Topic: Cali. Jails: DVD Players/full sized refrig/nice gym/come & g | |
---|---|
Wow.. Based on what ive read on here...prisoners in some US states are spoiled... There are differences between rights and privileges, and between due consideration and luxuries...and these concepts seem to get more and more mixed up... Yep.. IMO , ALL prisons in English speaking countries spoil & pamper inmates. And it takes wayyy.... to long for 'due process '. And for an ACTUAL death sentence to be carried out. Some states don't have a death penalty. And each state decides ' the grounds ' for the death penalty & the penalty for most crimes. Federal crimes, are under government jurisdiction. For a Death Sentence to get carried out in some states takes up to 25 years. My brother works on Nevada's only Death Row. Some of these guys die of old age before their sentence got carried out. 50-60 years ago the sentence was carried out immediately. |
|
|
|
there was a poster on Mingle a few months ago, looking for a relationship with a woman.. When I asked why he was wearing a orange jumpsuit (I already knew the answer). He told me he was incarcerated. So here we have prison inmates surfing the web.. looking for ladies. and nobody in the corrections department sees a problem with this Not to mention that we (tax payers) are most likely picking up the tab Are you kidding me? Mingle has convicts here? Like we don't suffer enough from the scammers here. This is an outrage! What did the article mean that the programs let the prisoners leave for work? You mean they are part time prisoners??? yes to both. I am doing a project for work to build a new factory. I won't say where, but that state ( and others) offered as part of the incentive to pick their state,prisoner work programs ( low risk inmates or inmates with less then a year left on their sentence). We pay the state DOC a agreed upon amount and they pay the inmates, transport them ect.... but to answer your question.. yes, they are out and working. We did not take that offer as we A) we did not think it a good business decision based on possible customer concerns.. B) we did not want the responsibility should something happen. But, I know of other companies that have. I think its a good idea actually, to keep their skills fresh and teach them new ones, makes it more likely to 'assimilate' back into society when they served their time And maybe in very small businesses that works.. but not in most others. To get a decent job these days a background check is done. ( almost every job) And if you have done time, chances are you are not going to be hired. Why?.. because businesses are in business for one reason.. to make money. The best get the job and a criminal record is a big red flag. It is a ( unfortunately for them) a by product of the trouble they got themselves into. Fair... nope.. reality.. yep |
|
|
|
So a rich rapest can live in luxury but a poor killer lives in a normal jail? Crazy. They are there for a reason Oh, nope. A rapist gets super special treatment in prison. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Sat 05/02/15 05:13 AM
|
|
Sheriff Joe puts them in tents in the desert and feeds them Emu meat ![]() |
|
|
|
Pay-to-Stay Jail Programs
Some are even advertising..... "" To keep the money coming, jail officials make a pitch in a special flier available at the police station: "Serve your time in our clean, safe secure facility! . . . Prices range from $55 to $78 per day. . . . We are the finest jail in Southern California!"" http://articles.latimes.com/2000/jul/09/local/me-50182 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
there was a poster on Mingle a few months ago, looking for a relationship with a woman.. When I asked why he was wearing a orange jumpsuit (I already knew the answer). He told me he was incarcerated. So here we have prison inmates surfing the web.. looking for ladies. and nobody in the corrections department sees a problem with this Not to mention that we (tax payers) are most likely picking up the tab I dont see an issue with incarcerated having some connection to what is going on in the world or to cyber 'relationships' as long as at the end of the day they dont have the 'freedom' to pose threats in the real world. The issue is: when someone WILLING commits a crime, THEY gave up their RIGHTS & PRIVILEGES. *There is no mean man or a persecution dictatorship society took it away from them. They gave their rights & privileges away, voluntarily, by breaking the law* But I see your point... God forbid we stop the exchange of gang & terrorist information & orders , from passing back & forth. And we wouldn't want to stop any pervert from getting his rocks off or stalking his next victim. Or checking his f**kbook account for the next riot address. ... Now would we ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Wow.. Based on what ive read on here...prisoners in some US states are spoiled... There are differences between rights and privileges, and between due consideration and luxuries...and these concepts seem to get more and more mixed up... Yep.. IMO , ALL prisons in English speaking countries spoil & pamper inmates. And it takes wayyy.... to long for 'due process '. And for an ACTUAL death sentence to be carried out. Some states don't have a death penalty. And each state decides ' the grounds ' for the death penalty & the penalty for most crimes. Federal crimes, are under government jurisdiction. For a Death Sentence to get carried out in some states takes up to 25 years. My brother works on Nevada's only Death Row. Some of these guys die of old age before their sentence got carried out. 50-60 years ago the sentence was carried out immediately. Like Caryl Chessman? eleven years and ten months,from '48 to '60! The rights to Appeal have always taken years! |
