100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
|
|
|
People have expressed interest in what exactly he is charged with.
His arrest record just says :730 ILCS 150/3(a) But, here is the complete definition as the law states in Illinois. http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext.asp?DocName=073001500K3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Like my mama always used to say, "everything will come out in the wash" ...and it generally does. Let us all just be thankful he is gone and that we are all who we say we are since this is all being watched closely since this happened.
I have met some very good people here and I know most are who they say they are.  Let's hope something good comes of all of this and perhaps dating sites and social sites will become safer places. I am lucky to be so computer savvy as not too much gets by me. But, some are savvier, yet...so , you got to stay on your toes. Be safe 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yes, I know..and my response was to her response/s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actually there probably has not been a study comparing the equality of temptation of laziness to temptation of molesting children. But, there is proof of extreme high recitivism rates of molesters. But, this is not the issue here at hand. He has acted twice that we know of. Was convicted. Was released with stipulations. He didn not follow the rules of his release. That is his charge. So, why would someone continue to try to distract from the real issue? To defend something we aren't even talking about? Why would you compare your desire to be lazy with his desire to molest children. I find that an odd comparison. Are you trying to say there should not be a sexual offender registry? That would be way off topic, as there is, and he broke the rules. Simple as that. I think she was simply giving an example to help express her point. And I think it was an odd comparison and isn't about the issue we are discussing. He is in jail for breaking terms of his release. We have laws we have to abide by. If not we go to jail. So, he is there because HE put himself there. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actually there probably has not been a study comparing the equality of temptation of laziness to temptation of molesting children. But, there is proof of extreme high recitivism rates of molesters.
But, this is not the issue here at hand. He has acted twice that we know of. Was convicted. Was released with stipulations. He didn not follow the rules of his release. That is his charge. So, why would someone continue to try to distract from the real issue? To defend something we aren't even talking about? Why would you compare your desire to be lazy with his desire to molest children. I find that an odd comparison. Are you trying to say there should not be a sexual offender registry? That would be way off topic, as there is, and he broke the rules. Simple as that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlike most guys, I have no interest in football or working on cars or hunting and fishing or going to bars or boobs. All of my gay male friends have loved boobs. It's inherit to being a man, it's a genetic indicator that a woman is a desirable mate. In other words, this is what you call a red flag. On Mingle2, I'm sometimes referred to as "intimidating" and "complicated," but I don't think that's accurate at all. I just have a solid idea of what it is I want in life -- and what it is I DON'T want. Some people find that difficult to cope with, I guess, but I think it all boils down to an individual's personal preferences, and why should we abandon them just because some stranger doesn't agree with them? wow, this is all very damaging to lex. i wonder how keith feels about it. i'm sorry for that (sort of). actually i could give a flying puck over a rolling donut about anything lex/keith posted.with all due respect spider it's about what charges can a court make stick to this slippery eel. that matters, because whatever charges turn to convictions will determine how long a punishment he will receive From what little I've read, violations of registration are punished more harshly than the original crime. I am not sure the time he will receive. But, $50,000 bond is pretty high bond for a possible light sentence. I do know for a fact that since he violated his sex offender registration, when he does get out he will most likely for life, but surely have to register every 90 days for as long as he is required to register. He will also be barred from internet social sites, and he will have to show proof of his residence and his work information. Tighter reins for a wilder animal. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
having something on your mind doesnt mean you act upon it I have lazing about on my mind all the time, wish I could just lounge around,,,, but I know I cant so I dont.... I think there is proof that laziness might be a wee bit easier to control than sexual deviance. But, I don't even know why I responded to this... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just a heads up for those looking for more profiles of Keith Willis. He also used the name Lowell Panadecker- a character from one of his books. I know it was his messenger ID for awhile and I have found profiles for mylife.com and reunion.com. I can't see his profiles since I am not a member of either. Then who is this Melissa Panadecker he mentions from Mingle in his books? A real person whom he used their last name for mihself or another of his alias? Anyone know? He mentions Melissa in this post off his website. http://lexfonteyne.webs.com/apps/blog/show/3235933-the-story-of-oton http://mingle2.com/topic/show/311105 Three Names I go by 1. Lex 2. Hoodley Nodbottom 3. Lowell Panadecker and remeber...XenonBaboon on OKcupid.... His counts of alias's keeps rising... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOL nope, I am sure this time. I do have to say that when someone says that these type of people can be fixed...they can't. They have done study after study showing that they always have visions of children on their minds, so there is no setting them free and letting them start over. OK I am done with this except for saying..I know a lot of you guys loved Lex BUT it is what it is...he is a sick person and thank God he never messed with anyone's child on here. I am saddened that he messed with any child. God Bless those children and may Lex or whoever the hell he is rot in hell.  i agree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 it seems "fairness" gets thrown out of the window when emotions are involved, and the scales of justice tip on a bias This! Fairness would be the kids could be un-molested and he could serve his complete time which includes following rules of his release. He didn't do that, so he didn't pay his debt to society. He will never be able to pay his debt to those little girls. And how can one not have emotions for the victims of these crimes? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
lilangel2
on
Thu 05/17/12 10:28 AM
|
|
My advice is and was earler directed toward people who are going to date or have a more intimate realtionship with the person...contact such as would give that UN Pictured person details into their lives, the lives of their families etc. Like Lou Lou2 wrote of her concerns that she may have exposed her family members and friends to HIM by virtue of having him on her friends list. I don't want anyone in my friends list that is that incognito. My choice. Smart choice, I think.
