Previous 1 3 4
Topic: Laziness not synonymous with welfare or need ...
msharmony's photo
Thu 08/09/18 05:06 PM
Chaffetz was articulating a commonly held belief that poverty in the United States is, by and large, the result of laziness, immorality and irresponsibility. If only people made better choices — if they worked harder, stayed in school, got married, didn’t have children they couldn’t afford, spent what money they had more wisely and saved more — then they wouldn’t be poor, or so the reasoning goes.

First, it’s founded on the assumption that the United States is a land of opportunity, where upward mobility is readily available and hard work gets you ahead. While grit may have ushered you up the socioeconomic ladder in the late 19th century, it’s no longer up to the task today.

To accept this as reality is to confront the unpleasant fact that myths of American exceptionalism are just that — myths — and many of us would fare better economically (and live longer, healthier lives, too) had we been born elsewhere

Second, to believe that poverty is a result of immorality or irresponsibility helps people believe it can’t happen to them. But it can happen to them (and to me and to you). Poverty in the United States is common, and according to the Census Bureau, over a three-year period, about one-third of all U.S. residents slip below the poverty line at least once for two months or more.



Third — and conveniently, perhaps, for people like Chaffetz or House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) — this stubborn insistence that people could have more money or more health care if only they wanted them more absolves the government of having to intervene and use its power on their behalf. This is both patronizing and, of course, a gross misreading of the actual outcome of laws like these.

There’s one final problem with these kinds of arguments, and that is the implication that we should be worried by the possibility of poor people buying the occasional steak, lottery ticket or, yes, even an iPhone. Set aside the fact that a better cut of meat may be more nutritious than a meal Chaffetz would approve of, or the fact that a smartphone may be your only access to email, job notices, benefit applications, school work and so on. Why do we begrudge people struggling to get by the occasional indulgence? Why do we so little value pleasure and joy? Why do we insist that if you are poor, you should also be miserable? Why do we require penitence?

Ryan and their compatriots offer us tough love without the love, made possible through their willful ignorance of (or utter disregard for) what life is actually like for so many Americans who do their very best against great odds and still, nonetheless, have little to show for it. Sometimes not even an iPhone.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2017/03/08/laziness-isnt-why-people-are-poor-and-iphones-arent-why-they-lack-health-care/?utm_term=.6dcb8975eb4c

Easttowest72's photo
Thu 08/09/18 06:14 PM
Like I've said before, I pulled myself up out of poverty by buying property. It was extra work but it was something anybody could have done.

Beans have just as much protein as steak.

I just got a job. This $40 thanksgiving day sale phone is my only internet access.

My best friend at 20 years old was black. While I was focused on paying off a mortgage. He was living a life of nice restaurants, etc. It gave me an advantage that existed through out my life. That's where better choices come in.

msharmony's photo
Thu 08/09/18 06:32 PM
Edited by msharmony on Thu 08/09/18 06:47 PM
it was something anybody could have done.


FALSE.

many people in todays economy cannot or should not. ITs an accomplishment but it is not ALWAYS the answer to upward mobility or financial status

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/wiseradvisorcom/stop-before-you-buy-a-hou_b_4995979.html

msharmony's photo
Thu 08/09/18 06:34 PM

Like I've said before, I pulled myself up out of poverty by buying property. It was extra work but it was something anybody could have done.

Beans have just as much protein as steak.

I just got a job. This $40 thanksgiving day sale phone is my only internet access.

My best friend at 20 years old was black. While I was focused on paying off a mortgage. He was living a life of nice restaurants, etc. It gave me an advantage that existed through out my life. That's where better choices come in.


Beans have just as much protein as steak.

ALSO FALSE


Essential amino acids
Your body can not produce these amino acids. You have to supply them to your body by eating protein rich foods. There are 9 essential amino acids: histidine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, threonine, tryptophan, and valine.
Animal sources of protein like red meat, chicken, eggs, fish and milk products contain all essential amino acids in high concentrations. They are often called complete sources of protein.

Non animal sources of protein are typically low in some of the essential amino acids. That’s the case with beans as well. Although they are a good source of protein they are low in certain amino acids compared to meat. That’s why they’re often called incomplete sources of proteins.

IgorFrankensteen's photo
Thu 08/09/18 06:56 PM

Like I've said before, I pulled myself up out of poverty by buying property. It was extra work but it was something anybody could have done.

Beans have just as much protein as steak.

I just got a job. This $40 thanksgiving day sale phone is my only internet access.

