/12 05:43 PM
If you have prescription insurance for drugs, it should cover most needed drugs. Strangely enough I guess it depends on the Insurance company.


msharmony's photo
Mon 03/05/12 05:52 PM

What I would like to point out is that it that Insurance covers Viagra for men who can't get it up.

Since sex is NOT MANDATORY or necessary for life, then Insurance should not cover Viagra - if they will not cover birth control.



ITS SEXIST!



I agree, it should not be MANDATED to cover viagra, it should be an option for insurance to cover it

are insurance companies mandated to cover viagra? I wouldnt know.