and for the people concerned that others may use your pics. There is a way in Google to do an IMAGE check to find any posts with that image. It is very simple to do. This is how some of HIS other alias's were located. There are laws against using other people's pics. I do feel that if moderators are screened, they shouldn't necessarily have to provide a pic if not dating. Because someone could become angry at you having to do your job. As long as this screening is done. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Every drug dealer does not do drugs???!!!???!! And your point is what, as long as you don't do em it's OK to sell em?.....point is without a market, possession turns into a clear case of personal use A market???? So those little grade school children (babies) who are getting turned on to drugs are some of the people you consider a market??....i don't know of any grade school children who are able to earn money to support a habit. if their parents are giving them money to buy, then that is a different thread topicWhen innocent children are victimized BY ADULTS there will be no free passes from me.... my point is the pictures he had may or may not have been used by him for his personal entertainment. i don't know if he even had any since his conviction in the early 2000's. what is clear to me is that he failed to register. if he was sneaking around waiting for an opportunity to strike or sneaking around because many people in today's society are unwilling to let him attempt to live a normal life is unclear. his day in court is coming and hopefully justice will be served It doesn't matter if he used them for his personal entertainment or not. In light of his previous conviction, it would be a fair assumption to think so. But, it doesnt matter. CHILD PORN is ILLEGAL. And, he had his chance to reenter society with the stipulation that he follow the rules set forth, which he did not. This is why he is back in jail. His own doing. Not societies. We don't owe him the benefit of the doubt. He owes the public. It is up to HIM to prove to society that he is safe to be among us. He has failed miserably. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No witch hunt. Just common sense advice to people. Some may be harmless. More often than not, if they can't show a pic of themself alarms should be raised. I just said I would not have anyone in my friends list that can't post a pic. I can't and don't try to control what other people do. I can state my opinion on the matter , though. And I see NO PIC as a problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am confused. Did they find kiddie porn in his possession again or just failing to register? As far as I know he is charged with multiple counts of violations of his release from prison. Which is not registering numerous alias's with the sex offender registry, lying about his whereabouts, and using these alias's on internet social sites. "just failing to register" sounds you might not feel that is much of a crime...Not sure, just came across that way. The stipulation of his release was to remain registered and to disclose his whereabouts in order provide the public with some sense of security. He did not do that. He did everything in his power to do just the opposite. To hide, deceive, violate is release agreement. Who knows if he had "kiddie Porn" (also sounds sugar coated considering it was rape of infants, bondage, beatings and possible murders). As he was trying to get away from the news media he said, "I have got to go, I have some things to take care of"...could have gotten rid of it. We might not ever know. Or, they may very well get search warrants in light of his violations on probable cause. I hope so. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
lilangel2
on
Wed 05/16/12 09:16 PM
|
|
We know he sexually assaulted two 8 year olds and a 10 year old in 1989. Then got busted with the vile porn filth in 2002. I think it is a fair assumption he was getting off on those pics and vids.
I might add that being in possession of or distribiting such vile filth makes him party to the abuse of those thousands of chidren. There would be none of that **** made if there wern't people buying and trading it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
How do you mingle?
|
|
I am rarely ever on here anymore.
Found my mate and I am Too busy most of the time. Peccy still comes on some. I spend more time on Facebook. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've heard every excuse under the sun about why someone doesn't have pictures, or doesn't have clear pictures. That makes me very wary of them. As it should. Even more so in light of this. Whether male or female. If they can't post a clear pic, something is UP! There are way more on here playing games then just HIM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Look around at the other ones that have been posting on here for years with little or NO clear pics. Start checking some profiles and then decide if they are really WHO they claim to be. I don't need these kind of people as frinds. I have plenty of REAL friends. I don't care who I offend. Dating sites should make people put up clear PICS of who they are! This will weed out the married ones too! Who are welcome to be here, but don't need to be DATING here! how would a clear pic change anything, people can post pics of anyone,,,, and this site doesnt require one even use a pic of themself, as its for mingling and anything beyond that is up to our own risk,, just like real life,,, For some odd reason, this does seem to be a problem for some people. I don't understand it. It is extremely easy to get clear pictures to put online, yet some people say they're unable to do so. It's just an excuse. Yes, and now more than ever we need to delve deeper into why they make these excuses or just not befriend them. It could be they are married, or it could be something much more sinister. If you are planning to get close to anyone...even as a friend...just emails whatever...demand some pics. Most normal people have no problem at all taking clear pics of themselves or using some sort of video chat to let someone know they are real. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How many thousands of posts did Lex make? He was breaking the law the whole time he was here. Have you checked his apartment? His car? His computer? How do you know that a man who was convicted of sexual assault twice and possession of child porn once was "repenting or changing"? Why would you even conclude that, when he was clearly breaking the law just by being here? Right on the money. Liberals want to overlook that itty-bitty detail. There is good reason he's locked away as we speak. Perhaps all those who wish to defend, forgive, forget, and turn the other cheek to convicted sex offenders who do their time, get released, break the law again, do more time, get released, break the law again, and are now being held w/o bail pending investigation should open up their homes as well as their hearts and take them in, support them, coddle them, and protect them from all the nasty, law abiding citizens who sit in judgement of them...  THANK YOU!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
His brother's comment about pediphilia needing to be legalized so they wouldn't have to kill the children makes me wonder...
Whose children will be the sacrificial lambs for their lust? Should they be allowed to exploit any child? Only certain children...orphans, poor, runaways for example. Or do they plain to breed children for this? Confused on this? Not really confused...TOTALLY BAFFLED! Is this the same world I live in!?!? |
|
|
|
|
Previous
