Seems stupid to blow up the national debt even more than Trump did. And abortion is a major issue for suburban women whom Trump needs more than ever before.

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/abortion-and-the-2024-election-there-is-no-easy-way-out-for-republicans/

With the Trump tax cuts, there was probably little Biden could do to stop inflation from shooting up. Record corporate profits and lowest taxes ever for shipping jobs overseas. Even with Congress doing nothing about it, the Administration as brought inflation back down to around 3%. And it's not like Trump has a plan to deal with inflation. And while the national debt is soaring, all Republicans have is tax cuts. Mostly for corporations and the top 1%. What's going to really kick Republican butts is their stance on abortion and abiding Trump's crimes.

That's funny, because Hillary's email server was not a government asset. It was a private server she kept in her home, so even if she had taken an axe to the server, there would've been no destruction of government property. I suspect you got your information from some unhinged radical bloggers. And as for Clinton & Biden not getting charged because their position, I'd refer you to the fact that they were investigated by House Republicans and Trump's DOJ. No friends there. What's your excuse for that?

Lastly, I haven't seen anything to indicate that Senator Menendez or Rep Cuellar will get extra help from Democrats on their legal problems.

It's easier to fake a YouTube video than government statistics.

Again, France's Macron never said he would deploy French troops to Ukraine, but simply said he would not "take it off the table."

Russia's decision to conduct nuclear drills (not nuclear tests--a whole other thing) has no bearing on Macron's clarification that France is not at war with Russia. But consider the source of the above video. Indian news channels are over sensational with their headlines to get attention. To believe them you'd have to think China is about to invade India and Russia.

While the 1994 crime bill had severe problems, it was drafted with input from the African American community and good intentions. Gang and drug crime at the time was a huge concern, as was prison overcrowding. Generally the Democrats wanted more crime prevention programs and Republicans wanted harsher penalties.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/fact-check-why-are-trump-democrats-talking-about-1994-crime-n1010691

Trump's "First Step" Act was a product of the decades of learning since the 1994 crime law, so sure, but it's not like Trump wrote that bill, and if it was such a success, why isn't he talking about it?

Michelle Obama is not going to run for President. She may be popular among Democrats, but she's said whenever asked that she's not running and not interested. Given she has no committees or agents working the process, and already makes $millions selling books and speeches, she's clearly not going to run. Gavin Newsom, however, has obviously been into being president since forever, and is just plotting his course.

Maybe not the smartest, but smart people are picked for President of the United States. Even Trump, who isn't a genius in the academic sense, is clearly "people smart" in that he does understand what people like to see and hear. The guy's an idiot when it comes to running a business or country, but he's got about half the voting population liking him and believing his lies. His famous "I could shoot a guy on Fifth Avenue and get away with it" has some truth. Joe Biden is brilliant at getting government work done, good at negotiations and is also good with people. But a globalist agenda is not the objective. Globalism is an economic tool to increase profits, even at the expense of the workers and the consumers. Industry does try to steer politics to their advantage and their ability to pay more gives them more influence than the regular voters, much less the population of other countries.

Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden are so guilty that nobody can find the evidence? So guilty that years after finding the classified docs in Biden's home and office, or Hillary's email server, They can't even identify the laws broken, or find witnesses to the "crimes." Maybe I'm the sheep, but I can point to articles and government reports that support what I'm saying, and the silly Republicans just say "it's obvious." Is it possible that they think "obvious" means "I can't say how, but I feel it's true."

Yes, it took years to put together indictments for Trump, but at least we can now read about which laws he's charged with breaking, and even see and listen to some of the evidence collected. In court, they're lining up witnesses--some of them were even in on the crimes, pleading out and agreeing to testify. The other side: "Biden is so guilty! The most corrupt president ever. The worst president ever. And so guilty." (with the lowest unemployment, the highest stock market, zero indictments, zero family members appointed to government positions & no foreign payments taken)

Who's the gullible one?

It's not Biden saying he's doing a good job, but observers and historians. The same people saying Trump did a lousy job. Biden actually got job creating bills passed and signed, whereas Trump was always about to do it "in two weeks." Infrastructure, and economic revitalization, and sure, the money's not all spent and there's lots of work to do, but objectively, Biden is doing a good job and Trump is falling apart--slurring his speech, forgetting and making up details and crapping his pants in front of us. The choice is getting clear for November.

Sorry, but I can't change what people think, especially if they choose to believe the lies of the former president saying stuff like "this president is the most corrupt in history" despite himself facing almost a hundred felony criminal charges and even during his administration appointing unqualified family members to his cabinet. You don't have to trust me that unemployment lower now than under Trump, or that the stock market is higher now than any time in history. Those are published statistics. And while they don't negate a person's individual sentiment, or the rantings of various people around here, they are evidence that Biden is doing a good job.

Go ahead and cry that the government is going to take away your incandescent light bulbs and gas stoves, but those, too, are lies from the Republicans. In the meantime, we've got a Democratic administration getting $trillions invested back into the national infrastructure and returning critical manufacturing to the USA.

There are no legal scholars who can show that Hillary illegally destroyed evidence and the crime is not merely keeping classified documents, but knowingly keeping them. Prosecutors would have to show intent, and simply having documents in the boxes out in the garage is not enough. Hillary's email servers getting wiped after she left office is not destroying evidence, but just a good idea for old computer hardware.

And still, where's the weaponization? Where has Biden directed the DOJ to do anything? Sure, Trump will say so, but that's just because it's how Trump ran his DOJ. A.G. Sessions ran the DOJ and didn't run it exactly how Trump wanted, so he installed Barr, and all along, both told Trump they found nothing on Biden and Clinton, making Trump look like an idiot after he promised to jail Hillary. That would be weaponization. By all accounts, Biden has kept out of the Trump investigation.

