Good profile. The main photo shows that you can wear a jacket & tie, and the 2nd does a good job suggesting that you're physically fit. The blurb appears thoughtful and well-written. All the other info filled-in. Overall, no corrections needed. I'd rate it 10/10.

Good luck!

Apparently updated, with interests and basic info filled in. Good job, but choosing not to put any information in the blurb or headline or even the profession probably doesn't do you any favors. Maybe the "Bleh..." is supposed to show that you're too cool to care, but you could have used that space to briefly introduce yourself with what you're like, and what you're looking for, here.

While the photos are clear and well-lit, They're all basically the same shot. Here's a tip: Figure out where the lens is on your camera/phone and look into it when taking the photo. Maybe upload other shots, too, like being out at interesting places, doing what you like to do. The biggest difference in these shots is your age and hair color.

But it's clear from the photos that you're an attractive, young woman, and lots of people don't even seem to read the profiles, anyway, so you'll probably do alright. But for the profile with the blurb and headline that could be so much better, I'd only rate it 6/10.

Good luck!

No, we know the new information is the same as the old information because when DNI Tulsi Gabbard tried to make her case on Fox, and was asked what the new information was, all she could say was "You'll have to read the report." She has nothing new. She's just doing all she can to to distract from the fact that Trump won't release the Epstein docs as previously promised.

Hey--look over there! Squirrel!! Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain! Etc..

I think I see your problem. You seem to think President Trump isn't lying. Spoiler: He's lying a lot!

Here's an article I found that's only a few days old:
Five false claims Trump made about inflation last night
www.cnn.com/2025/07/23/politics/fact-check-trump-inflation-lies


And trump may have claimed to get the EU to invest $600 billion into the US, but there was obviously BS, as laid out in reports.

EU vowed $600B US economy investment from Trump trade deal. Hours later, European bloc admitted it can’t back that promise
www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/eu-vowed-600b-us-economy-investment-from-trump-trade-deal-hours-later-european-bloc-admitted-it-can-t-back-that-promise/ar-AA1JsfMW?ocid=BingNewsVerp


Basically the Trump Admin just counted up all the money they expect to be spent in the US that they can find, any time, including decades into the future, and calls that investments in the US from his trade deals, even if that money was already going to be spent, anyway, with or without a deal.

So because you say it it's true? You make a lot of claims and provide no evidence. Meanwhile Cheeto Mussolini cannot understand that tariffs are a tax on consumers--Mexico is not going to pay 30% on their exports, but Americans will be paying 30% more. Luckily, our eggs don't come from outside the US, but our coffee from Columbia will get a tax hike of 50%. Trump is an imbecile.

Not ludicrous. I remember Republicans harping on Biden about inflation, so I noted prices of things in general when he left office to see where we'd go with Trump. The cheapest gas was $3.79/gal. and the organic milk we buy was $7.99/gal.. The cheapest eggs at Trader Joes were $2.49. Now, the cheapest gas is $4.29 (after bounding up to $5.29), milk is $10.49 and eggs are "only" $3.99 (down from $6.99). Maybe I should've taken photos, but it's not like facts shut you up, either.

It's a really good profile. Some clear photos and a brief, thoughtful blurb. You even filled in the headline which is usually a pet peeve of mine. Shows some thought and effort.

The photos would be nicer if you weren't wearing a hat as if to hide a bad haircut, and I think a more flattering angle is from above eye level. Also find the lens of your camera/phone and make sure to look into it when snapping selfies. overall the photos are mostly clear and well-lit.

Overall, great work! I might've taken points off for the extremely casual wear, but compared to most other profiles I see, I have to give this 10/10.

Good luck!

Not collusion. The Trump DOJ is being run by idiots and the good lawyers are leaving as fast as they can get a new job. Some even sooner than that. Now all they have are the worse lawyers who will put up with the illegal shenanigans committed by the Administration.

The losses will continue, and the only reason Judges will be prejudiced is because they'll become all too aware of DOJ lawyers' propensity to lie, mislead and fumble their cases.

