100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: A very unfortunate matter concerning a Mingle2 moderator | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news%252Fiteam&id=8655692&fb_source=message This appears to be LexFonteyne, one of our moderators until today, when we got wind of the details. We are shocked and saddened by the situation, just like a number of you. We have removed this person from our team, our site, and we will cooperate with any investigations by the authorities. A few more points which need to be made clear: 1) Our moderators DO NOT have access to your information. They are only able to edit, move, close, and delete posts or topics. 2) From here on out, we plan on doing background checks on Mingle2 moderators. 3) We do not allow anybody under the age of 18 on this site, so the situation could have been a good deal more unsettling. Thank you for your time and patience, Charles Mingle2 administrator Great you are proactive here, but although 'children' are not allowed on the site, there are thousands of profiles with small children in the pictures. It makes me ill that Lex, who I knew as a very arrogant (re: his intelligence) man, was googling ANY pictures on this site. Sad indeed. If I'm reading this right, as a moderator, he still would have had access to private photos yes? Exactly why photos of our young children or grandchildren should not be on here. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hey
 Great you are proactive here, but although 'children' are not allowed on the site, there are thousands of profiles with small children in the pictures. It makes me ill that Lex, who I knew as a very arrogant (re: his intelligence) man, was googling ANY pictures on this site. Sad indeed. It is sad. I don't believe that is against the rule (kid pics) but better safe than sorry (not to post pics of kids) If I'm reading this right, as a moderator, he still would have had access to private photos yes? No we see the same pictures that you (members) see. Exactly why photos of our young children or grandchildren should not be on here. Kinda why I keep my real life and online life separated as much as possible. I'm very protective of my family. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 pages wow Keith aka Lex is popular maybe he should come back to the site......or maybe it should just be gotten over and move on now.....giving credence to this thread keeps it all alive and going besides keeping him going on the site..........
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 pages wow Keith aka Lex is popular maybe he should come back to the site......or maybe it should just be gotten over and move on now.....giving credence to this thread keeps it all alive and going besides keeping him going on the site.......... I see your point, but you absolutely have to make people aware .. it's dam*ed if you do, and dam*ed if you don't 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry but I always thought something was odd about him. I never liked him and I have been here for a long time...he just gave me this funny creepy feeling. You know what they say, listen to your gut!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry but I always thought something was odd about him. I never liked him and I have been here for a long time...he just gave me this funny creepy feeling. You know what they say, listen to your gut!!! would you say you were "unsure" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 pages wow Keith aka Lex is popular maybe he should come back to the site......or maybe it should just be gotten over and move on now.....giving credence to this thread keeps it all alive and going besides keeping him going on the site.......... I see your point, but you absolutely have to make people aware .. it's dam*ed if you do, and dam*ed if you don't Maybe they will flip the thread then..... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry but I always thought something was odd about him. I never liked him and I have been here for a long time...he just gave me this funny creepy feeling. You know what they say, listen to your gut!!! would you say you were "unsure"   that was horrible! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOL nope, I am sure this time.
I do have to say that when someone says that these type of people can be fixed...they can't. They have done study after study showing that they always have visions of children on their minds, so there is no setting them free and letting them start over. OK I am done with this except for saying..I know a lot of you guys loved Lex BUT it is what it is...he is a sick person and thank God he never messed with anyone's child on here. I am saddened that he messed with any child. God Bless those children and may Lex or whoever the hell he is rot in hell. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 it seems "fairness" gets thrown out of the window when emotions are involved, and the scales of justice tip on a bias This! Fairness would be the kids could be un-molested and he could serve his complete time which includes following rules of his release. He didn't do that, so he didn't pay his debt to society. He will never be able to pay his debt to those little girls. And how can one not have emotions for the victims of these crimes? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
having something on your mind doesnt mean you act upon it
I have lazing about on my mind all the time, wish I could just lounge around,,,, but I know I cant so I dont.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOL nope, I am sure this time. I do have to say that when someone says that these type of people can be fixed...they can't. They have done study after study showing that they always have visions of children on their minds, so there is no setting them free and letting them start over. OK I am done with this except for saying..I know a lot of you guys loved Lex BUT it is what it is...he is a sick person and thank God he never messed with anyone's child on here. I am saddened that he messed with any child. God Bless those children and may Lex or whoever the hell he is rot in hell. i agree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOL nope, I am sure this time. I do have to say that when someone says that these type of people can be fixed...they can't. They have done study after study showing that they always have visions of children on their minds, so there is no setting them free and letting them start over. OK I am done with this except for saying..I know a lot of you guys loved Lex BUT it is what it is...he is a sick person and thank God he never messed with anyone's child on here. I am saddened that he messed with any child. God Bless those children and may Lex or whoever the hell he is rot in hell. i agree 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just a heads up for those looking for more profiles of Keith Willis. He also used the name Lowell Panadecker- a character from one of his books. I know it was his messenger ID for awhile and I have found profiles for mylife.com and reunion.com. I can't see his profiles since I am not a member of either. Then who is this Melissa Panadecker he mentions from Mingle in his books? A real person whom he used their last name for mihself or another of his alias? Anyone know? He mentions Melissa in this post off his website. http://lexfonteyne.webs.com/apps/blog/show/3235933-the-story-of-oton http://mingle2.com/topic/show/311105 Three Names I go by 1. Lex 2. Hoodley Nodbottom 3. Lowell Panadecker and remeber...XenonBaboon on OKcupid.... His counts of alias's keeps rising... