Washington, D.C. – Despite receiving little attention in the mass media, the November 2017 and April 2018 release of more than 35,000 and 18,000 documents by the Trump Administration, relating to the assassination of former President Kennedy—which had been withheld from the public for more than 50 years—sheds new light on the president’s murder and the two soldiers who attempted to stop it.

While the mainstream media did cursorily cover the two releases, virtually none of the coverage was aimed at the most damning revelations, which included the fact that two U.S. soldiers in separate locations uncovered cryptographic messages indicating that President Kennedy was going to be assassinated, prior to his murder in Dallas.

Ominously, both of these soldiers were subsequently institutionalized after attempting to get the information they had uncovered to authorities.

The first case involves an army code breaker named Eugene V. Dinkin.

U.S. Army Private First Class Eugene Dinkin served in Metz, France, in the 599th Ordinance Group and worked in the cryptography section of his unit. His duties at Metz reportedly included deciphering cable traffic from the European Commands, NATO, etc.

A report by Citizens for Truth About the Kennedy Assassination (CTAKA) explained:

On September, 1963, Dinkin noticed material in the Army newspaper, Stars and Stripes, and other print publications, that was negative toward the president and his policies and implied that he was a weak president in dealing with the Russians. The examples that he found became more negative, the suggestion being that if he were removed as president it would be a good thing. By mid-October Dinkin had found enough information—some of it subliminal—that he was convinced that a plot was in the works. One driven by some high-ranking members of the military, some right-wing economic groups, and with support by some national media outlets…

Dinkin’s studies forced him to conclude that the plot would happen around November 28, 1963, and that the assassination would be blamed on “a Communist or a Negro”. He then sent a registered letter to Attorney General Robert Kennedy. When he got no reply, he decided on other options.

Dinkin gathered his evidentiary material in late October 1963, which included psychological sets he had uncovered that he believed were being used to induce a specific state of mind into citizens’ consciousness regarding President Kennedy in the run-up to his assassination and he went to the U.S. Embassy in Luxembourg in an effort to meet with Mr. Cunningham, the Chargé d’Affaires.

Despite Dinkin informing Cunningham by phone that he had important information about a plot to assassinate Kennedy, Cunningham refused to meet with him or look at his evidentiary data.

Upon returning to Metz, his superiors informed him that he was scheduled to undergo a psychological evaluation on November 5, 1963. Dinkin then decided he had to leave his unit and go to Geneva, Switzerland, in an attempt to get this information to someone that could potentially assist in thwarting the assassination attempt.

Despite unsuccessfully attempting to speak to the editor of the newspaper, Geneva Diplomat, and a Newsweek reporter, who refused to listen to the information, Dinkin was able to speak to the secretary for Time-Life who was located in Zurich.

The documents reveal that on November 6, 1963, Dinkin went to the press room of the United Nations office in Geneva, where he informed reporters about the assassination plot.

Reporter, Alex des Fontaines, a freelancer for Time-Life and Radio Canada, later told authorities that he and a female reporter both recalled Dinkin discussing the evidence he had uncovered regarding an assassination plot. In fact, the information from Dinkin actually prompted Des Fontaines to file the story on November 26, 1963.

Additionally, an FBI Airtel from the Paris Legation to FBI Director Hoover of February 27, 1964, provides evidence that the FBI was aware of Dinkin’s information, as the Airtel notes that on November 8, 1963—over two weeks before Kennedy’s assassination—a message containing references to Dinkin’s activities noted that his statements and actions had apparently received considerable publicity.

The documents reveal that despite a wide range of U.S. government officials being made aware of Dinkin’s information, they all failed to report the assassination plot to the White House or Secret Service.

Dinkin was placed in detention upon his return on November 8 and held until November 13—when he was taken to Landstuhl Hospital in Germany for a psychological evaluation, and was subsequently transferred to Walter Reed Naval Hospital, where he was held for four months until he was discharged.

While Dinkin was being detained, a man who claimed to be from the Department of Defense visited him and asked him for the data he had collected regarding the assassination plot. Dinkin reportedly told the man where the papers were located. Upon his release, he realized that all of his data he had collected had been taken.

