100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Barkley Agrees With Zimmerman Verdict | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
well, it seems like most topics here are pointless then
if the criteria for sharing is being able to 'do something about it',,,,, but I continue to contribute my opinion just the same, as everyone else here does,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, and everyone is well aware of your opinion. You disagree with the verdict. You only have to say it once.
And yet there are pages and pages of it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Mon 08/12/13 07:04 PM
|
|
and pages and pages of someone telling me they know how I feel,,,
that or sharing my feeling is pointless |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and pages and pages of someone telling me they know how I feel,,, that or sharing my feeling is pointless Yep, that is what they are . . . feelings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
feelings, perspectives, opinions,,
mingle2 is the place to find them all,,,,, 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I just wonder what the pay off is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, "feelings" isn't a synonym of "facts"
A person's feelings can conflict with facts. So, one can share feelings and still be wrong about the facts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, "feelings" isn't a synonym of "facts" A person's feelings can conflict with facts. So, one can share feelings and still be wrong about the facts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, "feelings" isn't a synonym of "facts" A person's feelings can conflict with facts. So, one can share feelings and still be wrong about the facts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, "feelings" isn't a synonym of "facts" A person's feelings can conflict with facts. So, one can share feelings and still be wrong about the facts. of course, if people wanted to read 'facts' they have libraries and books, encyclopedias and dictionaries but in normal CASUAL discourse, people instead express their perception about FACTS, along with their opinions and feelings about those perceptions,,,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the fact that the Zimmerman verdict was legally correct won't stop some people from feeling that the verdict was wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the fact that the Zimmerman verdict was legally correct won't stop some people from feeling that the verdict was wrong. yep, and dna testing has proved that a 'legally correct' verdict can actually end up being wrong,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the fact that the Zimmerman verdict was legally correct won't stop some people from feeling that the verdict was wrong. yep, and dna testing has proved that a 'legally correct' verdict can actually end up being wrong,,, DNA testing relies on facts, not feelings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the fact that the Zimmerman verdict was legally correct won't stop some people from feeling that the verdict was wrong. yep, and dna testing has proved that a 'legally correct' verdict can actually end up being wrong,,, [/quote!] DNA? Big Z cut him off a piece of dead thug tale? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the fact that the Zimmerman verdict was legally correct won't stop some people from feeling that the verdict was wrong. yep, and dna testing has proved that a 'legally correct' verdict can actually end up being wrong,,, DNA testing relies on facts, not feelings. still doesn't change the reality that juries can and do get it 'wrong' |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Lpdon
on
Mon 08/12/13 10:22 PM
|
|
Well, the fact that the Zimmerman verdict was legally correct won't stop some people from feeling that the verdict was wrong. yep, and dna testing has proved that a 'legally correct' verdict can actually end up being wrong,,, DNA testing relies on facts, not feelings. still doesn't change the reality that juries can and do get it 'wrong' Yup they can, they can wrongly convict when they let their emotions and not the facts lead their decision. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the fact that the Zimmerman verdict was legally correct won't stop some people from feeling that the verdict was wrong. yep, and dna testing has proved that a 'legally correct' verdict can actually end up being wrong,,, DNA testing relies on facts, not feelings. still doesn't change the reality that juries can and do get it 'wrong' Yup they can, they can wrongly convict when they let their emotions and not the facts lead their decision. we are in agreement,,,some emotions respond to a fist with a gun,,some emotions don't,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the fact that the Zimmerman verdict was legally correct won't stop some people from feeling that the verdict was wrong. yep, and dna testing has proved that a 'legally correct' verdict can actually end up being wrong,,, DNA testing relies on facts, not feelings. still doesn't change the reality that juries can and do get it 'wrong' Still doesn't change the fact that armchair attorneys who have never been in law school can misinterpret what happens during a trial. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the fact that the Zimmerman verdict was legally correct won't stop some people from feeling that the verdict was wrong. yep, and dna testing has proved that a 'legally correct' verdict can actually end up being wrong,,, DNA testing relies on facts, not feelings. still doesn't change the reality that juries can and do get it 'wrong' Still doesn't change the fact that armchair attorneys who have never been in law school can misinterpret what happens during a trial. lol, as can JURORS,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wanna know more about this DNA in the dead thug case.
Did Z rape the banger? |
|
|
|
|