|
|
|
Sojourning_Soul stated >>>
Sheriff Joe puts them in tents in the desert and feeds them Emu meat ![]() Oh...yes, good ole Joe the scourge of Maricopa County; if nobody else could show the world how to screw over his tax payers then I'd not know whom that would be --- LMAO From his Wikipedia page >>> Misuse of funds
An analysis by the Maricopa County Office of Management and Budget, completed in April 2011, found Arpaio had misspent almost $100 million over the previous 5 years. The analysis showed that money from a restricted detention fund which could only legally be used to pay for jail items, such as food, detention officers' salaries and equipment, was used to pay employees to patrol Maricopa County. The analysis also showed that many Sheriff's Office employees, whose salaries were paid from the restricted detention fund, were working job assignments different from those recorded in their personnel records. Arpaio's office kept a separate set of personnel books detailing actual work assignments, different from information kept on the county's official human-resources records. Arpaio used the detention fund to pay for investigations of political rivals, and activities involving his human-smuggling unit. The analysis also showed a number of inappropriate spending items, including a trip to Alaska where deputies stayed at a fishing resort, and trips to Disneyland. Separate investigations by The Arizona Republic uncovered widespread abuse of public funds and county policies by Arpaio's office, including high-ranking employees routinely charging expensive meals and stays at luxury hotels on their county credit cards. The Republic also found that a restricted jail enhancement fund was improperly used to pay for out-of-state training, a staff party at a local amusement park, and a $456,000 bus, which was purchased by Arpaio in violation of county procurement rules. And there was another segment about his infamous 'PINK BOXERS' that he had printed up for all those inmates to wear; he started selling them on line/at the county fairs/local city market days and netted a goodly profit; of which none of the funds ever showed up on the sheriff department books! Yipper, that 85+ yr old con-man sure knows how to turn a screw - screw the system and build a mafia empire all at the tax payers expense! ![]() |
|
|
|
there was a poster on Mingle a few months ago, looking for a relationship with a woman.. When I asked why he was wearing a orange jumpsuit (I already knew the answer). He told me he was incarcerated. So here we have prison inmates surfing the web.. looking for ladies. and nobody in the corrections department sees a problem with this Not to mention that we (tax payers) are most likely picking up the tab Are you kidding me? Mingle has convicts here? Like we don't suffer enough from the scammers here. This is an outrage! What did the article mean that the programs let the prisoners leave for work? You mean they are part time prisoners??? yes to both. I am doing a project for work to build a new factory. I won't say where, but that state ( and others) offered as part of the incentive to pick their state,prisoner work programs ( low risk inmates or inmates with less then a year left on their sentence). We pay the state DOC a agreed upon amount and they pay the inmates, transport them ect.... but to answer your question.. yes, they are out and working. We did not take that offer as we A) we did not think it a good business decision based on possible customer concerns.. B) we did not want the responsibility should something happen. But, I know of other companies that have. I think its a good idea actually, to keep their skills fresh and teach them new ones, makes it more likely to 'assimilate' back into society when they served their time And maybe in very small businesses that works.. but not in most others. To get a decent job these days a background check is done. ( almost every job) And if you have done time, chances are you are not going to be hired. Why?.. because businesses are in business for one reason.. to make money. The best get the job and a criminal record is a big red flag. It is a ( unfortunately for them) a by product of the trouble they got themselves into. Fair... nope.. reality.. yep definitely, thats why I believe it should be offered and those willing to take the risk should have some perk for doing so,,,, |
|
|
|