My best friend at 20 years old was black. While I was focused on paying off a mortgage. He was living a life of nice restaurants, etc. It gave me an advantage that existed through out my life. That's where better choices come in.


Well, you really didn't pull yourself out of POVERTY by buying property. People who are actually in poverty, can't qualify to buy property.

I'm sure you really did have to work very hard at whatever you did, and that you certainly didn't have an easy time of things, but you have to admit that there is no such thing as buying property with no money down, no job, and no education.

Easttowest72's photo
Thu 08/09/18 07:14 PM
No. I was actually living in poverty. 2 kids and no child support. I have good credit because we didn't enjoy the occasional ribeye and iPhone that people living in poverty seem to be able to afford. I worked 6 and 7 days a week to be able to finance and cover payments. Priorities

Rock's photo
Fri 08/10/18 02:32 AM
Welfare/foodstamp recipients, by and large,
are some of the laziest oxygen thieves walking
the planet.


no photo
Fri 08/10/18 05:51 AM
Personally, I have absolutely no problem with helping people out who have fell on hard times.. none what so ever. That is what welfare and its affiliated programs were designed to do. And I do not know one American who would not help another in need.. not one

The system was designed as a short term crutch to help the people get back on their feet, not a long term life choice.

it is the abuse of this system that I do not like. When you have 2nd and 3rd generation welfare recipients, people selling food stamp cards for cash and people having more kids while on welfare that is a blatant abuse of the system and a smack in the face to all the taxpayers who have to shoulder the financial burden. And to say it is not abused by segments of our population is a insult to our intelligences.

But some believe that one must be PC. One must not say what they see.. what they know... because it will offend those abusing the system. And then there are others who could care less if those folks are insulted.. like me... because I am insulted that I have to pay for them.

msharmony's photo
Fri 08/10/18 09:36 AM

Welfare/foodstamp recipients, by and large,
are some of the laziest oxygen thieves walking
the planet.




more of that Trump like throw it out and see if it sticks ... no research or experience to back up the claim or know if its true ...




Most SNAP recipients who can work do so. Among SNAP households with at least one working-age, non-disabled adult, more than half work while receiving SNAP — and because many workers turn to SNAP when they are between jobs, more than 80 percent work in the year before or after receiving SNAP. The rates are even higher for families with children. (About two-thirds of SNAP recipients are not expected to work, primarily because they are children, elderly, or disabled.)


https://www.cbpp.org/research/policy-basics-introduction-to-the-supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap



A central component of the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program is its emphasis on work. Adult TANF recipients, with some exceptions, must participate in work activities as a condition of receiving cash benefits


https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/resource/tanf-work-requirements-and-state-strategies-to-fulfill-them



In most cases, you can only receive TANF benefits for a maximum of 5 years (or 60 months)

https://www.verywellfamily.com/tanf-grant-program-overview-2997412

so, there you have DATA, 80 percent are between jobs, and the limit to receiving cash is 5 years in a LIFETIME< which im sure gets paid back in in some way or another during the other fifty years of their life ...



msharmony's photo
Fri 08/10/18 09:42 AM
Edited by msharmony on Fri 08/10/18 09:43 AM

Personally, I have absolutely no problem with helping people out who have fell on hard times.. none what so ever. That is what welfare and its affiliated programs were designed to do. And I do not know one American who would not help another in need.. not one

The system was designed as a short term crutch to help the people get back on their feet, not a long term life choice.

it is the abuse of this system that I do not like. When you have 2nd and 3rd generation welfare recipients, people selling food stamp cards for cash and people having more kids while on welfare that is a blatant abuse of the system and a smack in the face to all the taxpayers who have to shoulder the financial burden. And to say it is not abused by segments of our population is a insult to our intelligences.

But some believe that one must be PC. One must not say what they see.. what they know... because it will offend those abusing the system. And then there are others who could care less if those folks are insulted.. like me... because I am insulted that I have to pay for them.


we can definitely agree there. Abuse in ANY system is abuse and should be dealt with. There are laws in place just for that. It is illegal to sell food stamp cards, and it is virtually impossible to have generational cash assistance anymore with lifetime caps.


As the numbers indicate though, the idea that those who are on welfare are mostly abusers or lazy, is not true.

Rock's photo
Sat 08/11/18 03:47 AM
Low ambition, and laziness, are synonymous
with welfare/foodstamp recipients.