Your insistence that Trump is innocent--despite literal piles of evidence, and that Biden "is the most corrupt president ever" is the real Trump derangement syndrome.

The video mischaracterizes Macron's statements. He never said he wanted war with Russia so there was nothing to soften, and his statement was that NATO troops in Ukraine should not be completely ruled out. This was after Russian state TV said that Russia should destroy Poland to test the NATO response. To Russia, that may sound aggressive, but peacekeeping troops in foreign countries has been going on for centuries. Especially with the French.

Senator Bob Menendez shows that Democrats aren't above the law.

https://apnews.com/article/menendez-federal-bribery-indictment-2f4a8945ea113debe54b062dc59d2c88

The DOJ investigated Biden extensively during the Trump Administration. Hillary too, and they couldn't come up with charges.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/01/hillary-clinton-justice-department-investigation-results

Trump was charged because he's so shockingly criminal that they had no choice but to indict and charge. This is not weaponization of the DOJ. It's just the DOJ doing their job.

There is no Democratic equivalent to Project 2025. Biden never demanded loyalty to himself but only to the country. And Biden's not destroying the country. Just not selling out to the top 1% like Trump did, on the backs of his brainwashed, impoverished voters. Instead, we got the Chips Act & the Inflation Reduction Act which invest $trillions into the country's infrastructure and improving energy independence. BTW: Russia is allowed to sell oil so that it doesn't cause oil & gas prices to shoot up more than they already did after Russia invaded Ukraine. They're still sanctioned in many ways, and Russia doesn't get anywhere near the best price for their oil because of it. The money for Iran was their own money, returned in consideration for their holding up their end of a deal. It's diplomacy.

How do you like Biden's latest work, getting easy refunds for air travelers with canceled flights and such?

https://apnews.com/article/airlines-junk-fees-baggage-delays-c4a93f9ee9a2bf7d9ee07394183a0374

Oh please. Quit crying. It was one photo and nobody ever said or even implied that the docs were found arranged like that on the floor. The photos of spilled documents, and the boxes in the bathroom are dated 2021, when the FBI search was done in 2022. I don't need to make Trump look bad. He does that by himself.

The rest of your comment is nonsense. Biden's documents were "more top secret" than previously reported? I'd like to know where it was previously reported or what "more top secret" means. And your reasoning that a senator and vice president cannot have classified documents is wrong. Anyway, it doesn't matter. Nobody was going to charge an ex-president for accidentally having documents. They weren't going to charge Trump until he refused to return his, and lied about everything.

No, the documents were clearly stored at Mar A Lago illegally, and the pictures show it. Those weren't put there by the FBI. There were news cameras on the searching agents and nobody has photos of boxes being taken into the place.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-indictment-photos-classified-documents-b2354891.html

Trump made up the story that the FBI tried to make him look sloppy.
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/trump-claims-fbi-scattered-top-032010505.html

In reality, law enforcement evidence photos get staged to show what was found, and not how it was found. Like when there's a huge drug bust, and the evidence photo shows all the bags of drugs lined up on a table with a line of weapons and cash next to it. The criminals didn't stack all their money, guns and drugs into neat lines on a table. Though, it's not surprising that this escapes that idiot Trump.

To hear Trump talk about it, and the people around him, it's just a straight line. Look up "project 2025" and read the details for yourself. Steve Bannon is talking it up a lot on his podcast, and other MAGA bloggers are more explicit. I'm not making it up.

Trump has basically pledged to fire all federal workers who don't pledge allegiance to him. He'll have his attorney general just arrest people and waste years with the investigations, with or without evidence, because nobody will stop him. He's said he'll be a dictator "only on day one" but dictators don't just stop being dictators. More likely, he'll just have the DOJ redefine what "dictator" means or what the powers of the president are, to include all the things Trump wants to do.

If Trump wins, all our old gripes about how Trump illegally kept classified documents or invited Russian agents into the Oval Office will look quaint. Trump will sell out the country to them, simply because Putin says nice things to Trump, and then gives him lots and lots of money (in exchange for numerous considerations).

The FBI didn't plant docs in Mar A Lago. Those photos of the spilled docs came from Walt Nauta's text to the cooperating witness, along with the texts saying that "the boss" wanted them moved. The NYC case has plenty of evidence, including receipts and voice recordings. Trump's going down. It's sad that you have to resort to conspiracy rumors to defend Trump.

And nobody really cares whether the virus came from the wet market or a lab leak. Either way, Trump fumbled the response despite being left a playbook from the Obama Administration. He had Republicans injecting bleach and gulping down horse medication, even after the vax came out, because he was afraid of losing support of his base and couldn't correct the misinformation.

The profile looks incomplete and the pictures are too similar and don't show your face well. Keep going.

It's nice that you have a photo showing your full body, so we can get an idea of your general shape, but All three photos are just you looking at your phone by the elevators. The phone blocks part of your face, and you're looking at the screen, and not into the camera. Maybe try taking a proper selfie, with the camera pointed at your face from maybe an arm's length away, and looking into the camera lens. Smiling might make you seem more friendly.

Your blurb could include what kind of woman you seek, and the headline could be more useful, like "cool, funny, and adventurous person" which helps you attract more attention in searches. You left the "lifestyle" section unanswered, so we don't know whether you smoke or drink. Many people find that important.

Anyway, even though and the phone blocks part of your face, you still seem like a good-looking man, and lots of women don't even read the profile, so you might still do alright. But for the redundant photos and missing information, I can only rate it 6/10.

Good luck!

So much regard for the First Amendment. Right?