there was a poster on Mingle a few months ago, looking for a relationship with a woman.. When I asked why he was wearing a orange jumpsuit (I already knew the answer). He told me he was incarcerated. So here we have prison inmates surfing the web.. looking for ladies. and nobody in the corrections department sees a problem with this Not to mention that we (tax payers) are most likely picking up the tab I dont see an issue with incarcerated having some connection to what is going on in the world or to cyber 'relationships' as long as at the end of the day they dont have the 'freedom' to pose threats in the real world. The issue is: when someone WILLING commits a crime, THEY gave up their RIGHTS & PRIVILEGES. *There is no mean man or a persecution dictatorship society took it away from them. They gave their rights & privileges away, voluntarily, by breaking the law* But I see your point... God forbid we stop the exchange of gang & terrorist information & orders , from passing back & forth. And we wouldn't want to stop any pervert from getting his rocks off or stalking his next victim. Or checking his f**kbook account for the next riot address. ... Now would we ![]() ![]() well, thats not completely true, not all crimes are equal so not all criminals are equal someone for instance who was caught lying on the stand or selling weed is not equal to someone who brutally raped a woman,, and so we have a standard in the states to not just treat prisoners like crap because they are in jail we have laws against cruel and unusual punishment and states have discretion to determine the minimum prison standard they wish to impose in this culture it is very unusual for anyone not to have internet access(public libraries are free) or access to a library for instance, and of course exercise is important to health so having internet access in jail is reasonable imho, not in every individual cell, but certainly accessible in a library type setting so they can continue to make themselves BETTER people and just like in any library its simple to set restrictions on the types of sites and activity that can happen on a computer which is as much of the point to me as punishing them in a state where they will perpetually have no chance for growth and even become worse ESPECIALLY that liar or weed seller who will be getting out and having to survive in society again |
|
|
|
MsHarmony stated >>>
well, thats not completely true, not all crimes are equal so not all criminals are equal someone for instance who was caught lying on the stand or selling weed is not equal to someone who brutally raped a woman,, and so we have a standard in the states to not just treat prisoners like crap because they are in jail we have laws against cruel and unusual punishment and states have discretion to determine the minimum prison standard they wish to impose in this culture it is very unusual for anyone not to have internet access(public libraries are free) or access to a library for instance, and of course exercise is important to health so having internet access in jail is reasonable imho, not in every individual cell, but certainly accessible in a library type setting so they can continue to make themselves BETTER people and just like in any library its simple to set restrictions on the types of sites and activity that can happen on a computer which is as much of the point to me as punishing them in a state where they will perpetually have no chance for growth and even become worse ESPECIALLY that liar or weed seller who will be getting out and having to survive in society again You've brought up some interesting 'food 4 thought' there; and back when there was a rush for all those states to vote in that '3 STRIKES 'N YOUR OUT' guideline for sentencing! Well, in theory that was supposed to take care of those repeat offenders but unfortunately the way that the law was written and the way the courts applied it was 2 highly different matters entirely! Once a 'New Law' is published and put into the law books {whatever state opts to use it - KS did not} they do not go back and readjust the length of time that crimes get adjudicated for specific offences {nothing retroactive happens in LAW} it just keeps moving forward; for example - someone with 2 drug busts on their record in California would only need to be busted for 1 more arrest of any kind {even a probation violation} and he/she would fall into that '3 STRIKES' and be sent away for life for drugs - while a heinous child rapist of the worst sort {allow your mind to go to that really dark place} gets his sentencing and is doing his time but there's a over crowding issue and they are in dire need of more roommates and prisoners per cells; guess who's going to get an EARLY RELEASE! It's always - always the sexual perverts/pedophiles/sexual deviants that they dump back into society because they are a housing problem for penitentiaries---so where will those perverts relocate to? Yipper...they'll be looking for a state that hasn't voted on that '3 STRIKES N' YOUR OUT' law; and KS is becoming a cesspool for meth heads and child molesters! Good Grief - our judicial system needs a house cleaning in the worst way; won't happen in my life time but it needs to be done! |
|
|
|