It's the reputation, they proudly earned.


mightymoe's photo
Sat 08/11/18 04:42 AM

Chaffetz was articulating a commonly held belief that poverty in the United States is, by and large, the result of laziness, immorality and irresponsibility. If only people made better choices — if they worked harder, stayed in school, got married, didn’t have children they couldn’t afford, spent what money they had more wisely and saved more — then they wouldn’t be poor, or so the reasoning goes.

First, it’s founded on the assumption that the United States is a land of opportunity, where upward mobility is readily available and hard work gets you ahead. While grit may have ushered you up the socioeconomic ladder in the late 19th century, it’s no longer up to the task today.

To accept this as reality is to confront the unpleasant fact that myths of American exceptionalism are just that — myths — and many of us would fare better economically (and live longer, healthier lives, too) had we been born elsewhere

Second, to believe that poverty is a result of immorality or irresponsibility helps people believe it can’t happen to them. But it can happen to them (and to me and to you). Poverty in the United States is common, and according to the Census Bureau, over a three-year period, about one-third of all U.S. residents slip below the poverty line at least once for two months or more.



Third — and conveniently, perhaps, for people like Chaffetz or House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) — this stubborn insistence that people could have more money or more health care if only they wanted them more absolves the government of having to intervene and use its power on their behalf. This is both patronizing and, of course, a gross misreading of the actual outcome of laws like these.

There’s one final problem with these kinds of arguments, and that is the implication that we should be worried by the possibility of poor people buying the occasional steak, lottery ticket or, yes, even an iPhone. Set aside the fact that a better cut of meat may be more nutritious than a meal Chaffetz would approve of, or the fact that a smartphone may be your only access to email, job notices, benefit applications, school work and so on. Why do we begrudge people struggling to get by the occasional indulgence? Why do we so little value pleasure and joy? Why do we insist that if you are poor, you should also be miserable? Why do we require penitence?

Ryan and their compatriots offer us tough love without the love, made possible through their willful ignorance of (or utter disregard for) what life is actually like for so many Americans who do their very best against great odds and still, nonetheless, have little to show for it. Sometimes not even an iPhone.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2017/03/08/laziness-isnt-why-people-are-poor-and-iphones-arent-why-they-lack-health-care/?utm_term=.6dcb8975eb4c
where do you get this crap? The communist weekly? Washington Post is about as libtard as MSNBC is now ...

Easttowest72's photo
Sat 08/11/18 06:05 AM


Personally, I have absolutely no problem with helping people out who have fell on hard times.. none what so ever. That is what welfare and its affiliated programs were designed to do. And I do not know one American who would not help another in need.. not one

The system was designed as a short term crutch to help the people get back on their feet, not a long term life choice.

it is the abuse of this system that I do not like. When you have 2nd and 3rd generation welfare recipients, people selling food stamp cards for cash and people having more kids while on welfare that is a blatant abuse of the system and a smack in the face to all the taxpayers who have to shoulder the financial burden. And to say it is not abused by segments of our population is a insult to our intelligences.

But some believe that one must be PC. One must not say what they see.. what they know... because it will offend those abusing the system. And then there are others who could care less if those folks are insulted.. like me... because I am insulted that I have to pay for them.


we can definitely agree there. Abuse in ANY system is abuse and should be dealt with. There are laws in place just for that. It is illegal to sell food stamp cards, and it is virtually impossible to have generational cash assistance anymore with lifetime caps.


As the numbers indicate though, the idea that those who are on welfare are mostly abusers or lazy, is not true.


You know that welfare queens have baby daddies. The daddy at the time supplements the income. Reason steak and cruises are affordable while on foodstamps. They aren't married and technically it isn't illegal. But it's morally wrong that welfare queens live better than tax payers. Trump is on a path to changing it and giving the American people a reason to work. We all see these welfare frauds. They are everywhere. It's not a few. It's the norm in women child bearing age. Welfare should be for the elderly and a woman whose husband has died. Not women having illegitimate kids.

no photo
Sat 08/11/18 06:17 AM


Personally, I have absolutely no problem with helping people out who have fell on hard times.. none what so ever. That is what welfare and its affiliated programs were designed to do. And I do not know one American who would not help another in need.. not one

The system was designed as a short term crutch to help the people get back on their feet, not a long term life choice.

it is the abuse of this system that I do not like. When you have 2nd and 3rd generation welfare recipients, people selling food stamp cards for cash and people having more kids while on welfare that is a blatant abuse of the system and a smack in the face to all the taxpayers who have to shoulder the financial burden. And to say it is not abused by segments of our population is a insult to our intelligences.