In an interview with FBI agents, he said he believed that there had been a plot perpetrated by a “military group,” and abetted by newspaper personnel working with the group that plotted to assassinate President Kennedy.

In a completely separate case, two newly released CIA documents reveal that prior to November 1963, Air Force Sergeant David Christensen, who was stationed at Kirknewton, Scotland, intercepted communications that an assassination attempt would be made on President Kennedy.

The documents reveal that Christensen, while stationed at a CIA listening post at an RAF base, reportedly intercepted communications about a plot to assassinate Kennedy—but few other substantive details surrounding exactly what he heard are available.

After hearing something he clearly was not intended to hear, and trying to get it sent to NSA, Christensen, like Dinkin, was reportedly committed to a mental health institution.

The fact that the cases of these two separate U.S. servicemen were withheld for over 50 years after the assassination clearly leads one to believe that this information was withheld for a reason. If these were two cranks, then why would these reports only be surfacing after 50 years?

The testimony of these men was hidden and kept secret for 50 years, as what they heard clearly implied a plot that went well beyond the single-gunman theory of the Warren Commission.

Links here

I can’t open the link.

Always thought it was a plot not just one man, being the murderer.

Higher ups covering up things has been going on for Decades.

Just like nowadays, with the DNC.

Going by the period in time and what was going on in America, I always felt that the Mob was behind it.

I still think that.

The Kennedy brothers were hell bent on busting the MOB. rightfully so. And they were making life very difficult for Hoffa and the rest.

I think it was the banksters... one of the coincidences of Lincoln and Kennedy was they both had taken steps to change the banking system that the people gained more than the banksters...the banksters weren't happy

It had to be the Mob and the CIA. Kennedy was taring the Agency apart and he was going after the Mob who happened to help him get elected. Plus the Mob cleaned house after the assassination......

seems that someone in the government knew about it...I guess it doesn't really say if it was a government frequency or not the men in the article listen to

Lyndon Johnson.

daddy Bush was there as well...

Politics aside, it's the physics of the whole thing doesn't make any sense.

Looking past the "so called" magic bullet, and how it traveled, one slug went through two people, and came out deformed. The one that hit Kennedy in the head threw him backwards, shattered his skull, and made a hole the size of a truck coming out.

There's no way you can convince me that one gun did it all. Two were in play. One was that Carcano that Oswald had. The other, was one of two possibles. A .222 that the secret service had in the car in front of Kennedy's, that was accidently fired in the excitement of the moment.

The other, was a Remington Fireball pistol, also a .222, that was fired from ether the grassy knoll, or the railroad bridge. Both were quite capable of inflicting the damage done to Kennedy. The Fireball, was a cut down version of the model 700 rifle, sold by Remington.

Interesting little sidebar to that- I understand that secret service agent that accidentally pulled the trigger, committed suicide some years later. Probably from the grief that he encountered from the whole situation. He might not have hit Kennedy, but, that very small chance that he might have is what made him do what he did.

A pistol could never have made that accurate of a shot. There had to have been two shooters and an over watch. The grassy knoll was a perfect position for an over watch and one of the shots. There were reports of a couple military types on the grassy knoll back from where the shots came from, that leads me to believe there was an over watch set up there which points to military involvement since it's how our CIA and Special Forces carry out missions and has for years.

A discussion I heard, mentioned a
"triangulation of fire", with an overwatch.

However, the overwatch mentioned,
was an office with a large window,
overlooking the motorcade route
where the assassination occurred.

Sad fact is, our politicians have so muddled
the evidence, the investigations, and the history
of events. The real truth will most likely, never
be known.

An over watch from the book depository would have been a horrible idea. They have to be able to step in and complete the job from the best advantage and from there they couldn't. The best shot was from the knoll.

Office building, other side.

Building, or at least the office,
was owned by a very prominent Dallas family.

Many buildings were owned by prominent families. It still wouldn't have been a good place to take a shot.