there was a poster on Mingle a few months ago, looking for a relationship with a woman.. When I asked why he was wearing a orange jumpsuit (I already knew the answer). He told me he was incarcerated. So here we have prison inmates surfing the web.. looking for ladies. and nobody in the corrections department sees a problem with this Not to mention that we (tax payers) are most likely picking up the tab Are you kidding me? Mingle has convicts here? Like we don't suffer enough from the scammers here. This is an outrage! What did the article mean that the programs let the prisoners leave for work? You mean they are part time prisoners??? yes to both. I am doing a project for work to build a new factory. I won't say where, but that state ( and others) offered as part of the incentive to pick their state,prisoner work programs ( low risk inmates or inmates with less then a year left on their sentence). We pay the state DOC a agreed upon amount and they pay the inmates, transport them ect.... but to answer your question.. yes, they are out and working. We did not take that offer as we A) we did not think it a good business decision based on possible customer concerns.. B) we did not want the responsibility should something happen. But, I know of other companies that have. I think its a good idea actually, to keep their skills fresh and teach them new ones, makes it more likely to 'assimilate' back into society when they served their time And maybe in very small businesses that works.. but not in most others. To get a decent job these days a background check is done. ( almost every job) And if you have done time, chances are you are not going to be hired. Why?.. because businesses are in business for one reason.. to make money. The best get the job and a criminal record is a big red flag. It is a ( unfortunately for them) a by product of the trouble they got themselves into. Fair... nope.. reality.. yep definitely, thats why I believe it should be offered and those willing to take the risk should have some perk for doing so,,,, well sounds like a good niche market.. start a company and then tell me how it works out. If your other employees appreciate your business decision. When we looked into it... our employees were not to keen on it.. not at all. |
|
|
|
Sheriff Joe puts them in tents in the desert and feeds them Emu meat ![]() Emu meat, would seem like a step up from the green bologna. |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sat 05/02/15 06:39 PM
|
|
there was a poster on Mingle a few months ago, looking for a relationship with a woman.. When I asked why he was wearing a orange jumpsuit (I already knew the answer). He told me he was incarcerated. So here we have prison inmates surfing the web.. looking for ladies. and nobody in the corrections department sees a problem with this Not to mention that we (tax payers) are most likely picking up the tab Are you kidding me? Mingle has convicts here? Like we don't suffer enough from the scammers here. This is an outrage! What did the article mean that the programs let the prisoners leave for work? You mean they are part time prisoners??? yes to both. I am doing a project for work to build a new factory. I won't say where, but that state ( and others) offered as part of the incentive to pick their state,prisoner work programs ( low risk inmates or inmates with less then a year left on their sentence). We pay the state DOC a agreed upon amount and they pay the inmates, transport them ect.... but to answer your question.. yes, they are out and working. We did not take that offer as we A) we did not think it a good business decision based on possible customer concerns.. B) we did not want the responsibility should something happen. But, I know of other companies that have. I think its a good idea actually, to keep their skills fresh and teach them new ones, makes it more likely to 'assimilate' back into society when they served their time And maybe in very small businesses that works.. but not in most others. To get a decent job these days a background check is done. ( almost every job) And if you have done time, chances are you are not going to be hired. Why?.. because businesses are in business for one reason.. to make money. The best get the job and a criminal record is a big red flag. It is a ( unfortunately for them) a by product of the trouble they got themselves into. Fair... nope.. reality.. yep definitely, thats why I believe it should be offered and those willing to take the risk should have some perk for doing so,,,, well sounds like a good niche market.. start a company and then tell me how it works out. If your other employees appreciate your business decision. When we looked into it... our employees were not to keen on it.. not at all. thats odd, my employer NEVER asked my opinion about who they hire nor shared with me their personal backgrounds,,, but even so, Im sure there are companies who would be willing to contribute to society in this manner and who would employ the type of people that supported it,,,, |
|
|
|
there was a poster on Mingle a few months ago, looking for a relationship with a woman.. When I asked why he was wearing a orange jumpsuit (I already knew the answer). He told me he was incarcerated. So here we have prison inmates surfing the web.. looking for ladies. and nobody in the corrections department sees a problem with this Not to mention that we (tax payers) are most likely picking up the tab Are you kidding me? Mingle has convicts here? Like we don't suffer enough from the scammers here. This is an outrage! What did the article mean that the programs let the prisoners leave for work? You mean they are part time prisoners??? yes to both. I am doing a project for work to build a new factory. I won't say where, but that state ( and others) offered as part of the incentive to pick their state,prisoner work programs ( low risk inmates or inmates with less then a year left on their sentence). We pay the state DOC a agreed upon amount and they pay the inmates, transport them ect.... but to answer your question.. yes, they are out and