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
having something on your mind doesnt mean you act upon it I have lazing about on my mind all the time, wish I could just lounge around,,,, but I know I cant so I dont.... I think there is proof that laziness might be a wee bit easier to control than sexual deviance. But, I don't even know why I responded to this... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlike most guys, I have no interest in football or working on cars or hunting and fishing or going to bars or boobs. All of my gay male friends have loved boobs. It's inherit to being a man, it's a genetic indicator that a woman is a desirable mate. In other words, this is what you call a red flag. On Mingle2, I'm sometimes referred to as "intimidating" and "complicated," but I don't think that's accurate at all. I just have a solid idea of what it is I want in life -- and what it is I DON'T want. Some people find that difficult to cope with, I guess, but I think it all boils down to an individual's personal preferences, and why should we abandon them just because some stranger doesn't agree with them? wow, this is all very damaging to lex. i wonder how keith feels about it. i'm sorry for that (sort of). actually i could give a flying puck over a rolling donut about anything lex/keith posted.with all due respect spider it's about what charges can a court make stick to this slippery eel. that matters, because whatever charges turn to convictions will determine how long a punishment he will receive From what little I've read, violations of registration are punished more harshly than the original crime. I am not sure the time he will receive. But, $50,000 bond is pretty high bond for a possible light sentence. I do know for a fact that since he violated his sex offender registration, when he does get out he will most likely for life, but surely have to register every 90 days for as long as he is required to register. He will also be barred from internet social sites, and he will have to show proof of his residence and his work information. Tighter reins for a wilder animal. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
having something on your mind doesnt mean you act upon it I have lazing about on my mind all the time, wish I could just lounge around,,,, but I know I cant so I dont.... I think there is proof that laziness might be a wee bit easier to control than sexual deviance. But, I don't even know why I responded to this... there is proof of it , really? actual studies?,,, Im doubtful,,,, people have been duped into thinking they arent in control but people can do whatever they want to or not , whatever they are 'thinking' about the 'proof' I would think is in the fact that recidivism drops significantly with treatment,,,, showing that even a 'sexual deviance' is within our control when it comes to our actions,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actually there probably has not been a study comparing the equality of temptation of laziness to temptation of molesting children. But, there is proof of extreme high recitivism rates of molesters.
But, this is not the issue here at hand. He has acted twice that we know of. Was convicted. Was released with stipulations. He didn not follow the rules of his release. That is his charge. So, why would someone continue to try to distract from the real issue? To defend something we aren't even talking about? Why would you compare your desire to be lazy with his desire to molest children. I find that an odd comparison. Are you trying to say there should not be a sexual offender registry? That would be way off topic, as there is, and he broke the rules. Simple as that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
having something on your mind doesnt mean you act upon it I have lazing about on my mind all the time, wish I could just lounge around,,,, but I know I cant so I dont.... I think there is proof that laziness might be a wee bit easier to control than sexual deviance. But, I don't even know why I responded to this... there is proof of it , really? actual studies?,,, Im doubtful,,,, people have been duped into thinking they arent in control but people can do whatever they want to or not , whatever they are 'thinking' about the 'proof' I would think is in the fact that recidivism drops significantly with treatment,,,, showing that even a 'sexual deviance' is within our control when it comes to our actions,,, If only life were as simple as you try to make it out to be. Every criminal could be rehabilitated and we could live in a safe crime free world! Treatment obliviously doesn't work in all cases. So you are saying we as a society should keep paying for a criminals treatments even when that person has showed it obviously is not working? Why doesn't this surprise me? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actually there probably has not been a study comparing the equality of temptation of laziness to temptation of molesting children. But, there is proof of extreme high recitivism rates of molesters. But, this is not the issue here at hand. He has acted twice that we know of. Was convicted. Was released with stipulations. He didn not follow the rules of his release. That is his charge. So, why would someone continue to try to distract from the real issue? To defend something we aren't even talking about? Why would you compare your desire to be lazy with his desire to molest children. I find that an odd comparison. Are you trying to say there should not be a sexual offender registry? That would be way off topic, as there is, and he broke the rules. Simple as that. I think she was simply giving an example to help express her point. |
|
|
|
|