But some believe that one must be PC. One must not say what they see.. what they know... because it will offend those abusing the system. And then there are others who could care less if those folks are insulted.. like me... because I am insulted that I have to pay for them.


we can definitely agree there. Abuse in ANY system is abuse and should be dealt with. There are laws in place just for that. It is illegal to sell food stamp cards, and it is virtually impossible to have generational cash assistance anymore with lifetime caps.


As the numbers indicate though, the idea that those who are on welfare are mostly abusers or lazy, is not true.


It is illegal to sell food stamps.. Lol... you really need to get out and into some of these areas to see what is REALLY going on.. you can't see it from a computer screen.

no photo
Sat 08/11/18 06:22 AM
And just where are you living? In Perfect?

I don't have to look very far to find people selling their SNAP benefits for cash to buy alcohol and drugs. Those same people are in line at food banks to get donated food for free.


I knew of a couple that did just that. They were getting rent assistance, SNAP, and money from their tribe. ( They were american Indians) Getting drunk was their main goal in life. He'd get drunk, beat her, and destroy their apartment. He never had a job, never looked for one. I was in their apartment many times, boarding up windows, fixing ripped off doors, and repairing holes in the walls. I walking in one day to find two burners lit on their stove. They weren't cooking, they were just lit. ( Just a month ago, during a heat wave) What were they doing? Sitting on the mattress on the floor, with an air conditioner on a box, running, and watching tv. It was almost 90 in that place.

(They got evicted two weeks ago)

no photo
Sat 08/11/18 06:33 AM
I too have seen it countless times. It is done.. daily.. they then take the money and do other things with it. The money that was supposed to be feeding their kids is used for alcohol and / or drugs.

And the concept that the food stamps is to be used only for food.. is a joke .. to some

The corner stores in these areas are part of the problem too. I have seen people but beer, cigs, and everything in between on the SNAP card. the corner stores are part of the problem, they just key something else into the register.

Sunryzer's photo
Sat 08/11/18 07:22 AM
Absolutely.
Leftist shills and tools hanging out here wont admit anything resembling the truth.

msharmony's photo
Sat 08/11/18 10:50 AM

And just where are you living? In Perfect?

I don't have to look very far to find people selling their SNAP benefits for cash to buy alcohol and drugs. Those same people are in line at food banks to get donated food for free.


I knew of a couple that did just that. They were getting rent assistance, SNAP, and money from their tribe. ( They were american Indians) Getting drunk was their main goal in life. He'd get drunk, beat her, and destroy their apartment. He never had a job, never looked for one. I was in their apartment many times, boarding up windows, fixing ripped off doors, and repairing holes in the walls. I walking in one day to find two burners lit on their stove. They weren't cooking, they were just lit. ( Just a month ago, during a heat wave) What were they doing? Sitting on the mattress on the floor, with an air conditioner on a box, running, and watching tv. It was almost 90 in that place.

(They got evicted two weeks ago)


you are right. I dont go to places and watch what card people are pulling out to pay for their things, so I can rush to the forums and complain about them. I dont watch closely to see what items a person is purchasing, I hardly pay attention to it at all, as Im usually just unloading what I am buying.

as far as donated food, so what? its not 'taxpayer' funds but people giving for those in need, and if one is on food stamps, they are probably in need.



msharmony's photo
Sat 08/11/18 10:52 AM

I too have seen it countless times. It is done.. daily.. they then take the money and do other things with it. The money that was supposed to be feeding their kids is used for alcohol and / or drugs.

And the concept that the food stamps is to be used only for food.. is a joke .. to some

The corner stores in these areas are part of the problem too. I have seen people but beer, cigs, and everything in between on the SNAP card. the corner stores are part of the problem, they just key something else into the register.


interesting that those types of places would exist in communities with swimming pools and such ... I am nowhere near that level of financial success, and I have not been in such places myself in this community.



msharmony's photo
Sat 08/11/18 10:54 AM

ah. truth.
if you are a leftist, you trust things like reasearch and such foolishness.
if you are a rightist, you go by truths that are spread by word of mouth, and anecdotal 'evidence'.


now, I have to say. I usually tire of people not voicing their own opinions and being credited as such, I despise the simple left vs right rhetoric .. usually....

but you make a point here, at least about those in these forums (hopefully, not for those out living their life in real time)





Previous 1 3 4