http://thepeoplescube.com/peoples-blog/peoples-tsa-thwarts-attempted-reichwing-hijacking-again-t12486.html

Sadly, I must report of yet another brazen attempt by a radical racist reichwinger to hijack an airliner & no doubt fly it straight into the Peoples House which has been narrowly thwarted by an observant Peoples servant at the TSA.

This time the perp tried to hide the weapon in her "monkey" which in itself is either racist or sexist or both.

Luckily, this time the weapon was confiscated just in time.

The bitter clingers are becoming more devious with every passing day. We need to double the TSA budget immediately to combat this deadly menace to a peaceful progressive society.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/03/dianne-feinstein-guns_n_3010058.html

now shes changed to semi automatics... it always starts small, then grows from there... did hitler just start going door to door collecting guns? no, he made everyone that had one register it first, then silently came knocking on doors later to take them.
and then laws were passed to silence the media, so people couldn't get together and talk about it...

califonia and new york are already going door to door....

"If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." -The Dalai Lama

If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it is reasonable to shoot back with your own gun. Not at the head, where a fatal wound might result. But at some other body part, such as a leg."

The Manual says at the Biggest Body-Mass,Not a Kneecap!

as I am not a gun owner, (and the dala lama may not be one either), I don't know about manuals or what they say

Im just responding to the opinion that others introduced into the discussion

So admitting that you know nothing about a subject..... why would you feel you can comment on it with any logic?

Damn that Dalai Lama again!!!
Commenting on something he knows nothing about

ahhhh, consistency


by George , SOMEONE gets the point

Yep, you have one person as wrong as you are. You might consider a mating and sit around agreeing with each other until you tire of the BS

And wouldn't you know, he's an admitted antagonist

The only reason we have to keep repeating ourselves is because liberals have a hard time learning anything......

maybe if we typed s l o w e r?

If he is convicted, then his lawyer is not doing his job. "Eavesdropping" is done without a persons knowledge when no other witnesses are present. The police have cameras on their cars. So why is that not "eavesdropping?"

If I wear a camera on my hat and video and record everything that happens in my day, I have a right to do that. It is not "eavesdropping."

I am also allowed to record every conversation I have with anyone without them knowing it. Eavesdropping is when you record what two (or more) other people are saying without them knowing it.

Also, if he gets convicted for "eavesdroppig" for recording the police doing their job, then this might be a good thing. We could sue every business and every police station that has camera's going.

No more cameras anywhere.


as for the rest of the O.P., what kind of response does the author of the article want? What can citizens do about this? (other than be enraged about it, what can we, as citizens do about this to change it?)

still missing the point,,,,

it wasn't I who introduced this person who was 'wrong' or their opinion,, it wasn't I who initiated using him to show agreement with me, IT wasn't I who used an 'admitted antagonist'

I have been repeating MYSELF, but only because I hope for adults to use some type of consistency and relevance in the information and the references they choose to contribute

,,,,that is all,,,

Origins: In May 2001 Tenzin Gyatso, the 14th and current Dalai Lama (the head monk of the Gelugpa lineage of Tibetan Buddhism), made a three-day visit to Portland, Oregon, during which he gave a talk to 7,600 area high school students in what was billed by organizers as the "Educating the Heart Summit."

As reported by the Seattle Times, during that talk the Dalai Lama responded to a question posed by a student about how to react to a potential school shooter by stating that it would "be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun," with the proviso that one should aim to wound and not to kill:
His message resonates in an era when schools must be on guard against violent acts by gun-toting students. Included in the audience were some 35 students from Thurston High School in Springfield, Ore., where Kip Kinkel went on a May 1998 rampage in which his parents and two students were killed and 24 other students were wounded.

Students, in a question-and-answer period, asked some hard questions.

One girl wanted to know how to react to a shooter who takes aim at a classmate.

The Dalai Lama said acts of violence should be remembered, and then forgiveness should be extended to the perpetrators.

But if someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, he said, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun. Not at the head, where a fatal wound might result. But at some other body part, such as a leg.
Many Americans might find the Dalai Lama's response surprising, given that he has expressed a dedication to nonviolence, and Buddhism is widely viewed in western culture as a religion that embraces pacifism. However, commentators have noted that the image of Buddhist pacifism is an exaggerated one which has been projected onto Buddhism by others:
Buddhist cultures, including Tibet, have not historically been pacifist. The previous dalai lama strove to develop a modern military. SNOPES

Admitted antagonist? huh? what?


I can see why your police forces would want to shoot first, ask questions later.... They're under siege daily by armed "not so well" up there idiots on meth.

I suppose the Dalai was wrong in all these cases...
Dead man can't testify! FIRE!!!!

That officer needs to come back to his family and work place and that armed thug need to disappear.

Ludwig von Mises Institute
As far as empirical--historical--evidence is concerned, proponents of the orthodox view face obvious embarrassment. The recently ended twentieth century was characterized by a level of human rights violations unparalleled in all of human history. In his book Death by Government, Rudolph Rummel estimates some 170 million government-caused deaths in the twentieth century. The historical evidence appears to indicate that, rather than protecting life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness of their citizens, governments must be considered the greatest threat to human security.

--Hans-Hermann Hoppe. Introduction to The Myth of National Defense: Essays on the Theory and History of Security Production

I gave this its own thread as well......

Nearly 20 LA sheriff's deputies charged in corruption, inmate abuse probe

http://investigations.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/12/09/21835238-nearly-20-la-sheriffs-deputies-charged-in-corruption-inmate-abuse-probe

"Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one." - Thomas Paine

Government is the only thing that can stand against corporate power. I do not think Mr Pain could see this from his time. The trouble with government is that it has been purchased.

Yep purchased by Big Labor!

You really need to brush up on your Political Philosophy 101!

you could probably learn quite a bit from Thomas Payne!


and yeah,Corporations and Unions,who are in Bed together,would be sooooo powerful without a Government standing behind them!

you sound like this Guy:".....we'd live under a totalitarian private state as there can be no reliable checks & balances without the civil state. The most ruthless private individual, in his own self-interest, would simply come to rule over everybody else and you'd have to be a hippy or a Marxist to believe that this is not in Human nature to do this."

Yep,that would happen,if Government in its Wisdom didn't dispense Favors to the highest Bidder!

There is no such thing as big labor in the US your argument is childish.