working. We did not take that offer as we A) we did not think it a good business decision based on possible customer concerns.. B) we did not want the responsibility should something happen. But, I know of other companies that have. I think its a good idea actually, to keep their skills fresh and teach them new ones, makes it more likely to 'assimilate' back into society when they served their time And maybe in very small businesses that works.. but not in most others. To get a decent job these days a background check is done. ( almost every job) And if you have done time, chances are you are not going to be hired. Why?.. because businesses are in business for one reason.. to make money. The best get the job and a criminal record is a big red flag. It is a ( unfortunately for them) a by product of the trouble they got themselves into. Fair... nope.. reality.. yep definitely, thats why I believe it should be offered and those willing to take the risk should have some perk for doing so,,,, well sounds like a good niche market.. start a company and then tell me how it works out. If your other employees appreciate your business decision. When we looked into it... our employees were not to keen on it.. not at all. thats odd, my employer NEVER asked my opinion about who they hire nor shared with me their personal backgrounds,,, but even so, Im sure there are companies who would be willing to contribute to society in this manner and who would employ the type of people that supported it,,,, I have no idea what your standing is in the company you work for or if you would actually be involved in the decision making process of new employees or not. Chances are, your not. And chances are that most ex cons would not get to the actual interview in todays business world. Did your company conduct a background check on you before they hired you?. Has any other people in your organization ever made mention that they did time? I think the answers are yes and no... there is a reason for that. I will tell you.. point blank. I have had ex cons apply for positions within our corporation at various levels.. And I have not hired them.. why.. because they have not passed the background investigation...so they never actually make it to the interview stage. plain and simple. This is not Boys Town and I am not Father Flannigan. Its business. Most companies invest in their employees.. which cost a lot of money and they want the best avalible. There is a sea of people avalible who have clean backgrounds.. a sea. They take precedence over ex cons But if you are "high up the food chain" in your corporation and involved in the actual decision process, tell me how many ex cons have you hired? |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sat 05/02/15 07:48 PM
|
|
well, my mom did hiring and firing over thousands in the cleveland post office and I know for a fact she would if given the chance
you speak of 'ex cons' as if they are all the same, they are not I certainly wouldnt hire someone convicted of selling weed to work at my day care, but if I had a sales position selling something,, they might just already have a skill set that could be used and an opportunity that could teach them other legal avenues and experience selling something thats not criminal I certainly wouldnt hire someone convicted of drunk driving to run a bar or valet, but they can certainly work in an office answering phones and filing and receiving clerical experience ,, there are plenty they can do , and should have the chance to in spite of being a 'con' |
|
|
|
well, my mom did hiring and firing over thousands in the cleveland post office and I know for a fact she would if given the chance you speak of 'ex cons' as if they are all the same, they are not I certainly wouldnt hire someone convicted of selling weed to work at my day care, but if I had a sales position selling something,, they might just already have a skill set that could be used and an opportunity that could teach them other legal avenues and experience selling something thats not criminal I certainly wouldnt hire someone convicted of drunk driving to run a bar or valet, but they can certainly work in an office answering phones and filing and receiving clerical experience ,, there are plenty they can do , and should have the chance to in spite of being a 'con' Nice non answers to my " are you a decision maker" question But First of all, I am sure the city of Cleveland postal service has policies in place that dictate the hiring process and final selection based on the federal civil service exam guidelines, not the decision of "Mom" And if you are selling weed out the side door of your day care center then by all means, that's your man.. Call me crazy but I wouldn't want anyone.. at all..affiliated with ANY kind of drug anywhere near my kids... don't really care if it was just pot. Bad judgment...and I really would not want my toddlers in the hands of someone who has shown bad judgment... wouldn't give me that " warm and fuzzy" as I drove off. It is easy to say " you certainly would hire".. quite another to actually do it. So.. you are a business person.. I guess?.. because earlier you stated you work at a company?.. by all means.. start hiring ex cons.. be a champion of your words... Bring them into the daycare center. I am sure that will be well received by the parents |
|
|
|
