well IMO i dont really think he has harmed our security anymore than invading and bombing all these countries we're messing with. thats why people hate us, because we go around scewing with everyone trying to impose our corrupt government system on them. its all propaganda, all of it. homeland security can kiss my @$$. of course they will say that about snowden, cuz all the politicians are mad they got caught doing something they werent supposed to, so instead of them owning up to what they did, they will try to turn it around and make it all snowdens fault. its all lies and propaganda

IMO snowden is a hero. alot of us have known we were being spied on well before snowden said anything, but i think when he came out he woke alot of people up to just how shady our government really is. i think anyone who calls snowden a traitor, is a traitor. this guy knew the government was doing illegal ****, so he exposed it and the government wants to lock him up and torture his a$$ for it. i dont blame snowden one bit, he did what was right and is now a man without a country. but he felt strong enough about it that he chose to expose it knowing the likely consequences. snowden is a hero in my book and i dont really care what other people think. this guy should be allowed to come home, and all these corrupt politicians who wants to lock him up should be tossed out of their positions of power and thrown in jail. snowden did the right thing and he doesnt deserve to be a fugitive for it. just shows how phucked up our gov. is. they get exposed doing something illegal, and instead of them being punished for it, they want to punish the guy who exposed it. phucking ludicrous IMO.

i hear ya moe. going to be going to a job interview in a couple days, so i been cleaning out my system, havent smoked in like a month! its phukkin killing me haha

anytime scoob, nothing like some bud porn haha

and the styrofoam cups they come in...

go talk to some people in the military conrad, i have friends who served over seas, and thats what they told me. so i guess you know more about the subject than someone who was actually over there fighting?

its all BS and a sham. the US creates terrorist networks so we have an excuse to invade other countries and steal their resources and force our "democracy" on them. politics is nothing more than the entertainment arm of the military industrial complex. it might be hard for other people to see but to me its really clear. we could have taken out ISIS 100 times over already, so why dont we? because the MIC needs something to do for war profiteers to make money. its all a sham. if they were really worried about protecting americans, they would have our soldiers here, defending us. were in what, 120 countries? 980 bases worldwide? and were phucking broke but yet we still continue to waste money on these ridiculous wars. the people over there arent all terrorists, theyre people trying to protect their homeland. if a foreign military invaded the US, would the man who takes up arms against them be considered a terrorist? no, he would be someone defending his country. most of these "terrorists" dont want us there, and i dont blame them.

why would the US government want to take out ISIS, after all the US created and funds them. how many times did we "accidentally" air drop supplys to ISIS? they dont want to take them out because of all the profiteers of war, thats why they want to keep fighting and feeding the military industrial complex.

too many scandals to keep up with? is it part of a plan?

ask mr obama, seems to be working pretty damn good for him.

Clinton Foundation hit with racketeering lawsuit
By Sarah Westwood | May 27, 2015 | 5:00 am



Bill and Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation have been hit with a racketeering lawsuit in Florida court.

The lawsuit, filed by Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch, includes a legal request to have the Florida judge seize the private server on which Hillary Clinton and her aides hosted their emails while she served as secretary of state.

Klayman has filed dozens of lawsuits against the Clintons and other prominent politicians.

The racketeering, influenced and corrupt organizations, or RICO, case alleges the former first couple and their family philanthropy traded political favors for donations or generous speaking fees for Bill Clinton while his wife was the nation's chief diplomat.

"Negotiations by email about influencing U.S. foreign policy or U.S. Government actions to benefit donors to ... The Clinton Foundation or sponsors of speaking engagements would not be captured on a U.S. Government email account because her emails would not be with a U.S. Government official," Klayman said in court documents obtained by the Washington Examiner.

Hillary Clinton deleted 32,000 email messages from her email server that included her communications arranging, negotiating, and agreeing upon speaking engagements by Bill Clinton in return for large speaking fees and donations to The Clinton Foundation," the documents, dated May 20, said.

Klayman pushed the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida to order a "neutral forensic expert ... to take custody and control of the private email server and reconstruct and preserve the official U.S. Government records relating to the conduct of U.S. foreign policy during Defendant Secretary Clinton's term as Secretary of State."

Hillary Clinton handed over 55,000 printed pages of emails to the State Department in November of last year and reportedly erased the remaining records off her private server.

Critics of Clinton's decision to forgo use of an official email account argue the presidential candidate could have simply withheld any incriminating messages from the batch she gave the State Department.

Her supporters have dubbed the quest for Clinton's State Department emails a partisan "witch hunt."

Klayman pointed to the litany of scandals involving missing records that have followed the Clintons for decades, including the fact that thousands of emails disappeared during Bill Clinton's administration after White House officials threatened internal computer experts who blew the whistle on the "suppression."

"It's a perfect RICO case, it fits completely," Klayman said of the lawsuit. "Our Congress doesn't even have the guts to subpoena her documents. They'd rather get on Fox News. So we felt had to bring that case. Somebody's got to do it."

Klayman said a major reason for his lawsuit involves the fact that Cheryl Mills, then-chief of staff to Hillary Clinton, and the secretary of state herself "lied to the lower court" in by claiming there were no documents related to a pair of Freedom of Information Act requests he filed in 2012 while knowing those records actually did exist on the private server.

One FOIA, filed May 2012, pertained to allegations that Hillary Clinton issued waivers for preferred companies to do business with Iran despite strict congressional sanctions. The other probed a 2012 leak of classified information about Israel and Iran to the New York Times and was filed in June of that year.

Klayman said records on the Clintons' private server are "in imminent danger of being lost" in court documents and urged the court to intervene.

Clinton Foundation officials did not return a request for comment on the case.

The massive charity drew fire after a book by Peter Schweizer entitled Clinton Cash suggested foreign governments and companies with interests before the State Department donated to the foundation with the expectation that Hillary or Bill Clinton would ensure they received preferential treatment from the agency.

thats what we have for now

hell yea its the diggity dankness



just so damn pretty to look at. i hope soon i can grow my own and see this beauty firsthand.

glad to hear that. WW is a pretty potent strain, definitely one of my top 3.

it tells us the our voting process is rigged and our votes dont mean $h1t, from what i see obama hasnt cleaned up bushs mess, he continued it. they're both criminals and should be hung outside the white house. treasonous ba$tards.

haha yea that $h1t sux tho, last like 5 mins and puts ya right to sleep.
i get medical grade 1 hit and your off to the moon. wish they would just legalize it already, i would love to grow some. esp. some white widow

i like rand too, but i feel like he flip flops on some things. hes definitely not his dad and that saddens me. but he is the best candidate we have right now if your someone who appreciates freedom.

ron paul was the man, the last 100% honest man we had in politics. when they included him in the debates he made everyone else look stupid. there was whole towns of people who were ron paul supporters that registered 0 votes. the establishment screwed him so bad and its proven they did.

hahahaha thats funny. ron should run, he was so obviously cheated last time.

i also remember him going on the "ellen show" and saying "it wont be mandatory".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QX_NifR5gZU

HAHAHA good one. and no i dont live in a trailer. i have a house and a mortgage. you can justify voting for trump however you want, it only makes you look like an idiot even further. and im not sure how him living in a penthouse that he owns is in anyway relevant to be being a good candidate for president. i dont even have to refute your arguments, like i said your words speak for themselves when ti comes to your level of intelligence. not too mention everytime you get proved wrong you run away from the thread.