100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: 21st Century Internment Camps: | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
all I have ever asked for was proof or something Always happy to help you, Rose. http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h645/text Anybody bother looking at the Bill? That is a well thought out and needed bill. I see nothing to be afraid of in there!  
You know, Dr. Paul warned the Republicans, on the record, against this sort of carte blanche power growth for the executive and for Government in general, he told them flat that while they think they are doing something good for the team, there's going to come a time that another party or another person will be in control and you might not like what it is that they intend to use those powers for. I would suggest that those blind loyalist Obama supporters take that advice as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That bill is not a carte blanche power growth for the executive and for Government in general!
Where do you read that in to it? It is a plan to better the response of FEMA during a Natural Disaster! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ok...maybe i'm wrong but as far as Katrina....there was ALOT of looting and crimes there. so why wouldn't they enforce something to try to stop it
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Mon 04/13/09 01:45 PM
|
|
That bill is not a carte blanche power growth for the executive and for Government in general! Where do you read that in to it? It is a plan to better the response of FEMA during a Natural Disaster! SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL EMERGENCY CENTERS. (b) Purpose of National Emergency Centers- The purpose of a national emergency center shall be to use existing infrastructure-- (4) to meet other appropriate needs, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security. that is pretty much cart Blanche |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That bill is not a carte blanche power growth for the executive and for Government in general! Where do you read that in to it? It is a plan to better the response of FEMA during a Natural Disaster! SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL EMERGENCY CENTERS. (b) Purpose of National Emergency Centers- The purpose of a national emergency center shall be to use existing infrastructure-- (4) to meet other appropriate needs, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security. that is pretty much cart Blanche You should try reading the whole thing and quit reading into it what isnt there. Twisting facts- exaggerating situations and making judgments—all without a shred of supporting evidence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Mon 04/13/09 01:59 PM
|
|
SEC. 3. DESIGNATION OF MILITARY INSTALLATIONS AS NATIONAL EMERGENCY CENTERS.
(b) Minimum Requirements- A site designated as a national emergency center shall be-- (2) environmentally safe and shall not pose a health risk to individuals who may use the center; ................................... not sure if (individuals who may use) means clients or those working there????? .................................... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Mon 04/13/09 02:02 PM
|
|
That bill is not a carte blanche power growth for the executive and for Government in general! Where do you read that in to it? It is a plan to better the response of FEMA during a Natural Disaster! SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL EMERGENCY CENTERS. (b) Purpose of National Emergency Centers- The purpose of a national emergency center shall be to use existing infrastructure-- (4) to meet other appropriate needs, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security. that is pretty much cart Blanche You should try reading the whole thing and quit reading into it what isnt there. Twisting facts- exaggerating situations and making judgments—all without a shred of supporting evidence maybe you should not be so quick to judge (where did i twist the fact it was a copy and paste) any other use means any other use nothing to read into it or out of it it says what it says |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Fanta46
on
Mon 04/13/09 02:05 PM
|
|
You said,
that is pretty much cart Blanche That's only if you read something into the bill that isnt there. That's only if you assume! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You said, that is pretty much cart Blanche That's only if you read something into the bill that isnt there. That's only if you assume! no it is not assumption is saying it is not going to be used as something """"(4) to meet other appropriate needs, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security.""""" that says if the Secretary of Homeland Security.can use the facility for any use that they feel is appropriate does it not thus it is pretty much whatever did i say they would use it for an inturnment camp no i did not obviously you assumed that i said such a thing so who is the one reading into it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You said, that is pretty much cart Blanche That's only if you read something into the bill that isnt there. That's only if you assume! no it is not assumption is saying it is not going to be used as something """"(4) to meet other appropriate needs, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security.""""" that says if the Secretary of Homeland Security.can use the facility for any use that they feel is appropriate does it not thus it is pretty much whatever did i say they would use it for an inturnment camp no i did not obviously you assumed that i said such a thing so who is the one reading into it
I once had to go into N Dakota on a mission while in the Army! The US gov, with no other place to put them, had taken the criminals released by Castro up there. They had intended to build a camp to hold them as most were violent criminals purged by Castro from his prisons. These Cubans rioted. They burned everything. When the Army went back to build the structures back the Cubans attacked the Engineers. An MP bn was deployed and two Infantry Bns. We stayed there for 60 days. Mostly beating them off the fences every time they tried to rush it. I think they were eventually split up and relocated to Fed Penitentiaries. This happened in 1980 I think! Maybe that is what they mean by other, or maybe what they mean is if a terrorist set off a nuke in an American City. It could mean almost anything! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
""""""""""""It could mean almost anything!"""""""""""""""
exactly almost anything (which includes cart blanche) could you tell me what cart blanche means carte blanche (kärt bläsh, blänch, blnch) n. pl. cartes blanches (kärt bläsh, kärts blänch, blnch) Unrestricted power to act at one's own discretion; unconditional authority: gave the contractor carte blanche to modernize the kitchen. carte blanche Noun complete authority: she's got carte blanche to redecorate Thesaurus Legend: Synonyms Related Words Antonyms Noun 1. carte blanche - complete freedom or authority to act authority, potency, authorization, authorisation, say-so, dominance - the power or right to give orders or make decisions; "he has the authority to issue warrants"; "deputies are given authorization to make arrests"; "a place of potency in the state" from free dictionary and if you take the time to read the post i was making when you posted the remark after the cart blanche post you would see i am not trying to read anything into it |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now you are at the root of the twist.
It's a twist to assume that the US gov would think about using an internment camp for the confinment of its own innocent citizens. That is not what the bill says and it would be twisting the intent of the bill to say it does! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Fanta46
on
Mon 04/13/09 03:04 PM
|
|
At the least it's a far stretch of the imagination!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Mon 04/13/09 03:13 PM
|
|
Now you are at the root of the twist. It's a twist to assume that the US gov would think about using an internment camp for the confinment of its own innocent citizens. That is not what the bill says and it would be twisting the intent of the bill to say it does! i never said it did as i said in the other post i was not the one making the assumption all i did was copy and past the following from the bill ______________________________________________ SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL EMERGENCY CENTERS. (b) Purpose of National Emergency Centers- The purpose of a national emergency center shall be to use existing infrastructure-- (4) to meet other appropriate needs, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security. ________________________________________________ and commented that is pretty much cart Blanche __________________________________________________ now could you show me where i said anything in that post that said internment camp __________________________________________________ you asked in a previous post .................................................. That bill is not a carte blanche power growth for the executive and for Government in general! Where do you read that in to it? It is a plan to better the response of FEMA during a Natural Disaster! _____________________________________________________- so i showed you where it said that you are the one that went on the defensive all i did was answer your post i said nothing about what their appropriate needs would or could be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OK adj!
It's cool! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OK adj!
It's cool!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debunking strawman fema camps.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/alex-jones-debunks-strawman-fema-camps-bird-flu-trucker-disinfo.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ok...maybe i'm wrong but as far as Katrina....there was ALOT of looting and crimes there. so why wouldn't they enforce something to try to stop it can someone explains this???? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ok...maybe i'm wrong but as far as Katrina....there was ALOT of looting and crimes there. so why wouldn't they enforce something to try to stop it can someone explains this???? It wasn't about enforcing against looters. They were kicking in peoples doors and taking their guns. They weren't bringing food and water, they were shooting at people trying to escape. |
|
|
|
|
