Previous 1
Topic: Beware of US backed govs!!
Fanta46's photo
Sun 05/18/08 05:04 PM
Edited by Fanta46 on Sun 05/18/08 05:04 PM
Thousands killed by US's Korean ally

Sometimes with US Military Officers and advisers present.

The low est is 100,000. The high more than 200,000.

Pictures taken by US Officers and the truth were placed in files marked secret and only now have been released.

The US all this time blamed all these deaths on the N Koreans!!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080518/ap_on_re_as/korea_mass_executions

adj4u's photo
Sun 05/18/08 05:09 PM

Thousands killed by US's Korean ally

Sometimes with US Military Officers and advisers present.

The low est is 100,000. The high more than 200,000.

Pictures taken by US Officers and the truth were placed in files marked secret and only now have been released.

The US all this time blamed all these deaths on the N Koreans!!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080518/ap_on_re_as/korea_mass_executions



they were only following orders

drinker drinker


Serchin4MyRedWine's photo
Sun 05/18/08 05:29 PM
hmmm...lets see..Whitehouse had a Democrat...congress was controlled by democrats....and not one Bush or "neo-con" there to blame for this atrocity!!! how can this be??? and you think Bush is bad for fighting an "illegal war" ? LMAO.

Serchin4MyRedWine's photo
Sun 05/18/08 05:42 PM
in June 1950, Truman..who was the Democrat President wrote this about the Korean conflict "there is a complete, almost unspoken acceptance on the part of everyone that whatever had to be done to meet this aggression had to be done."
This is by the same Democrat who dropped 2 atomic bombs on the innocent civilians of Japan. I know..Bush and the "neo-cons' are so much worse then thislaugh laugh laugh

adj4u's photo
Sun 05/18/08 05:43 PM
drinker

willy_cents's photo
Sun 05/18/08 05:48 PM
It was still bush's fault. He had just been born and God made Truman do it for revenge on the world.laugh laugh laugh

adj4u's photo
Sun 05/18/08 05:55 PM
sssshhhhhhhhhhhh

someone will use the reagan line

Fanta46's photo
Sun 05/18/08 06:02 PM
Edited by Fanta46 on Sun 05/18/08 06:04 PM
Is there a purpose to this transference?

Regardless of who was responsible here the hypocritical practice of defending and covering up atrocities by our allies and us has been going on for years.

Regardless of who was President when this happened it was wrong, and does not retract any responsibility for those of Bush away from Bush.

MirrorMirror's photo
Sun 05/18/08 06:03 PM
noway dangnoway

warmachine's photo
Sun 05/18/08 06:10 PM

in June 1950, Truman..who was the Democrat President wrote this about the Korean conflict "there is a complete, almost unspoken acceptance on the part of everyone that whatever had to be done to meet this aggression had to be done."
This is by the same Democrat who dropped 2 atomic bombs on the innocent civilians of Japan. I know..Bush and the "neo-cons' are so much worse then thislaugh laugh laugh



But wait, democrats... learned trotsky's principle of permanent war... wilsonianism... infiltrated the GOP, accepted the moniker NeoCon... in fact the same kind of evil idiot, just a different title.

Globalists,for them the ends justify the means...

MirrorMirror's photo
Sun 05/18/08 06:11 PM


in June 1950, Truman..who was the Democrat President wrote this about the Korean conflict "there is a complete, almost unspoken acceptance on the part of everyone that whatever had to be done to meet this aggression had to be done."
This is by the same Democrat who dropped 2 atomic bombs on the innocent civilians of Japan. I know..Bush and the "neo-cons' are so much worse then thislaugh laugh laugh



But wait, democrats... learned trotsky's principle of permanent war... wilsonianism... infiltrated the GOP, accepted the moniker NeoCon... in fact the same kind of evil idiot, just a different title.

Globalists,for them the ends justify the means...
drinker

willy_cents's photo
Sun 05/18/08 06:13 PM
the most successful democrats studied in depth the writings of Marx, adopted the strategy of class warfare, and became elected officials. What they missed, weas the last 5 decades of marxisms failures in the communist world, or wqrote it off to "bad leadership" on the parts of the communistslaugh laugh laugh

MirrorMirror's photo
Sun 05/18/08 06:18 PM
drinker WHOOT WHOOTdrinker

adj4u's photo
Sun 05/18/08 07:12 PM

the most successful democrats studied in depth the writings of Marx, adopted the strategy of class warfare, and became elected officials. What they missed, weas the last 5 decades of marxisms failures in the communist world, or wqrote it off to "bad leadership" on the parts of the communistslaugh laugh laugh


is that the before reagan became republican democrats

or the after reagan became a republican democrats

Fanta46's photo
Sun 05/18/08 08:46 PM
Edited by Fanta46 on Sun 05/18/08 08:48 PM


the most successful democrats studied in depth the writings of Marx, adopted the strategy of class warfare, and became elected officials. What they missed, weas the last 5 decades of marxisms failures in the communist world, or wqrote it off to "bad leadership" on the parts of the communistslaugh laugh laugh


is that the before reagan became republican democrats

or the after reagan became a republican democrats


It was Democratic-Republican Party!!drinker

adj4u's photo
Sun 05/18/08 08:48 PM
well reagan said when confronted about changing to the republican party that

he did not leave the democratic party the democratic party left him

and i think something about JFK was in there as well

Fanta46's photo
Sun 05/18/08 08:58 PM

well reagan said when confronted about changing to the republican party that

he did not leave the democratic party the democratic party left him

and i think something about JFK was in there as well


Reagan was exactly what this country needed at the time.
He was a motivator, but he also did a lot of very controversial things!!

I liked him for bringing the country back from the low moral of Vietnam and Watergate, but I would not want him as President today!!

Dragoness's photo
Sun 05/18/08 09:02 PM
I sense a little defensiveness in the bushies here, maybe they are jealous it wasn't Bush who did this one too, huh?huh noway :wink: laugh

Fanta46's photo
Sun 05/18/08 09:04 PM

I sense a little defensiveness in the bushies here, maybe they are jealous it wasn't Bush who did this one too, huh?huh noway :wink: laugh


I thought that for a half a second, but then my love for George pushed that thought right from my mind!!!laugh laugh laugh

Dragoness's photo
Sun 05/18/08 09:05 PM


I sense a little defensiveness in the bushies here, maybe they are jealous it wasn't Bush who did this one too, huh?huh noway :wink: laugh


I thought that for a half a second, but then my love for George pushed that thought right from my mind!!!laugh laugh laugh


:wink: laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh

Previous 1