Community > Posts By > msharmony

 
msharmony's photo
Sun 02/26/12 05:46 PM





why do you think some fathers distance themselves from their pregnant partner or the child after it's born?


Some people are incapable of being a parent, even though their body is able to produce children, they lack the mentality, maturity, and emotional capacity to be a responsible adult, and a parent. There's all kinds of reasons why one would be this way.



And boys feel like sex is a freebie and they don't want to take responsibility for the life they created.


girls too,,,,but boys dont have abortion as an option


Boys think if they get a girl pg, she can just abort. I heard that is very psychologically draining on a to-be mom to abort her baby! I know I would not.

msharmony's photo
Sun 02/26/12 05:34 PM
Edited by msharmony on Sun 02/26/12 05:35 PM



why do you think some fathers distance themselves from their pregnant partner or the child after it's born?


Some people are incapable of being a parent, even though their body is able to produce children, they lack the mentality, maturity, and emotional capacity to be a responsible adult, and a parent. There's all kinds of reasons why one would be this way.



And boys feel like sex is a freebie and they don't want to take responsibility for the life they created.


girls too,,,,but boys dont have abortion as an option

msharmony's photo
Sun 02/26/12 05:34 PM
ouch,, two hours

I will bookmark it for later

but I totally agree with your POV, most of the incarcerated are either impoverished or uneducated,,,,

msharmony's photo
Sun 02/26/12 05:31 PM
I am striving toward a permanent CAREER and a self business


through furthering my education

msharmony's photo
Sun 02/26/12 05:27 PM







why do you think some fathers distance themselves from their pregnant partner or the child after it's born?


I just think some people were not meant to be parents. I am not one to judge their decision but maybe the kid is better off without the dad. JMO


No no no you're a little off this time. There were studies done and the biggest forewarning of a kid going to jail, etc., was lack of a father figure involvement. I think they were 3x more likely to have societal, behavioral and criminal activities. I'd have to look it back up and be for sure, but 3x sounds right, and I don't feel like looking it up tonight!!

For all that info the ladies owe me a smooch! blushing



lol

well, I already kind of new that,, thats why I Said I would NEVER keep a child from their father unless that parent was abusive to the child personally,,,


The study didn't specify but I feel sure it meant a good father figure, it might not have, you can never tell if they don't specify.



yes, a father is better than no father,, UNLESS that father is tainted

(abusive)

just like eating SOME food, is better than eating NO food, unless that food is tainted,,,


Ahhh I forgot about me. Mine was verbally, physically and mentally abusive. That's what made me swear when I was a kid I'd never treat anyone like that, and I made it out. I am distanced from my father (he died) and mother (she's 82) cuz I remember my youth and resent it.


Im sorry to hear it, but even that experience with your father taught you valuable lessons

so it wasnt really a loss

msharmony's photo
Sun 02/26/12 05:23 PM





why do you think some fathers distance themselves from their pregnant partner or the child after it's born?


I just think some people were not meant to be parents. I am not one to judge their decision but maybe the kid is better off without the dad. JMO


No no no you're a little off this time. There were studies done and the biggest forewarning of a kid going to jail, etc., was lack of a father figure involvement. I think they were 3x more likely to have societal, behavioral and criminal activities. I'd have to look it back up and be for sure, but 3x sounds right, and I don't feel like looking it up tonight!!

For all that info the ladies owe me a smooch! blushing



lol

well, I already kind of new that,, thats why I Said I would NEVER keep a child from their father unless that parent was abusive to the child personally,,,


The study didn't specify but I feel sure it meant a good father figure, it might not have, you can never tell if they don't specify.



yes, a father is better than no father,, UNLESS that father is tainted

(abusive)

just like eating SOME food, is better than eating NO food, unless that food is tainted,,,

msharmony's photo
Sun 02/26/12 05:22 PM

I agree, which is why we're long over due for a new government that truly represents the people.


its something to work towards, for sure

but in an electorate , those who dont participate rarely get

'represented' , whether they are excluded by choice or by chance,,,

msharmony's photo
Sun 02/26/12 05:17 PM



why do you think some fathers distance themselves from their pregnant partner or the child after it's born?


I just think some people were not meant to be parents. I am not one to judge their decision but maybe the kid is better off without the dad. JMO


No no no you're a little off this time. There were studies done and the biggest forewarning of a kid going to jail, etc., was lack of a father figure involvement. I think they were 3x more likely to have societal, behavioral and criminal activities. I'd have to look it back up and be for sure, but 3x sounds right, and I don't feel like looking it up tonight!!

