There are many debated aspects of 911 no doubt. What is not in doubt is everything failed, the procedures to intercept planes off course, air defenses over washington failed, buildings failed in improbable ways, government lies like Condi Rice all well documented and available to anyone who chooses to search it out.

Fair warning.... The NSA tracks all your internet activity good luck

That seems to be about the Pentagon. Is there anything about Tower 7 on there?

Was the building that fragile it would fall straight down when it was hit on the side?

OMG are you in Trouble for Un-american Activities!
The whole Troofer-Establishment is a huge Joke on itself!
BTW,who is your Comrade?

try this video...
http://www.seekerland.com/2009/06/911-debunked-wtc-7s-collapse-explained.html

no comments? why not? OK I watched the video. I seen the buildings hit by debris. They were pretty beat up on top, and ragged looking but still standing. Look at how neatly WT7 came straight down in the video. I am not an architect but listen to what Architects and engineers have to say. U Tube (NEW) Solving the mystery of WT7 Architecs and engineers

no comments? why not? OK I watched the video. I seen the buildings hit by debris. They were pretty beat up on top, and ragged looking but still standing. Look at how neatly WT7 came straight down in the video. I am not an architect but listen to what Architects and engineers have to say. U Tube (NEW) Solving the mystery of WT7 Architecs and engineers

Sure, just keep drinking the kool-aid.

In order to understand the improbability of the government’s explanation of 9/11, it is not necessary to know anything about what force or forces brought down the three World Trade Center buildings, what hit the Pentagon or caused the explosion, the flying skills or lack thereof of the alleged hijackers, whether the airliner crashed in Pennsylvania or was shot down, whether cell phone calls made at the altitudes could be received, or any other debated aspect of the controversy.

You only have to know two things.

One is that according to the official story, a handful of Arabs, mainly Saudi Arabians, operating independently of any government and competent intelligence service, men without James Bond and V for Vendetta capabilities, outwitted not only the CIA, FBI, and National Security Agency, but all 16 US intelligence agencies, along with all security agencies of America’s NATO allies and Israel’s Mossad. Not only did the entire intelligence forces of the Western world fail, but on the morning of the attack the entire apparatus of the National Security State simultaneously failed. Airport security failed four times in one hour. NORAD failed. Air Traffic Control failed. The US Air Force failed. The National Security Council failed. Dick Cheney failed. Absolutely nothing worked. The world’s only superpower was helpless at the humiliating mercy of a few undistinguished Arabs.

It is hard to image a more far-fetched story–except for the second thing you need to know: The humiliating failure of US National Security did not result in immediate demands from the President of the United States, from Congress, from the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and from the media for an investigation of how such improbable total failure could have occurred. No one was held accountable for the greatest failure of national security in world history. Instead, the White House dragged its feet for a year resisting any investigation until the persistent demands from 9/11 families for accountability forced President George W. Bush to appoint a political commission, devoid of any experts, to hold a pretend investigation.
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2012/09/11/the-11th-anniversary-911-paul-craig-roberts/

yes these people you mention trump all the other firemen and scientists that don't buy the conspiracy theory..

the only ones credible are the ones that tell the story you want to believe.

Has there ever been a case where a steel building like tower 7 collapsed from fire? If so I would like to know where and when.

so let me ask you this... what does building 7 matter? everything around it was destroyed, as was the whole complex... they evacuated the building, and no one was hurt or killed...why do the CT'ers even care? pulled, fell, blew up, hit with a laser beam, who the hell cares? it would have been leveled either way, so why is when important to yall?

They use WTC7 as 'proof' of a CD as no plane struck the building. Of course, there is no other proof to support this silly idea.

Was the building that fragile it would fall straight down when it was hit on the side?

i don't get why it's so hard to believe that 19 muslims flew planes into buildings...
anyone with a flight simulator could do it, except for the idiots that say it can't be done...

I would like to know who your comrade is. I suspect he is not one that believes in freedom,critical thinking and freedom of thought and speech.

Ok, this old line. I put it to you, has there ever been a case where a building was struck by the debris of a larger building and where fires raged unfought for seven hours?

Think about it.
I think about it a lot. I googled skyscraper fires. There are some bad ones. None of them collapsed the buildings. Now think about this, if a building was damaged on one side by debris or whatever, and did fall. Would it not fall to the weaker side and not come straight down like a controlled demolition.

I think about it a lot. I googled skyscraper fires.
There are some bad ones. None of them collapsed the buildings.

Now think about this, if a building was damaged on one side by debris or whatever, and did fall. Would it not fall to the weaker side and not come straight down like a controlled demolition.