CBS settled because they have a multi-$billion merger in the works and they knew Trump would abuse his official powers to stop the merger out of spite. That's not a court win, but a big, fat bribe CBS paid. Similar story for Columbia University. It was Trump weaponizing the DOJ against the university for $millions so that he wouldn't stop $billions in funding research, just so he could push his agenda. Of course Congressional Republicans are blind to abuse of office when it's a Republican doing it.

And no, there's no evidence Obama or Biden pushed the Steele Dossier. Congressional Republicans spent years trying to make that connection and failed.

Coffee price hikes expected across the U.S.
www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/coffee-price-hikes-expected-across-the-us/ar-AA1JaHkh?ocid=BingNewsVerp

Things are only cheaper now that they were a few months ago. Not cheaper than when Biden left, and this is a temporary drop. Prices are about to shoot back up soon, thanks to the idiotic, illegal tariffs.

Not just this judge. Lots of judges have figured out that the Trump Administration is full of crap.

Trump’s Success Rate In The Courts So Far: 31%
www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/07/09/trumps-success-rate-in-the-courts-so-far-31/

Nice try. Trump's case against CNN was dismissed back in 2023.
www.cnn.com/2023/07/29/politics/trump-cnn-big-lie-defamation-lawsuit

And sure, he "won" the election, no small thanks to the billionaires who helped him so they wouldn't get their taxes raised. But my question above was not about the election, but rather court cases. Trump's losing most of his.

I get it that regarding facts isn't your thing, but Trump is costing the country $trillions in debt and bad faith with our national allies. Thought he could make friends with Putin, Xi & Kim, and is now just a national joke. We're not winning. Things are getting worse, and soon, Trump's cover-ups wont work anymore. There'll be no way to hide the higher unemployment and inflation caused by the tariffs.

There are the 34 felony convictions for fraud, and can you name even one case that Trump's won with Alina Habba as his lawyer?

Yeah, I get it that you accept everything The Donald tells you, but if you cared to look around, you'd know it's false. His administration had to change the way the collected data to make economic statistics look good for him, and nobody in government is allowed to contradict the dope.

Most of the tariffs don't take effect until August. The metal tariffs have already started, but manufacturing takes a while to work through the system, and elsewhere, prices are largely unchanged or a bit higher, except where merchants stockpiled pre-tariff goods in anticipation of all this nonsense. Once those supplies run out, we get higher prices, and the countries that used to import US goods are now boycotting.

Furious Canadians Boycott US, Slashing $2B in Trade and 14K Jobs
www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/furious-canadians-boycott-us-slashing-2b-in-trade-and-14k-jobs/ar-AA1BGCjW


But I'm sure you consider this winning.

Good point! I heard that Trump deliberately shopped the case to Florida, hoping that it'd go to Aileen Cannon. No such luck!

Hah. That would be hilarious if Trump wins, because the WSJ has become a MAGA tabloid, but it'll also mean that Trump with his incompetent lawyers will sit through hours of recorded depositions under oath, and Trump's mind is so gone, he can't even tell what's real, anymore. Can you imagine the legion of sanctions against him for perjury? I can!

Wooh. This didn't take long...

White House retaliates against Wall Street Journal over Trump-Epstein story
www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/white-house-retaliates-against-wall-street-journal-over-trump-epstein-story/ar-AA1J1wCS?ocid=BingHp01&cvid=4b9228aab34f41d0e56a22915234fef5&ei=20


So much for transparency, huh? The Trump Administration really is a clown show.

Trump's tariffs are asinine and illegal. Among Americans, they're unpopular with only Trump's biggest fans saying they like the tariffs. And anybody with brains knows the tariffs are just another tax on consumers, since the importers are not going to "eat the tariffs" as Trump insisted. If Walmart or Amazon get around to breaking out the cost of the tariffs, as previously suggested, then popular support for them will drop a lot further.

Ultimately, tariffs or no, Trump is still an imbecile.