well, my mom did hiring and firing over thousands in the cleveland post office and I know for a fact she would if given the chance you speak of 'ex cons' as if they are all the same, they are not I certainly wouldnt hire someone convicted of selling weed to work at my day care, but if I had a sales position selling something,, they might just already have a skill set that could be used and an opportunity that could teach them other legal avenues and experience selling something thats not criminal I certainly wouldnt hire someone convicted of drunk driving to run a bar or valet, but they can certainly work in an office answering phones and filing and receiving clerical experience ,, there are plenty they can do , and should have the chance to in spite of being a 'con' Nice non answers to my " are you a decision maker" question But First of all, I am sure the city of Cleveland postal service has policies in place that dictate the hiring process and final selection based on the federal civil service exam guidelines, not the decision of "Mom" And if you are selling weed out the side door of your day care center then by all means, that's your man.. Call me crazy but I wouldn't want anyone.. at all..affiliated with ANY kind of drug anywhere near my kids... don't really care if it was just pot. Bad judgment...and I really would not want my toddlers in the hands of someone who has shown bad judgment... wouldn't give me that " warm and fuzzy" as I drove off. It is easy to say " you certainly would hire".. quite another to actually do it. So.. you are a business person.. I guess?.. because earlier you stated you work at a company?.. by all means.. start hiring ex cons.. be a champion of your words... Bring them into the daycare center. I am sure that will be well received by the parents to repeat the important parts as I have said my employer doesnt ask my opinion about whom they hire, I obviously am not one of the 'decision makers', I mentioned it in response to a statement that your 'employees'(people under your employ) didnt approve I didnt say I would hire a weed seller for child care , I said I WOULDNT,, considering the offense that would be in appropriate I said I could hire them in a position of SALES,,,which is appropriate for their skill set and their offense not all criminals have the same crime, and common sense would obviously be in play with matching jobs ,, just like in civilian hiring,, I am sure I am not the only person who would feel this was a good program and take advantage of it if I could but the point is not about whether I will, because I am struggling to keep my head above water as someone else's employee but knowing others who HAVE had businesses and who HAVE been in decision making positions,, I know there are those who would do it,,, rather or not you are one of them isn't really worth debating,, I never said everyone would,,, |
|
|
|
Sheriff Joe puts them in tents in the desert and feeds them Emu meat ![]() And makes them wear Pink Underwear! ![]() |
|
|
|
Edited by
Lpdon
on
Sun 05/03/15 01:13 AM
|
|
there was a poster on Mingle a few months ago, looking for a relationship with a woman.. When I asked why he was wearing a orange jumpsuit (I already knew the answer). He told me he was incarcerated. So here we have prison inmates surfing the web.. looking for ladies. and nobody in the corrections department sees a problem with this Not to mention that we (tax payers) are most likely picking up the tab Are you kidding me? Mingle has convicts here? Like we don't suffer enough from the scammers here. This is an outrage! What did the article mean that the programs let the prisoners leave for work? You mean they are part time prisoners??? yes to both. I am doing a project for work to build a new factory. I won't say where, but that state ( and others) offered as part of the incentive to pick their state,prisoner work programs ( low risk inmates or inmates with less then a year left on their sentence). We pay the state DOC a agreed upon amount and they pay the inmates, transport them ect.... but to answer your question.. yes, they are out and working. We did not take that offer as we A) we did not think it a good business decision based on possible customer concerns.. B) we did not want the responsibility should something happen. But, I know of other companies that have. I think its a good idea actually, to keep their skills fresh and teach them new ones, makes it more likely to 'assimilate' back into society when they served their time And maybe in very small businesses that works.. but not in most others. To get a decent job these days a background check is done. ( almost every job) And if you have done time, chances are you are not going to be hired. Why?.. because businesses are in business for one reason.. to make money. The best get the job and a criminal record is a big red flag. It is a ( unfortunately for them) a by product of the trouble they got themselves into. Fair... nope.. reality.. yep definitely, thats why I believe it should be offered and those willing to take the risk should have some perk for doing so,,,, They do offer perks. That's why when you apply for a job you are requested to fill out a WOTC (Work Opportunity Tax Credit) It is like 7 questions long and one of them is have you been convicted or served time for a felony offense. If they answer yes and the company hires them they get a nice tax credit. |
|
|