For all that info the ladies owe me a smooch! blushing



lol

well, I already kind of new that,, thats why I Said I would NEVER keep a child from their father unless that parent was abusive to the child personally,,,

msharmony's photo
Sun 02/26/12 03:25 PM
grabbing his beard and sign?

and the version I read claimed someone was choked,,,,,smh


media whoa

msharmony's photo
Sun 02/26/12 03:21 PM
my rights end where anothers begins

my disagreement is probably one of the main reasons for the variance in opinion


whether or not another life constitutes a strict issue of one persons privacy, or whether that life has similar 'personhood' to be protected

msharmony's photo
Sun 02/26/12 03:18 PM
our founding fathers had strong ideals while continuing to own slaves

the country has never been perfect, and never will be,


but we can strive to do better, no matter how good/bad we already are,,,

msharmony's photo
Sun 02/26/12 03:15 PM



'used against you',,,,lol


whatever dude,,,


MsHarmony...at first you claim that those that never personally observed or experienced God would require "Faith" to believe

then you tried to use Columbus as an example ...you claim that since you never met columbus you would need faith in the authors that wrote the books about Columbus, that what they wrote was truth

and then I said wouldn't the same also apply to the bible...that someone they never personally observed or experienced God would require Faith in the authors of the bible that what they wrote about God was truth

and then finding yourself in a pickle you then claim that you had "personally experienced God"

so what the heck does "personally experienced God" means?...is that the same double talk believers use to claim that the bible was "inspired by God" ...

but anyway...if you claim that you personally experienced God...then why would you still need Faith ...unless you had doubts that it was God that you had that personal experience with...because it could have been Satan

but anyway...can you explain the term "personally experienced God"...er...without sounding delusional?



probably not to you,,,,


carry on,,,


apparently not to yourself either



keep trying, maybe some valid point will arise from the circular rhetoric,,,


msharmony's photo
Sun 02/26/12 11:37 AM

'used against you',,,,lol


whatever dude,,,


MsHarmony...at first you claim that those that never personally observed or experienced God would require "Faith" to believe

then you tried to use Columbus as an example ...you claim that since you never met columbus you would need faith in the authors that wrote the books about Columbus, that what they wrote was truth

and then I said wouldn't the same also apply to the bible...that someone they never personally observed or experienced God would require Faith in the authors of the bible that what they wrote about God was truth

and then finding yourself in a pickle you then claim that you had "personally experienced God"

so what the heck does "personally experienced God" means?...is that the same double talk believers use to claim that the bible was "inspired by God" ...

but anyway...if you claim that you personally experienced God...then why would you still need Faith ...unless you had doubts that it was God that you had that personal experience with...because it could have been Satan

but anyway...can you explain the term "personally experienced God"...er...without sounding delusional?



probably not to you,,,,


carry on,,,

msharmony's photo
Sun 02/26/12 11:14 AM


two universally controversial truths about human individuals


1. They can have a healthy happy life without an intimate partner.
2. They can have a healthy, happy life without sex,,,,


BUT They have to love themself enough to manage either one,,,,and be able to cherish more than one type of relationship or one type of 'intimacy' or love


,,there, thats better,,,lol


Truth is....
If we aint happy with ourselves.......
we don't have anything to offer anyone else.
Soooo many people don't realize this and rush into the next relationship, without first finding peace and happiness with themselves.



well done drinker

msharmony's photo
Sun 02/26/12 10:58 AM
took a while for them to accept africans as persons too

,,time will tell:wink:

msharmony's photo
Sun 02/26/12 10:53 AM

I can't help but notice that black public figures are labelled 'crack-head' far more often than white public figures, without any regard for those person's actual habits.





true

its considered a harsher and more addictive drug, I guess, and carries harsher sentencing

people needing drugs or alcohol to cope are all in the same boat in my opinion, but popular opinion is a bit different,,,

msharmony's photo
Sun 02/26/12 10:51 AM

why do you think some fathers distance themselves from their pregnant partner or the child after it's born?


fear
insecurity
selfishness



msharmony's photo
Sun 02/26/12 10:30 AM
two universally controversial truths about human individuals


1. They can have a healthy happy life without an intimate partner.
2. They can have a healthy, happy life without sex,,,,


BUT They have to love themself enough to manage either one,,,,and be able to cherish more than one type of relationship or one type of 'intimacy' or love


,,there, thats better,,,lol

msharmony's photo
Sun 02/26/12 10:29 AM
Edited by msharmony on Sun 02/26/12 10:30 AM
two universally controversial truths about human individuals


1. They can have a healthy happy life without an intimate partner.
2. They can have a healthy, happy life without sex,,,,


BUT They have to love themself enough to manage either one,,,,and be able to cherish more than one type of relationship or one type of 'intimacy' or love,,,,



SORRY CLICKED THE WRONG THREAD,,,lol

msharmony's photo
Sun 02/26/12 10:25 AM

It's time for a witch-hunt!

Who needs facts?

Its more fun to accuse people, hate people, demonize people based on allegations.

We have nothing here except the allegations of bereaved parents.




true as well

that is why I said there was not enough information


but culturally, if it happened in a place where locking a door in a room that has a child in it is deplorable,, no more information would be needed,,,

1 2 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Next