Russia Today & Youtube. Well, there's media credibility for you.

Now kids, can we say 'Sensationalism"?

You can google it all day and find the same thing choose any source you wish to discredit this report.

Its really a waste of bandwidth to even respond to this.

and laugh and laugh and laugh and laugh,after all THEY can afford it!

Yeah, I think that's the real reason some peeps are sooooo pizzed.....What's up with that?

Maybe they see their inadequacy!
In Life one has to grab!
Nothing comes Free!
So they laugh at those who think things are Free!

Yeh how lame.

I think they should take one of their most evil doers and burn him at the next party as a show of good faith that they are going to change their evil ways before they are all hunted down and hung by the White dragons.



I vote Henry Kissinger first.

and laugh and laugh some more,all the way to Galt's Gulch!

Reverse psychology...gotta be it!!

Youtube and the Internet is the only real free press left. Don't knock it.

The Bohemian Grove weirdos have been worshiping Lucifer there for decades. There is nothing new about that, everyone knows it.

But rumor has it that their days are numbered.

Hey mon, did Atlas just shrug or what....

He still is!

A war criminal for sure.

Funny, I was thinking the same thing.

Free it may be, accurate? That's questionable in a lot of cases. The prevailing belief that the media is controlled by governments and/or business, or whatever bogeyman people are incensed by on any given day is utterly ridiculous and anyone with even a rudimentary background in media studies knows this.

Editorial content is often influenced by the owner's, and/or a reporter's persuasions, but that has never been a secret.

I suppose I'll get a load of youtube vids trying to prove otherwise. Or articles from Sign of The Times or other discredited and specious sites. You know the ones, where you can buy badly written books 'proving' this crap.

Hello Beautiful. I'm loving the new pic. *sigh*

Nope, all you have earned with that statement is a few rolling heads.




But thanks for the laugh.

TY...

This might be a good and recent book to read about censorship in the Media. It is called "Project Censored's Censored 2012" volume, by Paul W. Rea.

A SOURCEBOOK FOR THE MEDIA REVOLUTION-Book review: http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=28769

Snippit:

Even more than its predecessors, Censored 2012 makes for highly engaging and informative reading. This collection is a well mixed bag containing much that we need to know but typically don’t.

In part, this deficit occurs because many Americans are, in Neil Postman’s memorable phrase, “amusing ourselves to death” and also because many exhibit an aversion to discussing issues. But above all this deficit results from increased media malpractice and censorship. When a study shows that regular viewers of Fox News are less informed—and likely more misinformed—than those who don’t follow the news, something is seriously amiss.

According to the project director Mickey Huff, the corporate media are serving up a diet of “junk-food news to avoid telling the public what is really going on at home and abroad” (p. 12). If this strikes many readers as obvious, fewer seem fully aware of just how pervasive this censorship has become—how very little coverage many significant issues receive.

As a result, even Americans who consider themselves informed don’t understand how their government attempts to minimize or even eliminate public awareness. On the climactic final day of the Durban Conference on Climate Change, NPR’s “Science Friday” featured a long segment on bedbugs (12/9/11). Censored 2012 reveals that even less coverage—none at all, in fact—is afforded to ongoing federal preparations to use a (real or contrived) state of emergency as a pretext to suspend the Constitution, declare martial law, and herd “dissidents” into mass holding camps (p. 85).